
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2IrGxqLRg2M
Moderator: Andrew
tragchk wrote:The Zoo...from July 2007...yeah, I kid a lot...until I heard this:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2IrGxqLRg2M
STORY_TELLER wrote:Soulless and empty. Notes are hit, but there's no depth. No emotion. If this is the future voice of Journey, it's a Journey I won't be on.
larryfromnextdoor wrote:i would hate to see his contract with the band formerly known as journey,, sing, do laundry, re write black book, tune piano, pretend to be brother and interact with the drummer ,, refill ross' water gun... ect.. ect...BLAH
Saint John wrote:tragchk wrote:The Zoo...from July 2007...yeah, I kid a lot...until I heard this:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2IrGxqLRg2M
VERY VERY good cover. Someone needs to tell him that it's "Whoa oh oh oh", not "Ho oh oh oh" at the end. Sounded ridiculous, but the rest was awesome.
STORY_TELLER wrote:Soulless and empty. Notes are hit, but there's no depth. No emotion. If this is the future voice of Journey, it's a Journey I won't be on.
Playitloudforme wrote:He's technically a poor singer. The breath control is all over the place. He runs out of 'gas' a couple of times. Notes, I still hear some sliding into base a few times.
Nope. Buh bye.
conversationpc wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:Soulless and empty. Notes are hit, but there's no depth. No emotion. If this is the future voice of Journey, it's a Journey I won't be on.
If you don't feel the emotion in his voice, it's not because it's not there but because you don't want to accept him singing that song. I hear the emotion in that delivery, so it does have depth and emotion. I'm not saying I want him to front Journey but you can't say it's "soulless and empty" just because you don't like it.
STORY_TELLER wrote:Uhh, no, dude. You're all kinds of wrong here... I'm the most fair minded guy you'll ever meet. When I followed the links to his youtube clips, I intentionally hid the youtube window so I could just LISTEN to his voice and not be influenced by his looks or stage presence. I'm not saying it's "soulless and empty because I don't like it". I'm saying I don't like it BECAUSE it's soulless and empty!! lol!!!
If he had the soul and emotion necessary to cover Journey, I'd be supporting him for the group not nay saying. It's not there because it's not there. If you hear it, well, all I can say is god bless! lol... I have extremely high standards. This guy doesn't meet that standard on Journey material. He'd be great in survivor though.
conversationpc wrote:It is ALL OPINION. I can listen to Perry sing, for instance, and hear the emotion in his voice. Someone else can listen to it and not get it at all because it's subjective.
conversationpc wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:Uhh, yes, dude. It sounds soulless and empty TO YOU. You can't force your opinion onto others. If you don't hear it, that doesn't mean it's not there.
It is ALL OPINION. I can listen to Perry sing, for instance, and hear the emotion in his voice. Someone else can listen to it and not get it at all because it's subjective.
STORY_TELLER wrote:Obviously, I have higher standards than you...
On a related note (pun intended) here's a good way to test the "soul factor":
Play any clip of Arnel's material, be it Journey covers or any other band. Then go and find clips from Steve Perry's FTLOSM tour (sang while 'not in his prime'). On that tour, Perry covered songs a capella by Seal among others at the top of his own songs (using them as a bridge into his own/journey material). You can feel the emotion he instilled. Emotion that wasn't there in the original versions, but his own spin added the emotion. Why? Because Perry is a soulful singer.
If you can't hear the difference, well, I don't know what to tell you. Perry has 'it'. JSS has 'it'. Even Hugo has 'it' (on his own material). Arnel does not. Jeremy does not. They have good solid vocal chops. But it's surface technique. Nothing deep about it. That's not enough for me nor is it enough for any frontman of Journey. Why? Because there's a standard to live up to.
conversationpc wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:Obviously, I have higher standards than you...
STORY_TELLER wrote:That's funny as hell! lol... Nice one. But seriously, if you're saying something is good and I'm saying it's not good enough, who has the higher standards? Sounds like a quantifiable measuring stick to me. Stick THAT in your photobucket image and smoke it!![]()
(note: all said respectfully and with a big shit eating grin on my face)
Greg wrote:If ya gotta "send the guy to school" in order to practice his English or to hide his accent, why don't you just find someone who doesn't have an accent, or who can phrase the words to your liking?
conversationpc wrote:
Perry is head and shoulders above most singers. No contest.
yak wrote:conversationpc wrote:
Perry is head and shoulders above most singers. No contest.
Not anymore he's not. And he's not a contender. The two asswipes are trying to resurrect a dead issue, because the two asswipes can't see the forest for the trees.
yak wrote:Plain and simple, they blew everything by letting Jeff will, however, be going strong long after these windbage have lost their last ounce of steam.
The issue WE were discussing, is the vocal quality bar set by Steve Perry. That is the standard by which every other singer will be compared to. That quality level. To replace that legacy is impossible to do, but if you're going to attempt it, at least pick a successor with a talent level that comes close. The debate is whether or not Arnel has the vocal chops to do that. I say he does not. I say he's a soulless karaoke singer. Talented, yes, but Journey quality, not even close. Dean is a better singer than Arnel. Arnel is only slightly better than Steve Augeri. John West and JSS have more sophisticated chords than this guy and they weren't chosen.
I brought up SP for comparison regarding soulful singing. You brought up a topic of discussion which wasn't mentioned once in this thread (Steve Perry should come back).
So, ummmm... about that asswipe comment?
yak wrote:Not anymore he's not. And he's not a contender.
conversationpc wrote:
If you don't feel the emotion in his voice, it's not because it's not there but because you don't want to accept him singing that song. I hear the emotion in that delivery, so it does have depth and emotion.
Wally_Hatchet wrote:conversationpc wrote:
If you don't feel the emotion in his voice, it's not because it's not there but because you don't want to accept him singing that song. I hear the emotion in that delivery, so it does have depth and emotion.
What PC said. ^
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests