jrnyman28 wrote:I have been on BT for many years. I have been here for many. I have walked the line between them. On BT I have openly criticized the band, the website, the management and the mods from time to time. For some I have received answers or explanations, for some I have received a certain amount of sarcasm in a reply. I have even felt very close to being banned for a time period where I was almost crusading for BT to fix what they had screwed up. Am I special? Am I the only one who can get away with it? I doubt it.
HOWEVER, in the last year BT has lost it's way. There has been a very large elephant in the room and they have been given nothing to work with to take care of it.
Knox made a very good suggestion that the band and management could stand to rethink their stances on some things. Like Marty said, YouTube is new. Journey is not exactly savvy in this digital age so they stuck by their previous model of thinking. When they released the Live 2001 DVD management wanted to remove the bootleg demand. They thought they were going to be able to give their audience the quality recordings they deserved. Turned out to be more difficult than that. But they had to try and remove bootlegs to create even more consumers for official product. They didn't understand that the bootleg fans would still buy the official stuff as well. After a couple years of the rule being there, the die hard fans on BT took to policing bootlegs and so the rule took a life of it's own. Then comes YouTube...a new way to share boots, and without money changing hands. That money was what made bootlegs illegal and it was the band's primary defense. So now they are using "creative or quality control" as their reason. They still do not understand what fans want. Finally, from what I have heard YouTube has made concessions to Warner (I think that is the company involved) to pay a fee for liscensing. So yet again 'legally' YouTube is staying ahead of the curve. Journey needs to get ahead of the curve.
If Journey were to provide these clips, ANY clips on a regular basis (much like Perryville does/did) you would see a positive response from their users. And the main site would certainly get more hits. If they had revamped the website to truly reflect Generations then they probably could have driven more sales. www.journeymusic.com is a promotion site for Journey. The forum is a bonus, but not specifically there for promotion. If you go to www.journeymusic.com you see very little promotion for Journey. And I have seen better MySpace pages than the site Journey has. We are talking 15 year old kids putting more thought into 3 pages on a free space than this band does. And they are changing them and modifying them, adding content more frequently...almost daily. Put one person in charge of regularly updating the main site. Every Monday there should be an update.
As for the mods at BT, I actually think they have a good group in place now. Most times CJ leads very well. I know John had a problem, but it appears to me that is the exception not the norm for CJ. Marty and Cathy and Sarah do fine. Miles is a bit long winded and toes the management line a bit much. Rusty...fits in too well with the love-fests. I think the main problem is that some of the mods no longer participate on the board, they only moderate it. Probably why I like Sarah, she still participates regularly. It keeps her closer to the 'little people'. The last problem is the psuedo-mod...those regular posters who feel the need to carry out the moderation of a post or thread instead of simply accepting that the mod staff can take care of things themselves. That grows into a mob mentality and THAT is when most of the problems occur.
(BTW, the thread that got closed for talking about a YouTube clip was closed because it had the link in the thread. it wasn't the discussion, it was the physical content.)
Great post! You continue to prove what I've always said about you over at "the other place"...you've always been the voice of reason! Incidentally, to be completely fair, CJ actually did send me an email, apologizing for the original email she had sent, telling me what my opinion should be about "Generations". I have always found many of CJ's posts to be well thought out and reasonable. I was simply taken aback when I got the "scolding" through email about an opinion I had expressed. I think mods on a site have every right to admonish someone through email if a member is being profane and offensive (which I certainly wasn't being). That said, a mod should never, ever send an email to a member, telling said member what opinions they should express. That is simply way out of line, for my taste!
John from Boston