Moderator: Andrew
ProgRocker53 wrote:I'm bummed they're not a different direction.
tammy wrote: I'll never buy the re-recorded so I guess I won't be buying the new package. There are a few songs from both Arrival & Generations that I like.
jrnyman28 wrote:tammy wrote: I'll never buy the re-recorded so I guess I won't be buying the new package. There are a few songs from both Arrival & Generations that I like.
Think of it this way: You are BUYING the new material, you are GETTING the DVD and the re-records for FREE. If you don't want or like them throw them away. But buy the new stuff! Classic rock bands need the support. We will never make a statement to the masses about this music if we do not buy it!
SteveForever wrote:It seems disrespectful to Perry and that is still where the fans hearts are.
SteveForever wrote:What they should have done is included every singer on this thing so that
you could listen to all the diff. styles
SteveForever wrote:and then have the new guy on the dvd if that's what they wanted and new songs...
SteveForever wrote:but to pretend like the others never existed is queer. They should have embraced their past completely.
jrnyman28 wrote:tammy wrote: I'll never buy the re-recorded so I guess I won't be buying the new package. There are a few songs from both Arrival & Generations that I like.
Think of it this way: You are BUYING the new material, you are GETTING the DVD and the re-records for FREE. If you don't want or like them throw them away. But buy the new stuff! Classic rock bands need the support. We will never make a statement to the masses about this music if we do not buy it!
RockitRide wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:I'm bummed they're not a different direction.
There are a million other bands to listen to if you want to hear "a different direction". By definition, fans are fans of a particular band or style of music because they like the sound. I don't see this as a valid bitch.
YoungJRNY wrote:Come on, it's no disrespect to Steve Perry. Steve Perry is the one who wants nothing to do with the band anymore after the band has tried time and time again to get him back at good will, and clear whatever bad blood they have stored. I like this move by Journey, just goes to show what power they do have and makes it known that they won't sit back with a finger up their ass anymore.
People say it's holding onto the past. I think it's just the exact opposite. For a band to re-do their classic hits with their new lead singer shows volume and mass on where they want to head, direction wise (as far as the hits go.) They are making it known that they moved on without Perry, and this is what we are now. They are sick of living in Perry's shadow, and with Perry having nothing to do with them, neither do they want anything to do with Perry, and that SUCKKKKKKS. It's something the band should do, even though they know it won't bode over with some fans. It might make sense, it might not. Interesting, nonetheless.
SteveForever wrote:
It seems disrespectful to Perry and that is still where the fans hearts are.
Red13JoePa wrote:SteveForever wrote:
It seems disrespectful to Perry and that is still where the fans hearts are.
No, my 1ove, that's where perryon1y fans' hearts are.
Remember, they're fans not of Journey but of a singer.
Deb wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:SteveForever wrote:
It seems disrespectful to Perry and that is still where the fans hearts are.
No, my 1ove, that's where perryon1y fans' hearts are.
Remember, they're fans not of Journey but of a singer.
LOL, you having problems with your "L"s again?
Red13JoePa wrote:Deb wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:SteveForever wrote:
It seems disrespectful to Perry and that is still where the fans hearts are.
No, my 1ove, that's where perryon1y fans' hearts are.
Remember, they're fans not of Journey but of a singer.
LOL, you having problems with your "L"s again?
Yea, is it showing?
Not hurting my impact, is it?![]()
Deano and Cyndy Poon actua11y showed me the 1 gimmick to try and fruit1ess1y get around it.
I'm not a11 that bright, you see.
SteveForever wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:Come on, it's no disrespect to Steve Perry. Steve Perry is the one who wants nothing to do with the band anymore after the band has tried time and time again to get him back at good will, and clear whatever bad blood they have stored. I like this move by Journey, just goes to show what power they do have and makes it known that they won't sit back with a finger up their ass anymore.
People say it's holding onto the past. I think it's just the exact opposite. For a band to re-do their classic hits with their new lead singer shows volume and mass on where they want to head, direction wise (as far as the hits go.) They are making it known that they moved on without Perry, and this is what we are now. They are sick of living in Perry's shadow, and with Perry having nothing to do with them, neither do they want anything to do with Perry, and that SUCKKKKKKS. It's something the band should do, even though they know it won't bode over with some fans. It might make sense, it might not. Interesting, nonetheless.
I wish them all the luck in the world with this plan, but I have no need for a bunch of extra songs that I already have
so, no thanks. If your dad got remarried you would see how it hurt your mother=even if she doesn't want him anymore, so yes its disrespectful because he
made those songs what they are. Not Arnel, Not JSS, Not Augeri.
Stoneyman wrote:Yes it is kind of a slap to Perry. But he basically controlled everything for a long time and there was no Journey period. He held them hostage for such a long time that the family vibe is long gone. Some people might see it as Perry disrespecting Jon and Neal by being a wishy washy recluse for nearly 10 straight years when they were a team and business unto themselves. Neal and Jon want to work and play the songs that help define their careers. If it were up to Perry Journey would have quit when he did. I am of the opinion that I would rather have some Journey than no Journey.
Rerecording the songs to me is silly and useless. But they can do whatever they want to THEIR music. I am not insulted as fan that they did it, because they are the ones who have to worry about their legacy. No matter what I can always get out my Journey/Perry cd's and have at it.
The novelty of the Arnel classics will fade as quickly as they appear and everyone will be back to the real classics. No harm, no foul.
Saint John wrote:If someone can verify that this is insulting or a "slap" to Perry please let me know so I can buy multiple copies of this package. Perry has been bitch slapping Journey fans for 20+ years. Payback time!!!
Journey69 wrote:Stoneyman wrote:Yes it is kind of a slap to Perry. But he basically controlled everything for a long time and there was no Journey period. He held them hostage for such a long time that the family vibe is long gone. Some people might see it as Perry disrespecting Jon and Neal by being a wishy washy recluse for nearly 10 straight years when they were a team and business unto themselves. Neal and Jon want to work and play the songs that help define their careers. If it were up to Perry Journey would have quit when he did. I am of the opinion that I would rather have some Journey than no Journey.
Rerecording the songs to me is silly and useless. But they can do whatever they want to THEIR music. I am not insulted as fan that they did it, because they are the ones who have to worry about their legacy. No matter what I can always get out my Journey/Perry cd's and have at it.
The novelty of the Arnel classics will fade as quickly as they appear and everyone will be back to the real classics. No harm, no foul.
I don't think they are doing it to piss Perry off,maybe indirectly..I think they are doing it more of a bridge..They want to get Arnel in the fans minds,past and present..Maybe using the classic catalog to start out the new fans..Its a statement to let everyone know that Journey wasn't just Steve Perry.. Just a thought.. People that grew up with Journey like me..Know SP,the 20 yr olds are growing up with Arnel now..
Saint John wrote:It's a win-win situation for Perry. If it tanks, his HUGE ego becomes even bigger, and if it does well his bank account might come close to rivaling his ego. The man is in the catbird seat...per usual.
SteveForever wrote:[
Do you think they should state on the package ...
Steve Perry is not singing on this album or This is a re-recording of previous hits with our NEW singer?
Saint John wrote:SteveForever wrote:[
Do you think they should state on the package ...
Steve Perry is not singing on this album or This is a re-recording of previous hits with our NEW singer?
Absolutely NOT. It has the name Journey on it and that is all they need to "state." If someone has been in a coma for 20+ years and doesn't realize that Perry has refused to toured for nearly a quarter century with his "brothers" then that's their own fault. To have the audacity to think ( and I'm not saying you do) that Journey has to specify that a guy that hasn't toured with them since fucking Reagan was in office, is not in the band, is absurd.
Arkansas wrote:I think they're all in the catbird seat. It's a vested interest. Azoff proved it with The Eagles, and now it looks to be validated with Journey. Anything that WM is paying 'people all-Journey' for this project is pure profit. The real work was done years ago when the music was created and they toured it non-stop (Chicago eleven times!). They peaked with Escape and carried-on with Frontiers...then branched into ROR, which solidly transitioned Journey from pop/rock to A/C. They came back with TBF which shipped top of the market right out of the gate.
Steve Smith is still making Journey money. I hope Fleischman still gets royalties from WITS. And of course I wish the best for Gregg Rolie. (Why isn't he in the band now?) And I really hope that Valory was/is able to regain big financial status from it all. DC may be a hired-gun, but I'm sure he's paid well.
Thing is, all the old talk about Journey being 'corporate' was right. And I applaud that hugely. Good, bad, right, or wrong...fish, fight or #uck, it's all a win-win.
There may be some animosities somewhere, but my gut is that they're all older and past all that juveniile crap. It's pure business...big business. They're doing what they (all involved) think is right for their 'company'.
Should Ford Motor Company have quit making vehicles because Henry was gone? Uh, no.
later~
SteveForever wrote:Saint John wrote:SteveForever wrote:[
Do you think they should state on the package ...
Steve Perry is not singing on this album or This is a re-recording of previous hits with our NEW singer?
Absolutely NOT. It has the name Journey on it and that is all they need to "state." If someone has been in a coma for 20+ years and doesn't realize that Perry has refused to toured for nearly a quarter century with his "brothers" then that's their own fault. To have the audacity to think ( and I'm not saying you do) that Journey has to specify that a guy that hasn't toured with them since fucking Reagan was in office, is not in the band, is absurd.
Of course people know he's not in the band, so putting the classics out people will assume these are his recordings.
Why can't Arnel's new songs and the live dvd be enough? I just don't get it, but doesn't matter its not gonna do that great anyway.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests