Moderator: Andrew
G.I.Jim wrote:They're high enough everywhere, that I think we should all get together as a country and stop these bastards! I've yet to understand how these damn companies can raise their profit margins by hundreds of percentages in a couple of years, yet there's nothing that the country can do about it!??? WTF! I understand the concept of a free economy, and everyone's right to make a dollar here in the U.S., but when it cripples the whole fucking country....DAMNIT!!!!
conversationpc wrote:Profit margins for oil companies have stayed virtually the same and are lower than lots of other industries.
strangegrey wrote:$4.05 for regular here on Long Island
strangegrey wrote:conversationpc wrote:Profit margins for oil companies have stayed virtually the same and are lower than lots of other industries.
It's not the net profit margin, it's the net profit. profit margins are generally static within a specific industry. They dont change...so trying to use that argument is pointless. The fact that oil company's have been able to drive up revenues is where they are making money hand over fist.
They're charging 4 dollars a gallon now...so that 9% profit just *doubled* from a few years ago, when it was 2 dollars a gallon.
Sure, the price of gas is partially beyond their control...however, some of the drivers of gas prices have been put into action by very highly placed 'friends' of big oil. That's without question....
Oil companies aren't as profitable as you think
I sometimes get the impression that people think oil executives hold clandestine meetings where they unilaterally decide to set the price of oil and gas in order to maximize their profits. After maniacally laughing about how they are gouging the American public, they then go swimming in pools of gold ala Scrooge McDuck.
But there's a problem with that theory. Even though many oil companies are reporting record profits, many people forget just how expensive it is for energy companies to engage in the oil business.
The average net profit margin for the S&P Energy sector, according to figures from Thomson Baseline, is 9.7%. The average for the S&P 500 is 8.5%. So yes, energy companies are more profitable than many others...but not by an inordinate amount.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/29/markets/thebuzz/
I shopped around - and ended up paying $4.04 today -strangegrey wrote:$4.05 for regular here on Long Island
conversationpc wrote:strangegrey wrote:Eh, it's not quite that simple, either...Oil companies aren't as profitable as you think
I sometimes get the impression that people think oil executives hold clandestine meetings where they unilaterally decide to set the price of oil and gas in order to maximize their profits. After maniacally laughing about how they are gouging the American public, they then go swimming in pools of gold ala Scrooge McDuck.
But there's a problem with that theory. Even though many oil companies are reporting record profits, many people forget just how expensive it is for energy companies to engage in the oil business.
The average net profit margin for the S&P Energy sector, according to figures from Thomson Baseline, is 9.7%. The average for the S&P 500 is 8.5%. So yes, energy companies are more profitable than many others...but not by an inordinate amount.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/29/markets/thebuzz/
Moose wrote:$3.57 in the Atlantic City area, but that probably changed in the time I typed this.
By trying to use the net profit margin to explain that oil companies dont make that much money is pretty sad.
Also, to bring in the suggestion that there are secret meetings where managers meet to plan profits? Are you a college student or do you just still think like one.
Because these secret meetings happen all of the time...in every industry...in every country. Call them board meetings, strategy sessions...whatever you want. But the name of the game with ANY company is profit....as much as possible.
The problem I have with big oil, is not necessarily the executive board of say, exxon or BP. It's the factors that are surrounding the recent and dramatic increases of oil prices. If you think for one second, that Bush's efforts to deregulate oil futures, drive down the value of the dollar, invade iraq, etc Didn't play right into the pockets of his oil friends, you're living in a fantasy world.
Trust me....they're doing things to gouge the average paying citizen....it's just not in the profit margin. It's in the total revenue stream. different method....same damn effect.
conversationpc wrote:You're totally missing my point or I'm just not making it clear enough. What I'm TRYING to say is that the oil companies do not deserve as much blame as they get. Could they be colluding to drive prices up? Yeah, possibly but I don't think it plays as big a part as other factors. Everyone just always gets up in arms about BIG OIL...OOOOOH....AAAAAHHHHH. There are many other factors, some of which you mentioned that play a role.
sadie65 wrote:$3.79 here in Southern Illinois. And climbing I'm sure.
strangegrey wrote:conversationpc wrote:You're totally missing my point or I'm just not making it clear enough. What I'm TRYING to say is that the oil companies do not deserve as much blame as they get. Could they be colluding to drive prices up? Yeah, possibly but I don't think it plays as big a part as other factors. Everyone just always gets up in arms about BIG OIL...OOOOOH....AAAAAHHHHH. There are many other factors, some of which you mentioned that play a role.
While I see your point, I don't think they are as blameless as you may think. They most definitely strategize....do they collude? no...but they dont have to. They've benefited from external factors that have dropped right into their lap.....and some of those external factors happen to be caused by highly placed people sympathetic to their goals. They can drive prices up by limiting production, shifting schedules, delaying deliveries....then you add on the hedging, the foreign policy and the various other 'blunders' from Bush....and you get a perfect picture of massive profits...
tj wrote:strangegrey wrote:conversationpc wrote:You're totally missing my point or I'm just not making it clear enough. What I'm TRYING to say is that the oil companies do not deserve as much blame as they get. Could they be colluding to drive prices up? Yeah, possibly but I don't think it plays as big a part as other factors. Everyone just always gets up in arms about BIG OIL...OOOOOH....AAAAAHHHHH. There are many other factors, some of which you mentioned that play a role.
While I see your point, I don't think they are as blameless as you may think. They most definitely strategize....do they collude? no...but they dont have to. They've benefited from external factors that have dropped right into their lap.....and some of those external factors happen to be caused by highly placed people sympathetic to their goals. They can drive prices up by limiting production, shifting schedules, delaying deliveries....then you add on the hedging, the foreign policy and the various other 'blunders' from Bush....and you get a perfect picture of massive profits...
Not trying to be a pain in the whatever, but help me understand then. If retail gas prices drop, yet the cost of goods sold stays the same, doesn't that mean that the profit margin decreases? If so, then to Dave's point, oil companies would not be earning as much as other industries. Their boards would be negligent in not seeking the maximum return for their shareholders.
I don't like high gas prices, diesel is over $4 per gallon here. That said, my divorced mother in law, whose retirement has been significantly invested in oil stocks for decades, is doing well at the moment. When anyone's 401K, mutual fund, stock,or whatever goes up in price, it is because someone else is paying that higher price. The raises you get in your job, the increase in your retirement account, all come from someone paying more than what was being paid when you started them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests