Moderator: Andrew
nikkib703 wrote:As much as I feel bad for his family, what happened to him was HIS fault. Aren't we, as adults, responsible for our own actions anymore?? It seems that when someone screws up they are always quick to blame someone else for their 'contribution' to their own misjudgement. Josh Hancock made an unfortunate fatal mistake which was his fault and his alone and no amount of money obtained from a frivolous lawsuit will bring him back. Then again, and I hate to think this might be true, but maybe his family is looking to cash in on this in some way. I sincerely hope that's not the case, but stranger thiings have happened. It'll be interesting to see what comes of this.
NealIsGod wrote:God, I hate lawyers.
conversationpc wrote:NealIsGod wrote:God, I hate lawyers.
The only legitimate defendant in this case should be the restaurant if they indeed continued to give him drinks after they knew he was drunk. Otherwise, the guy is just looking for an easy windfall and the lawyer should be ashamed of himself/herself.
belar wrote:This is making us all sick here in STL.
whocares wrote:belar wrote:This is making us all sick here in STL.
Yes it is!!!!!
As someone who commented on the Local newspaper website said, I guess when the gravy train is gone, the family needs to get greedy and not accept that their child was drinking and driving and talking on the cell phone not paying attention to a tow truck in the lane in front of him. This isn't a case of involuntarily getting drunk. He knew what he was doing, he'd done it just a few days before his death, even oversleeping and showing up late the next day, for an afternoon ballgame.![]()
There's too much trying to blame everyone else, but the party that's mostly at fault here, by the family. That's very sad and brings the city down, as belar has suggested.
nikkib703 wrote:As much as I feel bad for his family, what happened to him was HIS fault. Aren't we, as adults, responsible for our own actions anymore?? It seems that when someone screws up they are always quick to blame someone else for their 'contribution' to their own misjudgement. Josh Hancock made an unfortunate fatal mistake which was his fault and his alone and no amount of money obtained from a frivolous lawsuit will bring him back. Then again, and I hate to think this might be true, but maybe his family is looking to cash in on this in some way. I sincerely hope that's not the case, but stranger thiings have happened. It'll be interesting to see what comes of this.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests