conversationpc wrote:
Dreadful?
In some games, yes. In game six against Atlanta, the guy was launching one ridiculous shot after another and not even hitting the rim!
conversationpc wrote: As I said above, all three guys' numbers were down this year due to the fact that they are all on the same team. If you have three 20 pt. + guys on the same team, their numbers are bound to go down.
We agree on this point. I agree if there are many superstars on one team, then all of their offensive numbers will inevitably go down. That said, Garnett was and is the one guy that makes that machine run. If you doubt that, watch a couple of Celtics games, and it will be VERY obvious what a dominant player Garnett is. He's the most dominant player I've ever seen, defensively. The guy doesn't have to score a point and can still dominate a game!
conversationpc wrote: Bryant has been one of the best defenders in the league for the last few years now.
Kobe is a VERY good all around player and always has been. That said, he's not on the same planet with Garnett, when it comes to defense. They are two completely different players and really can't be compared. Garnett's game isn't offense and never has been. Kobe is an offensive machine. They're both great players and both first ballot hall of famers. I just believe that defense wins in ALL sports!
conversationpc wrote: Was Garnett a better defender this year? Probably
Once again, we agree!
conversationpc wrote:I don't know too many knowledgeable pro-basketball fans who would say that the Lakers would be better off without Kobe than the Celtics would without Garnett.
Well, as I said previously, we'll never know. One can speculate all we want, but we know what the Celtics were without Garnett last season. I also know that before Pau Gasol joined the Lakers, they were an okay team, but not dominant. After Gasol joined the team, the Lakers went 22-4 with Gasol in the lineup. When Gasol was hurt for 10 games, the Lakers went 5-5, including two home losses to both Charlotte and Memphis (teams the Lakers should beat without Kobe on the floor)! Keep in mind that Kobe played in all 10 of those games that Gasol was hurt and only managed to produce a .500 record. I'm not saying Kobe sucks. The guy is a GREAT, GREAT player! I'm simply saying that if you (objectively) look at the Lakers record this past season, Gasol was every bit (and in my opinion, moreso) as instrumental as Kobe was, and their record with Kobe and without Gasol certainly add some validity to my opinion!
John from Boston