Replacing JSS Expensive?

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Replacing JSS Expensive?

Postby mrmusicman73 » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:19 am

Okay, I have noticed alot of people talking about how in their mind Perry will never come back. JSS is also not talking. People have speculated that JSS is under a non-disclosure agreement of some sort that is tied to a monetary severance package. This is most definately the reason for JSSs' silence but it also is the reason that Perry will be back with Journey.

Why in world would Journey sign a deal making JSS the permenent lead singer for Journey if they ever planned on dumping him? As a business, this would be a very expensive change to make so early in the contract, not to mention an expensive change had already occured with Augerie earlier. When JSS made his deal you can bet he had attornies looking after his best interest for these types of situations that could come up, in his contract there are clauses that will outline how he would be handled in the situation of a termination.

I would also bet that there is some sort of "Perry" clause that probably states they can end the contract at anytime should Perry want to return. I am fairly certain this was the case with Augeries contract as the band always maintained that Perry had an open invitation at anytime or any stage.

I have also heard alot about the tribute band thing being a possibility, but why on earth again would they go through the legal and pricey expense of early terminating a contract? They would have to have a BIG BIG reason to do this. A HUGE reason just to justify the cost. Think about it! Just like JSS has BIG$$ reasons to keep him quiet.
mrmusicman73
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:35 am

Re: Replacing JSS Expensive?

Postby Saint John » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:28 am

mrmusicman73 wrote:Okay, I have noticed alot of people talking about how in there mind Perry will never come back. JSS is also not talking. People have speculated that JSS is under a non-disclosure agreement of some sort that is tied to a monetary severance package. This is most definately the reason for JSS's silence but it also is the reason that Perry will be back with Journey.

Why in world would Journey sign a deal making JSS the permenent lead singer for Journey if they ever planned on dumping him? As a business, this would be a very expensive change to make so early in the contract, not to mention an expensive change had already occured with Augerie earlier. When JSS made his deal you can bet he had attornies looking after his best interest for these types of situations that could come up, in his contract there are clauses that will outline how he would be handled in the situation of a termination.

I would also bet that there is some sort of "Perry" clause that probably states they can end the contract at anytime should Perry want to return. I am fairly certain this was the case with Augeries contract as the band always maintained that Perry had an open invitation at anytime or any stage.

I have also heard alot about the tribute band thing being a possibility, but why on earth again would they go through the legal and pricey expense of early terminating a contract? They would have to have a BIG BIG reason to do this. A HUGE reason just to justify the cost. Think about it! Just like JSS has BIG$$ reasons to keep him quiet.




Here's what I think happened. They were taking on water with the whole Tapegate thing. Neal says I know a guy that can pull this off. He discusses it with Friga and management and realize that Jeff is the only tour savvy veteran that could pull something off like this. Couple that with these two things. Firstly, they KNOW it's Jeff's dream to front this band. They use Neal's friendship with Jeff to fuck Jeff. They tell him they'll iron out all of the other deals AFTER the tour is over. Secondly, they knew ALL ALONG that he was immensely popular in Europe and that he was the ONLY guy that could have pulled off 16 shows in 24 days. Folks, he was USED. These motherfuckers used his ass, and moreso his emotions, to get him to sign on the dotted line knowing damn well they would be dumping him after the tour. Classlessly firing JSS has NOTHING to do with any Perry reunion.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Re: Replacing JSS Expensive?

Postby JrnySuxBalls » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:29 am

mrmusicman73 wrote:Okay, I have noticed alot of people talking about how in their mind Perry will never come back.

He can't sing the older material anymore.

You know, the "legacy" :lol:
Image
User avatar
JrnySuxBalls
8 Track
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 7:25 pm
Location: Not in a Tribute Band

Re: Replacing JSS Expensive?

Postby mrmusicman73 » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:51 am

Saint John wrote:
mrmusicman73 wrote:Okay, I have noticed alot of people talking about how in there mind Perry will never come back. JSS is also not talking. People have speculated that JSS is under a non-disclosure agreement of some sort that is tied to a monetary severance package. This is most definately the reason for JSS's silence but it also is the reason that Perry will be back with Journey.

Why in world would Journey sign a deal making JSS the permenent lead singer for Journey if they ever planned on dumping him? As a business, this would be a very expensive change to make so early in the contract, not to mention an expensive change had already occured with Augerie earlier. When JSS made his deal you can bet he had attornies looking after his best interest for these types of situations that could come up, in his contract there are clauses that will outline how he would be handled in the situation of a termination.

I would also bet that there is some sort of "Perry" clause that probably states they can end the contract at anytime should Perry want to return. I am fairly certain this was the case with Augeries contract as the band always maintained that Perry had an open invitation at anytime or any stage.

I have also heard alot about the tribute band thing being a possibility, but why on earth again would they go through the legal and pricey expense of early terminating a contract? They would have to have a BIG BIG reason to do this. A HUGE reason just to justify the cost. Think about it! Just like JSS has BIG$$ reasons to keep him quiet.




Here's what I think happened. They were taking on water with the whole Tapegate thing. Neal says I know a guy that can pull this off. He discusses it with Friga and management and realize that Jeff is the only tour savvy veteran that could pull something off like this. Couple that with these two things. Firstly, they KNOW it's Jeff's dream to front this band. They use Neal's friendship with Jeff to fuck Jeff. They tell him they'll iron out all of the other deals AFTER the tour is over. Secondly, they knew ALL ALONG that he was immensely popular in Europe and that he was the ONLY guy that could have pulled off 16 shows in 24 days. Folks, he was USED. These motherfuckers used his ass, and moreso his emotions, to get him to sign on the dotted line knowing damn well they would be dumping him after the tour. Classlessly firing JSS has NOTHING to do with any Perry reunion.


I respectively disagree with you. The reason why is that these things don't work like that. Everything surrounds legal contracts, in this case most likely two contracts were used, 1) Contract "A" for outlining the terms of his temporary fill-in status 2) Contract "B" for outlining terms on his permanent status.

I don't believe JSS got "fucked" by anyone, he would have had to sign a contract that outlines the different scenerios which we are witnessing. Scenerios in which none of us with exception to JSS and Journey Management are privaledged. JSS has departed and believe me JSS agreed to the way his termination would go down long before he became a permanent member by way of his contract.

Judging by JSS's silence, I also doubt that his departure has caused him to go running down to the GAP for a job. Now is JSS upset that the termination clause was used, probably, especially since he did not have time to ride the influx of a financial windfall working for the band would most undoubtedly provided if were allowed to continue.

In the meantime, during his severance period, JSS will probably roaming the world on a yacht or racing around the country in a Ferarri like any other rock star would and hopefully for his sake he delayed purchasing a 20 million dollar home, unless of course he already had one previous to this mess.
mrmusicman73
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:35 am

Re: Replacing JSS Expensive?

Postby JrnySuxBalls » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:53 am

mrmusicman73 wrote:In the meantime, during his severance period, JSS will probably roaming the world on a yacht or racing around the country in a Ferarri like any other rock star would and hopefully for his sake he delayed purchasing a 20 million dollar home, unless of course he already had one previous to this mess.

Umm...what??

:?:
Image
User avatar
JrnySuxBalls
8 Track
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 7:25 pm
Location: Not in a Tribute Band

Re: Replacing JSS Expensive?

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:12 am

Saint John wrote:
mrmusicman73 wrote:Okay, I have noticed alot of people talking about how in there mind Perry will never come back. JSS is also not talking. People have speculated that JSS is under a non-disclosure agreement of some sort that is tied to a monetary severance package. This is most definately the reason for JSS's silence but it also is the reason that Perry will be back with Journey.

Why in world would Journey sign a deal making JSS the permenent lead singer for Journey if they ever planned on dumping him? As a business, this would be a very expensive change to make so early in the contract, not to mention an expensive change had already occured with Augerie earlier. When JSS made his deal you can bet he had attornies looking after his best interest for these types of situations that could come up, in his contract there are clauses that will outline how he would be handled in the situation of a termination.

I would also bet that there is some sort of "Perry" clause that probably states they can end the contract at anytime should Perry want to return. I am fairly certain this was the case with Augeries contract as the band always maintained that Perry had an open invitation at anytime or any stage.

I have also heard alot about the tribute band thing being a possibility, but why on earth again would they go through the legal and pricey expense of early terminating a contract? They would have to have a BIG BIG reason to do this. A HUGE reason just to justify the cost. Think about it! Just like JSS has BIG$$ reasons to keep him quiet.




Here's what I think happened. They were taking on water with the whole Tapegate thing. Neal says I know a guy that can pull this off. He discusses it with Friga and management and realize that Jeff is the only tour savvy veteran that could pull something off like this. Couple that with these two things. Firstly, they KNOW it's Jeff's dream to front this band. They use Neal's friendship with Jeff to fuck Jeff. They tell him they'll iron out all of the other deals AFTER the tour is over. Secondly, they knew ALL ALONG that he was immensely popular in Europe and that he was the ONLY guy that could have pulled off 16 shows in 24 days. Folks, he was USED. These motherfuckers used his ass, and moreso his emotions, to get him to sign on the dotted line knowing damn well they would be dumping him after the tour. Classlessly firing JSS has NOTHING to do with any Perry reunion.



If they were "using" him, then why even offer him the job in the first place? Once he agreed to step in to fill in for Augeri, then they had him "used" for the tour from that moment forward. Why offer him the lead singer job once they already knew they "used" him. Just for shits and giggles? I think not. There's something going on that NOONE knows, except them. :shock:
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Replacing JSS Expensive?

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:47 am

mrmusicman73 wrote:
I would also bet that there is some sort of "Perry" clause




You may be right. I think there is a perry clause.

Here. Perry Claus.


Image
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Re: Replacing JSS Expensive?

Postby Clasicrockldy » Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:46 am

mrmusicman73 wrote:Okay, I have noticed alot of people talking about how in their mind Perry will never come back. JSS is also not talking. People have speculated that JSS is under a non-disclosure agreement of some sort that is tied to a monetary severance package. This is most definately the reason for JSSs' silence but it also is the reason that Perry will be back with Journey.


What is it with you thinking Perry is coming back to save the day? Perry has maintained over the past 10 years that he will not rejoin Journey. Your pipe dream will not come true.

Why in world would Journey sign a deal making JSS the permenent lead singer for Journey if they ever planned on dumping him? As a business, this would be a very expensive change to make so early in the contract, not to mention an expensive change had already occured with Augerie earlier. When JSS made his deal you can bet he had attornies looking after his best interest for these types of situations that could come up, in his contract there are clauses that will outline how he would be handled in the situation of a termination.


Who knows why Frick and Frack make the decisions that they do.

I would also bet that there is some sort of "Perry" clause that probably states they can end the contract at anytime should Perry want to return. I am fairly certain this was the case with Augeries contract as the band always maintained that Perry had an open invitation at anytime or any stage.


A Perry clause? Sheesh......... :roll:

Perry had an open invitation to sing with them if he so desired since the Walk Of Fame in 2005. The invitation wasn't given any earlier than that. And as you can see, Perry has done nothing with the invitation.


I have also heard alot about the tribute band thing being a possibility, but why on earth again would they go through the legal and pricey expense of early terminating a contract? They would have to have a BIG BIG reason to do this. A HUGE reason just to justify the cost. Think about it! Just like JSS has BIG$$ reasons to keep him quiet.


Because Frick and Frack don't know what the hell they want anymore. And their big, big reason is that they are now wanting to go back to sounding like those 65 million units they have out there, Journey's legacy. There is no way on this earth that they will sound like that again.

JSS has more class than Frick and Frack, and let me say this.......... when it is time, Jeff will put out a press release. And believe me, it will be said with more class than Journey's.
Image Image

"Friends are the family that you choose."
User avatar
Clasicrockldy
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4146
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 4:38 am
Location: In The TARDIS


Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests