Moderator: Andrew
Uncle heFTy wrote:Awesome Marty - just needs a soundtrack to put us right there in the audience again.
FT
fredinator wrote:I loved these pictures, Marty!! It looked like SO MUCH fun! Did the audience give a standing ovation at the end? It kind of looks like it... What a wonderful venue, and slideshow with crowd pictures, too! I really love the English and the Euros (does that include the French?)!
MartyMoffatt wrote:Well, I know I haven't finished editing my photos from Bournemouth, Cardiff or Birmingham yet, but Hammersmith was just such a special show that I wanted to do them first.
Not only was it a GREAT concert, but I managed to get an unprecedented level of access during the show to shoot where I wanted. The result is a few images that really give a band's eye view of the show.
Unfortunately the view from out front for photography was not as good as at other venues. Anybody without a camera got pounced upon and even those with a photo pass, such as myself, had to stand specifically in one of two positions at the front of the stage - neither of which offered a good view of Deen.
Fortunately, at the invitation of the band I was able to take some shots from the side of the stage and even from behind Deen's drumkit.
Take a look for yourself http://www.martymoffatt.com/journey2007hammersmith
There are 106 photos in this slideshow, and at least half are taken from positions that the average punter like you and me wouldn't normally be privy to.
Hope you enjoy them
Marty
bionic wrote:Stunning pictures you have really captured the energy of the band,there was one of myself girlfriend and friends that i would like from the Hammersmith show,how much do you charge for a photo?
MartyMoffatt wrote:Uncle heFTy wrote:Awesome Marty - just needs a soundtrack to put us right there in the audience again.
FT
Frank, I'll have to send you one of the pictures, because, when enlarged up there are several which clearly show your face in the audience beaming from ear to ear.
Marty
AR wrote:Awesome!
Marty, question?
Why is Hammersmith Apollo the name now? I recall it being Hammersmith Odeon from the Kerrang days.
TVL wrote:Awesome pics, Marty!![]()
....I have a son that wants to be a photographer. He recently applied to a school and was accepted but is thinking twice about going because it will cost about $6000 a quarter for a 2 year program. He doesnt want to incur that much debt with student loans and he doesnt want to ask me to pay for more. He thinks he can do it without the school. Do you think going to a good school and getting a degree in photography would be a good idea or do you think he should just start taking alot of various shots, build up a portfolio and start knocking on doors? He is artistic and has a good eye and understands composition. I have taught him how to "look" as an artist, but would the school, iyo, be a good idea to attend?
Moon Beam wrote:I love the one of Sir Soto sharing the mic with
a lady in the crowd, Fan-tastic!.
)
Moon Beam wrote:Thanks so much Marty, these are some
of the nicest concert photos I've ever seen!
I love the one of Sir Soto sharing the mic with
a lady in the crowd, Fan-tastic!.
There was also a superb shot of Neal smiling.
One question, can the guys not afford their own clothes?
Cain starts off wearing a Japanese smock then Ross
has it on in remaining pics?![]()
Great job Marty!
Moon Beam wrote:Thanks so much Marty, these are some
of the nicest concert photos I've ever seen!
I love the one of Sir Soto sharing the mic with
a lady in the crowd, Fan-tastic!.
There was also a superb shot of Neal smiling.
One question, can the guys not afford their own clothes?
Cain starts off wearing a Japanese smock then Ross
has it on in remaining pics?![]()
Great job Marty!
Thank you very much for your advice! I'll let him know. Again, awesome pics! You have a great eye and really capture the emotion and atmosphere of the concert and the personalitys of the band. Thanks!MartyMoffatt wrote:TVL wrote:Awesome pics, Marty!![]()
....I have a son that wants to be a photographer. He recently applied to a school and was accepted but is thinking twice about going because it will cost about $6000 a quarter for a 2 year program. He doesnt want to incur that much debt with student loans and he doesnt want to ask me to pay for more. He thinks he can do it without the school. Do you think going to a good school and getting a degree in photography would be a good idea or do you think he should just start taking alot of various shots, build up a portfolio and start knocking on doors? He is artistic and has a good eye and understands composition. I have taught him how to "look" as an artist, but would the school, iyo, be a good idea to attend?
That's a difficult question, and I don't think there is any right or wrong answer. Getting a Degree in photography is a huge investment with no guarantee it would lead to anything. If he can afford it it could be a worthwhile investment. If he can't then it isn't.
I don't earn my income from photography - luckily I have a full time job in IT that pays the bills - and I treat photography as a part time business which just about pays for itself and keeps me in consumables and equipment upgrades, so maybe I'm not the best person to offer advice. Certainly, I can say that an area such as concert photography doesn't pay. Wedding and portrait photography does pay better but, particularly the former, is a difficult and stressful way to earn money from photography. Commercial photography can also pay well but IMHO is a much less interesting way from an artistic viewpoint. There are also many other areas to photography.
None of these jobs require a Degree, although some form of qualification and/or membership of a professional body certainly helps to give your work credibility to clients. However, I've found the best way to generate business is to keep improving through practice, and build up a big portfolio of quality work. Tell him to keep taking photos and trying new things and remember what works and what doesn't. Then, when he's under pressure to produce results those little tricks he's tried in the past will start to become instinctive, and it is a proven ability to produce good work time after time that will impress clients more than whether he has a Degree to his name.
In the UK there is a program called City & Guilds which covers training in a number of areas, one of which is photography. This can be done part time or in evening classes and does give a good grounding in the basics of photography, both from a technical and compositional view. I'd certainly recommend some form of training like that, but other than that there is no magic formula that a paper qualification will provide that will turn you into a better photographer. With today's hi tech cameras anybody can produce a stunning photo. The objective should be to do it time after time, and that comes mainly from practice, practice and more practice.
Marty
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests