
Moderator: Andrew
Rockindeano wrote:Would you throw the guy who did this in jail, or would you offer him an art scholarship?
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
I know what he was going for and why he included the bird. The bird is proportional....it's in the foreground and he was using it to show scale and to distance the mountains in the background....so he had the right idea....what does look disproportional is the bird to the branch..thats where he made the mistake...the bird is too large in that respect and why the overall picture looks slightly unbalanced..he should have made the branch larger and had it coming from the right direction....another mistake he made was to center the bird...nothing should be exactly centered in a painting..it draws the viewers eyes only to that and becomes the focus other then the painting as a whole and is distracting in that aspect....one should be drawn into a piece of art and the eyes should travel over the whole..thats what should happen when the dimensions are proportional...art school would help him improve his technique but he did a good job overall.StoneCold wrote:Scratch that, that bird seems disproportinately big for the type of bird.
Send him to school then.
Blueskies wrote: I know what he was going for and why he included the bird. The bird is proportional....it's in the foreground and he was using it to show scale and to distance the mountains in the background....so he had the right idea....what does look disproportional is the bird to the branch..thats where he made the mistake...the bird is too large in that respect and why the overall picture looks slightly unbalanced..he should have made the branch larger and had it coming from the right direction....another mistake he made was to center the bird...nothing should be exactly centered in a painting..it draws the viewers eyes only to that and becomes the focus other then the painting as a whole and is distracting in that aspect....one should be drawn into a piece of art and the eyes should travel over the whole..thats what should happen when the dimensions are proportional...art school would help him improve his technique but he did a good job overall.
yulog wrote:If he painted the rest of the train i could see that train becoming a local attraction(if he painted the rest of the cars with topless woman,then it would be a global attraction)
Apparently you are not an artist and have no knowledge of it. Hopefully they won't have an art category if you ever make it on Jeopardy.Enigma869 wrote:Blueskies wrote: I know what he was going for and why he included the bird. The bird is proportional....it's in the foreground and he was using it to show scale and to distance the mountains in the background....so he had the right idea....what does look disproportional is the bird to the branch..thats where he made the mistake...the bird is too large in that respect and why the overall picture looks slightly unbalanced..he should have made the branch larger and had it coming from the right direction....another mistake he made was to center the bird...nothing should be exactly centered in a painting..it draws the viewers eyes only to that and becomes the focus other then the painting as a whole and is distracting in that aspect....one should be drawn into a piece of art and the eyes should travel over the whole..thats what should happen when the dimensions are proportional...art school would help him improve his technique but he did a good job overall.
Fuck...That made my head hurt like a bad Jeopardy math answer!
John from Boston
Enigma869 wrote:Blueskies wrote: I know what he was going for and why he included the bird. The bird is proportional....it's in the foreground and he was using it to show scale and to distance the mountains in the background....so he had the right idea....what does look disproportional is the bird to the branch..thats where he made the mistake...the bird is too large in that respect and why the overall picture looks slightly unbalanced..he should have made the branch larger and had it coming from the right direction....another mistake he made was to center the bird...nothing should be exactly centered in a painting..it draws the viewers eyes only to that and becomes the focus other then the painting as a whole and is distracting in that aspect....one should be drawn into a piece of art and the eyes should travel over the whole..thats what should happen when the dimensions are proportional...art school would help him improve his technique but he did a good job overall.
Fuck...That made my head hurt like a bad Jeopardy math answer!
John from Boston
Blueskies wrote: Hopefully they won't have an art category if you ever make it on Jeopardy.![]()
![]()
lights1961 wrote:yulog wrote:If he painted the rest of the train i could see that train becoming a local attraction(if he painted the rest of the cars with topless woman,then it would be a global attraction)
yulog...best pics of the year... these asses beat anything that the fake boobs pics had!!
nice painting but throw em in jail anyway... just for fun. because he is an artist!!
Rick
Rockindeano wrote:Would you throw the guy who did this in jail, or would you offer him an art scholarship?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests