Moderator: Andrew
pineda1 wrote:In this interview Arnel mentioned they originally would have recorded only four new songs.
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.as ... yId=117601
The_Noble_Cause wrote:This article also incorrectly lumps Shirley in with ALL of the songs on the album, when in fact, he only produced the new tracks.
Wonder how the Caveman feels to be associated with the newly re-done greatest hits.
Rip Rokken wrote:I didn't realize he didn't do all of them. I remember one of his earliet "Caveman's Diary" entries where he mentioned working on a project that was like going back in time to the 80's or something like that. I took it to mean the re-recorded greatest hits. Who produced these, then?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:I could've sworn I read that somewhere - most likely it was on this very forum.
Ahh well...far be it from me to overrule The Wombat.
Sorry about that.
Considering he's had previous dealings with Perry, I am somewhat surprised Shirley would even consider touching the classic recordings.
Kalodner would have probably nixed the idea.
EightyRock wrote:They'll never free themselves of the Perry legacy, so they continue to milk it.
Saint John wrote:EightyRock wrote:They'll never free themselves of the Perry legacy, so they continue to milk it.
There is no "Perry legacy." Only a JOURNEY legacy that Perry was a part of. The "Steve Perry legacy" is Street Talk and FTLOSM. Hardly anything "legacy" worthy.
NealIsGod wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:Even Neal said they let him creatively steer the ship.
Right into the fucking iceburg of a dozen years of inactivity.
STORY_TELLER wrote:NealIsGod wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:Even Neal said they let him creatively steer the ship.
Right into the fucking iceburg of a dozen years of inactivity.
That's irrelevant to the topic being discussed, and, Neal's just as responsible. He could have tweaked Perry out of retirement by making his Chalfant/Rollie/Cain moving on move sooner, right?
NealIsGod wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:NealIsGod wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:Even Neal said they let him creatively steer the ship.
Right into the fucking iceburg of a dozen years of inactivity.
That's irrelevant to the topic being discussed, and, Neal's just as responsible. He could have tweaked Perry out of retirement by making his Chalfant/Rollie/Cain moving on move sooner, right?
The topic is an Arnel interview. How is your post before mine relevant to the topic? Blame SJ for hijacking this one.
Jeremey wrote:Cain produced the Greatest Hits tracks. Don't know if that's the "official" line or not, but it's the factual one. There was very little time to finish up the GH once they spent so much time on the new tracks.
STORY_TELLER wrote:NealIsGod wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:Even Neal said they let him creatively steer the ship.
Right into the fucking iceburg of a dozen years of inactivity.
That's irrelevant to the topic being discussed, and, Neal's just as responsible. He could have tweaked Perry out of retirement by making his Chalfant/Rollie/Cain moving on move sooner, right? Let's also not forget that during that time, melodic rock dropped off the radar and grunge was the popular style. I'm sure that influenced the inactivity to a degree.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:pineda1 wrote:In this interview Arnel mentioned they originally would have recorded only four new songs.
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.as ... yId=117601
I think Neal said as much in one of the earlier press releases.
This article also incorrectly lumps Shirley in with ALL of the songs on the album, when in fact, he only produced the new tracks.
Wonder how the Caveman feels to be associated with the newly re-done greatest hits.
If you recall, as he said in his own words....
"I have been brutally honest with them, and was not interested in being any part of them being a nostalgia/tribute band"
Jeremey wrote:Cain produced the Greatest Hits tracks. Don't know if that's the "official" line or not, but it's the factual one. There was very little time to finish up the GH once they spent so much time on the new tracks.
Saint John wrote:The only thing Neal is guilty of is showing faith in a guy that had no intention of ever touring again and whose primary goal was to sink the ship he once captained because he was unable to move on physically and/or emotionally. And Perry was no more important than the guy that picked him (Herbert) or the guy that was able to mimic and compliment his voice so artistically (Schon). He recorded 2 albums, Against The Wall and FTLOSM, completely out of Journey (for all intents and purposes), and they were colossal flops. One so bad that the label refused to even release it and the other so unispiring that it was supported with a high school gym tour. Street Talk was recorded while he was an active member of Journey. So basically, outside of Journey, he was artistically bankrupt with very little to offer.
STORY_TELLER wrote:I swear dude, when it comes to Perry, you sound like Alanis Morrisette singing "you outta know".![]()
Saint John wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:I swear dude, when it comes to Perry, you sound like Alanis Morrisette singing "you outta know".![]()
The only thing more pathetic than that are the people that let his amazing time in Journey (77-83) veto almost 15 years of aimless vision, deceit, control, ego, and the capsizing of a once great band. When he left in 98 I'd bet he was certain that he exacted enough chaos and legal wrangling that the band would never recover. What he didn't realize was, unlike himself, that Neal and Jon aren't quitters.
STORY_TELLER wrote:Saint John wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:I swear dude, when it comes to Perry, you sound like Alanis Morrisette singing "you outta know".![]()
The only thing more pathetic than that are the people that let his amazing time in Journey (77-83) veto almost 15 years of aimless vision, deceit, control, ego, and the capsizing of a once great band. When he left in 98 I'd bet he was certain that he exacted enough chaos and legal wrangling that the band would never recover. What he didn't realize was, unlike himself, that Neal and Jon aren't quitters.
![]()
![]()
![]()
By jove! I think I hit a nerve!
Thank you for illustrating my point. What you just said has nothing to do with the musical legacy. You're just pissed at the guy because your favorite band disappeared. Fine. But the musical legacy was what was being discussed when you chimed in and that is what is at issue. Keep (your) other separate issue out of it, because when it comes to the music, your other issues are clouding your statements and it's obvious. Seek help and enjoy the new release.![]()
![]()
http://youtube.com/watch?v=705LEH3j2g0
Red13JoePa wrote:That's when the magical, BTM verified "sudden urge to be in Journey again" gripped p.
Red13JoePa wrote:He mothballed them in '87.
By refusing to officially quit, he got away with robbing Journey of a few albums and tours.
It WAS faith in him, that he needed his monk-like time off.
Much like now, using the Garboeesque mystique of his hibernationg vocal prowess that threatens every now and then to sing to maniupulate the comeback hopes, he used the notion of "he didn't say he's done with Journey, he'll come back to us someday now" to keep Journey shelved for the better part of that decade.
Schon/Cain see FTLOSM drop a year and a half after turns his considerable bugle up at a request to lay down vox for With A Tear and Into Your Arms and finally see the light and go "fuck this. We're Journey again and we're not even gonna ASK him to sing."
That's when the magical, BTM verified "sudden urge to be in Journey again" gripped p.
STORY_TELLER wrote:Perry especially. He was a major reason we discuss this band and its music long after their heyday and he blew his freaking voice out doing so. I think he deserves respect for that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests