Moderator: Andrew
Paul_UK wrote:I myself always preferred the 80s era Chicago! I know i'm in the minority here, but i guess its something to do with that era being the time i discovered the band and Chicago 16 thru to 21 practically created the soundtrack to my youth!
I actually went to see them a few years back and came away so disappointed cos they only played 3 tracks from the above time period. Although great musos and the practically 70s setlist was well played, i hated it!
Still love the above albums tho and always will.
E5C4P33 wrote:After Kath died so tragically, they really did become a new band. He was the soul in that band. When he died, the band's soul died with him.
I never thought it was fair to compare the earlier stuff with the later stuff. Apples and oranges.
Give me the older stuff, though.
chf34jmac wrote:Always liked them. Thought they really brought a lot of soul and passion to their music. I used one of their songs at my wedding to dance with my mother. "What kind of man would I be" was the song. If you've never heard it, check it out.
E5C4P33 wrote:After Kath died so tragically, they really did become a new band. He was the soul in that band. When he died, the band's soul died with him.
I never thought it was fair to compare the earlier stuff with the later stuff. Apples and oranges.
Give me the older stuff, though.
Classic Rock wrote:E5C4P33 wrote:After Kath died so tragically, they really did become a new band. He was the soul in that band. When he died, the band's soul died with him.
I never thought it was fair to compare the earlier stuff with the later stuff. Apples and oranges.
Give me the older stuff, though.
My sediments exactly. Thanks for posting this video, way back in 1970 when they were still called Chicago Transit Authority. I am seeing them tomorrow in San Antonio, TX and I can’t wait, they are still a good live band these days.
Matthew wrote:I'm utterly uninterested in the 'credible' bluesy early days of Chicago. Give me the ballads produced by David Foster every time!
conversationpc wrote:Matthew wrote:I'm utterly uninterested in the 'credible' bluesy early days of Chicago. Give me the ballads produced by David Foster every time!
Most of that early stuff doesn't have that much in common with the blues. There's more of a jazz/classical/big band mix there.
Matthew wrote:conversationpc wrote:Matthew wrote:I'm utterly uninterested in the 'credible' bluesy early days of Chicago. Give me the ballads produced by David Foster every time!
Most of that early stuff doesn't have that much in common with the blues. There's more of a jazz/classical/big band mix there.
I still don't care, Dave. It's "You're The Inspiration" or nothing for me.
ohsherrie wrote:"Twenty five or six to four".............(I have no idea what that meant but it was a great song.)
conversationpc wrote:Matthew wrote:conversationpc wrote:Matthew wrote:I'm utterly uninterested in the 'credible' bluesy early days of Chicago. Give me the ballads produced by David Foster every time!
Most of that early stuff doesn't have that much in common with the blues. There's more of a jazz/classical/big band mix there.
I still don't care, Dave. It's "You're The Inspiration" or nothing for me.
For that comment and the gay avatar, you must now hand over your "Musical Cred" card. If you choose not to do so, I shall be required to add you to the ten most wanted list.
Matthew wrote:Why oh why is Jonathan Cain considered to be so utterly gay? I mean...I'd expect this on a Metallica forum but on a Journey site? Where's the love for the keytar legend?
Shoot 'em up wrote:ohsherrie wrote:"Twenty five or six to four".............(I have no idea what that meant but it was a great song.)
I read where they had been up all night trying to put some material together, and someone asked what time it was. The reply was "It's 25 or 6 to 4."
Shoot 'em up wrote:ohsherrie wrote:"Twenty five or six to four".............(I have no idea what that meant but it was a great song.)
I read where they had been up all night trying to put some material together, and someone asked what time it was. The reply was "It's 25 or 6 to 4."
NealIsGod wrote:Shoot 'em up wrote:ohsherrie wrote:"Twenty five or six to four".............(I have no idea what that meant but it was a great song.)
I read where they had been up all night trying to put some material together, and someone asked what time it was. The reply was "It's 25 or 6 to 4."
I thought the reply was, "Does anybody really know what time it is?"
Here's an interesting link about it and other songs.
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/m25or6to4.html
styxman wrote:
Stone of Sisyyphus rejected by Warner Brothers as it wasn't in there words a pop album was probably one of Chicagos great albums that never was..DaWayne Bailey, wonder where he's at now? Scheffs 'Bigger than Elvis' is for me one of those....isn't that a nice song, the kinda song you'd want to sing to one of your relatives - for those wondering what the fuck I'm going on about, Scheffs father played backing for Elvis but as a kid Scheff simply looked out for his father on stage, what kid wouldn't, great that he had the stage with Chicago to get across such a heart fealt song.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests