Saint John wrote:strangegrey wrote:....it seems to me, based on ticket availability in Las Vegas, I'm not the only one with concerns...
The fact that the show wasn't promoted probably accounts for that. I think they're doing this right. Putting him in front of a largely casual audience for his first public U.S. date is smart. I never got the "ticket sales" argument. I'm going and that's all I really give a shit about. Some people judge concerts by attendance (and I'm not implying you do), I judge them by substance.
That is to be seen.
While I'll agree in principle that maybe keeping it low key is a good idea....
I'm not sure what promotion you expect? It's a vegas show....anyone here from Vegas that can attest to no promotion? If I were the backer of the show, I'd have a hard time agreeing to the show not being promoted. I suspect in Vegas, the show is being promoted apropriately. I also question, if no/little promotion is being employed, why they would do that if they are filming the show for a DVD? That seems rediculously reckless to me.
Moving onto the judging thing. I'm not suggesting that the concert be judged by concert attendance, but it's definitely a leading indicator on the current draw ability of this band. We're not talking about whether an individual tom, dick or harry is going to like Arnel in this band. They can judge that on their own. This is ALL about whether or not the band can support a certain attendance level when booking a date in a city with 2.5 months to go.
By comparison, I can't get a 2 seats together for VH at MSG in NYC in mid march. The show is about as close to sold out as you can imagine. Same time frame, drastically different draw. I guess having a band with it's original singer = ticket sales. replacement singer != ticket sales.