Moderator: Andrew
Saint John wrote:Do WHATEVER it takes to get Perry back.
Eric wrote:1
8. How you view your favorite (or once-favorite) band today - Are you an active relevant band or not???
EightyRock wrote:This is a dedicated thread to concisely tell them what each of us thinks about......
1. Another singer
2. Another tour
3. Going "back" to their "legacy sound"
4. Re-recording their hits with another new singer
5. Recording or NOT recording newly created music
6.. Any responsibility to preserve or protect the legacy?
7. Any responsibility to their longtime fanbase?
8. How you view your favorite (or once-favorite) band today
If I've left anything out, add it in. Let's see just how much they care what we think and how much good any of this does.
Matthew wrote:EightyRock wrote:This is a dedicated thread to concisely tell them what each of us thinks about......
1. Another singer
2. Another tour
3. Going "back" to their "legacy sound"
4. Re-recording their hits with another new singer
5. Recording or NOT recording newly created music
6.. Any responsibility to preserve or protect the legacy?
7. Any responsibility to their longtime fanbase?
8. How you view your favorite (or once-favorite) band today
If I've left anything out, add it in. Let's see just how much they care what we think and how much good any of this does.
1. No-one can ever beat Perry but to continue on the nostalgia/tribute path like they have for the last ten years this Arnel chap seems a better choice than most.
2. I'd go to another show next year no matter who is singing.
3. They never left their 'legacy sound' behind. It's been one pale imitation of it after another since 1998.
4. They ought to avoid re-recording the hits - unless it's new unplugged/acoustic versions with just Perry and Schon.
5. I can't see how a new album would measure up to the 1978-1996 classics...even if JSS returned to the band. So they ought to let it go....or rather...we ought to let it go because it seems they already have.
6. Journey do promote the legacy. Jonathan Cain was on the radio a couple of days ago doing just that....
7. Journey could show more interest and warmth toward their die-hard fan base but they owe us absolutely nothing.
8. I view Journey as being no different from any other time since they fired Perry. It isn't the real deal without him. Simple as that. The only difference now is that this doesn't get me wound up like it used to and I can go along to the shows and enjoy them whilst knowing I'm watching a second-rate version of a once great band.
styxman wrote:You enjoy watching a second rate version of a band and pay good money for that priviledge![]()
Matthew wrote:styxman wrote:You enjoy watching a second rate version of a band and pay good money for that priviledge![]()
Didn't you enjoy the show you went to in Scotland, Styxman? Or did you give it a miss?
Yes, I'm happy to pay good money to see Schon and Cain play live. Absolutely.
styxman wrote:Matthew wrote:styxman wrote:You enjoy watching a second rate version of a band and pay good money for that priviledge![]()
Didn't you enjoy the show you went to in Scotland, Styxman? Or did you give it a miss?
Yes, I'm happy to pay good money to see Schon and Cain play live. Absolutely.
I went but I still thought Perry was singing![]()
EightyRock wrote:Saint John wrote:Do WHATEVER it takes to get Perry back.
I guess that's a pretty concise answer for numbers 1-8!At this point, they could prop a cardboard cutout of him onstage and get more interest and respect than have, after firing singer #3.
ohsherrie wrote:DSB is played on the Sopranos finale.
That along with the use of the song in Monster, Laguna Beach and the World Series make it obvious that the only sound Journey is ever going to be known for is the Perry fronted sound. That's where the butter for the bread comes from.
Band fires Jeff and closes BT.
Jon does an interview talking about DSB and says they're interested in getting back to their legacy sound.
Rumors start yet again hinting at the possiblity of Steve Perry returning. (Does anybody know where these rumors really come from?)
Band starts active search for the closest soundalike they can find.
Jon does a radio interview talking as if Steve is still around.I don't know but.............
............anybody ever heard the term "Bait and Switch"?
Playitloudforme wrote:Steve's NOT going back to Journey.
The stone has not just be cracked, it's pummelled into dust.
It would literally take a miracle for him to turn around and say, sure... I'll risk my sanity to work with these jerkwads again.
He's too damn smart to do that. And thank GOD.
So... with that. RETIRE NEAL! PLEASE. For CHRISTS SAKE!!!!
ScarabGator wrote:Playitloudforme wrote:Steve's NOT going back to Journey.
The stone has not just be cracked, it's pummelled into dust.
It would literally take a miracle for him to turn around and say, sure... I'll risk my sanity to work with these jerkwads again.
He's too damn smart to do that. And thank GOD.
So... with that. RETIRE NEAL! PLEASE. For CHRISTS SAKE!!!!
I have no idea why you even bother discussing todays Journey talking like that.
Matthew wrote:5. I can't see how a new album would measure up to the 1978-1996 classics...
EightyRock wrote:This is a dedicated thread to concisely tell them what each of us thinks about......
1. Another singer
2. Another tour
3. Going "back" to their "legacy sound"
4. Re-recording their hits with another new singer
5. Recording or NOT recording newly created music
6.. Any responsibility to preserve or protect the legacy?
7. Any responsibility to their longtime fanbase?
8. How you view your favorite (or once-favorite) band today
If I've left anything out, add it in. Let's see just how much they care what we think and how much good any of this does.
This is a dedicated thread to concisely tell them what each of us thinks about......
1. Another singer - doesn't really matter, but please remember you're an AMERICAN band.
2. Another tour - tour 'til you drop. Keep playing 'til you're in wheelchairs and you're fingers are gone.
3. Going "back" to their "legacy sound" - all sounds are their legacy.
4. Re-recording their hits with another new singer - no. not worth the effort and cost.
5. Recording or NOT recording newly created music - always experiment with new music.
6.. Any responsibility to preserve or protect the legacy? - preserve, no. protect, yes. always play the dirty dozen.
7. Any responsibility to their longtime fanbase? - please define fan. the general public that keeps buying albums, or a hundred or so online?
8. How you view your favorite (or once-favorite) band today. just looking forward to the next chapter, whatever it is.
If I've left anything out, add it in. Let's see just how much they care what we think and how much good any of this does.
GET PERRY AND ROLIE back for one bang out INIFINTY 30 year anniversary tour!! Thats the legacy I WANT..
conversationpc wrote:Matthew wrote:5. I can't see how a new album would measure up to the 1978-1996 classics...
Correction...1978-1983.
"Arrival" is better than either ROR or TBF, though there are a few good tunes on each.
Saint John wrote:I think the fact that by all accounts Irving Azoff and co. are still around shows that there is a possibility of Perry coming back. If he knew with a great degree of certainty that Perry was not coming back I think he'd bail on Journey. He has bigger and better artists to deal......
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 45 guests