Moderator: Andrew
stevew2 wrote:They all knew,everyone of them. Its all about the money nothing else.I was going to give it a chance with Jeff putting out new materail. Once they fucked him over to, that did it for me.
livin2do wrote:They were so eager to "make hay while the sun shines," that rather than allowing Augeri to address his medical issues, they just kept signing up for that next tour -
Matthew wrote:Rick wrote:Matt, don't listen to Matt.
I can't believe I got sucked into this thread....must stop arguing with Augerios....must try harder.....
Rick wrote:Matthew wrote:Rick wrote:Matt, don't listen to Matt.
I can't believe I got sucked into this thread....must stop arguing with Augerios....must try harder.....
The OP is Matt Carty, he did the Castles Burning interview with HH. He's credible.
Red13JoePa wrote:livin2do wrote:They were so eager to "make hay while the sun shines," that rather than allowing Augeri to address his medical issues, they just kept signing up for that next tour -
You get that when one bandmember keeps you in friggin mothballs for a decade in what should've been an extension of your prime and sets up to do it again. Of course they had to work.
Matthew wrote:Rick wrote:Matthew wrote:Rick wrote:Matt, don't listen to Matt.
I can't believe I got sucked into this thread....must stop arguing with Augerios....must try harder.....
The OP is Matt Carty, he did the Castles Burning interview with HH. He's credible.
Oh...that posionous bilefest that has virtually been the reference source for every two-bit Perry basher ever since?
this was in response to Matthew
RipRokken wrote:Even Brian May noted that there was a strange vibe between Steve A. and the rest of the guys, which is a shame. He really seemed to be having a great time at the Vegas show (2001 DVD), and put on a heck of a performance -- a really good frontman with a lot of class. I'm doubting any future singer will feel a real bond with them, but I'm still looking forward to hearing more music and seeing them in concert.
Also, I'm still kicking myself for missing my only chance to see them live w/Augeri. Had free tickets to a show here, and gave them away (this was probably 7 years ago. "Arrival" had just come out, and I wasn't that excited. Yes, still kicking myself for doing that.
stevew2 wrote:They should have took 2005 off ,it was clear his voice was ragged at the end of 2004. The next year they the do a three hour concert, where he doesnt sing until about 60 minutes into the first set {fucked his warm up routine} Then they book 2006 with no voice. Again if they took 2005 off, he could have recovered{I think Neal didnt want him in the band anyway} They took this summer off anyway,what would it mattered if it was 2005 or 2007
I dont beleive that Matthew,Id like to see his contractMatthew wrote:stevew2 wrote:They should have took 2005 off ,it was clear his voice was ragged at the end of 2004. The next year they the do a three hour concert, where he doesnt sing until about 60 minutes into the first set {fucked his warm up routine} Then they book 2006 with no voice. Again if they took 2005 off, he could have recovered{I think Neal didnt want him in the band anyway} They took this summer off anyway,what would it mattered if it was 2005 or 2007
Or Augeri could have taken care of his own 'instrument' and indeed his integrity by refusing to tour. All he needed was a doctor's note and the dread lawyers of the Azoff organisation would have been powerless....
Red13JoePa wrote:From a $-making standpoint, THAT was the point Matto.
Haven't talked to you in 3 1/2 months and this way you're coming at me?
stevew2 wrote:I dont beleive that Matthew,Id like to see his contractMatthew wrote:stevew2 wrote:They should have took 2005 off ,it was clear his voice was ragged at the end of 2004. The next year they the do a three hour concert, where he doesnt sing until about 60 minutes into the first set {fucked his warm up routine} Then they book 2006 with no voice. Again if they took 2005 off, he could have recovered{I think Neal didnt want him in the band anyway} They took this summer off anyway,what would it mattered if it was 2005 or 2007
Or Augeri could have taken care of his own 'instrument' and indeed his integrity by refusing to tour. All he needed was a doctor's note and the dread lawyers of the Azoff organisation would have been powerless....
stevew2 wrote:I dont beleive that Matthew,Id like to see his contractMatthew wrote:stevew2 wrote:They should have took 2005 off ,it was clear his voice was ragged at the end of 2004. The next year they the do a three hour concert, where he doesnt sing until about 60 minutes into the first set {fucked his warm up routine} Then they book 2006 with no voice. Again if they took 2005 off, he could have recovered{I think Neal didnt want him in the band anyway} They took this summer off anyway,what would it mattered if it was 2005 or 2007
Or Augeri could have taken care of his own 'instrument' and indeed his integrity by refusing to tour. All he needed was a doctor's note and the dread lawyers of the Azoff organisation would have been powerless....
brywool wrote:stevew2 wrote:I dont beleive that Matthew,Id like to see his contractMatthew wrote:stevew2 wrote:They should have took 2005 off ,it was clear his voice was ragged at the end of 2004. The next year they the do a three hour concert, where he doesnt sing until about 60 minutes into the first set {fucked his warm up routine} Then they book 2006 with no voice. Again if they took 2005 off, he could have recovered{I think Neal didnt want him in the band anyway} They took this summer off anyway,what would it mattered if it was 2005 or 2007
Or Augeri could have taken care of his own 'instrument' and indeed his integrity by refusing to tour. All he needed was a doctor's note and the dread lawyers of the Azoff organisation would have been powerless....
Agreed. I think that he was committed to it and there was no room to take a break. Ever been the guy on the team that everyone depends on and you've got problems? The pressure to perform is pretty heavy.
Matthew wrote:Sorry Red...wasn't meaning to be hostile...just the usual banter...
livin2do wrote:You know, six years ago I did my interview with Herbie Herbert.
livin2do wrote:You know, six years ago I did my interview with Herbie Herbert. My motive, whether it came through or not, was to sway people to realize that the Augeri-voiced Journey was valid. The members of Journey could not be faulted for wanting to continue on, even if that meant getting rid of their most popular and recognizeable member. Plus, they had replaced Steve Perry and Steve Smith with two guys who were committed to giving their all to help rekindle the legacy that the band had built so long ago.
During 1998 - 2005, I saw Journey 10 times - with each show being better than the last. The 30-year anniversary tour was a lifelong fan's dream, during which I got to hear music from every incarnation of the band. I wasn't looking forward to the Def Leppard/Journey tour, because I knew I wouldn't get to hear nearly the selection that had been played the tour before. Then, when word started to surface about pre-recorded vocals being piped in to mask Augeri's performance, and his subsequent dismissal from the band, I couldn't get behind the idea of seeing Journey on that tour.
Here's my point: I felt like the band was loyal to Steve Perry. From 1987 to 1995, they waited for him to hop back on the bus and get the Journey going again. When he finally did, they saw him refusing to commit to touring again due to his medical issues, and probably had a flashback at that point to how long they had to wait before. It seemed like it was out of desperation that they finally gave up on him.
But they never showed that kind of loyalty to Steve Augeri. They knew he was having problems with his voice. They made adjustments to their set, having Deen sing some of the songs, changing from the predictable format by having other band members sing. How much of that would've been necessary if they had just taken some time off? They were so eager to "make hay while the sun shines," that rather than allowing Augeri to address his medical issues, they just kept signing up for that next tour - knowing they could make Augeri sound however they wanted him to sound whether he was healthy or not. Had the band at least acknowledged his condition and taken some time off for once, they would've avoided all the embarassment of having that scandal go public - and the ensuing fan animosity.
Steve Augeri got shafted, worse than Steve Perry. He took the fall for the band over the whole tapegate thing. His personal integrity was ridiculed. It is impossible for me to believe that Neal "didn't know" what was going on. And, since it seems like we will be lucky to ever hear from Steve Augeri again, I feel the most effective way of showing support for him is to not spend our money on future Journey tours, unless they feature the original lineup.
marco17 wrote: it is a whole lot easier for the rest of the band to claim they didn't know anything and live to see another day, while SA [who certainly should take his share of the blame] is left holding bag.
Either way, all those bashing Augeri during tapegate probably never liked the guy from day one since it wasn't Perry, so it just gives them ammunition to use when they attack him. But, what the hell do I know?
Matthew wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:From a $-making standpoint, THAT was the point Matto.
Haven't talked to you in 3 1/2 months and this way you're coming at me?
Except Journey made an absolute ton of money during that period from HH's efforts re: the back catalogue...
Matthew wrote:
Except Journey didn't leave him carrying anything. They denied it happened and tried to protect Augeri's reputation by saying he had a throat infection. They have never once blamed him and even issued a joint press release when he left.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests