by donnaplease » Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:00 am
OK, I've given this some thought and I wanna add my 2 cents...
I'm no expert on 'degenerative joint diseases' but I work with patients every day who suffer from them, and physical therapists who treat them. A degenerative condition is just that... degenerative. It is a gradual process, breakdown of the bone occurs due to disease or overuse. Often a patient doesn't know they have it until they have suffered an injury. For those that DO know they have it, the first line of treatment is ALWAYS conservative treatment. Medications, exercises, and other therapy modalities. Surgery is usually not considered until all other options have been exhausted and the pain and/or immobility is such that the patient has no other choice. It is a common surgery, but not one that doesn't carry any risks.
If he never had the surgery and needed to make up a lie to cover his tracks, wouldn't it have been smarter for him to just tell everyone that the conservative treatment he tried worked, and he didn't need the surgery after all. He wouldn't have to prove it with a 'scar' and it would lend credibility to his request for a little more time. Admitting the surgery is not a cover up, I see it rather as giving ammunition to those that say he just didn't want to tour or he should've had the surgery immediately. If he never had the surgery, I think he would be foolish to say he did.
It's kinda like calling in sick to work. Most people who are 'faking' it don't call in with a major illness, they call in saying they have 'a stomach bug' or 'a migraine' or something that allows the time off, but doesn't require a trip to the doctor and is hard to verify...