Moderator: Andrew
Matthew wrote:Am I the only person who actually enjoyed Joe Reardon/Journeytroll's posts at TJF?
L~L~L wrote:Matthew wrote:Am I the only person who actually enjoyed Joe Reardon/Journeytroll's posts at TJF?
Honestly I thought JT/JR was very well behaved and funny. I am confused as how strangegrey can say JT/JR had multiple usernames yet he never posted from the same IP. So how can strangegrey make that claim of JT/JR using multiples? By the way I liked reading the forum.
L~L~L wrote:Matthew wrote:Am I the only person who actually enjoyed Joe Reardon/Journeytroll's posts at TJF?
Honestly I thought JT/JR was very well behaved and funny. I am confused as how strangegrey can say JT/JR had multiple usernames yet he never posted from the same IP. So how can strangegrey make that claim of JT/JR using multiples? By the way I liked reading the forum.
stingthebeerdrinker wrote:L~L~L wrote:Matthew wrote:Am I the only person who actually enjoyed Joe Reardon/Journeytroll's posts at TJF?
Honestly I thought JT/JR was very well behaved and funny. I am confused as how strangegrey can say JT/JR had multiple usernames yet he never posted from the same IP. So how can strangegrey make that claim of JT/JR using multiples? By the way I liked reading the forum.
I read my brother's site when Reardon was on there. He was a freak. Part of the problem I think is a bunch of people forgiving that idiot. "Oh he was nice on one site, but a psycho on every other one."
C'mon. You do not deal with the devil and expect anything less that bullshit.
Matthew wrote:I agree with Hots. Journeytroll has been made a scapegoat - and I have no idea why his name has even been brought up as a reason for the failure of that site.
In fact...I say we welcome Journeytroll onto this site. I'm not sure why he was banned from MR in the first place last October. He was no more or less difficult or offensive than the rest of us.
Monker wrote:I
So, what did we all learn from this? There are two extremes, and their is no room for a forum in the middle. It's like a third party canidate in an election...The people who are tired of the two parties have an option, but there is no hope of any REAL success for that campaign...because too many people are too loyal to their own party of choice to give the third a real chance.
Monker wrote:
Like I said in my other post, you don't know what has gone on behind the scenes (in Email, PM's, whatever). He was also banned years ago, for going all psycho.
Matthew wrote:Monker wrote:
Like I said in my other post, you don't know what has gone on behind the scenes (in Email, PM's, whatever). He was also banned years ago, for going all psycho.
Yes - I'm aware of what Reardon is capable of. But surely they could have simply banned him or refused him registration in the first place?
And again - where's the proof that Journeytroll is Reardon?
Monker wrote:
That's not their style. Like you said, he publicly did nothing "wrong" on the forums. If he would have slipped, I think he would have been banned. They treat everyone the same...which is what like about how they run their forum(s).
I am not claiming JT and Joe are the same person. But, isn't it a bit ironic that they always show up as a pair, and disapear as a pair? Like I've said, they may as well be the same person cuz they act and talk exactly the same.
stingthebeerdrinker wrote:You all making fools of yourselves laying in bed with Reardon. You are making yourselves look like idiots.
When my brother, the guys from Journey Site Forums and Melodicrock all agree that says something that tells me all I need to know. Ed went to see Shaw Blades tonight. I wonder what he will say tomorrow?
stingthebeerdrinker wrote:You all making fools of yourselves laying in bed with Reardon. You are making yourselves look like idiots.
When my brother, the guys from Journey Site Forums and Melodicrock all agree that says something that tells me all I need to know. Ed went to see Shaw Blades tonight. I wonder what he will say tomorrow?
Monker wrote:stingthebeerdrinker wrote:You all making fools of yourselves laying in bed with Reardon. You are making yourselves look like idiots.
When my brother, the guys from Journey Site Forums and Melodicrock all agree that says something that tells me all I need to know. Ed went to see Shaw Blades tonight. I wonder what he will say tomorrow?
WHO is 'in bed with Reardon'? I said on that forum, to Joe, that I was no fan of his...and he replied back to me that he was never a fan of mine either. So, I don't exactly see us as being 'in bed together'.
All I am saying is he did nothing worthy of banning him on TJF.com. That's the truth.
I think it is absolutely WRONG to ban somebody for what they said or did in a completely different forum. That is something that some claim BT has done. Why make an exception with Joe? To me that is not respecting the idea of creating a forum where all opinions are accepted, as long as you stayed within the rules. I think it would have been a bad idea to ban him from the outset...let him fuck up and then ban him. He didn't fuck up.
Matthew wrote:Well, they often show up as a pair - but the style of writing is completely different. Sure, it could be a skilful impersonation - but for someone as erratic as Reardon (who uses capitals,exclamation marks, dots and emoticons all over the place) ot might be hard to be so consistent about writing in the assured and orderly way that Journeytroll writes.
Monker wrote:stingthebeerdrinker wrote:You all making fools of yourselves laying in bed with Reardon. You are making yourselves look like idiots.
When my brother, the guys from Journey Site Forums and Melodicrock all agree that says something that tells me all I need to know. Ed went to see Shaw Blades tonight. I wonder what he will say tomorrow?
WHO is 'in bed with Reardon'? I said on that forum, to Joe, that I was no fan of his...and he replied back to me that he was never a fan of mine either. So, I don't exactly see us as being 'in bed together'.
All I am saying is he did nothing worthy of banning him on TJF.com. That's the truth.
I think it is absolutely WRONG to ban somebody for what they said or did in a completely different forum. That is something that some claim BT has done. Why make an exception with Joe? To me that is not respecting the idea of creating a forum where all opinions are accepted, as long as you stayed within the rules. I think it would have been a bad idea to ban him from the outset...let him fuck up and then ban him. He didn't fuck up.
stingthebeerdrinker wrote:
But you are only as good as you show yourself. I have been shown the stuff this guy does. Ok, he didn't do it where you are where- but have you seen it? Wow, he didn't do it where you were posting. He seems to be an asshole. Not something I would post and you are fools. Go onot his site if he was so innocent.
The guys on these sites were right and you are all fucking nuts. I barely post here but I agree with all the guys that run these places.
Matthew wrote:stingthebeerdrinker wrote:
But you are only as good as you show yourself. I have been shown the stuff this guy does. Ok, he didn't do it where you are where- but have you seen it? Wow, he didn't do it where you were posting. He seems to be an asshole. Not something I would post and you are fools. Go onot his site if he was so innocent.
The guys on these sites were right and you are all fucking nuts. I barely post here but I agree with all the guys that run these places.
You're referring to the alt.music site? Well, I've seen posts on this site from regular members which are every bit as venomous.
stingthebeerdrinker wrote:But you are only as good as you show yourself. I have been shown the stuff this guy does. Ok, he didn't do it where you all where- but have you seen it? Wow, he didn't do it where you were posting. He seems to be an asshole. Not something I would post and you are all fools. Go on to his site if he was so innocent.
The guys on these sites were right and you are all fucking nuts. I barely post here but I agree with all the guys that run these places.
stingthebeerdrinker wrote:Reardon has been posting IP's and names on weird gay porno sites. Do a google search of Journeytroll, Joeydelight and see how weird this dude is.
\Monker wrote:stingthebeerdrinker wrote:But you are only as good as you show yourself. I have been shown the stuff this guy does. Ok, he didn't do it where you all where- but have you seen it? Wow, he didn't do it where you were posting. He seems to be an asshole. Not something I would post and you are all fools. Go on to his site if he was so innocent.
The guys on these sites were right and you are all fucking nuts. I barely post here but I agree with all the guys that run these places.
Dude, Sky owned the forum that Joe ORIGINALY posted on. I was there reading Joe's FIRST POSTS on a Journey forum. I read his posts on BT. I read his posts on Vh1.com (when it had a Journey forum anyways), I read his posts HERE. I've read his rants on alt.music.journey (joe's blog).
So, please, don't think I'm cluelesss on this.
The bottom line is Joe did nothing publicly worthy of being banned on tjf.com. If he had, he would have been banned. I have absolutely no doubt about that.
stingthebeerdrinker wrote:Matthew wrote:stingthebeerdrinker wrote:
But you are only as good as you show yourself. I have been shown the stuff this guy does. Ok, he didn't do it where you are where- but have you seen it? Wow, he didn't do it where you were posting. He seems to be an asshole. Not something I would post and you are fools. Go onot his site if he was so innocent.
The guys on these sites were right and you are all fucking nuts. I barely post here but I agree with all the guys that run these places.
You're referring to the alt.music site? Well, I've seen posts on this site from regular members which are every bit as venomous.
Man go re-read.
Seriously. You want to align yourself with Reardon ? GO FOR IT!
Monker wrote:stingthebeerdrinker wrote:Reardon has been posting IP's and names on weird gay porno sites. Do a google search of Journeytroll, Joeydelight and see how weird this dude is.
So what. Did he post it on tjf.com? No...if he did, he would have been banned.
stingthebeerdrinker wrote:\Monker wrote:stingthebeerdrinker wrote:But you are only as good as you show yourself. I have been shown the stuff this guy does. Ok, he didn't do it where you all where- but have you seen it? Wow, he didn't do it where you were posting. He seems to be an asshole. Not something I would post and you are all fools. Go on to his site if he was so innocent.
The guys on these sites were right and you are all fucking nuts. I barely post here but I agree with all the guys that run these places.
Dude, Sky owned the forum that Joe ORIGINALY posted on. I was there reading Joe's FIRST POSTS on a Journey forum. I read his posts on BT. I read his posts on Vh1.com (when it had a Journey forum anyways), I read his posts HERE. I've read his rants on alt.music.journey (joe's blog).
So, please, don't think I'm cluelesss on this.
The bottom line is Joe did nothing publicly worthy of being banned on tjf.com. If he had, he would have been banned. I have absolutely no doubt about that.
Don't know everything. but from what I have read it makes no difference what this person has done on one site. If you defend him, you are a party to it.
You want to align yourself with this nut?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests