Moderator: Andrew
kbo wrote:Some of these comments about Augeri being the one who should be blamed for concerts with taped vocals are simply absurd!
Why is he the one blamed for tapegate or lipsyncing when he was TOLD to sing with a F@$#ed up voice.
Augeri has no say in what this band does during a show and all decisions I am sure are made by the BAND and its mgmt.
Neal Schon and the bands mgmt run Journey.
I think they all are culpable.
The buck stops with him ultimately.
That's illegal.
Neal would've been more than happy for Augeri to have had the sense to gracefully exit.
I don't believe this for a second, and even if it were true, u are doing Augeri no favors by presenting him in this light.
What is he?
Some servile bootlicker completely devoid of free will?
He is the singer and he decides to set foot on the stage w/out a voice.
If that were true Neal would've fired Augeri as far back as 2002!
kbo wrote:I think they all are culpable.
The buck stops with him ultimately.
The buck stops with the BAND.That's illegal.
Neal would've been more than happy for Augeri to have had the sense to gracefully exit.
How would you know? Neal controls Augeri and whether or not he sings for the band! Don't be a dumbass thinking otherwise.I don't believe this for a second, and even if it were true, u are doing Augeri no favors by presenting him in this light.
What is he?
Some servile bootlicker completely devoid of free will?
He is the singer and he decides to set foot on the stage w/out a voice.
He is under contract and also a replacement singer! The band even pays someone to wipe his ass.. They make the decisions and tell him what to do. Either sing or go work for the GAP!If that were true Neal would've fired Augeri as far back as 2002!
And monkeys fly out of your ass!
kbo wrote:Just trying to use COMMON FUCKING SENSE!
The guy is a replacement singer that signed a contract to "SING and DO WHAT HE IS TOLD"! This is NEALS band and always has been.
Everyone thinks Steve A has a voice to make decisions. I'm saying he doesn't have a leg to stand on.. The BAND did everyone WRONG and should have replaced him sooner and should have spoken the truth.
Doesn't take a lawyer to figure that out..
kbo wrote:Just trying to use COMMON FUCKING SENSE!
The guy is a replacement singer that signed a contract to "SING and DO WHAT HE IS TOLD"! This is NEALS band and always has been.
Everyone thinks Steve A has a voice to make decisions. I'm saying he doesn't have a leg to stand on.. The BAND did everyone WRONG and should have replaced him sooner and should have spoken the truth.
Doesn't take a lawyer to figure that out..
kbo wrote:Dude Bitch, speak then. Andrew won't speak out of respect for the band.. What's your excuse?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:I think they all are culpable.
The buck stops with him ultimately.
That's illegal.
Neal would've been more than happy for Augeri to have had the sense to gracefully exit.
If that were true Neal would've fired Augeri as far back as 2002!
Monker wrote:If Neal had the balls that you all seem to believe he has, he wouldn't have stood on stage with him...if he didn't want him in "HIS" band.
JourneyRox wrote:Oh but don't u remember Neal stood on stage w/Perry for years & hated what he was doing? Don't u remember Perry saying Neal mocked his vocals for Open Arms so bad he requested Neal leave before he finish the track?
How short ur memory is Monker. Neal has obviously bitten his tongue many times in the last 30 yrs for the good of the band.
Rockin'Deano wrote:Respect for the band.
Monker wrote:No, I don't remember that. I remember him saying that he HATED Perry during the recording of ROR...but, when did he say HATED performing with Steve Perry?.
Monker wrote:Yeah, right. Whatever serves YOUR purpose is where you go.
When it serves your purpose to say JSS doesn't fit the band and sounds like crap, that's what you say. When it serves your purpose to say he is the next best singer to Perry, that's what you say. When it serves your purpose to blame the entire band for using tapes, that's what you say. When it serves your purpose to lay it all on Augeri, that's what you say.
All you do is spew band related propaganda.
JourneyRox wrote:Monker wrote:No, I don't remember that. I remember him saying that he HATED Perry during the recording of ROR...but, when did he say HATED performing with Steve Perry?.
I am a bit drunk tonite Monker. Too drunk to go looking up quotes I'm afraid. Remind me tomorrow & I'll look up where Steve said he had to ask Neal to leave the studio to finish OA b/c it was too annoying & where Neal said OA was a Mary Poppins type song. I know those quotes are out there. In fact, they're even mentioned in Shania's book.
He hated Perry back then. Hated performing w/him. But then he saw how crowds reacted. Hmmm. kinda the same thing as SA isn't it? Crowds (in the front anyway) liked SA.
JourneyRox wrote:So then what exactly IS Dean's purpose?
Could he maybe be just a fervent passionate fan whose opininon CAN be changed by what he sees & hears?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Journey isn't the one gunking up the works.
It's a soon-to-be ex-member that is strangulating the boys coffers and nickel and diming them to death!
Steve Augeri- u are a crookedy nosed guido punk.
Get over urself and give Jeff the same chance the boys generously gave u back in 1998.
pdsidd wrote:silverblue wrote:pdsidd wrote:jrnyman28 wrote:pdsidd wrote:Do you think you can fool all the people for two hours and no-one will spot it??.
He didn't and some did.
"The truth is out there"
Maybe it was not the entire show, but it did happen.
It was well disguised then, we stayed just off south Bridge Street after the Edinburgh gig and there was a family and two other couples in the bar that night that had been at the show - none of them saw it but hey if some did it must be true. You've convinced me and I'm sure someone will post links to the supporting evidence shortly - will check back tomorrow.
pdsidd, many of us were sceptical...at first. But, the evidence was presented here & many music professionals, including Jeremey, gave extensive explanations - such as how these boots could not have been manipulated by any one other than a person who had access to the masters (I hope I described that right). Personally, I had no dislike of SA (and I still don't) - but, I disliked being conned. Before the "lipsynch - tapegate" came out, I had thought it was rather odd that SA's voice was so rough one night at a concert on some songs & fine on others & then I thought to myself how strange that the PA was playing "Beyond the Clouds" as we were exiting the Greek & it sounded as clear as when SA was up on stage singing with all the audience yelling up front...how did his voice come across without the audience noise? Only after I heard about the "rumors" and listened to the evidence & compared that I came to my conclusion - that yes, I believe the mic was turned off on stage & tapes were coming across thru the PA.
I also think the eyewitness of Svante, the journalist in Sweden was entirely credible.
Believe me, we would all love to know "the truth" but if the band & SA & mgt do not give it to us then we are left to our own conclusions.
I'd love to know the truth too, but the Edinburgh gig in June was the best concert I've ever been to and that's not just because of Steve A, it was a collective thing. The rumours of lip-syncing tarnish the memory for me of what was a great gig and there was nothing to suggest anything but a complete band performance. Obviously things went awry when the band got back to the states or they wouldn't have brought in JSS but I find it hard to believe that people wouldn't pick up on the vocalist miming in Edinburgh? It just pushes credibility too far? I don't know Svante from Adam but I've already seen him described as a sound engineer and a journalist - which is he? and I'm sure he's a good source but as a manager I wouldn't take someone into a disciplinary meeting without evidence - hearsay is worth nothing, evidence is everything and that's all I'm asking for. Point me to a video that has no crowd noise where there should be crowd noise or whatever and I'm a believer but when push comes to shove you believe your own eyes and ears and I was in Edinburgh and if Steve was miming he was absolute perfection at it because I couldn't tell he was doing it.
Like you say we may never know the truth but I'd hate to see a great singer's reputation ruined without good cause. I'm just like that.
Citygirl wrote:Unfortunately I have to agree with pdsidd on this one. Even after all the stuff that's been said here I still stick to my original thoughts on the Edinburgh gig. And just for the record, a good friend of mine was at Manchester and never mentioned any problem with Faithfully either.
I'm not saying what you hear on stage is completely pure, obviously all bands with use some form of enhancements. But like I said, what's been suggested here i.e. miming to a tape of his own voice for the whole gig... 2 feet away I think I would have noticed. But maybe I was on something that night...
Monker wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:Respect for the band.
Yeah, right. Whatever serves YOUR purpose is where you go.
When it serves your purpose to say JSS doesn't fit the band and sounds like crap, that's what you say. When it serves your purpose to say he is the next best singer to Perry, that's what you say. When it serves your purpose to blame the entire band for using tapes, that's what you say. When it serves your purpose to lay it all on Augeri, that's what you say.
All you do is spew band related propaganda.
kbo wrote:
This is NEALS band and always has been.
pdsidd wrote:Surely if you got tapes there's no reason to swap singers?? Why go to all the trouble?
Crazie Scarab wrote: To gain respect by music industry as a whole. Maybe?
Monker wrote:saint John wrote:not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4....BUT 5
You can count, can't you? What the hell am I supposed to do with an empty case?
Amanda wrote:Crazie Scarab wrote: To gain respect by music industry as a whole. Maybe?
A little quote editing there to get to my point: do you think the music industry ever respected them?
And for the tape aftermath - I think there was more of a fan fallout than music industry fallout, in my opinion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests