Moderator: Andrew
Saint John wrote:When is Ed's "timeout" over? I'm not sure I saw any rules infractions. Granted, his posts were eating up thread space on the main board, but I just can't see how banning him fit the crime. Please respond. I am representing him in this matter.
Jeremey'sTXfan wrote:Saint John wrote:When is Ed's "timeout" over? I'm not sure I saw any rules infractions. Granted, his posts were eating up thread space on the main board, but I just can't see how banning him fit the crime. Please respond. I am representing him in this matter.
What the heck is he drinking? We need to know.
Saint John wrote:Jeremey'sTXfan wrote:Saint John wrote:When is Ed's "timeout" over? I'm not sure I saw any rules infractions. Granted, his posts were eating up thread space on the main board, but I just can't see how banning him fit the crime. Please respond. I am representing him in this matter.
What the heck is he drinking? We need to know.
Dude is a great guy. He was merely venting. Nothing more.
Jeremey'sTXfan wrote:Saint John wrote:Jeremey'sTXfan wrote:Saint John wrote:When is Ed's "timeout" over? I'm not sure I saw any rules infractions. Granted, his posts were eating up thread space on the main board, but I just can't see how banning him fit the crime. Please respond. I am representing him in this matter.
What the heck is he drinking? We need to know.
Dude is a great guy. He was merely venting. Nothing more.
He was venting faster than I could click on them!
Saint John wrote:Jeremey'sTXfan wrote:Saint John wrote:Jeremey'sTXfan wrote:Saint John wrote:When is Ed's "timeout" over? I'm not sure I saw any rules infractions. Granted, his posts were eating up thread space on the main board, but I just can't see how banning him fit the crime. Please respond. I am representing him in this matter.
What the heck is he drinking? We need to know.
Dude is a great guy. He was merely venting. Nothing more.
He was venting faster than I could click on them!
Fucker IS fast.
Saint John wrote:Ed got a record TWENTY threads closed. Funny shit though, nothing vulgar or vile. Reinstatement should be prompt and swift.
Jeremey'sTXfan wrote:Saint John wrote:When is Ed's "timeout" over? I'm not sure I saw any rules infractions. Granted, his posts were eating up thread space on the main board, but I just can't see how banning him fit the crime. Please respond. I am representing him in this matter.
What the heck is he drinking? We need to know.
Saint John wrote:When is Ed's "timeout" over? I'm not sure I saw any rules infractions. Granted, his posts were eating up thread space on the main board, but I just can't see how banning him fit the crime. Please respond. I am representing him in this matter.
Saint John wrote:Ed got a record TWENTY threads closed. Funny shit though, nothing vulgar or vile. Reinstatement should be prompt and swift.
Andrew wrote:Not even sure I want to work anything out now that I am banned from ARs site and the shit he posted about me and MR on another forum. Classy stuff from a "friend"....
Andrew wrote:Not even sure I want to work anything out now that I am banned from ARs site and the shit he posted about me and MR on another forum. Classy stuff from a "friend"....
T-Bone wrote:And... Nobody "Represents" anybody else here. When someone is banned for some reason, THAT member and Andrew will work out the details. No input is needed from anyone else regarding how long the vacation will beAR was asked to stop, but he was drunk or something... It was cut short before a shitfest started, and YES SJ, there was a couple threads I squashed probably before you saw them that were in violation.
Saint John wrote:T-Bone wrote:And... Nobody "Represents" anybody else here. When someone is banned for some reason, THAT member and Andrew will work out the details. No input is needed from anyone else regarding how long the vacation will beAR was asked to stop, but he was drunk or something... It was cut short before a shitfest started, and YES SJ, there was a couple threads I squashed probably before you saw them that were in violation.
Just to clarify, I was kidding. I respect Andrew and his rules...well most of the time (when I'm sober).
Andrew wrote:Not even sure I want to work anything out now that I am banned from ARs site and the shit he posted about me and MR on another forum. Classy stuff from a "friend"....
The shadow wrote:Didn't they say they were updating the site and that there was going to be outages? Perhaps that is the problem?
duke22, Vader, AR? (Well maybe not AR if he's banned, cause he probably can't read this)
Andrew wrote:Not even sure I want to work anything out now that I am banned from ARs site and the shit he posted about me and MR on another forum. Classy stuff from a "friend"....
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RaiderFan wrote:Andrew wrote:Not even sure I want to work anything out now that I am banned from ARs site and the shit he posted about me and MR on another forum. Classy stuff from a "friend"....
Yeah, apparently we're a bunch of pussies here. A dick would know!
Saint John wrote:RaiderFan wrote:Andrew wrote:Not even sure I want to work anything out now that I am banned from ARs site and the shit he posted about me and MR on another forum. Classy stuff from a "friend"....
Yeah, apparently we're a bunch of pussies here. A dick would know!
Who said anything about being "pussies?"
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
AR wrote:I'd say something, but I can't get past laughing about how bad the Raiders suck.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RaiderFan wrote:AR wrote:I'd say something, but I can't get past laughing about how bad the Raiders suck.
Original! I think they've won as many SB's as Baltimore/Cleveland and the Baltimore Colts combined haven't they?
RaiderFan wrote:AR wrote:I'd say something, but I can't get past laughing about how bad the Raiders suck.
Original! I think they've won as many SB's as Baltimore/Cleveland and the Baltimore Colts combined haven't they?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests