NEED TO GET AWAY

by **Journeyman2122** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:48 am

whew............ I dont want to ignite the forum wars but I need the calm that is in this place. I need a few drinks after posting a simple statement of time to go forward and ended up getting my fucking ass chewed out on there. maybe and hopefully it will calm soon :shock:

by **Rockindeano** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:51 am

A snotdick, if it is too hot in here, go chill at Cracktalk. This place rules, period. Either fight back, or run into a field of daisies and sniff cow shit.

by **ArnelRox** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:56 am

RockinDeano wrote:A snotdick, if it is too hot in here, go chill at Cracktalk. This place rules, period. Either fight back, or run into a field of daisies and sniff cow shit.

& that kind of is my sentiment. I fight back. They don't like it, they go sniff daisies & um... that other stuff!

Love ya Dean baby.

by AR » Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:01 pm

JourneyRox wrote:
RockinDeano wrote:A snotdick, if it is too hot in here, go chill at Cracktalk. This place rules, period. Either fight back, or run into a field of daisies and sniff cow shit.

& that kind of is my sentiment. I fight back. They don't like it, they go sniff daisies & um... that other stuff!

Love ya Dean baby.

Some us just think you're annoying.

by **Journeyman2122** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:11 pm

well i should vent on a person on this thread

by **Andrew** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:58 pm

RockinDeano wrote:A snotdick, if it is too hot in here, go chill at Cracktalk. This place rules, period. Either fight back, or run into a field of daisies and sniff cow shit.

Deano - you need to re-read that post before attacking it. They are saying they needed to come HERE for a rest - to gget away from the trouble eslewhere.

Your attack therefore is out of order.

by **Saint John** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:02 pm

Andrew wrote:
RockinDeano wrote:A snotdick, if it is too hot in here, go chill at Cracktalk. This place rules, period. Either fight back, or run into a field of daisies and sniff cow shit.

Deano - you need to re-read that post before attacking it. They are saying they needed to come HERE for a rest - to gget away from the trouble eslewhere.

Your attack therefore is out of order.

Not really Andrew. Deano was baited. Read through this person's bullshit. If they needed to get away they'd go to a bar, jerk off, take a nap, pet their cat, or take a shit. NOT start a new thread HOPING to be followed by Deano.

by **Journeyman2122** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:06 pm

after deano wrote this then I baited him is that so bad? I promise to work out my grammer issues your critique was noted.

by **Saint John** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:10 pm

Journeyman2122 wrote:after deano wrote this then I baited him is that so bad? I promise to work out my grammer issues your critique was noted.

Your whole agenda was for Deano to get riled up, follow you here and get in trouble with Andrew. You're like the sissy in grammar school who talks shit, gets punched in the face and gets the other kid in trouble. Hopefully, Andrew sees your transparent agenda.

by AR » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:12 pm

Go to Journeyman2122's profile and read all his posts. Seems to be a JSS fan to me. Looks like an innocent post was made, and Deano attacked (then of course the little lapdog JRox had to chime in - asskisser), then journeyman2122 reacted by calling him out.

Now Dean, may have some info on who the poster is and if there is some other motive. I wouldn't know, but just from the posts this person seems a legit Soto supporter. Dean is my friend, but on appearances he jumped the gun here IMO.

by **Journeyman2122** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:12 pm

he wisely closed the thread and I will not get down to your level, thanks again for your concern about my grammar

by **Journeyman2122** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:15 pm

no there was no other hidden agenda by being from back talk it was an innocent post so I had to call deano out and that was the perfect way. The point of it was to hit the core. btw I edited this message of any grammar issues does it meet to your standards?

by **Saint John** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:23 pm

Journeyman2122 wrote:no there was no other hidden agenda by being from back talk it was an innocent post so I had to call deano out and that was the perfect way. The point of it was to hit the core. btw I edited this message of any grammar issues does it meet to your standards?

I'm missing the part where Deano initially attacked you. I only see you attacking him and then creating the "call out" thread followed by the "follow me" thread.

by AR » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:26 pm

saint John wrote:
Journeyman2122 wrote:no there was no other hidden agenda by being from back talk it was an innocent post so I had to call deano out and that was the perfect way. The point of it was to hit the core. btw I edited this message of any grammar issues does it meet to your standards?

I'm missing the part where Deano initially attacked you. I only see you attacking him and then creating the "call out" thread followed by the "follow me" thread.

The thread we are reading now came before the "call out" thread. The first post here seems fine. Maybe I'm wrong, but Andrew read it the same way. I just read this posters stuff from the beginning from the profile dialog box and didn't see anything malicious. Shit grammar for sure though.

by **Andrew** » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:26 pm

Everyone knock it off. Goodnight.

MR

NEED TO GET AWAY

NEED TO GET AWAY

Who is online