OT: Another One Bites The Dust...

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby SteveForever » Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:08 pm

ohsherrie wrote:
SteveForever wrote:"The thing that sets the American Christian apart from all other people in the world is, he will die on his feet before he'll live on his knees."

George Washington


I'm sure the British, French or Australian Christian is just as proud of his God and Country as the American one and I think the Muslims could probably quote something similar from one of their leaders. Whatever the religion, it's the same hyperbole.


So? This is America the last time I checked and our country was founded on some wonderful principles and this quote is from one of the great men that did so. This thread is about American politics Sherrie, not Britain or the others you mentioned.
My response was related to what Memorex posted about Mormons, should have quoted him as a matter of a fact.
SteveForever
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3177
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:37 am

Postby ohsherrie » Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:27 pm

SteveForever wrote:
ohsherrie wrote:
SteveForever wrote:"The thing that sets the American Christian apart from all other people in the world is, he will die on his feet before he'll live on his knees."

George Washington


I'm sure the British, French or Australian Christian is just as proud of his God and Country as the American one and I think the Muslims could probably quote something similar from one of their leaders. Whatever the religion, it's the same hyperbole.


So? This is America the last time I checked and our country was founded on some wonderful principles and this quote is from one of the great men that did so. This thread is about American politics Sherrie, not Britain or the others you mentioned.


Yes, American politics, that shouldn't have anything to do with religion. If you want to talk religion then a Christian, is a Christian, is a Christian, regardless of his nationality, and a Muslim, regardless of nationality believes just as strongly in his dogma.

The term freedom of religion may have meant freedom of Christian religion when it was penned in antiquity, but at that time the right to bear arms meant the right to bear a single shot muzzle loader too. Every man was created equal also meant every white man then. If we're going to adapt the principles to suit the evolution of society and culture then all of the principles need to evolve equally. Picking and choosing which principles suit which political philosophy negates the validity of all of them
User avatar
ohsherrie
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Postby RedWingFan » Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:31 pm

ohsherrie wrote:
SteveForever wrote:
ohsherrie wrote:
SteveForever wrote:"The thing that sets the American Christian apart from all other people in the world is, he will die on his feet before he'll live on his knees."

George Washington


I'm sure the British, French or Australian Christian is just as proud of his God and Country as the American one and I think the Muslims could probably quote something similar from one of their leaders. Whatever the religion, it's the same hyperbole.


So? This is America the last time I checked and our country was founded on some wonderful principles and this quote is from one of the great men that did so. This thread is about American politics Sherrie, not Britain or the others you mentioned.


Yes, American politics, that shouldn't have anything to do with religion. If you want to talk religion then a Christian, is a Christian, is a Christian, regardless of his nationality, and a Muslim, regardless of nationality believes just as strongly in his dogma.

The term freedom of religion may have meant freedom of Christian religion when it was penned in antiquity, but at that time the right to bear arms meant the right to bear a single shot muzzle loader too. Every man was created equal also meant every white man then. If we're going to adapt the principles to suit the evolution of society and culture then all of the principles need to evolve equally. Picking and choosing which principles suit which political philosophy negates the validity of all of them

You're right. We are a pretty rotten country. Always have been. In fact I think folks in China and India deserve to have our jobs shipped to them. Yours and your husbands included. Reap what we sow.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby SteveForever » Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:34 pm

ohsherrie wrote:
SteveForever wrote:
ohsherrie wrote:
SteveForever wrote:"The thing that sets the American Christian apart from all other people in the world is, he will die on his feet before he'll live on his knees."

George Washington


I'm sure the British, French or Australian Christian is just as proud of his God and Country as the American one and I think the Muslims could probably quote something similar from one of their leaders. Whatever the religion, it's the same hyperbole.


So? This is America the last time I checked and our country was founded on some wonderful principles and this quote is from one of the great men that did so. This thread is about American politics Sherrie, not Britain or the others you mentioned.


Yes, American politics, that shouldn't have anything to do with religion. If you want to talk religion then a Christian, is a Christian, is a Christian, regardless of his nationality, and a Muslim, regardless of nationality believes just as strongly in his dogma.

The term freedom of religion may have meant freedom of Christian religion when it was penned in antiquity, but at that time the right to bear arms meant the right to bear a single shot muzzle loader too. Every man was created equal also meant every white man then. If we're going to adapt the principles to suit the evolution of society and culture then all of the principles need to evolve equally. Picking and choosing which principles suit which political philosophy negates the validity of all of them


:? huh? what does this have to do with Muslims? not sure what your motive is here in response to me quoting George Washington....?
freedom of religion means=we can have our own religions Sherrie and mine is Christianity.
SteveForever
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3177
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:37 am

Postby ohsherrie » Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:58 pm

I'm not sure of your motive in posting that quote then Liz. It seemed to me that you were saying Christianity is The American Religion and that it's the only religion that is used to exemplify valour or as an excuse for war.
User avatar
ohsherrie
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Postby SteveForever » Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:07 pm

ohsherrie wrote:I'm not sure of your motive in posting that quote then Liz. It seemed to me that you were saying Christianity is The American Religion and that it's the only religion that is used to exemplify valour or as an excuse for war.


no, it was in response to Memorex and Tammy's exchange about being left by their fathers and that welfare and Mormons helped them, again I should have quoted them, I already said that...
I had no motive, mine was praising this nation's kindness as a whole and I still believe in it. I believe in what this country was founded on, no apologies.
I don't have a problem either with candidates running for the Presidency having faith, I think people that have a spiritual life are more balanced.
SteveForever
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3177
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:37 am

Postby ohsherrie » Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:51 pm

Oh, uh-huh, sure, Ok.
User avatar
ohsherrie
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:42 pm

mistiejourney wrote:
Memorex wrote:Just to be clear - I am a firm believer in separation of church and state. I also take comfort, maybe for my own shortcomings, that generally our leaders have faith in a higher power. Maybe it will keep their hand off the button.

Mormon, Baptist, woman, black, Muslim - Actually a damn great moment in our country's history if you ask me.


Actually, I was thinking that the other day! We've come farther than we give ourselves credit for.


And to think... it was a big unsettling deal when Kennedy was running and became elected... "GASP! A Catholic president!? *faints*"
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:53 pm

ohsherrie wrote:The term freedom of religion may have meant freedom of Christian religion when it was penned in antiquity, but at that time the right to bear arms meant the right to bear a single shot muzzle loader too. Every man was created equal also meant every white man then. If we're going to adapt the principles to suit the evolution of society and culture then all of the principles need to evolve equally. Picking and choosing which principles suit which political philosophy negates the validity of all of them


I always love to happen across people who can see through that shit too. People do have a nasty habit of picking and choosing only what fits into personal agendas, eh? So if we're going to throw out one or two, then they all have to go. You can't just pick the ones you think are a good idea.

I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby STORY_TELLER » Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:12 pm

Greg wrote:
STORY_TELLER wrote:
Greg wrote:So, which one of these candidates have specifically said that they plan on including their religious beliefs into their presidential policy?


I'm not even going to dignify this with an answer. :roll:


Why not?


The reason I said I wasn't going to dignify it was because I thought you were baiting me. The reason I thought you were baiting me was because it's a silly question. It's a silly question because no candidate would ever specifically say they plan on including their religious beliefs into their presidential policy because it would be political suicide to do so. They would lose the moderate vote.

I considered your question to be silly because I thought that was a given, hence why I thought you were baiting me. If you were sincere, I apologize.

John McCain has this very same balancing act right now. He's trying to get the far right to back him. Even though he's now the front runner for the republican party, they're still not crazy about him because in their eyes, he's not conservative enough. And while he needs their backing, he doesn't want to lose the moderate voters who made him the front runner in the first place. Just using him as an example here, if he was to do what you were suggesting, no way he'd be the front runner now.
User avatar
STORY_TELLER
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:42 pm

Postby Rhiannon » Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:29 pm

bluejeangirl76 wrote:I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:


Jesus said for you to stop being an overinterpretive liberal bitch! :lol: :shock: :wink:
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:36 pm

Rhiannon wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:


Jesus said for you to stop being an overinterpretive liberal bitch! :lol: :shock: :wink:


Maybe so, but he still loves me. This I know. :D
Wasn't my interpretation, I robbed it from a program I saw. I still like it though.
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby Rhiannon » Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:38 pm

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:


Jesus said for you to stop being an overinterpretive liberal bitch! :lol: :shock: :wink:


Maybe so, but he still loves me. This I know. :D
Wasn't my interpretation, I robbed it from a program I saw. I still like it though.


I know. I just like pretending to deliver messages from the Son of Man. Yeah, He'd probably like it if I shut up. :lol:
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:47 pm

Rhiannon wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:


Jesus said for you to stop being an overinterpretive liberal bitch! :lol: :shock: :wink:


Maybe so, but he still loves me. This I know. :D
Wasn't my interpretation, I robbed it from a program I saw. I still like it though.


I know. I just like pretending to deliver messages from the Son of Man. Yeah, He'd probably like it if I shut up. :lol:


If he wanted you to shut up, he'd smite you. :wink: I have it on good authority that he enjoys your visuals.
I would like to believe we were given voices for a reason (or in this case, keyboards) :D
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby FishinMagician » Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:52 pm

Barb wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
Barb wrote:I'm not a bible thumper or even very religious, but I hate to see people mocked for their religious beliefs. I know each religion thinks they are right and so do the atheists who mock them. Call me old school, but I find that kind of humor tasteless and disrespectful. George Carlin doesn't have all the answers either.



I'm not really sure what your point is. I don't recall saying that George Carlin had "all the answers". As Dean pointed out...The guy is a COMEDIAN! His job in life is to poke fun at the life he sees around him. I'm personally NEVER going to criticize a comedian for making people laugh or actually think (which I think Carlin does a lot of). While most "Christians" may find it offensive, I went to church EVERY Sunday as a kid growing up (and for the record, it was a Christian church), and still was able to laugh about it.


John from Boston


My point I guess is that I think comedians who attack/mock relgious people are tacky (and arrogant) and that Mr. Carlin as an atheist probably isn't right either.


haha so every other aspect like race and ethnicity, gender, etc is ok. but religion??!! no not allowed!!
User avatar
FishinMagician
8 Track
 
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Florida

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:56 pm

bluejeangirl76 wrote:And to think... it was a big unsettling deal when Kennedy was running and became elected... "GASP! A Catholic president!? *faints*"



Yes, but sadly, I think Kennedy was the last non-Protestant president we elected, and that was well before I was even born!


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby FishinMagician » Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:57 pm

bluejeangirl76 wrote:I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:


well, thats just plain nasty!
User avatar
FishinMagician
8 Track
 
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Florida

Postby Rhiannon » Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:50 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:


Jesus said for you to stop being an overinterpretive liberal bitch! :lol: :shock: :wink:


Maybe so, but he still loves me. This I know. :D
Wasn't my interpretation, I robbed it from a program I saw. I still like it though.


I know. I just like pretending to deliver messages from the Son of Man. Yeah, He'd probably like it if I shut up. :lol:


If he wanted you to shut up, he'd smite you. :wink: I have it on good authority that he enjoys your visuals.
I would like to believe we were given voices for a reason (or in this case, keyboards) :D


Agreed. Shellfish is nasty though. For the record. :P (Except shrimp!)
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Sat Feb 09, 2008 1:16 am

FishinMagician wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:


well, thats just plain nasty!


Well yeah, but that wasn't quite the point I was going for....lol!
That's a whole different topic, and one I'm not going to be the one to start. :shock: :lol:
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby Rhiannon » Sat Feb 09, 2008 1:19 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
FishinMagician wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:


well, thats just plain nasty!


Well yeah, but that wasn't quite the point I was going for....lol!
That's a whole different topic, and one I'm not going to be the one to start. :shock: :lol:


You brought it up!! You sick freak! I mean, ewwww. So if sex in the monthlies is nasty, shellfish is nasty, what does that tell us about man-on-man lovin? ...Nasty? Ummhmmm... :lol: :wink:
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Sat Feb 09, 2008 1:25 am

Rhiannon wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
FishinMagician wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:I love when people argue gay rights with me and hide behind "the Bible says it's wrong." I don't hesitate to whip out Leviticus on the folks and point out that two pages BEFORE it even deals with that issue, it tells you eating shellfish is a sin. So is being intimate during that special womanly time. So is BATHING during that special womanly time. How many women adhere to THAT? So have another shrimp cocktail, re-read that bible, and come back when you have a better arugument. :roll: :lol:


well, thats just plain nasty!


Well yeah, but that wasn't quite the point I was going for....lol!
That's a whole different topic, and one I'm not going to be the one to start. :shock: :lol:


You brought it up!! You sick freak! I mean, ewwww. So if sex in the monthlies is nasty, shellfish is nasty, what does that tell us about man-on-man lovin? ...Nasty? Ummhmmm... :lol: :wink:


Yes, but all of those are subjective. To some... nasty. To others, not so much.
Schwimps is yummy. :D
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby Rhiannon » Sat Feb 09, 2008 1:30 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Well yeah, but that wasn't quite the point I was going for....lol!
That's a whole different topic, and one I'm not going to be the one to start. :shock: :lol:


You brought it up!! You sick freak! I mean, ewwww. So if sex in the monthlies is nasty, shellfish is nasty, what does that tell us about man-on-man lovin? ...Nasty? Ummhmmm... :lol: :wink:


Yes, but all of those are subjective. To some... nasty. To others, not so much.
Schwimps is yummy. :D


Skrimps is deelish... but the other critters, not so much. Ooh damn, now I'm craving some calabash. *drool*

Image
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Previous

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests