Moderator: Andrew
Musician95616 wrote:Do you really think that Neal Schon will be seen as the larger talent? I am interested to hear your opinion on this. From my perspective, one would argue that Carols Santana fused Latin rhythms and World beats into popular music. His career is very diverse and popularized a new genre of music.
In comparison, Neal Schon's career with Journey has been more one-dimensional, in terms of style and recorded output.
Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Neal Schon's playing and have all of his albums. I just don't see how he can be the more significant talent between the two.
Naughtius Maximus wrote:Musician95616 wrote:Do you really think that Neal Schon will be seen as the larger talent? I am interested to hear your opinion on this. From my perspective, one would argue that Carols Santana fused Latin rhythms and World beats into popular music. His career is very diverse and popularized a new genre of music.
In comparison, Neal Schon's career with Journey has been more one-dimensional, in terms of style and recorded output.
Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Neal Schon's playing and have all of his albums. I just don't see how he can be the more significant talent between the two.
Absolutely classy response. We should all follow your example!
My contention would be that Neal has forayed into the following "genres" over the course of his career:
Santana - Latin, World
early Journey - Jazz/Fusion and Progressive Rock (at the time)
Perry-led Journey - Classic Rock, Rock
Schon and Hammer - Synth pop/rock
HSAS - Hard Rock
Hardline - Hard Rock/Heavy Metal
Bad English - Pop/Rock
Abraxas Pool - Blues, Latin
solo stuff - across the board
post-Perry Journey - some good stuff interspersed with loads of crap
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests