OT: smear letter on ebay

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby rubyglare » Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:52 am

There was no 'forcing of words' into his mouth, he's a real boy & if he was just an actor reading a what-if script then it would be blasted for not being real. It appears it's a no-win situation with you guys. And we said, "You know what? We're going to find out where your kids go to school.

"We're going to find out who you knocked up in high school. We're going to find out what drugs you used. We're going to find out where you go to drink and do -- we're gonna find out how you paid for your house. We're going to do -- and we're going to do exact -- and we're going to say that, you know what?"

in context-

From the October 15 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: Here's who it is that's funding this ProPublica bunch. "It is Herb and Marion Sandler, legendary capitalist, multibillionaire, builders of a financial empire, philanthropic allies of Peter Lewis and George Soros. They're ponying up $10 million a year for a charitable venture to supply investigative reporting at no cost to newspapers, which are laying off editorial employees and others as their bidness [sic] model becomes obsolete. Efforts are being made to wrap this propaganda venture in the cloak of pure public interests."

And ProPublica, does that -- you know, that's a Latin name. Does it not sound like something a bunch of socialists would come up with? ProPublica. "The board comprises a distinguished multi-ethnic panel that even includes a white, male former congressman, Jim Leach [R] of Iowa. Former Wall Street Journal editor Paul Steiger is in charge for the time being. No doubt there will be window-dressing stories going after subjects who could be described as liberal in some sense," just to show that they're, you know, balanced and so forth, but that'll be just at the outset here.

Thomas Lifson at the American Thinker says, "Given the background of the holders of the purse strings, there's reason to suspect that the venture will be used to go after opponents of the left. Even Jane Mayer of The New Yorker described them and their circle as hard-core partisans. The Sandlers are famous, celebrated, notorious for their policy of not spending a penny without getting their money's worth and more. They're going to hire up to 24 journalists and pay salary and benefits comparable to the biggest newspapers," which, in essence, you know what this is -- a safety net for some of those journalists who have been canned or who have been let go. So the same journalists who weren't doing their jobs in the first place are now going to get hired to not do their jobs as well as they had been. The whole thing is a ruse, and it's a tax dodge. The whole thing is a tax -- and it's giving away its work. It's a tax dodge for these donors. So, "No longer tethered to the responsibility of earning their way in the marketplace, this talent pool of investigative journalists can be turned loose on potentially anyone. If you look hard enough, you can find all sorts of difficult-to-explain matters that, at a minimum, can tie up and distract even the most innocent paragon of virtue. For real people born as sinners, there's always something that investigative journalists can find."

I'll tell you, folks, the way to deal with this -- I have always said it. I don't know anybody who's doing it. Maybe I should found ProDestroya and get a bunch of people willing to do investigative journalism on these investigative journalists. You know, AntiPublica. They get to sit there -- who are these people that get to act as though they are sin-free, that they are as clean and pure as the wind-driven snow, that they've got no skeletons in their closet? They can go out and dig up dirt on -- and everybody's got dirt. They can go out and dig whatever up and then they can slant it and taint it, smear it and lie about it, do whatever they want, and nobody examines who these people are. And if you try, they get mad. "Well, we're journalists, we're immune. You can't treat us the way we treat other people."

I've had journalists tell me this. "Well, we're journalists." Why are you immune? Why are you immune to the same kind of destructive reporting and behavior that you dish out? You know, we have practiced -- I've practiced it once. I am not going to tell you the story because I'm don't want to give it away, and I would have to mention names, and I'm not going to mention names. But there was a cover story on me coming out of one of the big news magazines, and it was going to totally mischaracterize me and what I do and how I do it. And we found out who was writing it and made a couple phone calls to the person writing it. And we said, "You know what? We're going to find out where your kids go to school. We're going to find out who you knocked up in high school. We're going to find out what drugs you used. We're going to find out where you go to drink and do -- we're gonna find out how you paid for your house. We're going to do -- and we're going to do exact -- and we're going to say that, you know what? You are no different than Al Goldstein. You both masturbate. You're no different than Al Goldstein, and you're both journalists, and so forth."

Kinda funny though, doesn't he know Latin is from old Rome? As is French, Italian, Portugeuse, Spanish :lol:
rubyglare
Radio Waves
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:39 pm
Location: CA

Postby Barb » Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:26 am

rubyglare, you just don't get it, do you? Rush is mimmicking the tactics of the left and how they do those things to smear their political opponents. Do you ever listen to Rush's program and hear the inflections in his voice that clearly demonstrate sarcasm or do you just read Media Matters transcripts? Because what the transcript says is accurate, but if you listen and understand what he's getting at, then you know his intention is not to do these things but to point out just how despicable it is that these things are done to conservatives by the left.
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby conversationpc » Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:37 am

Barb wrote:rubyglare, you just don't get it, do you? Rush is mimmicking the tactics of the left and how they do those things to smear their political opponents. Do you ever listen to Rush's program and hear the inflections in his voice that clearly demonstrate sarcasm or do you just read Media Matters transcripts? Because what the transcript says is accurate, but if you listen and understand what he's getting at, then you know his intention is not to do these things but to point out just how despicable it is that these things are done to conservatives by the left.


Media Matters does this on an alarmingly regular basis against conservative talk show hosts.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Fri Oct 26, 2007 1:26 am

conversationpc wrote:Media Matters does this on an alarmingly regular basis against conservative talk show hosts.


Media Matters makes no bones about its mission statement to monitor, analyze, and correct conservative misinformation.
What should be genuinely alarming about the frequency with which Media Matters target talk show hosts, is how many people actually listen to these lying bags of shit.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:04 am

conversationpc wrote:He'll attack Limbaugh for some comments taken completely out of context..


Prove it.
When it came time to re-air his “phony soldiers” comments, why did Limbaugh excise a full 1 minute and 35 seconds, making it seem his “phony soldiers” comment was immediately followed by a specific reference to actual “phony soldier” Jesse McBeth.
Anyone who heard Limbaugh that day knew what he was saying.
He wasn’t referencing any particular soldier, he was referencing anti-war soldiers in general.
This is further evidenced by the fact that prior to his “phony soldiers” remark, Limbaugh also balked at the notion that one previous anti-Iraq War caller had served in the military. Upon hearing this, he flippantly cracked to the soldier/caller, “and I walked on the moon.”

Actually, I am quite surprised at the ensuing outrage considering Rush gets away with spouting such not-so-thinly-veiled Mccarthyian hate speech on a daily basis. His “phony soldiers” comments typify right wing radio, as a whole.

conversationpc wrote:yet he won't attack MoveOn.org for an advertisement slamming a decorated general.


Let’s not lose sight of the fact that General Colin Powell rues the day he delivered his erroneous speech to the U.N. Security Council. If MoveOn, or anyone, had been holding him and other officials accountable, then the crimson blood of over 3000 men may not have imbrued the sands of Mesopotamia.

Petraeus’s judgment is rendered suspect by the preponderance of fired generals Bush has left in his wake (i.e. Garner, Shinseki, Casey, and Abizaid). And before you say a military man should be excused from the political fray, what about Petraeus’s partisan op-ed in the Washington Post that coincided with Bush’s re-election, and his confided hopeful presidential aspirations?

What I'd like to know is, where was the hue and cry from Republicans when Max Clealand, who left his limbs in Vietnam, was compared to Osama Bin Laden?
Better still, why did you fail to muster up similar self-righteous ire when the attendees of the 2004 Republican convention openly mocked the sacred military decoration of the Purple Heart?
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby conversationpc » Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:17 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
conversationpc wrote:Media Matters does this on an alarmingly regular basis against conservative talk show hosts.


Media Matters makes no bones about its mission statement to monitor, analyze, and correct conservative misinformation.
What should be genuinely alarming about the frequency with which Media Matters target talk show hosts, is how many people actually listen to these lying bags of shit.


You're correct. Media Matters really are "lying bags of shit".
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby conversationpc » Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:22 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Prove it.
When it came time to re-air his “phony soldiers” comments, why did Limbaugh excise a full 1 minute and 35 seconds, making it seem his “phony soldiers” comment was immediately followed by a specific reference to actual “phony soldier” Jesse McBeth.
Anyone who heard Limbaugh that day knew what he was saying.
He wasn’t referencing any particular soldier, he was referencing anti-war soldiers in general.
This is further evidenced by the fact that prior to his “phony soldiers” remark, Limbaugh also balked at the notion that one previous anti-Iraq War caller had served in the military. Upon hearing this, he flippantly cracked to the soldier/caller, “and I walked on the moon.”

Actually, I am quite surprised at the ensuing outrage considering Rush gets away with spouting such not-so-thinly-veiled Mccarthyian hate speech on a daily basis. His “phony soldiers” comments typify right wing radio, as a whole.


I can't stand Limbaugh. I've only listened to his show in its entirety a handful of times. He is full of himself and not really all that entertaining, in my opinion. However, I've heard the comments in their entirety and it's entirely obvious that he was not talking about real soldiers but the phony ones, and there is a group who claims to have served in Iraq but never did, who are against the war but didn't serve.

Better still, why did you fail to muster up similar self-righteous ire when the attendees of the 2004 Republican convention openly mocked the sacred military decoration of the Purple Heart?


What the flying monkey crap are you talking about? I wasn't even on this forum in 2004. I didn't post for the first time until, I believe, June 2006. If you're talking about the mocking of Kerry with the fake purple heart bandaids, then you are correct. That was a dumb thing to do. They should've done something to protest more directly against Kerry.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby strangegrey » Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:51 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Media Matters makes no bones about its mission statement to monitor, analyze, and ultimately falsify facts (and try to disseminate them in their puppet media organizations) from conservatives in the efforts to serve liberal disinformation.


I corrected your statement for you. :roll:
Image
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby RedWingFan » Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:12 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
conversationpc wrote:He'll attack Limbaugh for some comments taken completely out of context..


Prove it.
When it came time to re-air his “phony soldiers” comments, why did Limbaugh excise a full 1 minute and 35 seconds, making it seem his “phony soldiers” comment was immediately followed by a specific reference to actual “phony soldier” Jesse McBeth.
Anyone who heard Limbaugh that day knew what he was saying.

I was listening. In fact I still have it on my ipod. I also still have the daily update about Jesse Al-Zaid from the previous day. Rush explained the website edit in a question by Alan Colmes.

RUSH: I did not edit -- here's what we edited out, for the purposes of my website. You know, Alan, "Brevity is the soul of wit." That is what Shakespeare said. The second caller, after discussing the phony soldiers, went into a discussion of weapons of mass destruction. At the time he's doing that, I am talking to my producer on the other side of the glass of the IFB, I'm saying, "Find the commentary I did yesterday morning on Jesse MacBeth," who, by the way, whose birth name is Jesse Al-Zaid. Find me that commentary. This guy is going on. He's got diarrhea of the mouth about weapons of mass destruction. I'm asking people to find this commentary so I can illustrate what I mean by phony soldiers. We edited -- that was about a minute and a half, or a minute and 45. When we put the transcript up -- and I finally told this guy, I said (summarized), "Look, weapons of mass destruction is a moot point now. Whether they're there or weren't there, it's not relevant because the situation in Iraq has gone way beyond that." We just edited that out. It had nothing to do -- there was nothing hidden. There was nothing I was trying to cover up. You've got to stop listening to these partisans and these propagandists at Media Matters for America. They are nothing but a bunch of hacks who are producing the primetime at MSNBC. If they ever went dark, Media Matters, MSNBC would have nothing to say. They do -- Alan, you have a radio show, and I have a radio show. You have a website. I have a website. All you have to do is turn on the radio to listen to each of us, or go to our websites. The Drive-By Media does not listen to my show, does not go to my website. They take for granted whatever Media Matters says about what I said is true. It is irresponsible. It's journalistic malpractice, and it's silly. We edited that out simply for the sake of brevity and to stay on point. When we got to the -- when I found the commentary, when they printed it out to my printer behind me, that's when I got rid of the call, and that's when I started in repeating the commentary on Jesse MacBeth that I had aired the previous morning.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby Rick » Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:25 am

RaiderFan wrote:I was listening. In fact I still have it on my ipod.


Music.... Use it for music. You'll be much happier than listening to politics. :D
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby RedWingFan » Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:29 am

Rick wrote:
RaiderFan wrote:I was listening. In fact I still have it on my ipod.


Music.... Use it for music. You'll be much happier than listening to politics. :D

I have the 80 gig. So I have every song I own on there and soooo much more. And it's still not even half full :lol:
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby Rick » Fri Oct 26, 2007 11:44 am

RaiderFan wrote:
Rick wrote:
RaiderFan wrote:I was listening. In fact I still have it on my ipod.


Music.... Use it for music. You'll be much happier than listening to politics. :D

I have the 80 gig. So I have every song I own on there and soooo much more. And it's still not even half full :lol:


Can you put movies on yours? I have the 30 gig and it's got about 5 gig available. I have, of course, the '81 Escape DVD on it. The screen's not big enough to really enjoy a movie, but for music videos, it's alright.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby RedWingFan » Fri Oct 26, 2007 11:47 am

Rick wrote:
RaiderFan wrote:
Rick wrote:
RaiderFan wrote:I was listening. In fact I still have it on my ipod.


Music.... Use it for music. You'll be much happier than listening to politics. :D

I have the 80 gig. So I have every song I own on there and soooo much more. And it's still not even half full :lol:


Can you put movies on yours? I have the 30 gig and it's got about 5 gig available. I have, of course, the '81 Escape DVD on it. The screen's not big enough to really enjoy a movie, but for music videos, it's alright.

How did you get it on there?
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:01 pm

conversationpc wrote:However, I've heard the comments in their entirety


From who? Beck?
Rush's program serves as the flagship broadcast for most of the stations on which he's aired (plus they are both syndicated by Premier Radio Networks).
Beck has a vested interest in defending the Viagra-popping, Havanna-chopping hophead AT ALL COSTS.
Same goes for Hannity (minus the Premier aspect).

....and it's entirely obvious that he was not talking about real soldiers but the phony ones, and there is a group who claims to have served in Iraq but never did, who are against the war but didn't serve.


Yes, but that *group* is neither mentioned by caller 1, 2, or even by Limbaugh during the course of the conversation.
So either you did not hear the full clip, or you are lying.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:15 pm

strangegrey wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Media Matters makes no bones about its mission statement to monitor, analyze, and ultimately falsify facts (and try to disseminate them in their puppet media organizations) from conservatives in the efforts to serve liberal disinformation.


I corrected your statement for you. :roll:


Yeah dude, and I bet Deano meticulously altered every single bootleg he ever uploaded just to reflect badly on the band. :roll:

Wake the fuck up, Limbaugh and other mock-outrage-dispensing career gasket-blowers don't need any assistance from MediaMatters (or anyone else) to gin up controversy. They do that themselves. MediaMatters just holds a mirror up to the streptococcus infected cespool that is right wing radio.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:37 pm

RaiderFan wrote:I was listening. In fact I still have it on my ipod. I also still have the daily update about Jesse Al-Zaid from the previous day. Rush explained the website edit in a question by Alan Colmes.

RUSH: I did not edit -- here's what we edited out, for the purposes of my website. You know, Alan, "Brevity is the soul of wit." That is what Shakespeare said. The second caller, after discussing the phony soldiers, went into a discussion of weapons of mass destruction. At the time he's doing that, I am talking to my producer on the other side of the glass of the IFB, I'm saying, "Find the commentary I did yesterday morning on Jesse MacBeth," who, by the way, whose birth name is Jesse Al-Zaid. Find me that commentary. This guy is going on. He's got diarrhea of the mouth about weapons of mass destruction. I'm asking people to find this commentary so I can illustrate what I mean by phony soldiers. We edited -- that was about a minute and a half, or a minute and 45. When we put the transcript up -- and I finally told this guy, I said (summarized), "Look, weapons of mass destruction is a moot point now. Whether they're there or weren't there, it's not relevant because the situation in Iraq has gone way beyond that." We just edited that out. It had nothing to do -- there was nothing hidden. There was nothing I was trying to cover up. You've got to stop listening to these partisans and these propagandists at Media Matters for America. They are nothing but a bunch of hacks who are producing the primetime at MSNBC. If they ever went dark, Media Matters, MSNBC would have nothing to say. They do -- Alan, you have a radio show, and I have a radio show. You have a website. I have a website. All you have to do is turn on the radio to listen to each of us, or go to our websites. The Drive-By Media does not listen to my show, does not go to my website. They take for granted whatever Media Matters says about what I said is true. It is irresponsible. It's journalistic malpractice, and it's silly. We edited that out simply for the sake of brevity and to stay on point. When we got to the -- when I found the commentary, when they printed it out to my printer behind me, that's when I got rid of the call, and that's when I started in repeating the commentary on Jesse MacBeth that I had aired the previous morning.


This neat and tidy post-facto spin job is meaningless.
Post the transcript of the actual comments in question.

Very simply -
The first caller calls up claiming to be an anti-Iraq War veteran.
To this revelation Rush promptly and flippantly responded: “yeah, and I walked on the moon.”
So right from the start, even before "phoney soldiers" happened, Limbaugh was already discriminating as to who is a REAL soldier and who isn’t.
Does anyone who has ever listened to him truly think he is incapable of doing such?
This is what he does on a daily basis.
Villify and scapegoat liberal boogeymen that lurk behind every corner of modern society.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Andrew » Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:54 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
RaiderFan wrote:I was listening. In fact I still have it on my ipod. I also still have the daily update about Jesse Al-Zaid from the previous day. Rush explained the website edit in a question by Alan Colmes.

RUSH: I did not edit -- here's what we edited out, for the purposes of my website. You know, Alan, "Brevity is the soul of wit." That is what Shakespeare said. The second caller, after discussing the phony soldiers, went into a discussion of weapons of mass destruction. At the time he's doing that, I am talking to my producer on the other side of the glass of the IFB, I'm saying, "Find the commentary I did yesterday morning on Jesse MacBeth," who, by the way, whose birth name is Jesse Al-Zaid. Find me that commentary. This guy is going on. He's got diarrhea of the mouth about weapons of mass destruction. I'm asking people to find this commentary so I can illustrate what I mean by phony soldiers. We edited -- that was about a minute and a half, or a minute and 45. When we put the transcript up -- and I finally told this guy, I said (summarized), "Look, weapons of mass destruction is a moot point now. Whether they're there or weren't there, it's not relevant because the situation in Iraq has gone way beyond that." We just edited that out. It had nothing to do -- there was nothing hidden. There was nothing I was trying to cover up. You've got to stop listening to these partisans and these propagandists at Media Matters for America. They are nothing but a bunch of hacks who are producing the primetime at MSNBC. If they ever went dark, Media Matters, MSNBC would have nothing to say. They do -- Alan, you have a radio show, and I have a radio show. You have a website. I have a website. All you have to do is turn on the radio to listen to each of us, or go to our websites. The Drive-By Media does not listen to my show, does not go to my website. They take for granted whatever Media Matters says about what I said is true. It is irresponsible. It's journalistic malpractice, and it's silly. We edited that out simply for the sake of brevity and to stay on point. When we got to the -- when I found the commentary, when they printed it out to my printer behind me, that's when I got rid of the call, and that's when I started in repeating the commentary on Jesse MacBeth that I had aired the previous morning.


This neat and tidy post-facto spin job is meaningless.
Post the transcript of the actual comments in question.

Very simply -
The first caller calls up claiming to be an anti-Iraq War veteran.
To this revelation Rush promptly and flippantly responded: “yeah, and I walked on the moon.”
So right from the start, even before "phoney soldiers" happened, Limbaugh was already discriminating as to who is a REAL soldier and who isn’t.
Does anyone who has ever listened to him truly think he is incapable of doing such?
This is what he does on a daily basis.
Villify and scapegoat liberal boogeymen that lurk behind every corner of modern society.


I'm only replying to say hello to TNC. How are you sir? :)
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10962
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby conversationpc » Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:54 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:This neat and tidy post-facto spin job is meaningless.
Post the transcript of the actual comments in question.

Very simply -
The first caller calls up claiming to be an anti-Iraq War veteran.
To this revelation Rush promptly and flippantly responded: “yeah, and I walked on the moon.”
So right from the start, even before "phoney soldiers" happened, Limbaugh was already discriminating as to who is a REAL soldier and who isn’t.
Does anyone who has ever listened to him truly think he is incapable of doing such?
This is what he does on a daily basis.
Villify and scapegoat liberal boogeymen that lurk behind every corner of modern society.


The only "post-facto" spin job going on are with liberal airheads like Harry Reid somehow trying to take credit for the money raised on eBay because of that letter, trying to deny Rush his Constitutional rights. I don't care for Limbaugh at all and wouldn't have a problem admitting it if I thought he had discriminated against real soldiers. It simply didn't happen.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Skylorde » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:38 am

Image
Skylorde
45 RPM
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:03 am

Postby conversationpc » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:42 am

Skylorde wrote:Image


Amazing the parallels that exist there, huh? :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby strangegrey » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:46 am

Yes Amazing.

What's more amazing is that there's a handfully of deft idiots in this country that just wont get it.
Image
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:13 am

strangegrey wrote:Yes Amazing.

What's more amazing is that there's a handful of deft idiots in this country that just wont get it.


Would those idiots be the people who elected and re elected the worst president in history? Just curious.

Because of recent events, my anger and demeanor is toned down quite a bit, but as I was reading these comments, my blood pressure hit 180 I am sure.

Carry on.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby lights1961 » Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:14 am

this went on before i left for two weeks--- i think the letter actually got about 1,000,000 or more for the Marines and RUSH MATCHED IT...Did any US senators who were on the list MATCH ANY FUNDS???...and at that time.. harry Reid wanted to take FULL CREDIT for it all.. how funny was that... its the last i remember!!

TNC hello sir as well. Long time.

Rick
lights1961
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5362
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:33 am

Postby conversationpc » Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:19 am

Rockindeano wrote:Would those idiots be the people who elected and re elected the worst president in history? Just curious.


He wasn't re-elected but why bother bringing up Jimmy Carter here? :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby RedWingFan » Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:25 am

conversationpc wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:Would those idiots be the people who elected and re elected the worst president in history? Just curious.


He wasn't re-elected but why bother bringing up Jimmy Carter here? :lol:

:lol: Yeah, Jimmy Carter and "misery index" are synonomous.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby RedWingFan » Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:32 am

lights1961 wrote:this went on before i left for two weeks--- i think the letter actually got about 1,000,000 or more for the Marines and RUSH MATCHED IT...Did any US senators who were on the list MATCH ANY FUNDS???...and at that time.. harry Reid wanted to take FULL CREDIT for it all.. how funny was that... its the last i remember!!

TNC hello sir as well. Long time.

Rick

Actually, the letter sold for $2,100,100 which Rush matched.
The auction lasted exactly 168 hours. With 150 hours left Reid said nothing. 100 hours left still nothing. 75 hours still nothing. 25 hours left Reid still ignored it. But with 1 hour left in the auction Harry Reid goes to the senate floor and talks about the auction, the money raised and can't stop using the word "we". What a joke. And no he hasn't matched.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby RedWingFan » Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:08 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:This neat and tidy post-facto spin job is meaningless.
Post the transcript of the actual comments in question.

As much fun as typing up a transcript of my recording sounds. I don't have the time.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Very simply -
The first caller calls up claiming to be an anti-Iraq War veteran.
To this revelation Rush promptly and flippantly responded: “yeah, and I walked on the moon.”
So right from the start, even before "phoney soldiers" happened, Limbaugh was already discriminating as to who is a REAL soldier and who isn’t.

Well anyone can call anywhere and claim to be anything. There was an incident a few years ago where someone called and claimed to be a veteran who was for the war. He gave his rank and platoon #. The following day Rush had to start his program saying they checked into the guy and he was a fraud. No such soldier.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:This is what he does on a daily basis.
Villify and scapegoat liberal boogeymen that lurk behind every corner of modern society.

You mean the boogeymen who tried to pass the amnesty bill for millions of illegals without debate? Or the boogeymen on the Supreme Court who change the meaning of "eminent domain" to seize private land and give it to another private entity, for more tax $'s? He's doing a damn fine job. That's why he's targeted for smearing by the U.S. Senate. No one ever attacks Air America. Unless of course you count CPC Dave jumping Randi Rhodes (or whatever her name is) while she's walking her dog :lol:
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby conversationpc » Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:22 am

RaiderFan wrote:No one ever attacks Air America. Unless of course you count CPC Dave jumping Randi Rhodes (or whatever her name is) while she's walking her dog :lol:


She's not hot enough for me to overlook her political views. :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby RedWingFan » Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:29 am

conversationpc wrote:
RaiderFan wrote:No one ever attacks Air America. Unless of course you count CPC Dave jumping Randi Rhodes (or whatever her name is) while she's walking her dog :lol:


She's not hot enough for me to overlook her political views. :lol:

I didn't even know who she was 'til one of her co-hosts speculated that conservatives assaulted her one night. Still don't know who she is.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby conversationpc » Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:31 am

RaiderFan wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
RaiderFan wrote:No one ever attacks Air America. Unless of course you count CPC Dave jumping Randi Rhodes (or whatever her name is) while she's walking her dog :lol:


She's not hot enough for me to overlook her political views. :lol:

I didn't even know who she was 'til one of her co-hosts speculated that conservatives assaulted her one night. Still don't know who she is.


She's a vile person, regardless of whether she's a liberal or not.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests