Saint John wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Saint John wrote:Those people are Journey fans because of Journey. If they were Perry fans exclusively they obviously wouldn't still come. Again, what Journey wants to do with their own music is their business. As for "pimping," Perry sure had no problem taking his cut when they were on the road performing songs he no longer wanted to/could. Like most corporations, once you leave you basically give up what you created in that corporation. This is no different. Are you trying to tell me that although 60% of the lineup that made those hits wants to tour and perform them that they're not supposed to because Perry won't/can't tour? And if their is any demand for those songs rerecorded they have every right to do so. Perry didn't have the foresight to know that his 10 year ban on them rerecording the hits wouldn't be long enough. Unlike Perry, Neal and Jon haven't retired, still love what they do and are able to perform. Maybe Perry does too, but I'll be damned if I know.
OK Dan, let's go through this one more time. I entered this conversation with this post:
ohsherrie wrote:I wish there was Rick. If the band's name had had Steve Perry in it, maybe, but because he was technically just another member of the band I'd assume that he would stop it if he legally could.
Steve Perry's voice was arguably Journey's trademark, but he has only very limited power to protect the trademark that is his voice.
I know some will say Neal's guitar was as much a trademark as Steve's voice, but I know of very few people who became Journey fans because of Neal's guitar. It was because of the voice they heard on the radio.
The magic of Journey couldn't be replicated by Steve with another band and it can't be replicated by the band with another voice because that kind of chemistry can't be copied. That's why they're now trying to scam people into believing their new CD has Perry on it by rerecording the GH to sell along with it.
I'm ashamed of them.
That's what I'm still saying. Nothing you've said changes the truth of that post.
Fair enough. I can agree with the majority of that with the exception of 2 things:
1) Journey's trademark was their music as a collective, collaborative entity. You hinted at this, but stopped short as you simply can't give any of the remaining members much credit.
2) They're
not "trying to scam people into believing their new CD has Perry on it." That's simply not true. No one thinks Perry is on the new CD, or in the band for that matter, as much as you'd like to use that as an aid in your argument.
Dan, I agree with you in principle, and I share your venom for Steve P's "inactivity" over the years, BUT re: #2:
- The other day I mentioned the Summer tour lineup to a good friend of mine (Who is quite the music fan- like evryone from RATT to Rufus Wainwright) who got very excited UNTIL I told her "...but no Steve Perry", to which she retorted "Oh, then why go?"
I don't necessarily AGREE with that line of thinking (I was stoked to get a chance to see them w/ JSS, but so much for that right?) but I think there are PLENTY of folks out there who don't realize Steve P isn't in the band. MTV isn't a part of our lives anymore, and most people don't have the time or wherewithall to follow music news, so when they hear JOURNEY there assumption is STEVE PERRY.
For my 2 cents (which no one really asked for!) I think I would be just as put off by a Journey lineup WITH Steve but WITHOUT Neal. To me, you really need both of those guys. Kinda like the KINKS without one of the Davies boys...it might be cool to listen to, and I might buy a ticket, but it wouldn't quite be the same.