Moderator: Andrew
tragchk wrote:I saw it last night...Mark and I really liked it!
BUT...yeah....there's some MAJOR "cringe-worthy" moments....oh, and a bad "John Travolta - walkin' - down - the - street" moment, too...
You'll see...
Agreed wholeheartedly. Saw it last night and LOVED it!Jeremey wrote:Just got back in from seeing this tonight!
My favorite of the Spiderman movies. But for an odd reason - It's not the "superhero" movie that 1 and 2 are. It's more of a Sam Raimi movie this time around - Lots of oddball shit in this film, but that's why it's my favorite of the 3. I think conventional wisdom will say differently, but it gets an A in my book!
NealIsGod wrote:
Yeah, that's one of the things that pissed me off. And the scene in the jazz club.But, like Jeremey said, these are the kind of over-the-top things that Raimi is known for. But it kind of ruined it for me.
Moonie, SM2 is my favorite. LOVE Doc Ock. But Sandman was great in the new one. Exactly like the comic.
X factor wrote:THis post is SLIGHTLY spoilerish...but not too bad...
Am I the only one who was HORRIBLY disappointed by this film?
Where do I start...WAY too many villians. VENOM, who is possibly the coolest Spidey villian ever, is absolutely WASTED in this film...and don't get me started on what "becomes" of him...Rami only put VENOM in this film to appease the producers and the fanboys and IT SHOWS!
Kirsten Dunst, as bad as she was in 1 and 2, is HORRIBLE in this thing, merely reaffirming that she was woefully miscast in this movie. Byrce Howard's character was useless - WHY introduce Gwen Stacy in film three? Rami;s point of casting Kiki as MJ was to sort of "integrate" the two characters of Mary Jane and Gwen into one. Ok, cool...so WHY BRING GWEN IN NOW??? Makes no sense, and , as usual with Hollywood and comic movies are concerned, it pisses on the source material.
Bryce Dallas Howard was quite good (and qutie hot!) - JK SImmonds (as always) was a friggin riot, and some of the fights (what few there were- Peter is only actually in the Spidey costume about 20 minutes of the film) were kick ass. OVerall, though, a huge letdown...WHY can't they get a third comic film RIGHT???????
Ratgirl wrote:Thanks for the "little" reviews. I didnt get to see it this weekend afterall.![]()
I guess I'll wait until the hype dies down.
Clasicrockldy wrote:Ratgirl wrote:Thanks for the "little" reviews. I didnt get to see it this weekend afterall.![]()
I guess I'll wait until the hype dies down.
I will just stay home and watch it on my own TV!![]()
NealIsGod wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:Ratgirl wrote:Thanks for the "little" reviews. I didnt get to see it this weekend afterall.![]()
I guess I'll wait until the hype dies down.
I will just stay home and watch it on my own TV!![]()
What's taking you so long to get it?
NealIsGod wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:Just to let you know, Niggy. I am going to sit down and watch Spiderman 3 today !![]()
Not quite the same as seeing it in the theater, but I am sure you will like it. Give us a report later.
Clasicrockldy wrote:Anyway, I did enjoy the movie, even tho one part drove me nuts. Bryn was wondering why Peter Parker was acting the way he was. Of course I had to explain it to her. What is bad is that I haven't seen Spiderman or Spiderman 2, so I don't know if anything in 3 cleared up anything from the previous movies. Looks like I will have to get those first two movies to find out.
NealIsGod wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:Anyway, I did enjoy the movie, even tho one part drove me nuts. Bryn was wondering why Peter Parker was acting the way he was. Of course I had to explain it to her. What is bad is that I haven't seen Spiderman or Spiderman 2, so I don't know if anything in 3 cleared up anything from the previous movies. Looks like I will have to get those first two movies to find out.
Yeah, you really need to see the first two to fully understand Harry Osborn, Green Goblin, etc. But you probably caught on with no problem.
Clasicrockldy wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:Anyway, I did enjoy the movie, even tho one part drove me nuts. Bryn was wondering why Peter Parker was acting the way he was. Of course I had to explain it to her. What is bad is that I haven't seen Spiderman or Spiderman 2, so I don't know if anything in 3 cleared up anything from the previous movies. Looks like I will have to get those first two movies to find out.
Yeah, you really need to see the first two to fully understand Harry Osborn, Green Goblin, etc. But you probably caught on with no problem.
Who is Harry Osborn? Is he the guy from the newspaper with the mustache? And the Green Goblin, was he on the side of good?![]()
NealIsGod wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:Anyway, I did enjoy the movie, even tho one part drove me nuts. Bryn was wondering why Peter Parker was acting the way he was. Of course I had to explain it to her. What is bad is that I haven't seen Spiderman or Spiderman 2, so I don't know if anything in 3 cleared up anything from the previous movies. Looks like I will have to get those first two movies to find out.
Yeah, you really need to see the first two to fully understand Harry Osborn, Green Goblin, etc. But you probably caught on with no problem.
Who is Harry Osborn? Is he the guy from the newspaper with the mustache? And the Green Goblin, was he on the side of good?![]()
Harry is Pete's friend, the guy in the black outfit, and he thought SM killed his father (the original Green Goblin). In actuality, GG sent his glider to come up from behind SM to stab him. SM ducked and the glider stabbed GG. That's what Harry's butler told him in SM3.
Users browsing this forum: artinis1 and 64 guests