by Rip Rokken » Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:21 am
I have a client who is a political consulting firm, and they normally work for senatorial campaigns. Always have great conversations with them, including yesterday, when I asked about the Ron Paul issue. Very interesting. He said this whole Internet blogger groundswell deal that seemed to really spark with Howard Dean, and now Ron Paul, is really something to watch, but so far has failed to translate into huge numbers of actual votes. He says the fundraising that has happened for these candidates has been phenomenal, so they end up with a huge amount of cash, but that for some reason it just hasn't in the past translated into the actual votes.
He also mentioned that this whole Fox News debate issue is very interesting. Basically, their reason for not including Ron Paul in the debates is because they consider him a "fringe candidate", but their argument doesn't really hold up when they include Fred Thompson, who has less money. It's cool learning about the machinations of how some of these things work, and I enjoy talking with them any chance I get.
In general, this group leans Democrat, and I was surprised when one of the younger girls there recently told me why she couldn't support Hillary Clinton for President. Turns out she actually likes and respects Hillary, but thinks that she's the wrong person to have in office while we have a war going on. She specifically mentioned that having a woman as President during this time would send the wrong message to our enemies. I was really surprised by this, but her rationale made sense.
