Moderator: Andrew
StyxCollector wrote:Learn how to read music and get some of the Japanese score books which are note-for-note transcriptions of all the instruments. Playing by ear is one thing, but learning to read will open up lots for you. It's one of the ways I learned early on - I bought songbooks for albums (arr. for piano/vocal/gtr) and played bass along with albums and then figured out what wasn't written.
ProgRocker53 wrote:I can read sheet music and tabs both. Do these songbooks have more than just the hit singles? That's all the online tab sites seem to have.
larryfromnextdoor wrote:im kidding about styxdudes advice.. if you can learn to read then the world is your oyster.. but if you learn to hear it by ear.. the girls will be.. whats more important?
Ehwmatt wrote:Also remember how tough it is to sightread for guitar/bass.
larryfromnextdoor wrote:for crying out loud man,, DONT take styxdudes advice!!.. reading music is for real musicians that play flutes and fiddles.. uh.. VIOLINS... .. learn your 5 penatonic scales.. put on the song you want to learn.. find the key,, and play by ear..
StyxCollector wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Also remember how tough it is to sightread for guitar/bass.
Sightreading is easy unless it's tab. Notes give you the ability to make the choice where to play it, whereas tab is trying to force you to do it one way.
I've done many pit bands for musicals where I sightread the score the night before the first show. I guess I'm lucky that way. The only way to get good at sightreading is to practice doing it.
StyxCollector wrote:Both approaches are valid. I've had success writing songs that started as technical, and others that came out of a riff or jamming and most of it was written in 5 - 10 minutes. I do know that when I labor over something, it generally comes out mediocre.
I generally compose on bass - at least that's where most of it starts - so I'm odd that way. When writing my jazz stuff, sometimes I'll collaborate. I'm very good at structure and arrangement, and I generally have horn players assist with melody if I can't come up with one. Having writing partners you work well with is a good checks and balance system - someone who can call bullshit on you. I'm not a fan of soulless music which do silly things like have odd meters or odd key signatures "just because". That's stupid.
Believe me, I know the downside of "thinking too much" when you play. Heck, I did a Rush tribute band for five years (I did keys and bass; we had a singer do that part of Geddy) lol Now you want a challenge, go do that![]()
Some complex music is good though. Right now I'm arranging a big band album and I'm even taking some songs you may know and turning them into big band versions (stuff like "La Villa Strangiato" by Rush, and both "Red" and "Vrooom" from King Crimson, for example). I'll be recording it over the next 6 - 8 months so I'll see how things turn out. Some of it is original stuff, too.
Ehwmatt wrote:Sure wish I had that ability. Should have started on piano or something instead of guitar. I can sightread at a rudimentary ability, certainly not like you described. Unfortunately, I (like many guitarists) have just never really been forced to learn.
Ehwmatt wrote:StyxCollector wrote:Both approaches are valid. I've had success writing songs that started as technical, and others that came out of a riff or jamming and most of it was written in 5 - 10 minutes. I do know that when I labor over something, it generally comes out mediocre.
I generally compose on bass - at least that's where most of it starts - so I'm odd that way. When writing my jazz stuff, sometimes I'll collaborate. I'm very good at structure and arrangement, and I generally have horn players assist with melody if I can't come up with one. Having writing partners you work well with is a good checks and balance system - someone who can call bullshit on you. I'm not a fan of soulless music which do silly things like have odd meters or odd key signatures "just because". That's stupid.
Believe me, I know the downside of "thinking too much" when you play. Heck, I did a Rush tribute band for five years (I did keys and bass; we had a singer do that part of Geddy) lol Now you want a challenge, go do that![]()
Some complex music is good though. Right now I'm arranging a big band album and I'm even taking some songs you may know and turning them into big band versions (stuff like "La Villa Strangiato" by Rush, and both "Red" and "Vrooom" from King Crimson, for example). I'll be recording it over the next 6 - 8 months so I'll see how things turn out. Some of it is original stuff, too.
Sounds pretty interesting and hard to imagine... keep me posted.
7 Wishes wrote:The only instrument where practical theory can really impact the songwriting process is with the piano. Chord voicing, counterpoint, harmonic structure..all elements of a sound theory background. If you look at most of the best keyboardist/pianist songwriters out there...Bruce Hornsby, Jordan Rudess, Geoffrey Downes...these guys all went to conservatories. On the other hand, look at Schon, Page, and Edward...see my point?
An exception to the classically trained guitarist rule would be Tom Scholz - but then look at his body of work compared to the aforementioned slingers. There is no comparison. Scholz is a technical genius, but he's not half the songwriter those guys are.
StyxCollector wrote:7 Wishes wrote:The only instrument where practical theory can really impact the songwriting process is with the piano. Chord voicing, counterpoint, harmonic structure..all elements of a sound theory background. If you look at most of the best keyboardist/pianist songwriters out there...Bruce Hornsby, Jordan Rudess, Geoffrey Downes...these guys all went to conservatories. On the other hand, look at Schon, Page, and Edward...see my point?
An exception to the classically trained guitarist rule would be Tom Scholz - but then look at his body of work compared to the aforementioned slingers. There is no comparison. Scholz is a technical genius, but he's not half the songwriter those guys are.
Chord voicing is just as important on guitar, too. Bass, not so much![]()
There's another aspect you're not saying: playing in a band - not sitting jerking off on your instrument in your bedroom - is what makes someone better. It's interaction. You can be the best technician, but if you can't play in context of a band (be it jazz or rock), you're fucked.
ProgRocker53 wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Sounds pretty interesting and hard to imagine... keep me posted.
Yeah definitely! Can't wait to hear it.
ProgRocker53 wrote:I find it interesting that you compose most things from the bass up... isn't that what Perry did for alot of his songs?
ProgRocker53 wrote:The drummer from my old band just joined my new one and we're writing some originals on Monday with our singer/guitarists. I'm really hoping these guys will suck up their egos and just let me and the drummer lay down a foundation for them to work over top of. I've got a zillion basslines that sound wonderful when it's just me and my drummer but suck if I try to plug them into one of my guitarists' original riffs. The guitarists are leaps and bounds more talented than I am, so maybe them working over top of my line will be easier than me trying to fit into what they're playing. Haha, if everything fails, I just ask them what the chords are and do basic blues/jazz walks. I'd like to branch out beyond that though.
ProgRocker53 wrote:These days I'm really trying to channel a bass style similar to that of Chris Wolstenholme from the band Muse. He's got a thick, churning lead bass style that carries the song and provides guitar-style riffs. Both of my guitarists like playing lead more than rhythm, so I have a feeling if I adapt that kind of style, they'd have more room to do what they like. I also get inspiration from a lot of Geddy's lines, and Randy Jackson's style on Raised on Radio.
Haha sometimes when blues/jazz walks and my improvisation don't help the song all, I end up playing VERY Styx-ish lines. I love Styx but some of their lines make Ross Valory look like Victor Wooten.
ProgRocker53 wrote:Good thing I can play in band context rather well for my experience level.
I eavesdropped on a local musicians' forum one day and there was a thread called "Bassists Needed." Someone said "I heard (ProgRocker53) is a solid bassist, give him a call." Yet another poster said "Are you serious? (ProgRocker53) knows his music, but is very limited in both skill and experience." (Which is true.) A third guy chipped in saying "Yeah, (ProgRocker53) isn't exactly Flea, but he can hold down a good groove and sounds alright in the mix. Even though he's only been playing for a year or so, he's already been in two bands. That's a huge plus. My band auditioned a bassist who could outplay everybody else by far, but sounded horrible when together with the rest of us. So we had to go with a guy that was kinda like (ProgRocker53) in alot of ways."
The band seeking bassists did indeed contact me, but I had to turn 'em down.... Sorry, but I really don't want to play grunge.
I cut my teeth on that Styx stuff, and if you notice up to about 1976 it's more busy and interesting. From Grand Illusion on, it's much more basic. But it works and servers the song. Chuck was one of my early influences and I have nothing but respect for him. Same for Ross - he's not going to win any best bass player awards, but what he does is right for Journey. And I treat those first few albums which were more prog WAY different than the stuff from 77 or so on.
StyxCollector wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:Good thing I can play in band context rather well for my experience level.
I eavesdropped on a local musicians' forum one day and there was a thread called "Bassists Needed." Someone said "I heard (ProgRocker53) is a solid bassist, give him a call." Yet another poster said "Are you serious? (ProgRocker53) knows his music, but is very limited in both skill and experience." (Which is true.) A third guy chipped in saying "Yeah, (ProgRocker53) isn't exactly Flea, but he can hold down a good groove and sounds alright in the mix. Even though he's only been playing for a year or so, he's already been in two bands. That's a huge plus. My band auditioned a bassist who could outplay everybody else by far, but sounded horrible when together with the rest of us. So we had to go with a guy that was kinda like (ProgRocker53) in alot of ways."
The band seeking bassists did indeed contact me, but I had to turn 'em down.... Sorry, but I really don't want to play grunge.
Look, I'm not Flea, Stanley, or Victor. I don't slap, etc. (Funny that I do RUsh, but that's a whole different deal.) I've always strived to be a bass player, not a soloist. This doesn't mean I don't have good technique or can't play fast, but you know what I mean. I've beaten others in auditions going back to high school by being solid, not Mr. Flashy. I've also lost positions that way, too. It works both ways. It depends what people are looking for.
I always know this to be true: there will always be people better than me at what I do. I'm not some egotistical jackass who thinks he's the bee's knees.
What's funny is I get more attention by doing what I do trying to just not be out front than if I try to be out front.
7 Wishes wrote:[ he's a musical genius, like a lot of the people on this board.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests