POSTED WITH THE BIZARRE NOTION NEAL MIGHT SEE IT AND CONSIDER THE IDEAS FOR THE FUTURE.
Got tired of seeing more political threads than Journey threads on this music forum, so I thought I'd try and get us back on track.
Like many of you, I personally am still on the fence about going to see another Journey show. I won't even consider it until I've heard Arnel with the band, but even more importantly, I'm tired of the dirty dozen tour. I need to hear new music (of at least TBF quality) from the band both on CD and on tour.
Knowing how I feel, I started asking myself what, if anything, would lure me to take the wife to see a show again? The only answer is basically what they've been doing themselves lately:
A double feature tour.
Then I started looking at things from Neal's perspective. Obviously the group is out there to work for a living. They want the most buck for their bang and we want the most bang for our buck, so what's the happy middle ground?
The answer:
.jpg)

Now, I don't know what the status of Neal and Jon's relationship is with John Waite, and this may have already been suggested before, but think about it. 3/4 of Journey are already Bad English. Assuming Neal, Jon and Deen are physically up to the touring challenge, this would not only be a financial windfall for them, but would center an entire tour on the musical collaboration between Neal and Jon over the years. Touring as both the opening and headlining act allows them to reap all the finances from the double ticket tour and we the fans get to see a hell of a show. Again, assuming they are up to the physical demands of such an outing.
(NOTE: I only left Ross out of that equation because I assumed they would go and hire a session bassist to fill in for Ricky Phillips (who will be on tour with Styx).
So is that a ticket you guys would be interested in seeing? If yes, say it. If not, put up your dream double feature tour. Time to start talking about music again peeps!