RaiderFan wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Canada rules.
In hockey and curling.

Moderator: Andrew
RaiderFan wrote:Rockindeano wrote:PS. They don't have George Bush up there either.
Didn't they just elect a pro-American president like France did?
RaiderFan wrote:Not making fun of Canada, don't you try getting moonbeam on my ass. I've had enough of her scolding me!
Rockindeano wrote:PS. They don't have George Bush up there either.
RaiderFan wrote:Didn't they just elect a pro-American president like France did?
Deb wrote:Stephen Harper, and it's Prime Minister not President.
Rockindeano wrote:All three of you are close minded one way street thinking jackasses.
What, are you pissed California and all its' 54 electoral college votes aren't going to a republican candidate? You make me sick.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Blue Radio Girl wrote:Moon Beam wrote:belly shakes and bullsheet!
Uhh... Gerene... are you the one on the right in your av? Cause if so, you've been a panty-loon flasher from day one, haven't ya?
Rockindeano wrote:Blue Radio Girl wrote:Moon Beam wrote:belly shakes and bullsheet!
Uhh... Gerene... are you the one on the right in your av? Cause if so, you've been a panty-loon flasher from day one, haven't ya?
Moonbeam is the ugly one, whichever one that is.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Marc S wrote:RaiderFan wrote:Go check out Cuba and it's crumbling infrastructure. It's doomed to failure just like the rest.
Cuba survives despite a 50 year or so blockade/embargo from the US, brainfade.
conversationpc wrote:Marc S wrote:RaiderFan wrote:Go check out Cuba and it's crumbling infrastructure. It's doomed to failure just like the rest.
Cuba survives despite a 50 year or so blockade/embargo from the US, brainfade.
Yeah, boy that Cuban economy is really going great guns there, isn't it?![]()
Thanks to the embargo, Cuba hasn't been a threat to anyone in decades now. Unless maybe you count those poor souls "assaulting" our beaches on homemade rafts.
Marc S wrote:INSPITE of the blockade (re-read the post - engage brain before keyboard?). The fact it survives at all is astounding.
ohsherrie wrote:http://www.stupid.com/stat/JN20.html
Blue Radio Girl wrote:Moon Beam wrote:belly shakes and bullsheet!
Uhh... Gerene... are you the one on the right in your av? Cause if so, you've been a panty-loon flasher from day one, haven't ya?
Blue Radio Girl wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Hussy you just wait till we meet up again.![]()
I'm the hussy? Who's the one showing her panties??![]()
RaiderFan wrote:Maybe it's the drinking water that's making you sick?![]()
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/27/us/27 ... tner=MYWAY
conversationpc wrote:Marc S wrote:INSPITE of the blockade (re-read the post - engage brain before keyboard?). The fact it survives at all is astounding.
Embargoes and/or blockades are not employed to destroy a country. They are employed to make it difficult for that country to do business. The fact they have survived is not surprising at all.
Marc S wrote:conversationpc wrote:Marc S wrote:INSPITE of the blockade (re-read the post - engage brain before keyboard?). The fact it survives at all is astounding.
Embargoes and/or blockades are not employed to destroy a country. They are employed to make it difficult for that country to do business. The fact they have survived is not surprising at all.
How naive?
conversationpc wrote:Marc S wrote:conversationpc wrote:Marc S wrote:INSPITE of the blockade (re-read the post - engage brain before keyboard?). The fact it survives at all is astounding.
Embargoes and/or blockades are not employed to destroy a country. They are employed to make it difficult for that country to do business. The fact they have survived is not surprising at all.
How naive?
Not naive but practical and correct. No one's dumb enough, except possibly you I suppose from the tone you've taken here, to believe that an embargo can destroy a country. You can call that naive but take a look at just about any embargo enacted against a country in recent history. They don't work in destroying a country. They make it fiscally difficult and can cause financial hardship but most of the countries against which they have been used are able to get around them enough to survive.
As proof, take a look at China, Iraq, South Africa, and even the country you brought up, Cuba, along with a host of others. They've all had some fairly harsh sanctions and/or embargoes enacted against them and they all survived pretty well.
Marc S wrote:You're trying to pick at technicalities, right or wrong. Fact is the US would rather not have had Castro on their back door for the last 50 years or so. Thats the point. The Bay of Pigs was a disaster, if they could have 'destroyed' Cuba they would have.
You just decided to skirt around the sentiment of the response, which I obviously expect of you from the discussions/exchanges had thus far.
Users browsing this forum: efrasjourney and 27 guests