Moderator: Andrew
tammy wrote:I'm thinking it's JSS.
Moon Beam wrote:Dang it's not nice being wrong but I am often enough, you'd think
I'd be used to it by now.
Herbie Herbert is the only other one I can see chatting it up for 3 hrs.
Oh the suspense!
Thanks for it Wombat.
Andrew wrote:Not Augeri. I'd love to though and he knows where to find me. Sadly he never returned any e-mails from last year and I hven't heard from him in a long time.
Andrew wrote:Not Augeri.
Rockindeano wrote:This is going to blow this board up.
I am ready.
Saint John wrote:Rockindeano wrote:This is going to blow this board up.
I am ready.
Whatever it is it should be unedited.
Rockindeano wrote:This is going to blow this board up.
I am ready.
youkeepmewaiting wrote:
NEED to get an Augeri interview soon though, come on Steve get in touch/
Red13JoePa wrote:youkeepmewaiting wrote:
NEED to get an Augeri interview soon though, come on Steve get in touch/
No shot for here.
If you're Augeri don't you see MR.com as "The site that broke tapegate?"
Red13JoePa wrote:It's NOT a slap at AJM.
The only time I'd do that would be to say "snap out of it" it he waited around thinking Augeri would respond to emails and requests for interviews.
I'm not talking about the message boards either, but the front page when the details ran. The outlets that ran with it attributed to MR.com but took no side in it one way or other, just saying "MR says it happened."
So again, if i'm Augeri I'm thinking "No way. If that site hadn't said anything on the front page it wouldn't have happened."
And you're gonna argue, "No way!!!! My blog this, and my posts that" but they weren't mainstream enough to raise the sheer number of eyebrows that drew's front page, the ONLY outlet to level the charges, raised.
tammy wrote:I'm thinking it's JSS.
Rockindeano wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:It's NOT a slap at AJM.
The only time I'd do that would be to say "snap out of it" it he waited around thinking Augeri would respond to emails and requests for interviews.
I'm not talking about the message boards either, but the front page when the details ran. The outlets that ran with it attributed to MR.com but took no side in it one way or other, just saying "MR says it happened."
So again, if i'm Augeri I'm thinking "No way. If that site hadn't said anything on the front page it wouldn't have happened."
And you're gonna argue, "No way!!!! My blog this, and my posts that" but they weren't mainstream enough to raise the sheer number of eyebrows that drew's front page, the ONLY outlet to level the charges, raised.
You are of course wrong. While Andrew might have appealed to the "curious fan" who wanted something of a higher authority, this Forum swayed a helluva lot more people. Have you not forgotten all the BT ers coming over to battle daily? They were all here. And the Blog was the monster. That thing did the most convincing truth. The fact Cj and her posse were engaging me tells me that I held the cards and the mere fact they did engage, proved to me at least, that they knew they were trying to do spin control. They knew they were wrong.
Saint John wrote:
I honestly don't think they did. Trying to tell a Wiggler that the "swaying one" was lipping is sort of like telling the Loons that the "tailed one" has a rather large sniffer. It's obvious to everyone but them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests