Coverdale says Zeppelin will tour

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Pelata » Thu May 15, 2008 4:44 am

I like how he called the dude "ol' cock"... :lol:
Pelata
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:50 am
Location: NC - USA

Postby STORY_TELLER » Thu May 15, 2008 4:49 am

ProgRocker53 wrote:Plant was definitely the first, the original...

...but Coverdale has a much much better singing voice.


I agree with this. If Robert Plant and David Coverdale were both in their early 20's today, and made new music as solo artists, having never heard of them before, listened to side by side, Coverdale has the better singing voice. He was born with better chords.

That being said, give me Zep over Whitesnake any day.
User avatar
STORY_TELLER
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:42 pm

Postby STORY_TELLER » Thu May 15, 2008 4:54 am

conversationpc wrote:
Pelata wrote:Plant is good...no question. Coverdale borrowed from Plant...no question. Coverdale is a technically better singer...no question.

Just because Plant has been "borrowed from" doesn't make him better than the borrower...just first.


Plant also borrowed from singers before him. I've heard him say as much in interviews. Happens in every genre of music and with every type of musical instrument, including the human voice.


Well, you're talking about style over physical ability. Those are two different things. You can't borrow physical vocal cords. If that were the case, Augeri would have had the vocal quality of Perry, but he doesn't.

You can try to sing by mimicking a style like someone else, but if you don't have that quality physical instrument in your throat to begin with, you can't create the quality of sounds they did.
User avatar
STORY_TELLER
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:42 pm

Postby maverick218 » Thu May 15, 2008 5:05 am

conversationpc wrote:
STORY_TELLER wrote:Wasn't Robert Plant perturbed at Jimmy Page's collaboration with Coverdale back in the 80's? I mean Coverdale's vocal choices, look and stage mannerisms were obviously derived from Robert Plant.


The difference being that Coverdale is/was a far better vocalist than Plant ever was.

No way- Coverdale was good, but Plant was just awesome, and (as alread stated, Coverdale largely copied Percy (Plant's nickname during their heyday).
maverick218
LP
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:39 am
Location: Here and there, mostly here, sometimes there.

Postby maverick218 » Thu May 15, 2008 5:07 am

STORY_TELLER wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:Plant was definitely the first, the original...

...but Coverdale has a much much better singing voice.


I agree with this. If Robert Plant and David Coverdale were both in their early 20's today, and made new music as solo artists, having never heard of them before, listened to side by side, Coverdale has the better singing voice. He was born with better chords.

That being said, give me Zep over Whitesnake any day.

Both great, but I think Plant is more versatile- Coverdale's more of a screamer.
maverick218
LP
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:39 am
Location: Here and there, mostly here, sometimes there.

Postby Angiekay » Sun May 18, 2008 2:58 pm

maverick218 wrote:Both great, but I think Plant is more versatile- Coverdale's more of a screamer.



Are you kidding? Have you LISTENED to any Led Zeppelin songs?! Let's see...IMMIGRANT SONG comes to mind!! :lol: :roll:











Image
User avatar
Angiekay
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3602
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:15 pm
Location: In a state of confusion

Postby Rick » Sun May 18, 2008 3:59 pm

Angiekay wrote:
maverick218 wrote:Both great, but I think Plant is more versatile- Coverdale's more of a screamer.



Are you kidding? Have you LISTENED to any Led Zeppelin songs?! Let's see...IMMIGRANT SONG comes to mind!! :lol: :roll:






Maverick is right I think. Plant can sing anything. So can Coverdale, but he's not on the same level and nobody remembers anything he's sang where he wasn't screaming.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Angiekay » Mon May 19, 2008 2:44 am

Rick wrote:
Angiekay wrote:
maverick218 wrote:Both great, but I think Plant is more versatile- Coverdale's more of a screamer.



Are you kidding? Have you LISTENED to any Led Zeppelin songs?! Let's see...IMMIGRANT SONG comes to mind!! :lol: :roll:






Maverick is right I think. Plant can sing anything. So can Coverdale, but he's not on the same level and nobody remembers anything he's sang where he wasn't screaming.


Yeah, but Plant doesn't remember anything HE sang!! :lol:








Image
User avatar
Angiekay
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3602
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:15 pm
Location: In a state of confusion

Postby weatherman90 » Mon May 19, 2008 3:00 am

Personally, I love Coverdale's voice. I've never been a big Led Zeppelin fan.

You gotta hand it to him - he's 56 and he can still belt it out like no other.
Matt
--------------------------------------
www.melodicrockconcerts.com
User avatar
weatherman90
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1565
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:03 am
Location: Bismarck, ND

Previous

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests