Stage Presence DOES matter!

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Panther » Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:36 pm

wildone wrote:
Arnelian wrote:wrong supposition. You cannot claim yourself to have the enigma of a certain icon. It is the group of people who embodies you with that perception. To understand what the new singer is about to accomplish in his own country is to understand the people. Look over the youtube and determine for yourself the support he is geting from his countrymen, it is very iconic. they are jubilating all over the world!
All Over the World... :lol: :lol: stop it stop it ...your killin me here.... :roll: wow Lumpia festivals maybe big over there ...but here ...it's a different ball game...he may know his country men ...but this isn't his country,we expect a real show here.


Damnit! That's it.... I can't stand it anymore. I've not made a batch in a few months, so I guess this week is as good as any... what, with all the references to them on this friggin forum! So, which should I make? Pork lumpia or beef lumpia (timing isn't right for shrimp version - bay is too cold)?
User avatar
Panther
45 RPM
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:34 am

Postby Rhiannon » Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:37 pm

Arnelian wrote:want the whole Journey to fail-------irregardless.


Pretty sure that was set into motion a couple of decades ago. What do they have left? Phenominal album sales this spring? Incessant radio airplay of the new recordings? ...Yeahhhh. No. Signed, sealed, and DOA, they're just a touring act. No big deal.
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby venomnation » Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:38 pm

I'm not much for the discussion going on through this thread only because i've missed so much of it. I might however, offer the following musings on the topic at hand.


For those who think Stage Presence does NOT matter. What would Queen have been if Freddie Mercury only came out and kept his shirt on, didn't ride on superman's back, didn't wear falsie's on stage, and just stood there like a stroke victim (Or recently, lou gramm) singing "we will rock you".....or didn't put the crown and cape on for "we are the champions" or didn't lead the crowd of 250,000 strong to clap in unison for "radio ga ga"....


Iggy Pop. Need I Mention. Iggy Pop? Walk up to him and say "stage presence doesn't matter"....The dude all but invented stage diving...he would BEG fans to throw stuff at him....

Led Zeppelin. Bonham, Page, and Jones are without a doubt unreplaceable (sans for Bonham, who was only fittingly replaced with Bonham), but that band would not have been all that it was without Plant. His bandmates were absolutely It was Plant who wielded the Hammer of the Stage Presence Gods.

Axl rose made his "stage presence" famous....by not being present on the stage half the time.....but when he was there....he was fighting with fans, dancing around, etc. Could you say there's no importance in stage presence there?

What would Van Halen have been, shy of a technically miraculous guitar player....if David Lee roth DIDN'T have assless chaps....and a sock down his spandex.....or improvize the lyrics to "panama" to be some sick sexual perverts fantasy? And then there was that time he flew into the audience from above in a boxing ring. And those hurkey's off the drum riser? Nah. that never mattered (Sarcasm in full effect)

What would all the matter have been about Elvis' gyrating? If Stage presence didn't matter.

And if Elvis was among the first musicians to allude to sex, then Mick Jagger was the first to personify it on stage. Would a stones concert BE a stones concert without his stage presence?

Aerosmith. Steven tyler has an undenniable stage presence. The motions. The innuendo, the scarves....the microphone blowjobs......and then there's the "love in elevator" video.

tell me NOW that stage presence doesnt' matter.

And No, I don't think what steve perry had was God-Given stage presence. He had one hell of a voice, and a bad case of the nerves that LEAD to stage-presence by default. He was still good though.
Download the Latest Venom Nation! At http://www.venomnationradio.com - or hear it streaming, Saturday nights at 10PM ET, 7PM PT, at KQLZ.org
User avatar
venomnation
LP
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:20 am
Location: Valdosta, GA USA

Postby donnaplease » Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:42 pm

Panther wrote:
wildone wrote:
Arnelian wrote:wrong supposition. You cannot claim yourself to have the enigma of a certain icon. It is the group of people who embodies you with that perception. To understand what the new singer is about to accomplish in his own country is to understand the people. Look over the youtube and determine for yourself the support he is geting from his countrymen, it is very iconic. they are jubilating all over the world!
All Over the World... :lol: :lol: stop it stop it ...your killin me here.... :roll: wow Lumpia festivals maybe big over there ...but here ...it's a different ball game...he may know his country men ...but this isn't his country,we expect a real show here.


Damnit! That's it.... I can't stand it anymore. I've not made a batch in a few months, so I guess this week is as good as any... what, with all the references to them on this friggin forum! So, which should I make? Pork lumpia or beef lumpia (timing isn't right for shrimp version - bay is too cold)?


Definitely pork... yum!!! :D
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby SteveForever » Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:44 pm

stevek2007 wrote:And No, I don't think what steve perry had was God-Given stage presence. He had one hell of a voice, and a bad case of the nerves that LEAD to stage-presence by default. He was still good though.


Yes he was, yes he was.. 8)
SteveForever
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3177
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:37 am

Postby Rockindeano » Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:47 pm

Steve Perry was a shy shy California farm boy. Yes, California has farms, probably better than any of the other states, but, I remember him in Infinity..very shy still, statuesque. He wasn't nearly the god he was at the ROR time.

However, when you sing that well, how hard can it be to have stage presence? Hell, if I had his voice, I would lose all the weight I had to in a month, and kill on onstage.

Arnel is no Perry, but he has a real shot to impress.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:02 pm

strangegrey wrote:
I disagree there...wholeheartedly. All one has to do is observe the constant and steady decline of the band's draw and the amount of power it projects in the music industry. Currently, the band is a fraction of it's former self. The constant during this decline, is Schon, Cain, and the hirelings. At this stage, it's rather obvious that Journey, as a band, has not allowed the singer to bring what he has to the table to allow Journey to start moving onward and upward.


No doubt.
Everything you said about the band forbidding its lead singers from taking the reins or creatively contributing in any substantive manner is 100% on the mark. That much is obvious. But while that may impede them from growing musically, I’m not convinced that has any real bearing on the band’s profits and touring longevity. Those are two separate issues.

Clearly, the band has reverted back to the precise model inplace during the Augeri years – bringing in another muzzled hired hand. Still, its worth noting that, while never coming close to recapturing their Escape glory days, Journey had no problem touring on their own as recently as 2005.
Has their "draw" really gone down since they first toured theatres in 1998?
I think that remains to be seen.

This is the same argument I was having with JSS-doomsayers just over a year ago.
I'm not squarely in the pom-pom-cheering Arnel crowd, I just think the issue of Journey's lead singer is entirely overrated.
As long as a touring band exists on the road called "Journey" to play the hits, Azoff Inc. will have no problem filling their coffers.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby strangegrey » Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:17 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
strangegrey wrote:
I disagree there...wholeheartedly. All one has to do is observe the constant and steady decline of the band's draw and the amount of power it projects in the music industry. Currently, the band is a fraction of it's former self. The constant during this decline, is Schon, Cain, and the hirelings. At this stage, it's rather obvious that Journey, as a band, has not allowed the singer to bring what he has to the table to allow Journey to start moving onward and upward.


No doubt.
Everything you said about the band forbidding its lead singers from taking the reins or creatively contributing in any substantive manner is 100% on the mark. That much is obvious. But while that may impede them from growing musically, I’m not convinced that has any real bearing on the band’s profits and touring longevity. Those are two separate issues.

Clearly, the band has reverted back to the precise model inplace during the Augeri years – bringing in another muzzled hired hand. Still, its worth noting that, while never coming close to recapturing their Escape glory days, Journey had no problem touring on their own as recently as 2005.
Has their "draw" really gone down since they first toured theatres in 1998?
I think that remains to be seen.

This is the same argument I was having with JSS-doomsayers just over a year ago.
I'm not squarely in the pom-pom-cheering Arnel crowd, I just think the issue of Journey's lead singer is entirely overrated.
As long as a touring band exists on the road called "Journey" to play the hits, Azoff Inc. will have no problem filling their coffers.


Eh, I disagree to a small extent. First...and I'm refering to Dean's post. In order to make a success out of this, Dean mentioned that Journey has to *market* Arnel. Make a spectacle out of his throat. Make him the second coming. Expose him. Allow Arnel to really project out front of the band and create a buzz. I had said in this thread that I couldn't paraphrase what Deano said any better...and I just did so, so I expect Deano to rightfully come in here and correct me. Regardless, the point was that Journey has to do what they haven't allowed with a singer since Perry (and in some cases, including Perry).

That's not going to happen.

Instead, Journey will do their best to subdue any explicit/outward notification to fans that they have a new singer. They think the less they say, the better...so people wont look at this with the disdain and amusement that they currently get when you hear they have yet another singer. What I think Deano was saying was give the sceptical fans (including myself) no where else to go with this. Push Arnel out front and go "Yeah, he's a new singer, so fucking what...he kicks ass, listen to him!"....

Journey wont do that because they want control...if this were 10 years ago, I would also say they would be afraid to push him into the center spotlight because they would be aprehensive about his performance...but I dont think that's it, even though I personally feel it's true. The fact of the matter is that they want to control this singer like they tried to control Jeff and Jeremey...and like they succeeded with Steve A.



As far as the decline of the band...this is where I feel that you might be wrong. You're citing an interesting year as an example. In 2005, Journey did their 30th aniversary tour. That tour was heavily promoted and touted as the tour to end all tours. They had plans to give away copies of generations for each ticket holder. Sadly, they stopped doing that partly into the tour, fucking ticket holders that were expecting a copy. Regardless, I would interested in seeing undoctored tour statistics from 2005 compared to say 2001. When I saw Journey at Jones Beach in 2001, on the arrival tour, the place was nearly filled. We're talking 10-15k. In 2005, on that 30th aniversary tour, the venue was half filled, at best.

So while they might have played the same venues from 01 compared directly to 05, their draw seems to have dropped...big time.


Also, take note of what venues they played in 03, on their shit13 tour.....I saw em at Bald Hill, out on Long Island. A dirt hill shit venue of 2-3k tops. The writing on the wall was clear then...the band was suffering.

All other tours have to be slightly called into question as they had strong supporting/coheadlining acts...Def Leppard, Styx, REO, etc.

I still maintain (as the news of JSS injecting some whoopass into the band probably travelled slowly, as journey didn't want to advertise yet another singer change) that if Journey were touring with a less popular band than Def Leppard, the 06 tour would have been at *much* smaller venues.
Image
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby Red13JoePa » Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:23 am

strangegrey wrote:They had plans to give away copies of generations for each ticket holder. Sadly, they stopped doing that partly into the tour, fucking ticket holders that were expecting a copy.


What a cluster that was.

Why did they stop that, because as the tour approached fall the retail release was imminent?
"I love almost everybody."---Rocky Balboa 1990
"Let's reform this thing.Let's go out and get some guys who want to work and go do it"--Neal Schon February, 2001
"I looked at Neal, and I just saw a guy who really wants his band back"-JCain 2/01
Red13JoePa
MP3
 
Posts: 11646
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Happy Valley

Postby strangegrey » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:08 am

Red13JoePa wrote:Why did they stop that, because as the tour approached fall the retail release was imminent?


No idea man. Whenever Neal Schon as on the business end of a decision, bad things happen.
Image
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:26 am

Red13JoePa wrote:
Why did they stop that, because as the tour approached fall the retail release was imminent?


Yeah, that's it :roll: Generations was a monster at retail I tell ya.

Dude, they stopped because they are so messed up. The Journey machine is rudderless, leaderless. Who gives a shit anyways? Hell, Lula has about 20 copies of that piece of shit. Who wants one?
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Arkansas » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:33 am

strangegrey wrote: ... In order to make a success out of this, Dean mentioned that Journey has to *market* Arnel. Make a spectacle out of his throat. Make him the second coming. Expose him. Allow Arnel to really project out front of the band and create a buzz. I had said in this thread that I couldn't paraphrase what Deano said any better...and I just did so, so I expect Deano to rightfully come in here and correct me. Regardless, the point was that Journey has to do what they haven't allowed with a singer since Perry (and in some cases, including Perry). ...


I used to say (several yrs ago @ BT) this same thing for Augeri. Circa 2000, for Journey to regain popularity, they needed to push an Augeri solo album - nothing to compete with Journey, but someting on the a/c charts, or some duet in a movie soundtrack...anything to get his face and voice out there. Since bands are known by their frontmen, and rarely anyone else, they needed to push Augeri into all the limelight prior to releasing Arrival. After gaining some status & public awareness, they release Arrival. I guarantee you it would have sold more than it did.

I don't know about AP yet, but the band should consider a similar business model if they're serious about putting Journey back on top.


later~
Arkansas
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2565
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:23 am
Location: duh?

Re: Stage Presence DOES matter!

Postby SacredEyes » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:36 am

I'm going to hold my tongue until I see what he can do for myself. There's no reason to make any decisions or form any opinions until we see it for ourselves. I don't think Journey is going to change their minds on the deal, so all we can do is wait and see. Should be interesting.[/quote]

Well said, gentleman from the South!
User avatar
SacredEyes
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: Texas

Postby jrnyman28 » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:36 am

Red13JoePa wrote:
strangegrey wrote:They had plans to give away copies of generations for each ticket holder. Sadly, they stopped doing that partly into the tour, fucking ticket holders that were expecting a copy.


What a cluster that was.

Why did they stop that, because as the tour approached fall the retail release was imminent?


They offered the CD all through the tour, but at many venues they were not "allowed" to give it away for some reason connected to accounting... :roll:
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby jrnyman28 » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:39 am

Arkansas wrote:I used to say (several yrs ago @ BT) this same thing for Augeri. Circa 2000, for Journey to regain popularity, they needed to push an Augeri solo album - nothing to compete with Journey, but someting on the a/c charts, or some duet in a movie soundtrack...anything to get his face and voice out there. Since bands are known by their frontmen, and rarely anyone else, they needed to push Augeri into all the limelight prior to releasing Arrival. After gaining some status & public awareness, they release Arrival. I guarantee you it would have sold more than it did.

I don't know about AP yet, but the band should consider a similar business model if they're serious about putting Journey back on top.


later~


Yep. My biggest complaint about Journey during the Steve A years was the way they didn't support that lineup ie. Steve A. There was never a highlighting of Steve, support for the music made with him, any marketing featuring him. They simply relied on the name "Journey" and that is what they will do mostly now.
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby strangegrey » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:39 am

jrnyman28 wrote:They offered the CD all through the tour, but at many venues they were not "allowed" to give it away for some reason connected to accounting... :roll:


Yeah, there's a good cover story! :roll:
Image
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby Red13JoePa » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:41 am

Exactly what I thought.
Smelled like spin born out of not pressing enough copies or some shit.
"I love almost everybody."---Rocky Balboa 1990
"Let's reform this thing.Let's go out and get some guys who want to work and go do it"--Neal Schon February, 2001
"I looked at Neal, and I just saw a guy who really wants his band back"-JCain 2/01
Red13JoePa
MP3
 
Posts: 11646
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Happy Valley

Postby Rocker Chic » Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:10 am

youkeepmewaiting wrote:Wait to see what he can do in a few months time.


Okay, fair enough, but you can bet that I'll be doing it in the comfort of my choosing: in front of a TV or computer, that's for sure! :roll: I won't be shelling out a single penny. :evil:

Debbie
User avatar
Rocker Chic
8 Track
 
Posts: 650
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 1:00 am
Location: New York City, Baby!

Postby jrnyman28 » Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:14 am

strangegrey wrote:As far as the decline of the band...this is where I feel that you might be wrong. You're citing an interesting year as an example. In 2005, Journey did their 30th aniversary tour. That tour was heavily promoted and touted as the tour to end all tours. They had plans to give away copies of generations for each ticket holder. Sadly, they stopped doing that partly into the tour, fucking ticket holders that were expecting a copy. Regardless, I would interested in seeing undoctored tour statistics from 2005 compared to say 2001. When I saw Journey at Jones Beach in 2001, on the arrival tour, the place was nearly filled. We're talking 10-15k. In 2005, on that 30th aniversary tour, the venue was half filled, at best.

So while they might have played the same venues from 01 compared directly to 05, their draw seems to have dropped...big time.


Also, take note of what venues they played in 03, on their shit13 tour.....I saw em at Bald Hill, out on Long Island. A dirt hill shit venue of 2-3k tops. The writing on the wall was clear then...the band was suffering.

All other tours have to be slightly called into question as they had strong supporting/coheadlining acts...Def Leppard, Styx, REO, etc.

I still maintain (as the news of JSS injecting some whoopass into the band probably travelled slowly, as journey didn't want to advertise yet another singer change) that if Journey were touring with a less popular band than Def Leppard, the 06 tour would have been at *much* smaller venues.


You have compared the Arrival Tour (with two other bands) to the 30th Anniversary Tour with only Journey. It stands to reason that there would be more of a turn-out for the multiple acts as you alluded to later in reference to the Def Leppard tour and the Main Event Tour. The UTR tour was a tour of secondary markets. This was a move they had recently incorporated to reach more people. It was viewed by many as a step down but each year Journey seemed to come back to the major markets again. So they perfomed a cycle: Major with support, minor on their own. Major with just the dirty dozen for the casual fans (of which there are many), minor with a more expansive and inclusive setlist for the more die-hard fans (of which there are fewer.)

I really don't think it is an indication of "success" but I do think it was a way to keep touring and giving their fans what they want. As pointed out many times, please show how many bands from Journey's era are doing better touring? You have the big name exceptions like U2 and Aerosmith which can be argued by "original lineup". You have reunion tours of course. But most bands either stick with the tour packages to stay in the larger venues or they are playing only the smaller venues...
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby Little Lenny » Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:28 am

different countries different cultures, however, on a rammstein dvd I have watched, which was filmed in Japan the crowd are just like any other crowd in the western hemisphere, up on their feet giving it loads :) ...so I don't know really , maybe it is also what is being listened to at the time...Journey is more mellow than Rammstein :shock:...However, regarding Stage presence I think it is important to a fairly reasonable degree, I also think Charisma is an important ingredient for a performer too...you can leap around like a lizard but if you have no charisma it means nothing it's just a load of moves and actions...:)
User avatar
Little Lenny
8 Track
 
Posts: 644
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 8:09 pm
Location: Kingston-upon-Hull City,East Yorkshire,ENGLAND

Postby Panther » Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:32 am

jrnyman28 wrote:
strangegrey wrote:As far as the decline of the band...this is where I feel that you might be wrong. You're citing an interesting year as an example. In 2005, Journey did their 30th aniversary tour. That tour was heavily promoted and touted as the tour to end all tours. They had plans to give away copies of generations for each ticket holder. Sadly, they stopped doing that partly into the tour, fucking ticket holders that were expecting a copy. Regardless, I would interested in seeing undoctored tour statistics from 2005 compared to say 2001. When I saw Journey at Jones Beach in 2001, on the arrival tour, the place was nearly filled. We're talking 10-15k. In 2005, on that 30th aniversary tour, the venue was half filled, at best.

So while they might have played the same venues from 01 compared directly to 05, their draw seems to have dropped...big time.


Also, take note of what venues they played in 03, on their shit13 tour.....I saw em at Bald Hill, out on Long Island. A dirt hill shit venue of 2-3k tops. The writing on the wall was clear then...the band was suffering.

All other tours have to be slightly called into question as they had strong supporting/coheadlining acts...Def Leppard, Styx, REO, etc.

I still maintain (as the news of JSS injecting some whoopass into the band probably travelled slowly, as journey didn't want to advertise yet another singer change) that if Journey were touring with a less popular band than Def Leppard, the 06 tour would have been at *much* smaller venues.


You have compared the Arrival Tour (with two other bands) to the 30th Anniversary Tour with only Journey. It stands to reason that there would be more of a turn-out for the multiple acts as you alluded to later in reference to the Def Leppard tour and the Main Event Tour. The UTR tour was a tour of secondary markets. This was a move they had recently incorporated to reach more people. It was viewed by many as a step down but each year Journey seemed to come back to the major markets again. So they perfomed a cycle: Major with support, minor on their own. Major with just the dirty dozen for the casual fans (of which there are many), minor with a more expansive and inclusive setlist for the more die-hard fans (of which there are fewer.)

I really don't think it is an indication of "success" but I do think it was a way to keep touring and giving their fans what they want. As pointed out many times, please show how many bands from Journey's era are doing better touring? You have the big name exceptions like U2 and Aerosmith which can be argued by "original lineup". You have reunion tours of course. But most bands either stick with the tour packages to stay in the larger venues or they are playing only the smaller venues...


Question please. This UTR tour.... what year(s) was/were that one? I know they came down my way in 98 or 99 and had Augeri with them at that time (I believe that was spring, but I'm not too sure). Crazy Deb would probably remember exact dates. lol
I'm just curious, because to my recollection, the turnout wasn't all that great. At least, not as full as that venue has been known to get (hell, even in a thunderstorm... Ratt packed that place, as did Def Lep -both with no-name front bands). It will be interesting to see if they do this "secondary" market thing with Arnel before hitting the larger venues here in the states. I'm sure this little ass town will be on call for something like that. :::shrug:::
User avatar
Panther
45 RPM
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:34 am

Postby jrnyman28 » Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:39 am

UTR=Under The Radar This was the tour for Red13 in 2003. But after the UTR Tour they played larger venues again..I think that was the Main Event Tour (or maybe that was before...)

In 1998/99 there were two legs of the Vacation's Over Tour. The first half, Augeri's first tour had little to no promo around here. They played World Arena in Colorado Springs. But for the 2nd leg in 1999 they had Foreigner opening and they played Red Rocks outside Denver...the same venue they played on the Arrival tour with John Waite and Peter Frampton. I thought it was impressive that they were able to play Red Rocks with Foreigner (with a recovering but not well Lou Gramm) with a new singer. I was skeptical, not even sure if I would check them out without Perry. But I went because I love the music and I saw Perry without Journey so I figured I would check out Journey without Perry. I was glad I did.
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby Panther » Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:52 am

jrnyman28 wrote:UTR=Under The Radar This was the tour for Red13 in 2003. But after the UTR Tour they played larger venues again..I think that was the Main Event Tour (or maybe that was before...)

In 1998/99 there were two legs of the Vacation's Over Tour. The first half, Augeri's first tour had little to no promo around here. They played World Arena in Colorado Springs. But for the 2nd leg in 1999 they had Foreigner opening and they played Red Rocks outside Denver...the same venue they played on the Arrival tour with John Waite and Peter Frampton. I thought it was impressive that they were able to play Red Rocks with Foreigner (with a recovering but not well Lou Gramm) with a new singer. I was skeptical, not even sure if I would check them out without Perry. But I went because I love the music and I saw Perry without Journey so I figured I would check out Journey without Perry. I was glad I did.


Ah... I'll have to check with Debbie to see when they were here then. I don't recall hearing about a fronting band, but hell.. half the time I hear "Journey" and don't pay attention to anything else anyway, so there is the chance that I missed something.
Unfortunately, I passed on that particular concert. Sad, I know... At this point, with the direction they are headed.. that was probably my last chance to see the "band" in top form.
User avatar
Panther
45 RPM
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:34 am

Postby odessa » Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:19 am

stevek2007 wrote:I'm not much for the discussion going on through this thread only because i've missed so much of it. I might however, offer the following musings on the topic at hand.


For those who think Stage Presence does NOT matter. What would Queen have been if Freddie Mercury only came out and kept his shirt on, didn't ride on superman's back, didn't wear falsie's on stage, and just stood there like a stroke victim (Or recently, lou gramm) singing "we will rock you".....or didn't put the crown and cape on for "we are the champions" or didn't lead the crowd of 250,000 strong to clap in unison for "radio ga ga"....


Iggy Pop. Need I Mention. Iggy Pop? Walk up to him and say "stage presence doesn't matter"....The dude all but invented stage diving...he would BEG fans to throw stuff at him....

Led Zeppelin. Bonham, Page, and Jones are without a doubt unreplaceable (sans for Bonham, who was only fittingly replaced with Bonham), but that band would not have been all that it was without Plant. His bandmates were absolutely It was Plant who wielded the Hammer of the Stage Presence Gods.

Axl rose made his "stage presence" famous....by not being present on the stage half the time.....but when he was there....he was fighting with fans, dancing around, etc. Could you say there's no importance in stage presence there?

What would Van Halen have been, shy of a technically miraculous guitar player....if David Lee roth DIDN'T have assless chaps....and a sock down his spandex.....or improvize the lyrics to "panama" to be some sick sexual perverts fantasy? And then there was that time he flew into the audience from above in a boxing ring. And those hurkey's off the drum riser? Nah. that never mattered (Sarcasm in full effect)

What would all the matter have been about Elvis' gyrating? If Stage presence didn't matter.

And if Elvis was among the first musicians to allude to sex, then Mick Jagger was the first to personify it on stage. Would a stones concert BE a stones concert without his stage presence?

Aerosmith. Steven tyler has an undenniable stage presence. The motions. The innuendo, the scarves....the microphone blowjobs......and then there's the "love in elevator" video.

tell me NOW that stage presence doesnt' matter.

And No, I don't think what steve perry had was God-Given stage presence. He had one hell of a voice, and a bad case of the nerves that LEAD to stage-presence by default. He was still good though.


It is true that the term “Rock Gods” was coined for Led Zeppelin because of their stage performances and “larger than life” lifestyles (or so it has been said).

Yes, Freddie Mercury was indeed a stellar performer. His performance at Live Aid stole the show from the minute he performed “Radio Gag Ga”. Elton John commented that the rest of the performers could just forget about going on stage after Freddie performed.

Iggy Pop was over the top, but then that was the persona he cultivated for himself in his genre of music. A persona that included, at times, self mutilation and harm on stage. Not the kind of stage presence I personally like, but that was something that some people enjoyed at that time.

You are correct in stating that these people all had stage presence, however you must ask yourself, how much “stage presence” of these examples was organic and how much was fueled by substance abuse coupled with great acting? Many of these performers used substances to give them that extra edge on stage or when having to deal with the public in any manner. As a result, some developed-if not all- some type of addiction (hence the nickname “the toxic twins”coined for Tyler and Perry). These people also brought fame and notoriety to their bands as the original band members. So what does one direct their energies to-especially in light of being singer #4? An amazing stage presence- fueled possibly by substance abuse-as in many of the examples you provided-or an “organic” stealer vocal performance? I also think the audience that attended these shows were quite different from the Journey crowds and that these bands cultivated a certain type of persona for themselves. Herbie Herbert generally tried to give Journey a wholesome PR image, free of outrageous antics or scandal in the press so that's what the audiences expects. There never was much dirt that ever came to light about the band members when he was their manager.

Arnel is an amazing singer and I have no reason to believe that he's not a decent person. I admit that he does seem to lack significant stage presence *based on the Youtube clips* and when compared to previous Journey singers. However, he will have to cope with some very new elements and eventually grow into his role-more so than any of the other singers ever had to. At this point it is really difficult to predict how he will perform with Journey and if stage presence is really what the band is looking for in a singer. Any suggestion on how he actually will perform with the band is speculation (at best) on our part. Furthermore, it has been shown (time and time again) that the band's priorities lye not with what the hardcore fans want, but what the band feels is best to earn themselves as much money as possible. Right now it seems that they want the Perry sound without the Perry drama.

Seriously though, I can't think of a better way for Arnel to loose his job, than by engaging in any of the outrageous antics some of those performers (you mentioned above) engaged in (ie fighting with fans, not showing up for performances, coming on stage wasted, mutilating himself on stage, diving into the audience to surf, walking on stage with falsies or better yet... asking fans to throw things at them (a request that many Melodic Rock Fan would happily oblige)) :lol: ...now that would be priceless! Sure it would be one hell of a show, but I can imagine the flack Arnel would get from the fans for that behavior (on this board) and the wrath he would incur from the band. My guess is that Arnel will be what the band tells him to be...nothing more and nothing less.
User avatar
odessa
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:16 am

Postby venomnation » Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:54 pm

odessa wrote: My guess is that Arnel will be what the band tells him to be...nothing more and nothing less.


Sorry...I can't resist a good "whip up 2 minutes of photoshop" opportunity.

Image
Download the Latest Venom Nation! At http://www.venomnationradio.com - or hear it streaming, Saturday nights at 10PM ET, 7PM PT, at KQLZ.org
User avatar
venomnation
LP
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:20 am
Location: Valdosta, GA USA

Postby stevew2 » Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:58 pm

strangegrey wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
strangegrey wrote:
I disagree there...wholeheartedly. All one has to do is observe the constant and steady decline of the band's draw and the amount of power it projects in the music industry. Currently, the band is a fraction of it's former self. The constant during this decline, is Schon, Cain, and the hirelings. At this stage, it's rather obvious that Journey, as a band, has not allowed the singer to bring what he has to the table to allow Journey to start moving onward and upward.


No doubt.
Everything you said about the band forbidding its lead singers from taking the reins or creatively contributing in any substantive manner is 100% on the mark. That much is obvious. But while that may impede them from growing musically, I’m not convinced that has any real bearing on the band’s profits and touring longevity. Those are two separate issues.

Clearly, the band has reverted back to the precise model inplace during the Augeri years – bringing in another muzzled hired hand. Still, its worth noting that, while never coming close to recapturing their Escape glory days, Journey had no problem touring on their own as recently as 2005.
Has their "draw" really gone down since they first toured theatres in 1998?
I think that remains to be seen.

This is the same argument I was having with JSS-doomsayers just over a year ago.
I'm not squarely in the pom-pom-cheering Arnel crowd, I just think the issue of Journey's lead singer is entirely overrated.
As long as a touring band exists on the road called "Journey" to play the hits, Azoff Inc. will have no problem filling their coffers.


