And they say W can't speak properly

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:25 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:It's expected that court records and often newspapers would use a person's formal name -- that proves nothing.


Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Keep spinning, Bush whore.


You are deluded -- I'm no Bush supporter. Voted for him twice, and could not be more disappointed. I'm completely independent, though hardcore conservative in idiology. I am a true free thinker, but you seem to be someone just spitting back out the pablum your professors crammed down your throat in college. I've pretty much shown I look at both sides, but you can't admit fault on your own side. You are nothing but a HACK.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Saint John » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:33 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Biden was gushing about Obama being so clean and articulate, as if such black men are an anomaly.


They are. He's the exception, not the rule. Pull your head out of Sharpton's pompadour hairdo and look around. :lol:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Centaure » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:46 pm

Rip Rokken wrote: Voted for him twice, and could not be more disappointed. K.


To vote twice for a man, is kind of a good support, imo. :P

The thing that I really don't understand is the second vote for him. The first time you have the excuse that he was a new guy, but the second time ??? You had hope that he would repear his mistakes ?

I agree that Kerry wasn't a strong candidate.
Centaure
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:30 am

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:50 pm

Rip Rokken wrote:You are deluded -- I'm no Bush supporter. Voted for him twice, and could not be more disappointed. I'm completely independent, though hardcore conservative in idiology. I am a true free thinker, but you seem to be someone just spitting back out the pablum your professors crammed down your throat in college. I've pretty much shown I look at both sides, but you can't admit fault on your own side. You are nothing but a HACK.


No independent thinker I know of takes Rush Limaugh at his word, and even goes so far as to defend him.
I have seen you do both.
Anyone who would vote for Bush twice, when all the flaws currently laid bare were openly displayed in 2004, is a moron not worth reckoning with.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:52 pm

Centaure wrote:To vote twice for a man, is kind of a good support, imo. :P

The thing that I really don't understand is the second vote for him. The first time you have the excuse that he was a new guy, but the second time ??? You had hope that he would repear his mistakes ?

I agree that Kerry wasn't a strong candidate.


Even Tucker Carlson admitted he couldn't bring himself to vote for Bush again.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:00 pm

Centaure wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote: Voted for him twice, and could not be more disappointed. K.


To vote twice for a man, is kind of a good support, imo. :P

The thing that I really don't understand is the second vote for him. The first time you have the excuse that he was a new guy, but the second time ??? You had hope that he would repear his mistakes ?

I agree that Kerry wasn't a strong candidate.


Very easy... I voted for him the first time because he was closer to my ideology than Gore, who I can't stand. He did become quite popular after the start of the war, and I supported him. 2nd term, I continued to support him and couldn't stand Kerry, who I think is a coward and a pompous liar. I'm glad he got his ass handed to him by his former veterans and exposed for the fraud he was. I still have a copy of "Stolen Honor", btw, and also read the book "Unfit For Command". No way would I ever want to see him in office, though I did get to watch him live from the Senate visitors gallery in D.C. introducing yet another bill to pull the troops from Iraq. Was pretty lucky to catch that during our tour, and he was pretty much one of the only ones in the room (except for the guy presiding), talking to the CSPAN cameras.

So I was extremely excited to find that the Repubs not only kept the White House, but also now had control of both the Senate and the House. Loved Bush's speech about feeling he'd earned some political "capital", and that he intended to spend it.... and then.... NOTHING. An INCREDIBLE wasted opportunity. Not a single issue important to me was handled, or at least, not in the way they could have handled it. If anything, they could have made the tax cuts permanent, hopefully enacted even more, and done something about border control. What did we get? JACK S**T! At that point, they proved that at least this round of Repubs were nothing more than politicians, not much different than the Dems. Mainly interested in keeping power than working for the American people. I'm done with supporting them -- I only support what I believe in, and have little to zilch faith in any person running for office, at least at this point in time.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:02 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Even Tucker Carlson admitted he couldn't bring himself to vote for Bush again.


I couldn't bring myself to ever watch Tucker Carlson again. Look, I can't stand watching Bush anymore, either, as disappointed as I've been in him. I meant to comment on his remark that he "hadn't heard the news" about $4.00 gas. I'm sure his intent was to avoid panicking the people, but it made him come off as unknowledgeable and out of touch, because everyone else in the country knew -- I'm much less forgiving of him these days.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:06 pm

Rip Rokken wrote:2nd term, I continued to support him and couldn't stand Kerry, who I think is a coward and a pompous liar. I'm glad he got his ass handed to him by his former veterans and exposed for the fraud he was. I still have a copy of "Stolen Honor", btw, and also read the book "Unfit For Command".


If the candidate who actually served is a coward, what does that make Bush?
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby RedWingFan » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:18 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:An off-the-cuff comment given by one man on the campaign trail is in no way comparable to a co-ordinated smear campaign produced, written and overseen by committee.

I bet you were just as outraged as the DNC ad that put a black girl on tv who said (paraphrasing from memory), "It was like my daddy was dragged behind that truck all over again"
Race baiters! Gotta keep that 90% black vote!
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:21 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:2nd term, I continued to support him and couldn't stand Kerry, who I think is a coward and a pompous liar. I'm glad he got his ass handed to him by his former veterans and exposed for the fraud he was. I still have a copy of "Stolen Honor", btw, and also read the book "Unfit For Command".


If the candidate who actually served is a coward, what does that make Bush?


I'm going to give you a challenge, man, because talking with you is always very one-sided. Now I'm admitting the problems I have with Bush, and there are many. Why don't you quit deflecting and own up to the shortcomings on your own side of the fence? Kerry went to Vietnam for something to bolster his political career, and he LIED about his record to make himself look like a hero he was not. You may think being a pilot in the National Guard is silly, but so what? Defend your guy, Kerry --- don't deflect it at Bush. You really are proving yourself the hack that you expose yourself for.

Come down to earth -- take a good look at the problems on both sides of the aisle instead of being a robotic hack. So far, you've proven yourself no better than your average partisan Hannity & Colmbs guest.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:21 pm

RedWingFan wrote:I bet you were just as outraged as the DNC ad that put a black girl on tv who said (paraphrasing from memory), "It was like my daddy was dragged behind that truck all over again"


Not familiar with this.

RedWingFan wrote:Race baiters! Gotta keep that 90% black vote!


Blacks used to vote Republican.
I could see a candidate with a strong populist streak like Huckabee, wooing many of them and other Democratic voters easily.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:27 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
RedWingFan wrote:I bet you were just as outraged as the DNC ad that put a black girl on tv who said (paraphrasing from memory), "It was like my daddy was dragged behind that truck all over again"


Not familiar with this.


I am -- where have you been?
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:30 pm

Rip Rokken wrote:I'm going to give you a challenge, man, because talking with you is always very one-sided. Now I'm admitting the problems I have with Bush, and there are many. Why don't you quit deflecting and own up to the shortcomings on your own side of the fence? Kerry went to Vietnam for something to bolster his political career, and he LIED about his record to make himself look like a hero he was not. You may think being a pilot in the National Guard is silly, but so what? Defend your guy, Kerry --- don't deflect it at Bush. You really are proving yourself the hack that you expose yourself for.


My take on the matter is, far be it from me to attack the valor of anyone who served in uniform regardless of their actual motives. There is a swiftboating group currently claiming McCain actually worked with the Vietcong. This group began to gain traction in the media a few months back. I just don't think there is any place to question the motives of people who had the guts to go over there.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:21 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:I'm going to give you a challenge, man, because talking with you is always very one-sided. Now I'm admitting the problems I have with Bush, and there are many. Why don't you quit deflecting and own up to the shortcomings on your own side of the fence? Kerry went to Vietnam for something to bolster his political career, and he LIED about his record to make himself look like a hero he was not. You may think being a pilot in the National Guard is silly, but so what? Defend your guy, Kerry --- don't deflect it at Bush. You really are proving yourself the hack that you expose yourself for.


My take on the matter is, far be it from me to attack the valor of anyone who served in uniform regardless of their actual motives. There is a swiftboating group currently claiming McCain actually worked with the Vietcong. This group began to gain traction in the media a few months back. I just don't think there is any place to question the motives of people who had the guts to go over there.


MY honest thoughts on the McCain issue? I admire the hell out of him for serving with valor, and also for enduring torture as a POW for such a length of time. Personally, I would bet hard money that they did break him, but to what capacity, I don't know. At a bare minimum, he admits to signing a "confession" of crimes, but says that he refused to record a vocal version. We like to have visions of heroes that can withstand all forms of torture and never crack, but I don't think that's realistic. Everyone breaks at some point, but I would have no way of knowing what he endured. At any rate, McCain's ordeal in Vietnam was far more respectable than Kerry's. It's about the only thing I like about McCain.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby X factor » Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:52 pm

Rip Rokken wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:I'm going to give you a challenge, man, because talking with you is always very one-sided. Now I'm admitting the problems I have with Bush, and there are many. Why don't you quit deflecting and own up to the shortcomings on your own side of the fence? Kerry went to Vietnam for something to bolster his political career, and he LIED about his record to make himself look like a hero he was not. You may think being a pilot in the National Guard is silly, but so what? Defend your guy, Kerry --- don't deflect it at Bush. You really are proving yourself the hack that you expose yourself for.


My take on the matter is, far be it from me to attack the valor of anyone who served in uniform regardless of their actual motives. There is a swiftboating group currently claiming McCain actually worked with the Vietcong. This group began to gain traction in the media a few months back. I just don't think there is any place to question the motives of people who had the guts to go over there.


MY honest thoughts on the McCain issue? I admire the hell out of him for serving with valor, and also for enduring torture as a POW for such a length of time. Personally, I would bet hard money that they did break him, but to what capacity, I don't know. At a bare minimum, he admits to signing a "confession" of crimes, but says that he refused to record a vocal version. We like to have visions of heroes that can withstand all forms of torture and never crack, but I don't think that's realistic. Everyone breaks at some point, but I would have no way of knowing what he endured. At any rate, McCain's ordeal in Vietnam was far more respectable than Kerry's. It's about the only thing I like about McCain.


Well, Ripper, say what you will about Kerry being opportunistic, he WAS there, and he DID serve...which is a hell of alot more than our last TWO presidents can say!
User avatar
X factor
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: KY

Postby JrnySuxBalls » Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:24 pm

Plus, that McCain came home to a disfigured wife (car accident), bailed on her and hooked up with the future trophy wife while still married to the 1st one. Nice. Beer heiress too. Score.

I'm sure the security moms will love that one.
User avatar
JrnySuxBalls
8 Track
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 7:25 pm
Location: Not in a Tribute Band

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:59 pm

X factor wrote:Well, Ripper, say what you will about Kerry being opportunistic, he WAS there, and he DID serve...which is a hell of alot more than our last TWO presidents can say!


I agree Kerry served -- himself. Watch "Stolen Honor" -- it's available streaming online, but you may have to search for it. If you can't find it, then try these mini-documentaries at the official Swift Vets site: http://www.swiftvets.com/swiftvetsandpows/ The truth about Kerry in Vietnam is appalling, and there is good reason he never wanted to release his actual military records for most of his campaign. Even worse that he'd come back to the U.S. as a protester to accuse fellow soldiers of FICTIONAL atrocities that he neither took part in nor ever witnessed or confirmed.

G.W. Bush was a pilot in the Air Force National Guard, and though there is controversy about whether or not he fulfilled all his requirements in the last few years, he is still considered as having served in the military. His father, Bush Sr., was actually shot down by the Japanese over the Pacific in WWII and had 58 combat missions under his belt.

I don't care whether McCain cracked under pressure or not -- anyone who is captured and endures that kind of abuse as a P.O.W. earns my respect and sympathy, though it stops there. Now, he's just another power-hungry opportunistic politician. That he got this nomination at all was a huge shocker to me.

Slick Willie was a straight-up draft dodger, plain and simple, who even wrote that he "loathed the military".
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby X factor » Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:44 am

Rip Rokken wrote:
X factor wrote:Well, Ripper, say what you will about Kerry being opportunistic, he WAS there, and he DID serve...which is a hell of alot more than our last TWO presidents can say!


I agree Kerry served -- himself. Watch "Stolen Honor" -- it's available streaming online, but you may have to search for it. If you can't find it, then try these mini-documentaries at the official Swift Vets site: http://www.swiftvets.com/swiftvetsandpows/ The truth about Kerry in Vietnam is appalling, and there is good reason he never wanted to release his actual military records for most of his campaign. Even worse that he'd come back to the U.S. as a protester to accuse fellow soldiers of FICTIONAL atrocities that he neither took part in nor ever witnessed or confirmed.

G.W. Bush was a pilot in the Air Force National Guard, and though there is controversy about whether or not he fulfilled all his requirements in the last few years, he is still considered as having served in the military. His father, Bush Sr., was actually shot down by the Japanese over the Pacific in WWII and had 58 combat missions under his belt.

I don't care whether McCain cracked under pressure or not -- anyone who is captured and endures that kind of abuse as a P.O.W. earns my respect and sympathy, though it stops there. Now, he's just another power-hungry opportunistic politician. That he got this nomination at all was a huge shocker to me.

Slick Willie was a straight-up draft dodger, plain and simple, who even wrote that he "loathed the military".


Well, here's what McCain said about the swiftboaters...
McCain : I think the ad is dishonest and dishonorable. As it is none of these individuals served on the boat (Kerry) commanded. Many of his crewmates have testified to his courage under fire. I think John Kerry served honorably in Vietnam.
The Swiftboat vets have been WIDELY discredited by Navy officials and many who served...and of course theres the fact that initial funding came mainly from a Houston home builder, Bob J. Perry, who has also given millions to the Republican party.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmm....
User avatar
X factor
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: KY

Postby Rip Rokken » Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:57 am

X factor wrote:Well, here's what McCain said about the swiftboaters...
McCain : I think the ad is dishonest and dishonorable. As it is none of these individuals served on the boat (Kerry) commanded. Many of his crewmates have testified to his courage under fire. I think John Kerry served honorably in Vietnam.
The Swiftboat vets have been WIDELY discredited by Navy officials and many who served...and of course theres the fact that initial funding came mainly from a Houston home builder, Bob J. Perry, who has also given millions to the Republican party.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmm....


I've seen McCain's comments before, and took them with a grain of salt. I always had the impression he was trying to help a fellow Senate colleague and "veteran" save face, but many of his points are not enough to hurt the case. Many of the swift vets did serve directly with Kerry and were eye-witnesses to his behavior, and some were in adjacent boats and saw what really happen when he fled a battle scene, abandoning every other boat who stayed to return fire, then circled back around only once the gunfire had been suppressed and scooped that fellow out of the water. Also the whole story of how he faked his 3rd Purple Heart... some of these guys were his superiors. My memory is a little sketchy, but I believe something like 200+ vets signed on to this, and are not so easily discredited.

As for the Republican funding, I'll tell ya exactly as I tell TNC -- it's a campaign, and the Republican goal, naturally, was to defeat Kerry. That fact IN NO WAY invalidates the truth about Kerry's war record, which was completely on the table for debate, since he put his "war heroics" first and foremost on display in his candidacy. It's always a misdirection to try to invalidate an expose or any claim based on the party alignment of the person who starts the ball rolling, or provides funding. I always focus on the facts, and naturally assume that the opposing party is the one who brings those issues to light -- that's their job in a campaign.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby X factor » Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:19 am

Rip Rokken wrote:
X factor wrote:Well, here's what McCain said about the swiftboaters...
McCain : I think the ad is dishonest and dishonorable. As it is none of these individuals served on the boat (Kerry) commanded. Many of his crewmates have testified to his courage under fire. I think John Kerry served honorably in Vietnam.
The Swiftboat vets have been WIDELY discredited by Navy officials and many who served...and of course theres the fact that initial funding came mainly from a Houston home builder, Bob J. Perry, who has also given millions to the Republican party.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmm....


I've seen McCain's comments before, and took them with a grain of salt. I always had the impression he was trying to help a fellow Senate colleague and "veteran" save face, but many of his points are not enough to hurt the case. Many of the swift vets did serve directly with Kerry and were eye-witnesses to his behavior, and some were in adjacent boats and saw what really happen when he fled a battle scene, abandoning every other boat who stayed to return fire, then circled back around only once the gunfire had been suppressed and scooped that fellow out of the water. Also the whole story of how he faked his 3rd Purple Heart... some of these guys were his superiors. My memory is a little sketchy, but I believe something like 200+ vets signed on to this, and are not so easily discredited.

As for the Republican funding, I'll tell ya exactly as I tell TNC -- it's a campaign, and the Republican goal, naturally, was to defeat Kerry. That fact IN NO WAY invalidates the truth about Kerry's war record, which was completely on the table for debate, since he put his "war heroics" first and foremost on display in his candidacy. It's always a misdirection to try to invalidate an expose or any claim based on the party alignment of the person who starts the ball rolling, or provides funding. I always focus on the facts, and naturally assume that the opposing party is the one who brings those issues to light -- that's their job in a campaign.


Well, Ripper, you say "potato"...
Suffice it to say that from what I know and have heard about this group, they were doing a hatchett job on Kerry, and simply trying to pull a rabbit out of the hat (which they somehow SUCCEDED in doing ) to get Bush elected to a second term (and OH what a term it's been!) Even former members of the group came out and disavowed them such as Steve Hayes, who stated that he came to believe that the group was "twisting Kerry's record", and broke with the group and voted for Kerry. Hayes told the New York Times:

The mantra was just 'We want to set the record straight,' Mr. Hayes said this month. It became clear to me that it was morphing from an organization to set the record straight into a highly political vendetta. They knew it was not the truth

Either way, it's an old argument, so why rehash? I never particularly liked John Kerry, even though I did vote for him... and I must say I think the country might be in a damn site better shape had he won...but, I'll go on saying "potAHto" and life is good!
User avatar
X factor
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: KY

Postby Barb » Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:40 am

Rip Rokken wrote:
X factor wrote:Well, Ripper, say what you will about Kerry being opportunistic, he WAS there, and he DID serve...which is a hell of alot more than our last TWO presidents can say!


I agree Kerry served -- himself. Watch "Stolen Honor" -- it's available streaming online, but you may have to search for it. If you can't find it, then try these mini-documentaries at the official Swift Vets site: http://www.swiftvets.com/swiftvetsandpows/ The truth about Kerry in Vietnam is appalling, and there is good reason he never wanted to release his actual military records for most of his campaign. Even worse that he'd come back to the U.S. as a protester to accuse fellow soldiers of FICTIONAL atrocities that he neither took part in nor ever witnessed or confirmed.

G.W. Bush was a pilot in the Air Force National Guard, and though there is controversy about whether or not he fulfilled all his requirements in the last few years, he is still considered as having served in the military. His father, Bush Sr., was actually shot down by the Japanese over the Pacific in WWII and had 58 combat missions under his belt.

I don't care whether McCain cracked under pressure or not -- anyone who is captured and endures that kind of abuse as a P.O.W. earns my respect and sympathy, though it stops there. Now, he's just another power-hungry opportunistic politician. That he got this nomination at all was a huge shocker to me.

Slick Willie was a straight-up draft dodger, plain and simple, who even wrote that he "loathed the military".



I most likely will not vote for John McCain, but I have profound respect for what he went through in Vietnam.


McCain requested a combat assignment,[25] and in December 1966 was assigned to the aircraft carrier USS Forrestal flying A-4 Skyhawks.[26][27] McCain's combat duty began when he was 30 years old. In summer 1967, Forrestal was assigned to a bombing campaign during the Vietnam War.[13][28] McCain and his fellow pilots were frustrated by micromanagement from Washington,[29] and he would later write that "In all candor, we thought our civilian commanders were complete idiots who didn’t have the least notion of what it took to win the war."[28]

By then a lieutenant commander, McCain was almost killed on July 29, 1967 when he was at the epicenter of the Forrestal fire. McCain escaped from his burning jet and was trying to help another pilot escape when a bomb exploded;[30] McCain was struck in the legs and chest by fragments.[31] The ensuing fire killed 134 sailors and took 24 hours to control.[32][33] As Forrestal headed for repairs, McCain volunteered for the USS Oriskany.[34]


John McCain's capture and imprisonment began on October 26, 1967. He was flying his 23rd bombing mission over North Vietnam, when his A-4E Skyhawk was shot down by a missile over Hanoi.[36][37][38][39] McCain fractured both arms and a leg,[40] and then nearly drowned when he parachuted into Truc Bach Lake in Hanoi.[36] After he regained consciousness, a mob attacked him,[41] crushed his shoulder with a rifle butt, and bayoneted him; he was then transported to Hanoi's main Hoa Loa Prison, nicknamed the "Hanoi Hilton".[41][42]

Although McCain was badly wounded, his captors refused to treat his injuries, instead beating and interrogating him to get information.[41] Only when the North Vietnamese discovered that his father was a top admiral did they give him medical care[41] and announce his capture. His status as a prisoner of war (POW) made the front pages of The New York Times[43] and The Washington Post.[44]

McCain spent six weeks in the Hoa Loa hospital, receiving marginal care.[36] Now having lost 50 pounds (23 kg), in a chest cast, and with his hair turned white,[36] McCain was sent to a different camp on the outskirts of Hanoi[45] in December 1967, into a cell with two other Americans who did not expect him to live a week.[46] In March 1968, McCain was put into solitary confinement, where he would remain for two years.[41]

In July 1968, McCain's father was named commander of all U.S. forces in the Vietnam theater.[2] McCain was immediately offered early release.[36] The North Vietnamese wanted a worldwide propaganda coup by appearing merciful, and also wanted to show other POWs that elites like McCain were willing to be treated preferentially.[41] McCain turned down the offer of repatriation; he would only accept the offer if every man taken in before him was released as well.[47]

In August of 1968, a program of severe torture began on McCain, at the same time as he was suffering from dysentery,[41][36] and McCain made an anti-American propaganda "confession".[36] He has always felt that his statement was dishonorable,[48] but as he would later write, "I had learned what we all learned over there: Every man has his breaking point. I had reached mine."[41] His injuries left him permanently incapable of raising his arms above his head.[49] He subsequently received two to three beatings per week because of his continued refusal to sign additional statements.[50] Other American POWs were similarly tortured and maltreated in order to extract "confessions" and propaganda statements,[41] with many enduring even worse treatment than McCain.[51]

McCain refused to meet with various anti-war groups seeking peace in Hanoi, not wanting to give either them or the North Vietnamese a propaganda victory.[41] From late 1969 on, treatment of McCain and some of the other POWs became more tolerable.[41] McCain and other prisoners cheered the B-52-led U.S. "Christmas Bombing" campaign of December 1972 as a forceful measure to push North Vietnam to terms.[41][52]

Altogether, McCain was held as a prisoner of war in North Vietnam for five and a half years. He was finally released from captivity on March 14, 1973.[53] McCain's return to the United States reunited him with his wife and family. His wife Carol had suffered her own crippling ordeal during his captivity, due to an automobile accident in December 1969.[54] As a returned POW, McCain became a celebrity of sorts.[55][41][54]


Interview with McCain on April 24, 1973, after his return home, McCain underwent treatment for his injuries, including months of grueling physical therapy,[56] and attended the National War College in Fort McNair in Washington, D.C. during 1973–1974.[54][18] By late 1974 McCain had his flight status reinstated,[54] and in 1976 he became commanding officer of a training squadron stationed in Florida.[54][18][57] He turned around a mediocre unit and won the squadron its first Meritorious Unit Commendation.[56]
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby Rip Rokken » Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:01 am

X factor wrote:Well, Ripper, you say "potato"...
Suffice it to say that from what I know and have heard about this group, they were doing a hatchett job on Kerry, and simply trying to pull a rabbit out of the hat (which they somehow SUCCEDED in doing ) to get Bush elected to a second term (and OH what a term it's been!) Even former members of the group came out and disavowed them such as Steve Hayes, who stated that he came to believe that the group was "twisting Kerry's record", and broke with the group and voted for Kerry. Hayes told the New York Times:

The mantra was just 'We want to set the record straight,' Mr. Hayes said this month. It became clear to me that it was morphing from an organization to set the record straight into a highly political vendetta. They knew it was not the truth

Either way, it's an old argument, so why rehash? I never particularly liked John Kerry, even though I did vote for him... and I must say I think the country might be in a damn site better shape had he won...but, I'll go on saying "potAHto" and life is good!


Sounds as if you've mainly only heard the spin on these guys from the left. I knew a few guys left the group, but the number who stayed overwhelmingly outnumber those who didn't -- a small, fractional percentage. Who knows what their motivations may have been? I think the most compelling thing about the Swift Vets' take is, KERRY WAS NEVER ABLE TO REFUTE THEM! If he could have, it would have happened instantly! They would have been all over it, but instead, he literally didn't know what to do, and his organization just started attacking them -- their credibility, their political loyalties -- everything except for the most important thing -- whether or not what they said was true.

Good for them, and I'll say again -- there is way too much misdirection in our thinking these days, and people just kinda lose focus on the facts while they are spinning, ducking, dodging, etc. Politics is a dirty business, and I don't like it, but it will always remain dirty. But whether someone exposes an attack as originating with a political opponent, or questions the timing of that attack (which in my opinion is used as a dirty trick -- dropping a bombshell right before an election so it will remain fresh on people's minds), it still doesn't affect the merits of the facts if they are true -- and that's where I always start.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:21 am

Rip Rokken wrote: I think the most compelling thing about the Swift Vets' take is, KERRY WAS NEVER ABLE TO REFUTE THEM! If he could have, it would have happened instantly!


Bob Shrum said they conserved their money until the end of the campaign and hoped the voters would see through it.

They would have been all over it, but instead, he literally didn't know what to do, and his organization just started attacking them -- their credibility, their political loyalties -- everything except for the most important thing -- whether or not what they said was true.


It's worth noting that as recently as last year Kerry accepted a $1 million open challenge by the financier of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth to disprove the charges. Unsurprisingly, upon Kerry accepting the challenge, the offer was quickly rescinded.

http://bigheaddc.com/2007/11/17/kerry-a ... r-reneges/
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Rip Rokken » Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:48 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Bob Shrum said they conserved their money until the end of the campaign and hoped the voters would see through it.


I take it you believe that... If a Republican or a conservative used such an excuse, you'd be all over it. C'mon... how much does it cost to appear (if even by satellite) on Meet The Press? The CBS Evening News? Absolute hogwash... with something rocking his campaign as hard as this did, if they could have defended it, they would have.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:It's worth noting that as recently as last year Kerry accepted a $1 million open challenge by the financier of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth to disprove the charges. Unsurprisingly, upon Kerry accepting the challenge, the offer was quickly rescinded.

http://bigheaddc.com/2007/11/17/kerry-a ... r-reneges/


You either didn't read the article, or you are purposefully whitewashing this... the challenge was to refute even A SINGLE charge (there were tons). Kerry could easily have bluffed this, but it's not inconceivable that he could have corrected a single charge if it wasn't accurate. The challenge was stupid in the first place, and never should have been made if they weren't prepared to follow it up. Still, to the best of my knowledge, Kerry has yet to publicly disprove the swift vets on anything major, if at all.

Again... why are stretching so hard to defending the guy? If he was Republican or conservative in the exact same circumstances, you'd be bashing him. I'd be bashing him no matter what side he was on. You are a master hacksmith, for sure.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:56 am

Rip Rokken wrote:Again... why are stretching so hard to defending the guy?


I'm not. In fact I already stated that anyone who served should be taken at their word.

Rip Rokken wrote:If he was Republican or conservative in the exact same circumstances, you'd be bashing him


I already mentioned a Swift Boat Group is targeting McCain.
I haven't been to their website, nor do I intend to carry the mantle for them in any way.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby RedWingFan » Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:24 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
RedWingFan wrote:I bet you were just as outraged as the DNC ad that put a black girl on tv who said (paraphrasing from memory), "It was like my daddy was dragged behind that truck all over again"


Not familiar with this.

The DNC evidently didn't run the ad I referred to, It was the NAALCP. But neither did the RNC run the Horton ad, it was also run by an independent source.

Think back to 1988, and the endless barrage of news stories condemning the independent pro-Bush ads focusing on Willie Horton, the convicted murderer who was released on a weekend furlough and traveled to Maryland and raped a woman. It didn’t matter that the Bush campaign didn’t produce the ad. Throughout the entire Bush presidency (and even beyond), the major media vented their collective spleen at Republican race-baiting, the exploitation of white fears of black crime.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is now airing an ad that seeks to exploit black fears of white crime. Actually, that’s too kind. Over black and white video of a pickup truck dragging a chain, the daughter of Texas dragging death victim James Byrd declares, "So when Gov. George W. Bush refused to sign hate crimes legislation, it was like my father was killed all over again."


TNC if your name was William would you be more offended at being called Willie or accused of being the equivalent of someone who would commit such a horrible crime???? Remember you're the most honest poster in this thread!!!
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:43 am

RedWingFan wrote:The DNC evidently didn't run the ad I referred to, It was the NAALCP. But neither did the RNC run the Horton ad, it was also run by an independent source.


Like the Swift Boat ads, questions still linger over just how indepent the source really was.

Think back to 1988, and the endless barrage of news stories condemning the independent pro-Bush ads focusing on Willie Horton, the convicted murderer who was released on a weekend furlough and traveled to Maryland and raped a woman. It didn’t matter that the Bush campaign didn’t produce the ad. Throughout the entire Bush presidency (and even beyond), the major media vented their collective spleen at Republican race-baiting, the exploitation of white fears of black crime.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is now airing an ad that seeks to exploit black fears of white crime. Actually, that’s too kind. Over black and white video of a pickup truck dragging a chain, the daughter of Texas dragging death victim James Byrd declares, "So when Gov. George W. Bush refused to sign hate crimes legislation, it was like my father was killed all over again."


Not familiar with this. Thanks.

TNC if your name was William would you be more offended at being called Willie or accused of being the equivalent of someone who would commit such a horrible crime???? Remember you're the most honest poster in this thread!!!


This only holds up if you deny the racial history of plantation owners etc. giving slaves subserviant names.
Even after abolition, blacks were routinely denigrated by being calling "boy."
You're party is already doing a bang-up job of denying reality.
If you wish to go ahead and deny history, no one will hold it against you.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby RedWingFan » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:01 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:This only holds up if you deny the racial history of plantation owners etc. giving slaves subserviant names.
Even after abolition, blacks were routinely denigrated by being calling "boy."
You're party is already doing a bang-up job of denying reality.
If you wish to go ahead and deny history, no one will hold it against you.

The only one in denial is you. Slavery was abolished. It's libs like you who look for every nugget to try to enflame racism in America to get votes. Remember Al Gore getting up in Bush's face in the town hall debates yelling, "Do you support quotas? Do you support quotas?"
I know you're a smart guy which is why I continue conversing with you. It seems like you're just about to get to a point and say, "You know what you're right".
But instead you snap back 200 years to plantations to divert the subject.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:07 am

RedWingFan wrote:The only one in denial is you. Slavery was abolished. It's libs like you who look for every nugget to try to enflame racism in America to get votes. Remember Al Gore getting up in Bush's face in the town hall debates yelling, "Do you support quotas? Do you support quotas?"
I know you're a smart guy which is why I continue conversing with you. It seems like you're just about to get to a point and say, "You know what you're right".
But instead you snap back 200 years to plantations to divert the subject.


Racism still thrives in America, and racists have made up a part of the Republican coalition since the 60s.
If you choose to believe that the motives behind the "Willie" Horton ad were benign, despite evidence to the contrary, you are free to do so.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby RedWingFan » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:14 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
RedWingFan wrote:The only one in denial is you. Slavery was abolished. It's libs like you who look for every nugget to try to enflame racism in America to get votes. Remember Al Gore getting up in Bush's face in the town hall debates yelling, "Do you support quotas? Do you support quotas?"
I know you're a smart guy which is why I continue conversing with you. It seems like you're just about to get to a point and say, "You know what you're right".
But instead you snap back 200 years to plantations to divert the subject.


Racism still thrives in America, and racists have made up a part of the Republican coalition since the 60s.
If you choose to believe that the motives behind the "Willie" Horton ad were benign, despite evidence to the contrary, you are free to do so.

Racism exists, I wouldn't agree that it thrives. Civil rights and equal rights laws were and are definitly needed.
The term "You can't legislate morality" first came during the Civil rights era, in regards to the fact that you can pass all the laws you want, but you can't change the heart of a racist. It was later highjacked by feminists to kill babies! :?
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests