Transcript of the US 'friendly fire' Video

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby larryfromnextdoor » Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:10 pm

Red13JoePa wrote:
LarryFromNextDoor wrote:
Red13JoePa wrote:We're gonna need a new Carlitto theme song soon with this development.

Lar, have you contacted Bernie Taupin yet regards to this matter? :D


:lol: red, you posted this in the wrong thread,, im staying out of this one man!!


Well, me and you aren't smart enough to partake of the regualry scheduled discourse in this thread so I thought it best we at least do what dummies would do and talk about a good way to homage Carl in song again given the heavy nature of the topic at hand and his pending departure. :)


red,, your selling yourself WAY short!!! your smarter than all these yahoos,, now me,, im a redneck , i play guitar in bars most wouldnt go in to take a leak in (with startched shirt and tie of course) and im in there eating gourmet Sonic burgers pretending i have tatoos :P with a biker club called the Beer Whores),, id love to play strip Chess with some of these geniuses that post here,, lets see what they look like... yikes... :shock: 8) as far as Carl,, im renting A Flock of Seagulls for his coming back party,,
larryfromnextdoor
MP3
 
Posts: 10331
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:40 am

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:15 pm

LarryFromNextDoor wrote:red,, your selling yourself WAY short!!! your smarter than all these yahoos,, now me,, im a redneck , i play guitar in bars most wouldnt go in to take a leak in (with startched shirt and tie of course) and im in there eating gourmet Sonic burgers pretending i have tatoos :P with a biker club called the Beer Whores),, id love to play strip Chess with some of these geniuses that post here,, lets see what they look like... yikes... :shock: 8) as far as Carl,, im renting A Flock of Seagulls for his coming back party,,


A Flock Of Seagulls?!?!?!?
Dude, I need to grow my hair out
so I can sport that doo :shock:

Image

Larry, you know what my fave was...

"Carlitto Hakk will set the world on fire!" :lol:
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby ohsherrie » Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:27 pm

LarryFromNextDoor wrote:
red,, your selling yourself WAY short!!! your smarter than all these yahoos,, now me,, im a redneck , i play guitar in bars most wouldnt go in to take a leak in (with startched shirt and tie of course) and im in there eating gourmet Sonic burgers pretending i have tatoos :P with a biker club called the Beer Whores),, id love to play strip Chess with some of these geniuses that post here,, lets see what they look like... yikes... :shock: 8) as far as Carl,, im renting A Flock of Seagulls for his coming back party,,


Priceless. Lar, you are absolutely priceless. :lol:
User avatar
ohsherrie
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Postby larryfromnextdoor » Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:36 pm

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
LarryFromNextDoor wrote:red,, your selling yourself WAY short!!! your smarter than all these yahoos,, now me,, im a redneck , i play guitar in bars most wouldnt go in to take a leak in (with startched shirt and tie of course) and im in there eating gourmet Sonic burgers pretending i have tatoos :P with a biker club called the Beer Whores),, id love to play strip Chess with some of these geniuses that post here,, lets see what they look like... yikes... :shock: 8) as far as Carl,, im renting A Flock of Seagulls for his coming back party,,


A Flock Of Seagulls?!?!?!?
Dude, I need to grow my hair out
so I can sport that doo :shock:

Image

Larry, you know what my fave was...

"Carlitto Hakk will set the world on fire!" :lol:


in that case i may rent STRUTTER for you party !! Image:lol: this is my fav or yours..

So throw on "Evolution" and sing along!


I know you got that special something, oh, Wombat
I know you like to keep it hummin', oh woh Wombat
'Cause girl, lovin' DREW is so easy.
Oh, woh, woh. Lovin' DREW is so easy.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,
My, my, my, my, my, my, myWombat
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Come on Drew, give me that good lovin', oh Wombat
Come on Drew, keep the motor hummin, oh, woh, Wombat
'Cause lovin' DREW is so easy.
My, my, my, my
Lovin' DREW is easy.
Lovin' DREW is easy.

Drew, after the story unfolds,
After the band has had their say,
Oh, we'll be thinkin' of you.
Yes, we'll be screaming out your name!
Lovin' DREW is easy
Lovin' DREW is easy
Lovin' DREW is easy
Lovin' DREW is easy
Oh, I'm lovin', lovin', lovin', lovin', lovin', lovin', lovin' DREW
Oh, and it's easy (easy).
Oh, I'm lovin', lovin', lovin', lovin', lovin', lovin', lovin' DREW
Oh, and it's easy (easy).
larryfromnextdoor
MP3
 
Posts: 10331
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:40 am

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:51 pm

:shock: :lol:

Holy Moly!!!
I forgot all about that one!

I did nail it, didn't I? :wink:

How about this one???

I never meant 2 cause u any sorrow
I never meant 2 get u in any dirt
I only wanted 2 one time see u ironned
I only wanted 2 see u dry-cleaned, oh my Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt


I only wanted 2 see me jamming in my Purple Shirt


Shirt, I know, I know, I know times are changing
It's time we all reach out 4 something new
But that doesn't mean u 2
U say u want a leader
But u can't seem 2 make up your mind
I think u better button up
And let me slip inside you Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt



Sorry, Larry gets me in a freaky kinda mood :)
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby Red13JoePa » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:01 pm

:lol: :shock: :lol: 8) :lol: YYYEEESSS!
"I love almost everybody."---Rocky Balboa 1990
"Let's reform this thing.Let's go out and get some guys who want to work and go do it"--Neal Schon February, 2001
"I looked at Neal, and I just saw a guy who really wants his band back"-JCain 2/01
Red13JoePa
MP3
 
Posts: 11646
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Happy Valley

Postby Blueskies » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:08 pm

Carlitto H@kk wrote::shock: :lol:

Holy Moly!!!
I forgot all about that one!

I did nail it, didn't I? :wink:

How about this one???

I never meant 2 cause u any sorrow
I never meant 2 get u in any dirt
I only wanted 2 one time see u ironned
I only wanted 2 see u dry-cleaned, oh my Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt


I only wanted 2 see me jamming in my Purple Shirt


Shirt, I know, I know, I know times are changing
It's time we all reach out 4 something new
But that doesn't mean u 2
U say u want a leader
But u can't seem 2 make up your mind
I think u better button up
And let me slip inside you Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt
Purple Shirt Purple Shirt



Sorry, Larry gets me in a freaky kinda mood :)
Thats hilarious!!........( Larry sure has a way of doing that to a person...I know!...thats cause he's a freak!) :wink: :lol: 8)
Blueskies
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:09 am

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:13 pm

TVL wrote:Thats hilarious!!........( Larry sure has a way of doing that to a person...I know!...thats cause he's a freak!) :wink: :lol: 8)


Don't Cha wish your girlfriend
was HOTS, Larry?
Don't Cha wish your girlfriend
was a freak like TNC?
Don't Cha?
Don't Cha, Larry?

Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby Blueskies » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:19 pm

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
TVL wrote:Thats hilarious!!........( Larry sure has a way of doing that to a person...I know!...thats cause he's a freak!) :wink: :lol: 8)


Don't Cha wish your girlfriend
was HOTS, Larry?
Don't Cha wish your girlfriend
was a freak like TNC?
Don't Cha?
Don't Cha, Larry?

:shock: ....... :lol: :lol:
Blueskies
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:09 am

Postby Matthew » Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:19 pm

Carlitto H@kk wrote:Damn, Matty!
I just can't get used to that
'keytar' Av!
You need to bring 'Randy' back...
DAWG! :lol: :lol:



:lol: You're quite right, CH!
User avatar
Matthew
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4979
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:47 am
Location: London

Postby conversationpc » Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:08 am

conversationpc wrote:
bufordt9 wrote:Everytime one of THEM comes over here there is trouble and they always bait Dean...ALWAYS..its a shame but sometimes he takes the bait because he is tired of getting trashed all the time...sometimes there are moments that u just have to respond.....

I loved it when they called me an old bag and a gold digger and a few other things...they just don't know when to quit!!!

Dean, just remember, PAYBACKS ARE HELL, and they will get theirs someday....


Give me a flipping break. Deano doesn't need anyone to bait him for his bad behavior to show up. Besides that, most of the members of The Journey Forums were members here first, so we don't come from over there. We are already here.

Some of you Deano disciples drink up everything he says, like you're worshipping him and that he's infallible. He's obviously not.

I've given Dean the benefit of the doubt many times and stayed out of his famous rants. However, he attacked Barb, who has been an online friend of mine for several years now and I wasn't about to put up with it. Barb certainly didn't bait him and I defy you to show the proof where she did.


Hey Bufordt9...I haven't seen a response to this or to Barb's response to your previous, ridiculous, post.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Red13JoePa » Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:19 am

There are only a handful there who have the superiority complex.
"I love almost everybody."---Rocky Balboa 1990
"Let's reform this thing.Let's go out and get some guys who want to work and go do it"--Neal Schon February, 2001
"I looked at Neal, and I just saw a guy who really wants his band back"-JCain 2/01
Red13JoePa
MP3
 
Posts: 11646
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Happy Valley

Postby Matthew » Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:23 am

conversationpc wrote:No, I think too many people actually think that nothing will happen here again.I think that's extremely naive. That's not to say that we ought to live in fear, either, but I do think we need to be prepared and accept the possibility that another terrorist attack is indeed possible, if not probable.


Okay - fair enough.


It's definitely unfair. I can't think of anyone on this site that I would consider to be bigoted towards Muslims in general. That's actually pretty ridiculous to even infer unless you have specific instances as evidence of this.


Well, comments such as "who give the crap what happens to the Iraqi people" and "I don't give a rat's ass about the Iraqi people" and arguments that most of the tens of thousands who died are "terrorists" isn't exactly showing the love.

But maybe all you proud Republicans feel warm feelings for - say - the Syrians or maybe even the good people of Dubai? Maybe it's just an Iraqi thing with you lot?
User avatar
Matthew
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4979
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:47 am
Location: London

Postby Behshad » Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:24 am

conversationpc wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
bufordt9 wrote:Everytime one of THEM comes over here there is trouble and they always bait Dean...ALWAYS..its a shame but sometimes he takes the bait because he is tired of getting trashed all the time...sometimes there are moments that u just have to respond.....

I loved it when they called me an old bag and a gold digger and a few other things...they just don't know when to quit!!!

Dean, just remember, PAYBACKS ARE HELL, and they will get theirs someday....


Give me a flipping break. Deano doesn't need anyone to bait him for his bad behavior to show up. Besides that, most of the members of The Journey Forums were members here first, so we don't come from over there. We are already here.

Some of you Deano disciples drink up everything he says, like you're worshipping him and that he's infallible. He's obviously not.

I've given Dean the benefit of the doubt many times and stayed out of his famous rants. However, he attacked Barb, who has been an online friend of mine for several years now and I wasn't about to put up with it. Barb certainly didn't bait him and I defy you to show the proof where she did.


Hey Bufordt9...I haven't seen a response to this or to Barb's response to your previous, ridiculous, post.



Isnt YOUR ridiculous post reponse enough!?
Or do you wanna start more shit and blame it on Deano!?
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Barb » Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:50 am

Matthew wrote:
conversationpc wrote:No, I think too many people actually think that nothing will happen here again.I think that's extremely naive. That's not to say that we ought to live in fear, either, but I do think we need to be prepared and accept the possibility that another terrorist attack is indeed possible, if not probable.


Okay - fair enough.


It's definitely unfair. I can't think of anyone on this site that I would consider to be bigoted towards Muslims in general. That's actually pretty ridiculous to even infer unless you have specific instances as evidence of this.


Well, comments such as "who give the crap what happens to the Iraqi people" and "I don't give a rat's ass about the Iraqi people" and arguments that most of the tens of thousands who died are "terrorists" isn't exactly showing the love.

But maybe all you proud Republicans feel warm feelings for - say - the Syrians or maybe even the good people of Dubai? Maybe it's just an Iraqi thing with you lot?


My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby Barb » Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:51 am

conversationpc wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
bufordt9 wrote:Everytime one of THEM comes over here there is trouble and they always bait Dean...ALWAYS..its a shame but sometimes he takes the bait because he is tired of getting trashed all the time...sometimes there are moments that u just have to respond.....

I loved it when they called me an old bag and a gold digger and a few other things...they just don't know when to quit!!!

Dean, just remember, PAYBACKS ARE HELL, and they will get theirs someday....


Give me a flipping break. Deano doesn't need anyone to bait him for his bad behavior to show up. Besides that, most of the members of The Journey Forums were members here first, so we don't come from over there. We are already here.

Some of you Deano disciples drink up everything he says, like you're worshipping him and that he's infallible. He's obviously not.

I've given Dean the benefit of the doubt many times and stayed out of his famous rants. However, he attacked Barb, who has been an online friend of mine for several years now and I wasn't about to put up with it. Barb certainly didn't bait him and I defy you to show the proof where she did.


Hey Bufordt9...I haven't seen a response to this or to Barb's response to your previous, ridiculous, post.


Dave, I really couldn't care less. Seriously. 8)
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby jrnychick » Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:10 am

Matthew wrote:
jrnychick wrote:
I have extended family in England. While I was there in October of 2006, one of the things we talked about was the problem they have with immigration from the middle east. Everyone I spoke to expressed a high level of concern about people of British descent becoming the minority. The people I spoke to were very upset about this. They were not only worried about terrorism, but also about immigrants taking their jobs. If I took their comments as a reflection of the UK as a whole, I could easily draw the same conclusion that about your country as you have drawn about mine.


I'm not denying that Britain has it's fair share of bigots who believe that the white race will disappear in Britain...that immigrants are taking their jobs...and so on. We had these same attitudes towards the West Indian community in the 1960s and 1970s...and now toward the Muslims...and increasingly toward the East Europeans. Of course the jobs the immigrants do take are the ones no-one else wants and even after all these years of immigration the power in this country remains firmly with the overwhelming majority of white people.

In fact, these views are typical of at least one right-wing newspaper - The Daily Mail - which has a huge circulation here - so these views are possibly more mainstream than we like to admit. And the terrorist attacks have set race relations back here....even though we still have the most integrated society in Europe.

So it's true...we are no more or less tolerant or fearful than you are in the States, as you say. I take my previous comment back.


Thanks for that, Matthew. I think we all need to remember that it's unfair to paint every group of people with such a broad brush. Just think how bad the impression of America would be if people in other countries thought we all agreed with members of the KKK.
jrnychick
8 Track
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:52 am

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:03 am

Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby Barb » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:19 am

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.


You make some very good points. It's really hard as an American to understand that kind of barbarity. I think I am just really feeling a sense of urgency about this war right now. We've got politicians in Washington ready to pull out now and one running for President who stated outright that she'd end the war no matter what in January 2009 if elected. :roll:
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby Behshad » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:30 am

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.


I agree with you Carl. Iraq and its people has been under dictatorship for too long and it takes a long time to get things straight there. However the main reason I dissagree with this war is, when we went to this war, our objectives and goals were not what theyve turned into.
We initiated the war to search , find and detroy WMD's (if we found any). But once we got in and couldnt find anything, we changed direction and concentrated on Iraq's problems. Now I know that almost every war change's its course during the time its going on, but I personaly think that our country has more problems to deal with than Iraq's problem.

I think if we're thinkin of helping any country in need, we should , but after we have helped our own people . If we have problems in our own country such as :major health insurance issues , the elderly struggling with their lowered SSI's, Unemployment, the homeles etc, shouldnt we take care of that first?
And if our war is really against terrorism, dont you think that Iraq is not in the top 3 countries supporting and harboring terrorism ( Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon are all more involved than Iraq).
Bush promised us in 2001 that he will find those responsible for 9/11 and bring them to justice. A problem he hasnt kept. But if he wouldve focused on Afghanistan back in October of 2001 , chances are we wouldve has better results than we do now.

I think you agree with me when I say that Bin Laden is a much greater threat to the world than Saddam ever was. Saddam was put in his place by Bush Sr during Desert Storm and he was in no way harmful to the rest of the world. And yes I know he was cruel to his own people, but we were slowly making a progress there too with the sanctions, the restricted flying zone and the overall controll we had over him watching every single move he made .

If we wanted to deal with him , we couldve AFTER we wouldve captured Bin Laden. You can not tell me itd be harder to find Bin Laden in Afghanistan than findin Saddam in Iraq. Sure , Afghanistan has more mountains and terrains unknown to us, but theyre army consists of bunch of mens runnin around with their guns left over from 20 years ago fighting with Russia, and wearing the exact same pants MC Hammer wore, also 20 years ago! With our advantage in technology, troops,weapons etc , we couldve covered the entire country in less than 6 months and finsihed the job.

I think the main problem I have with Bush is he has his priorities mixed up! And as the president of the worlds most powerful nation, its one of the most important things in my opinion to HAVE A PLAN based on logic, common sense and PRIORITIES.

:)
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Barb » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:46 am

Behshad wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.


I agree with you Carl. Iraq and its people has been under dictatorship for too long and it takes a long time to get things straight there. However the main reason I dissagree with this war is, when we went to this war, our objectives and goals were not what theyve turned into.
We initiated the war to search , find and detroy WMD's (if we found any). But once we got in and couldnt find anything, we changed direction and concentrated on Iraq's problems. Now I know that almost every war change's its course during the time its going on, but I personaly think that our country has more problems to deal with than Iraq's problem.

I think if we're thinkin of helping any country in need, we should , but after we have helped our own people . If we have problems in our own country such as :major health insurance issues , the elderly struggling with their lowered SSI's, Unemployment, the homeles etc, shouldnt we take care of that first?
And if our war is really against terrorism, dont you think that Iraq is not in the top 3 countries supporting and harboring terrorism ( Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon are all more involved than Iraq).
Bush promised us in 2001 that he will find those responsible for 9/11 and bring them to justice. A problem he hasnt kept. But if he wouldve focused on Afghanistan back in October of 2001 , chances are we wouldve has better results than we do now.

I think you agree with me when I say that Bin Laden is a much greater threat to the world than Saddam ever was. Saddam was put in his place by Bush Sr during Desert Storm and he was in no way harmful to the rest of the world. And yes I know he was cruel to his own people, but we were slowly making a progress there too with the sanctions, the restricted flying zone and the overall controll we had over him watching every single move.

If we wanted to deal with him , we couldve AFTER we wouldve captured Bin Laden. You can not tell me itd be harder to find Bin Laden in Afghanistan than findin Saddam in Iraq. Sure , Afghanistan has more mountains and terrains unknown to us, but theyre army consists of bunch of mens runnin around with their guns left over from 20 years ago fighting with Russia, and wearing the exact same pants MC Hammer wore, also 20 years ago! With our advantage in technology, troops,weapons etc , we couldve covered the entire country in less than 6 months and finsihed the job.

I think the main problem I have with Bush is he has his priorities mixed up! And as the president of the worlds most powerful nation, its one of the most important things in my opinion to HAVE A PLAN based on logic, common sense and PROIORITIES.

:)


I don't think it's a matter of the President's priorities being out of whack. I believe it is a difference in strategy. The President believes that the long term "cure" for terrorism is democracy. Let's face it - there are parts of the Middle East that have been living in the 7th century forever. For decades, it's been largely ignored and though there have been acts of terror on a lower scale, the West has ignored it pretty much for the sake of stability and peace. Then comes 9/11 and it becomes clear that this situation can no longer be ignored. The President believes terror grows when people are not free. The strategy was to create democracy in Afghanistan, then Iraq and have it spread. Yes, there was the threat posed by WMD and the main case stated for going to war, but if you read the President's speeches and listen to what he is saying (not just what is filtered through the news media) you will understand that it was about much more than that. The problem is, Iraq is not as easy as they thought it would be, and ultimately, he is to blame for that as the man responsible. Bin Laden is one guy, and yes he needs to be "brought to justice" for what he did, but the root of this problem is not bin laden. The President didn't want to just go after one bad guy, he wanted to change the Middle East with freedom and democracy which he felt could elminate the roots of terrorism. It's a strategy that I agree could work, but a huge undertaking. The problem is that it's much harder to achieve than to put it on paper.
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:47 am

Barb wrote:You make some very good points. It's really hard as an American to understand that kind of barbarity. I think I am just really feeling a sense of urgency about this war right now. We've got politicians in Washington ready to pull out now and one running for President who stated outright that she'd end the war no matter what in January 2009 if elected. :roll:


Honestly, I truly believe that we will have to maintain a permanent presence there for years to come
kinda like we have for the past 50-some years in South Korea (spent a year there too). We pull out, within a
few years a new Nutjob or faction from a surrounding country like Iran will set-up shop
and we will be starting this all over again.

And look at it this way...
The Men and Women of the Armed Forces 'signed up' for this responsibility.
The numbers of new recruits across all the Armed Forces over the last few years
has greatly increased. I don't want sound "high and mighty" but, honestly,
this our job. This is what we've trained for. We know therisks and have accepted them.
I get tired of hearing the public 'crying for us'.
I would rather just get a Thank You or 'We support you".
If folks are so concerned about the troops, get with a local recruiter a base near you.
Find out how you can support them, i.e. care packages, pen-pals, family donations...
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby Behshad » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:56 am

Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.


I agree with you Carl. Iraq and its people has been under dictatorship for too long and it takes a long time to get things straight there. However the main reason I dissagree with this war is, when we went to this war, our objectives and goals were not what theyve turned into.
We initiated the war to search , find and detroy WMD's (if we found any). But once we got in and couldnt find anything, we changed direction and concentrated on Iraq's problems. Now I know that almost every war change's its course during the time its going on, but I personaly think that our country has more problems to deal with than Iraq's problem.

I think if we're thinkin of helping any country in need, we should , but after we have helped our own people . If we have problems in our own country such as :major health insurance issues , the elderly struggling with their lowered SSI's, Unemployment, the homeles etc, shouldnt we take care of that first?
And if our war is really against terrorism, dont you think that Iraq is not in the top 3 countries supporting and harboring terrorism ( Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon are all more involved than Iraq).
Bush promised us in 2001 that he will find those responsible for 9/11 and bring them to justice. A problem he hasnt kept. But if he wouldve focused on Afghanistan back in October of 2001 , chances are we wouldve has better results than we do now.

I think you agree with me when I say that Bin Laden is a much greater threat to the world than Saddam ever was. Saddam was put in his place by Bush Sr during Desert Storm and he was in no way harmful to the rest of the world. And yes I know he was cruel to his own people, but we were slowly making a progress there too with the sanctions, the restricted flying zone and the overall controll we had over him watching every single move.

If we wanted to deal with him , we couldve AFTER we wouldve captured Bin Laden. You can not tell me itd be harder to find Bin Laden in Afghanistan than findin Saddam in Iraq. Sure , Afghanistan has more mountains and terrains unknown to us, but theyre army consists of bunch of mens runnin around with their guns left over from 20 years ago fighting with Russia, and wearing the exact same pants MC Hammer wore, also 20 years ago! With our advantage in technology, troops,weapons etc , we couldve covered the entire country in less than 6 months and finsihed the job.

I think the main problem I have with Bush is he has his priorities mixed up! And as the president of the worlds most powerful nation, its one of the most important things in my opinion to HAVE A PLAN based on logic, common sense and PROIORITIES.

:)


I don't think it's a matter of the President's priorities being out of whack. I believe it is a difference in strategy. The President believes that the long term "cure" for terrorism is democracy. Let's face it - there are parts of the Middle East that have been living in the 7th century forever. For decades, it's been largely ignored and though there have been acts of terror on a lower scale, the West has ignored it pretty much for the sake of stability and peace. Then comes 9/11 and it becomes clear that this situation can no longer be ignored. The President believes terror grows when people are not free. The strategy was to create democracy in Afghanistan, then Iraq and have it spread. Yes, there was the threat posed by WMD and the main case stated for going to war, but if you read the President's speeches and listen to what he is saying (not just what is filtered through the news media) you will understand that it was about much more than that. The problem is, Iraq is not as easy as they thought it would be, and ultimately, he is to blame for that as the man responsible. Bin Laden is one guy, and yes he needs to be "brought to justice" for what he did, but the root of this problem is not bin laden. The President didn't want to just go after one bad guy, he wanted to change the Middle East with freedom and democracy which he felt could elminate the roots of terrorism. It's a strategy that I agree could work, but a huge undertaking. The problem is that it's much harder to achieve than to put it on paper.


Image

As usual I have to disagree with you and your point. I give up tryin to debate with you cause if you read all your posts in this thread , you have contradicted yourself more than once. Funny how you would mention the Presidents speach though,,, now thats something to laugh at,, the guy doesnt even know how to say "NUCLEAR". I think I can say it a bit better than him and I wasnt even born in this country!


Carl,,, please dont think that those who dont support the war , dont support the troops. Anyone that isnt grateful to you guys should be shot and then hung!
Event tho people signed up for this honroble job, many of them also happen to disagree with why theyre there.
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Matthew » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:58 am

Barb wrote:[

My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.



Carlitto has made some great points already about this - and it's also true that ordinary Iraqis are often too scared to be seen to "step up and do the hard work". Take for example the numerous times that volunteers for the police force have been attacked and killed while they are queuing to apply. Or are lured with the promise of work into truck loaded with explosives? Or are informed on by neighbours to local militias?

And let's face it - all these militias DO think they are fighting for their country. It's just that there are so many conflicting interests, ideologies, religious beliefs and so on.

So I'm not at all sure it's right to say that the Iraqi population are passive or lazy or work-shy. I would imagine that most of them are terrified and confused - and that every day millions of people there are bravely trying to keep their lives together and are taking risks daily by trying to contribute to the new Iraq.
User avatar
Matthew
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4979
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:47 am
Location: London

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:01 am

Behshad wrote:Carl,,, please dont think that those who dont support the war , dont support the troops. Anyone that isnt grateful to you guys should be shot and then hung!
Event tho people signed up for this honroble job, many of them also happen to disagree with why theyre there.


You're right...
A lot of us don't really agree with this war or totally enjoy being there.
But we also know that "we signed on the dotted line" and knew
we were joining the 'military' not Club Med.
Our true power and "disagreement", as citizens and military members,
will be shown in the next Election :)
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby Barb » Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:02 am

Behshad wrote:
Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.


I agree with you Carl. Iraq and its people has been under dictatorship for too long and it takes a long time to get things straight there. However the main reason I dissagree with this war is, when we went to this war, our objectives and goals were not what theyve turned into.
We initiated the war to search , find and detroy WMD's (if we found any). But once we got in and couldnt find anything, we changed direction and concentrated on Iraq's problems. Now I know that almost every war change's its course during the time its going on, but I personaly think that our country has more problems to deal with than Iraq's problem.

I think if we're thinkin of helping any country in need, we should , but after we have helped our own people . If we have problems in our own country such as :major health insurance issues , the elderly struggling with their lowered SSI's, Unemployment, the homeles etc, shouldnt we take care of that first?
And if our war is really against terrorism, dont you think that Iraq is not in the top 3 countries supporting and harboring terrorism ( Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon are all more involved than Iraq).
Bush promised us in 2001 that he will find those responsible for 9/11 and bring them to justice. A problem he hasnt kept. But if he wouldve focused on Afghanistan back in October of 2001 , chances are we wouldve has better results than we do now.

I think you agree with me when I say that Bin Laden is a much greater threat to the world than Saddam ever was. Saddam was put in his place by Bush Sr during Desert Storm and he was in no way harmful to the rest of the world. And yes I know he was cruel to his own people, but we were slowly making a progress there too with the sanctions, the restricted flying zone and the overall controll we had over him watching every single move.

If we wanted to deal with him , we couldve AFTER we wouldve captured Bin Laden. You can not tell me itd be harder to find Bin Laden in Afghanistan than findin Saddam in Iraq. Sure , Afghanistan has more mountains and terrains unknown to us, but theyre army consists of bunch of mens runnin around with their guns left over from 20 years ago fighting with Russia, and wearing the exact same pants MC Hammer wore, also 20 years ago! With our advantage in technology, troops,weapons etc , we couldve covered the entire country in less than 6 months and finsihed the job.

I think the main problem I have with Bush is he has his priorities mixed up! And as the president of the worlds most powerful nation, its one of the most important things in my opinion to HAVE A PLAN based on logic, common sense and PROIORITIES.

:)


I don't think it's a matter of the President's priorities being out of whack. I believe it is a difference in strategy. The President believes that the long term "cure" for terrorism is democracy. Let's face it - there are parts of the Middle East that have been living in the 7th century forever. For decades, it's been largely ignored and though there have been acts of terror on a lower scale, the West has ignored it pretty much for the sake of stability and peace. Then comes 9/11 and it becomes clear that this situation can no longer be ignored. The President believes terror grows when people are not free. The strategy was to create democracy in Afghanistan, then Iraq and have it spread. Yes, there was the threat posed by WMD and the main case stated for going to war, but if you read the President's speeches and listen to what he is saying (not just what is filtered through the news media) you will understand that it was about much more than that. The problem is, Iraq is not as easy as they thought it would be, and ultimately, he is to blame for that as the man responsible. Bin Laden is one guy, and yes he needs to be "brought to justice" for what he did, but the root of this problem is not bin laden. The President didn't want to just go after one bad guy, he wanted to change the Middle East with freedom and democracy which he felt could elminate the roots of terrorism. It's a strategy that I agree could work, but a huge undertaking. The problem is that it's much harder to achieve than to put it on paper.


Image

As usual I have to disagree with you and your point. I give up tryin to debate with you cause if you read all your posts in this thread , you have contradicted yourself more than once. Funny how you would mention the Presidents speach though,,, now thats something to laugh at,, the guy doesnt even know how to say "NUCLEAR". I think I can say it a bit better than him and I wasnt even born in this country!


Carl,,, please dont think that those who dont support the war , dont support the troops. Anyone that isnt grateful to you guys should be shot and then hung!
Event tho people signed up for this honroble job, many of them also happen to disagree with why theyre there.


Ok. Well, I was trying to answer you respectfully, but I see there is no point in that.
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby Behshad » Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:07 am

Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.


I agree with you Carl. Iraq and its people has been under dictatorship for too long and it takes a long time to get things straight there. However the main reason I dissagree with this war is, when we went to this war, our objectives and goals were not what theyve turned into.
We initiated the war to search , find and detroy WMD's (if we found any). But once we got in and couldnt find anything, we changed direction and concentrated on Iraq's problems. Now I know that almost every war change's its course during the time its going on, but I personaly think that our country has more problems to deal with than Iraq's problem.

I think if we're thinkin of helping any country in need, we should , but after we have helped our own people . If we have problems in our own country such as :major health insurance issues , the elderly struggling with their lowered SSI's, Unemployment, the homeles etc, shouldnt we take care of that first?
And if our war is really against terrorism, dont you think that Iraq is not in the top 3 countries supporting and harboring terrorism ( Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon are all more involved than Iraq).
Bush promised us in 2001 that he will find those responsible for 9/11 and bring them to justice. A problem he hasnt kept. But if he wouldve focused on Afghanistan back in October of 2001 , chances are we wouldve has better results than we do now.

I think you agree with me when I say that Bin Laden is a much greater threat to the world than Saddam ever was. Saddam was put in his place by Bush Sr during Desert Storm and he was in no way harmful to the rest of the world. And yes I know he was cruel to his own people, but we were slowly making a progress there too with the sanctions, the restricted flying zone and the overall controll we had over him watching every single move.

If we wanted to deal with him , we couldve AFTER we wouldve captured Bin Laden. You can not tell me itd be harder to find Bin Laden in Afghanistan than findin Saddam in Iraq. Sure , Afghanistan has more mountains and terrains unknown to us, but theyre army consists of bunch of mens runnin around with their guns left over from 20 years ago fighting with Russia, and wearing the exact same pants MC Hammer wore, also 20 years ago! With our advantage in technology, troops,weapons etc , we couldve covered the entire country in less than 6 months and finsihed the job.

I think the main problem I have with Bush is he has his priorities mixed up! And as the president of the worlds most powerful nation, its one of the most important things in my opinion to HAVE A PLAN based on logic, common sense and PROIORITIES.

:)


I don't think it's a matter of the President's priorities being out of whack. I believe it is a difference in strategy. The President believes that the long term "cure" for terrorism is democracy. Let's face it - there are parts of the Middle East that have been living in the 7th century forever. For decades, it's been largely ignored and though there have been acts of terror on a lower scale, the West has ignored it pretty much for the sake of stability and peace. Then comes 9/11 and it becomes clear that this situation can no longer be ignored. The President believes terror grows when people are not free. The strategy was to create democracy in Afghanistan, then Iraq and have it spread. Yes, there was the threat posed by WMD and the main case stated for going to war, but if you read the President's speeches and listen to what he is saying (not just what is filtered through the news media) you will understand that it was about much more than that. The problem is, Iraq is not as easy as they thought it would be, and ultimately, he is to blame for that as the man responsible. Bin Laden is one guy, and yes he needs to be "brought to justice" for what he did, but the root of this problem is not bin laden. The President didn't want to just go after one bad guy, he wanted to change the Middle East with freedom and democracy which he felt could elminate the roots of terrorism. It's a strategy that I agree could work, but a huge undertaking. The problem is that it's much harder to achieve than to put it on paper.


Image

As usual I have to disagree with you and your point. I give up tryin to debate with you cause if you read all your posts in this thread , you have contradicted yourself more than once. Funny how you would mention the Presidents speach though,,, now thats something to laugh at,, the guy doesnt even know how to say "NUCLEAR". I think I can say it a bit better than him and I wasnt even born in this country!


Carl,,, please dont think that those who dont support the war , dont support the troops. Anyone that isnt grateful to you guys should be shot and then hung!
Event tho people signed up for this honroble job, many of them also happen to disagree with why theyre there.


Ok. Well, I was trying to answer you respectfully, but I see there is no point in that.


I never said you were disrespectful, did I?
I just dont think theres any point in having a debate with you, cause your answers dont make sense to me at all. You have no idea of whats goin on, yet youre tryin to tell us that you and Bush know exactly whats goin on. Bush has never had a strategy, thats why we're in this fuckin mess.
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Barb » Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:15 am

Behshad wrote:
Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.


I agree with you Carl. Iraq and its people has been under dictatorship for too long and it takes a long time to get things straight there. However the main reason I dissagree with this war is, when we went to this war, our objectives and goals were not what theyve turned into.
We initiated the war to search , find and detroy WMD's (if we found any). But once we got in and couldnt find anything, we changed direction and concentrated on Iraq's problems. Now I know that almost every war change's its course during the time its going on, but I personaly think that our country has more problems to deal with than Iraq's problem.

I think if we're thinkin of helping any country in need, we should , but after we have helped our own people . If we have problems in our own country such as :major health insurance issues , the elderly struggling with their lowered SSI's, Unemployment, the homeles etc, shouldnt we take care of that first?
And if our war is really against terrorism, dont you think that Iraq is not in the top 3 countries supporting and harboring terrorism ( Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon are all more involved than Iraq).
Bush promised us in 2001 that he will find those responsible for 9/11 and bring them to justice. A problem he hasnt kept. But if he wouldve focused on Afghanistan back in October of 2001 , chances are we wouldve has better results than we do now.

I think you agree with me when I say that Bin Laden is a much greater threat to the world than Saddam ever was. Saddam was put in his place by Bush Sr during Desert Storm and he was in no way harmful to the rest of the world. And yes I know he was cruel to his own people, but we were slowly making a progress there too with the sanctions, the restricted flying zone and the overall controll we had over him watching every single move.

If we wanted to deal with him , we couldve AFTER we wouldve captured Bin Laden. You can not tell me itd be harder to find Bin Laden in Afghanistan than findin Saddam in Iraq. Sure , Afghanistan has more mountains and terrains unknown to us, but theyre army consists of bunch of mens runnin around with their guns left over from 20 years ago fighting with Russia, and wearing the exact same pants MC Hammer wore, also 20 years ago! With our advantage in technology, troops,weapons etc , we couldve covered the entire country in less than 6 months and finsihed the job.

I think the main problem I have with Bush is he has his priorities mixed up! And as the president of the worlds most powerful nation, its one of the most important things in my opinion to HAVE A PLAN based on logic, common sense and PROIORITIES.

:)


I don't think it's a matter of the President's priorities being out of whack. I believe it is a difference in strategy. The President believes that the long term "cure" for terrorism is democracy. Let's face it - there are parts of the Middle East that have been living in the 7th century forever. For decades, it's been largely ignored and though there have been acts of terror on a lower scale, the West has ignored it pretty much for the sake of stability and peace. Then comes 9/11 and it becomes clear that this situation can no longer be ignored. The President believes terror grows when people are not free. The strategy was to create democracy in Afghanistan, then Iraq and have it spread. Yes, there was the threat posed by WMD and the main case stated for going to war, but if you read the President's speeches and listen to what he is saying (not just what is filtered through the news media) you will understand that it was about much more than that. The problem is, Iraq is not as easy as they thought it would be, and ultimately, he is to blame for that as the man responsible. Bin Laden is one guy, and yes he needs to be "brought to justice" for what he did, but the root of this problem is not bin laden. The President didn't want to just go after one bad guy, he wanted to change the Middle East with freedom and democracy which he felt could elminate the roots of terrorism. It's a strategy that I agree could work, but a huge undertaking. The problem is that it's much harder to achieve than to put it on paper.


Image

As usual I have to disagree with you and your point. I give up tryin to debate with you cause if you read all your posts in this thread , you have contradicted yourself more than once. Funny how you would mention the Presidents speach though,,, now thats something to laugh at,, the guy doesnt even know how to say "NUCLEAR". I think I can say it a bit better than him and I wasnt even born in this country!


Carl,,, please dont think that those who dont support the war , dont support the troops. Anyone that isnt grateful to you guys should be shot and then hung!
Event tho people signed up for this honroble job, many of them also happen to disagree with why theyre there.


Ok. Well, I was trying to answer you respectfully, but I see there is no point in that.


I never said you were disrespectful, did I?
I just dont think theres any point in having a debate with you, cause your answers dont make sense to me at all. You have no idea of whats goin on, yet youre tryin to tell us that you and Bush know exactly whats goin on. Bush has never had a strategy, thats why we're in this fuckin mess.


I'm not trying to tell you what's going on or even debate you. I'm giving my opinion. I'm no military expert, nor do I know what the people in charge of this war know, but I do have opnions as does everyone else. I am only saying what the President's strategy was when this all began. That was all I was trying to convey. Some believe his priority should have been Bin Laden, but his priority was a long term solution.
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby Behshad » Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:55 am

Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.


I agree with you Carl. Iraq and its people has been under dictatorship for too long and it takes a long time to get things straight there. However the main reason I dissagree with this war is, when we went to this war, our objectives and goals were not what theyve turned into.
We initiated the war to search , find and detroy WMD's (if we found any). But once we got in and couldnt find anything, we changed direction and concentrated on Iraq's problems. Now I know that almost every war change's its course during the time its going on, but I personaly think that our country has more problems to deal with than Iraq's problem.

I think if we're thinkin of helping any country in need, we should , but after we have helped our own people . If we have problems in our own country such as :major health insurance issues , the elderly struggling with their lowered SSI's, Unemployment, the homeles etc, shouldnt we take care of that first?
And if our war is really against terrorism, dont you think that Iraq is not in the top 3 countries supporting and harboring terrorism ( Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon are all more involved than Iraq).
Bush promised us in 2001 that he will find those responsible for 9/11 and bring them to justice. A problem he hasnt kept. But if he wouldve focused on Afghanistan back in October of 2001 , chances are we wouldve has better results than we do now.

I think you agree with me when I say that Bin Laden is a much greater threat to the world than Saddam ever was. Saddam was put in his place by Bush Sr during Desert Storm and he was in no way harmful to the rest of the world. And yes I know he was cruel to his own people, but we were slowly making a progress there too with the sanctions, the restricted flying zone and the overall controll we had over him watching every single move.

If we wanted to deal with him , we couldve AFTER we wouldve captured Bin Laden. You can not tell me itd be harder to find Bin Laden in Afghanistan than findin Saddam in Iraq. Sure , Afghanistan has more mountains and terrains unknown to us, but theyre army consists of bunch of mens runnin around with their guns left over from 20 years ago fighting with Russia, and wearing the exact same pants MC Hammer wore, also 20 years ago! With our advantage in technology, troops,weapons etc , we couldve covered the entire country in less than 6 months and finsihed the job.

I think the main problem I have with Bush is he has his priorities mixed up! And as the president of the worlds most powerful nation, its one of the most important things in my opinion to HAVE A PLAN based on logic, common sense and PROIORITIES.

:)


I don't think it's a matter of the President's priorities being out of whack. I believe it is a difference in strategy. The President believes that the long term "cure" for terrorism is democracy. Let's face it - there are parts of the Middle East that have been living in the 7th century forever. For decades, it's been largely ignored and though there have been acts of terror on a lower scale, the West has ignored it pretty much for the sake of stability and peace. Then comes 9/11 and it becomes clear that this situation can no longer be ignored. The President believes terror grows when people are not free. The strategy was to create democracy in Afghanistan, then Iraq and have it spread. Yes, there was the threat posed by WMD and the main case stated for going to war, but if you read the President's speeches and listen to what he is saying (not just what is filtered through the news media) you will understand that it was about much more than that. The problem is, Iraq is not as easy as they thought it would be, and ultimately, he is to blame for that as the man responsible. Bin Laden is one guy, and yes he needs to be "brought to justice" for what he did, but the root of this problem is not bin laden. The President didn't want to just go after one bad guy, he wanted to change the Middle East with freedom and democracy which he felt could elminate the roots of terrorism. It's a strategy that I agree could work, but a huge undertaking. The problem is that it's much harder to achieve than to put it on paper.


Image

As usual I have to disagree with you and your point. I give up tryin to debate with you cause if you read all your posts in this thread , you have contradicted yourself more than once. Funny how you would mention the Presidents speach though,,, now thats something to laugh at,, the guy doesnt even know how to say "NUCLEAR". I think I can say it a bit better than him and I wasnt even born in this country!


Carl,,, please dont think that those who dont support the war , dont support the troops. Anyone that isnt grateful to you guys should be shot and then hung!
Event tho people signed up for this honroble job, many of them also happen to disagree with why theyre there.


Ok. Well, I was trying to answer you respectfully, but I see there is no point in that.


I never said you were disrespectful, did I?
I just dont think theres any point in having a debate with you, cause your answers dont make sense to me at all. You have no idea of whats goin on, yet youre tryin to tell us that you and Bush know exactly whats goin on. Bush has never had a strategy, thats why we're in this fuckin mess.


I'm not trying to tell you what's going on or even debate you. I'm giving my opinion. I'm no military expert, nor do I know what the people in charge of this war know, but I do have opnions as does everyone else. I am only saying what the President's strategy was when this all began. That was all I was trying to convey. Some believe his priority should have been Bin Laden, but his priority was a long term solution.



IF his priorities were long term and he actually HAD a plan and strategy, then why did we start of wrong!? Why didnt we just start off by going to Iraq right away and start so called this long term solution.

You have every right to post and cast your opinions here but it seems like you add your opinoins everytime just to disagree with what anyone said and THAT pretty much IS a debate.

I didnt say why do you cast your opinions here. But have you noticed that sometimes your own opinions are conflicting with eachother!? Its because sometimes you just respond just to prove someone wrong, without remembering that at some point you may have stated something earlier thats simliar to what your opposing now.
:roll:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Barb » Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:08 am

Behshad wrote:
Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Barb wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Barb wrote:My comment about the Iraqi people comes from frustration that they themselves seem to be unwilling to step up and do the hard work of fighting for their own country. If you can't stand up and fight for what is yours, you will have to accept your fate. How many of our soldiers and yours will die or become maimed for life because the people they are fighting to protect won't do the hard work themselves? Granted, some of them are very willing and extremely brave, but not enough. After 4 years, I expected more from them.


Barb, you're talking about a people trhat have been bred in a culture of fear, terror and oppression for hundreds of years. You just can't change that kind of mentality over-night. They demograghic in that country that will bve relied upon to 'take control back' were also denied the kinds of schooling and training that we take for granted in other countries. They have ALOT to learn before they can do it all on thier own.
And sadly, they are still living in that fear and state of terror even though we are there. You don't here much about all the killing and raping that is still going on throughout the country in the smaller areas the Allied Forces can't always reach. You don't here about the extremist still entrenched in these communities, the on-going mass murders or all the means in which they use to try and defeat the "infidels". Maybe you haven't heard how these nutjobs will send unsuspecting children to do thier dirty work: they will bury explosives in bags filled with food and send these children over to greet Allied Forces in the streets or at checkpoints, only to try and kill some of our troops and blowing up the unsuspecting child in the act. The terror these people are STILL facing is horrendous and it is going to take time for them to be able to regain control. I hate going there but I know why we are there. NO COUNTRY or Culture should have to live that way.


I agree with you Carl. Iraq and its people has been under dictatorship for too long and it takes a long time to get things straight there. However the main reason I dissagree with this war is, when we went to this war, our objectives and goals were not what theyve turned into.
We initiated the war to search , find and detroy WMD's (if we found any). But once we got in and couldnt find anything, we changed direction and concentrated on Iraq's problems. Now I know that almost every war change's its course during the time its going on, but I personaly think that our country has more problems to deal with than Iraq's problem.

I think if we're thinkin of helping any country in need, we should , but after we have helped our own people . If we have problems in our own country such as :major health insurance issues , the elderly struggling with their lowered SSI's, Unemployment, the homeles etc, shouldnt we take care of that first?
And if our war is really against terrorism, dont you think that Iraq is not in the top 3 countries supporting and harboring terrorism ( Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon are all more involved than Iraq).
Bush promised us in 2001 that he will find those responsible for 9/11 and bring them to justice. A problem he hasnt kept. But if he wouldve focused on Afghanistan back in October of 2001 , chances are we wouldve has better results than we do now.

I think you agree with me when I say that Bin Laden is a much greater threat to the world than Saddam ever was. Saddam was put in his place by Bush Sr during Desert Storm and he was in no way harmful to the rest of the world. And yes I know he was cruel to his own people, but we were slowly making a progress there too with the sanctions, the restricted flying zone and the overall controll we had over him watching every single move.

If we wanted to deal with him , we couldve AFTER we wouldve captured Bin Laden. You can not tell me itd be harder to find Bin Laden in Afghanistan than findin Saddam in Iraq. Sure , Afghanistan has more mountains and terrains unknown to us, but theyre army consists of bunch of mens runnin around with their guns left over from 20 years ago fighting with Russia, and wearing the exact same pants MC Hammer wore, also 20 years ago! With our advantage in technology, troops,weapons etc , we couldve covered the entire country in less than 6 months and finsihed the job.

I think the main problem I have with Bush is he has his priorities mixed up! And as the president of the worlds most powerful nation, its one of the most important things in my opinion to HAVE A PLAN based on logic, common sense and PROIORITIES.

:)


I don't think it's a matter of the President's priorities being out of whack. I believe it is a difference in strategy. The President believes that the long term "cure" for terrorism is democracy. Let's face it - there are parts of the Middle East that have been living in the 7th century forever. For decades, it's been largely ignored and though there have been acts of terror on a lower scale, the West has ignored it pretty much for the sake of stability and peace. Then comes 9/11 and it becomes clear that this situation can no longer be ignored. The President believes terror grows when people are not free. The strategy was to create democracy in Afghanistan, then Iraq and have it spread. Yes, there was the threat posed by WMD and the main case stated for going to war, but if you read the President's speeches and listen to what he is saying (not just what is filtered through the news media) you will understand that it was about much more than that. The problem is, Iraq is not as easy as they thought it would be, and ultimately, he is to blame for that as the man responsible. Bin Laden is one guy, and yes he needs to be "brought to justice" for what he did, but the root of this problem is not bin laden. The President didn't want to just go after one bad guy, he wanted to change the Middle East with freedom and democracy which he felt could elminate the roots of terrorism. It's a strategy that I agree could work, but a huge undertaking. The problem is that it's much harder to achieve than to put it on paper.


Image

As usual I have to disagree with you and your point. I give up tryin to debate with you cause if you read all your posts in this thread , you have contradicted yourself more than once. Funny how you would mention the Presidents speach though,,, now thats something to laugh at,, the guy doesnt even know how to say "NUCLEAR". I think I can say it a bit better than him and I wasnt even born in this country!


Carl,,, please dont think that those who dont support the war , dont support the troops. Anyone that isnt grateful to you guys should be shot and then hung!
Event tho people signed up for this honroble job, many of them also happen to disagree with why theyre there.


Ok. Well, I was trying to answer you respectfully, but I see there is no point in that.


I never said you were disrespectful, did I?
I just dont think theres any point in having a debate with you, cause your answers dont make sense to me at all. You have no idea of whats goin on, yet youre tryin to tell us that you and Bush know exactly whats goin on. Bush has never had a strategy, thats why we're in this fuckin mess.


I'm not trying to tell you what's going on or even debate you. I'm giving my opinion. I'm no military expert, nor do I know what the people in charge of this war know, but I do have opnions as does everyone else. I am only saying what the President's strategy was when this all began. That was all I was trying to convey. Some believe his priority should have been Bin Laden, but his priority was a long term solution.



IF his priorities were long term and he actually HAD a plan and strategy, then why did we start of wrong!? Why didnt we just start off by going to Iraq right away and start so called this long term solution.

You have every right to post and cast your opinions here but it seems like you add your opinoins everytime just to disagree with what anyone said and THAT pretty much IS a debate.

I didnt say why do you cast your opinions here. But have you noticed that sometimes your own opinions are conflicting with eachother!? Its because sometimes you just respond just to prove someone wrong, without remembering that at some point you may have stated something earlier thats simliar to what your opposing now.
:roll:


How are my opinions conflicting with each other? I think I've been pretty consistent. I made a harsh statement early on because I AM frustrated with how things are going. Carlitto's post gave me another perspective and I agree that he is right about that, and what he said should be considered. I believe in what we are trying to do, but think it has been poorly executed. Is that not allowed? I think the President has made mistakes, but I still support him. Is that what you are talking about?
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HydraRed and 11 guests