Enigma869 wrote:I've heard it explained on this site as Journey didn't need any permission from Perry to perform his songs in concert,
Correct.
Enigma869 wrote:but that permission was needed, if they ever wanted to record those tracks in a studio.
For a time limit agreed on between Perry and Journey. But that is not normal. Journey should not have needed any "permission". Perry was very "smart" on that one.
Enigma869 wrote:In fact, I was told the 2001 DVD didn't need approval from Perry, because it was a live performance.
Absolutely false. First: Rumor has it that Journey had to give editorial rights to the BTM special to Perry in return for releasing Journey 2001. Second: Any time there is a visual matched to the audio than ALL writers must give permission to it's use.
Enigma869 wrote:Regardless of what agreement has expired, I don't believe that Journey "owns" any song that Perry wrote or co-wrote. The notion of that is simply ridiculous!
Not sure about that.
Enigma869 wrote:As far as I know, the writers of a song ALWAYS retain the rights to those songs (unless they sell them off). Heck, just on American Idol tonight, they performed all Beatles songs, and I read that they were trying to get permission from McCartney since their first season to perform those songs! McCartney, as a co-writer, was the one who had to give the permission, so I'm not sure why Perry wouldn't have to do the same thing.
John from Boston
Again, that is the case when there is anything visual with the material. I know it sounds a little weird but as soon as there is a visual representation accompanying the song than the writers must agree to allow it's use. It has something to do with how their art is being portrayed, not just how it is used. That is why music to ads and TV shows and movies must be agreed on by all parties.