Eh, I disagree to a small extent. First...and I'm refering to Dean's post. In order to make a success out of this, Dean mentioned that Journey has to *market* Arnel. Make a spectacle out of his throat. Make him the second coming. Expose him. Allow Arnel to really project out front of the band and create a buzz. I had said in this thread that I couldn't paraphrase what Deano said any better...and I just did so, so I expect Deano to rightfully come in here and correct me. Regardless, the point was that Journey has to do what they haven't allowed with a singer since Perry (and in some cases, including Perry).

That's not going to happen.

Instead, Journey will do their best to subdue any explicit/outward notification to fans that they have a new singer. They think the less they say, the better...so people wont look at this with the disdain and amusement that they currently get when you hear they have yet another singer. What I think Deano was saying was give the sceptical fans (including myself) no where else to go with this. Push Arnel out front and go "Yeah, he's a new singer, so fucking what...he kicks ass, listen to him!"....

Journey wont do that because they want control...if this were 10 years ago, I would also say they would be afraid to push him into the center spotlight because they would be aprehensive about his performance...but I dont think that's it, even though I personally feel it's true. The fact of the matter is that they want to control this singer like they tried to control Jeff and Jeremey...and like they succeeded with Steve A.



As far as the decline of the band...this is where I feel that you might be wrong. You're citing an interesting year as an example. In 2005, Journey did their 30th aniversary tour. That tour was heavily promoted and touted as the tour to end all tours. They had plans to give away copies of generations for each ticket holder. Sadly, they stopped doing that partly into the tour, fucking ticket holders that were expecting a copy. Regardless, I would interested in seeing undoctored tour statistics from 2005 compared to say 2001. When I saw Journey at Jones Beach in 2001, on the arrival tour, the place was nearly filled. We're talking 10-15k. In 2005, on that 30th aniversary tour, the venue was half filled, at best.

So while they might have played the same venues from 01 compared directly to 05, their draw seems to have dropped...big time.


Also, take note of what venues they played in 03, on their shit13 tour.....I saw em at Bald Hill, out on Long Island. A dirt hill shit venue of 2-3k tops. The writing on the wall was clear then...the band was suffering.

All other tours have to be slightly called into question as they had strong supporting/coheadlining acts...Def Leppard, Styx, REO, etc.

I still maintain (as the news of JSS injecting some whoopass into the band probably travelled slowly, as journey didn't want to advertise yet another singer change) that if Journey were touring with a less popular band than Def Leppard, the 06 tour would have been at *much* smaller venues.
I handed out those free cds as part of the Street team many people didnt want them or thoughti was tryingtosell them something computor is fucking upsorry
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

How about this for stage presence?

Postby pedro » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:21 pm

A friend sent me this link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZccz5cy3ks
The Koreans reactions were hilarious :D

Ellen Degeneres was so impressed she invited the girl to perform on the show. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5TafXFY ... re=related

Maybe AP could use a bit of coaching from this girl. :D
pedro
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:03 pm

Re: How about this for stage presence?

Postby stevew2 » Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:28 pm

pedro wrote:A friend sent me this link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZccz5cy3ks
The Koreans reactions were hilarious :D

Ellen Degeneres was so impressed she invited the girl to perform on the show. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5TafXFY ... re=related

Maybe AP could use a bit of coaching from this girl. :D
All the gays must sit around and watch you tube{Neal and Ellen} to look for new talent. Cool
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby stevew2 » Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:40 pm

Rockindeano wrote:Steve Perry was a shy shy California farm boy. Yes, California has farms, probably better than any of the other states, but, I remember him in Infinity..very shy still, statuesque. He wasn't nearly the god he was at the ROR time.

However, when you sing that well, how hard can it be to have stage presence? Hell, if I had his voice, I would lose all the weight I had to in a month, and kill on onstage.

Arnel is no Perry, but he has a real shot to impress.
With them seven pound turds you were talking about earlier,it wouldnt take you anytime to lose weight.Tell Perry about your diet
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: How about this for stage presence?

Postby journey123 » Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:12 am

pedro wrote:A friend sent me this link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZccz5cy3ks
The Koreans reactions were hilarious :D

Ellen Degeneres was so impressed she invited the girl to perform on the show. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5TafXFY ... re=related

Maybe AP could use a bit of coaching from this girl. :D


Not another Filipino. That was fantastic. Perhaps she can teach Arnel a trick or two when it comes to stage presence, whilst he's on holiday in the Philippines
journey123
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: London, United Kingdom

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests