Moderator: Andrew
texafana wrote:wow..it's been a long time since a movie made it into my personal bottom 3. This movie is just plain bad. Mark Wahlberg's acting is so frickin lame, constrained it's laughable. No special effects, nothing scary at all. Seriously, the first 10 minutes were somewhat interesting and then it went downhill from there very quickly. Read the reviews, this one is a bomb. I was REALLY hoping for an incredible movie, I was ripped off. I'm not even going to recap the movie here, just a total waste.
texafana wrote:wow..it's been a long time since a movie made it into my personal bottom 3. This movie is just plain bad. Mark Wahlberg's acting is so frickin lame, constrained it's laughable. No special effects, nothing scary at all. Seriously, the first 10 minutes were somewhat interesting and then it went downhill from there very quickly. Read the reviews, this one is a bomb. I was REALLY hoping for an incredible movie, I was ripped off. I'm not even going to recap the movie here, just a total waste.
Rip Rokken wrote:M. Night Shyamalan had a few good ones (6th Sense, Unbreakable, Signs was ok, and I even liked The Village) and then it seemed to have went a little too much to his head. He even cast himself as the savior-like character in Lady In The Water, which was one of the most self-indulgent and horrible films I've ever seen, along with everything David Lynch has ever done. I think he's become every bit as much a hack as TNC is on politics. His formula has run its course, and I won't be seeing it.
Rip Rokken wrote:I think he's become every bit as much a hack as TNC is on politics. His formula has run its course, and I won't be seeing it.
STORY_TELLER wrote:I haven't seen the movie, but it's too bad the consensus is so damning. Guess I'll skip it. I had high hopes that after his last two outings, the studio would reign him in and not give him as much free reign. The first 3 were decent because he was being produced. That is, he didn't have final say on the script. As of The Village, he started having final say and he's too close to his own material to see the flaws. Not uncommon and that's why producers are involved in the creative process during pre-production and are not just the project managers (which is their major duty, allowing the director to concentrate on artistic and story issues).
Seems to me he might be surrounded by 'yes' men. Someone needs to tell the emperor he's not wearing any clothes.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:"Sixth Sense" was an overblown Twilight Zone episode with an ending that gave itself away within the first ten frames.
Liam wrote:For a "Big letdown" movie, go see Indiana Jones. I saw it a couple of weeks ago and, even though there were some good parts, it SUCKED as a whole. First movie I've gone to see since TransFormers, and it BLEW. Go Figure. At least when I get the DVDs I can say "This movie sucks" from the comfort of my own home.
texafana wrote:The original name of this movie was "The Green Effect" which should tell you the plot of the story. The story itself is...ok...it's just the delivery, pace, overall "entertainment" value, etc, is all so low you just sit there realizing you would have a better time at a funeral. I could see this being trimmed down to a 30 min public service announcement being played before a real movie. The "R" rating was probably due to one scene involving a man and a lion and 2 arms in a zoo. Seriously, this movie's budget all went to Wahlberg, otherwise I didn't see anything at all to make this a big budget summer movie. BIG let down....
NealIsGod wrote:Shyamalan's rep keeps getting worse with each dud he puts out. Disney was right to drop him.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Rick wrote:Liam wrote:For a "Big letdown" movie, go see Indiana Jones. I saw it a couple of weeks ago and, even though there were some good parts, it SUCKED as a whole. First movie I've gone to see since TransFormers, and it BLEW. Go Figure. At least when I get the DVDs I can say "This movie sucks" from the comfort of my own home.
I heard it wasn't good by a critic, but this pretty much cements it. Thanks Liam.
RedWingFan wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Shyamalan's rep keeps getting worse with each dud he puts out. Disney was right to drop him.
In the AICN talkback someone posted...."I see dead careers.....They don't know they're dead"
texafana wrote:wow..it's been a long time since a movie made it into my personal bottom 3. This movie is just plain bad. Mark Wahlberg's acting is so frickin lame, constrained it's laughable. No special effects, nothing scary at all. Seriously, the first 10 minutes were somewhat interesting and then it went downhill from there very quickly. Read the reviews, this one is a bomb. I was REALLY hoping for an incredible movie, I was ripped off. I'm not even going to recap the movie here, just a total waste.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:I think he's become every bit as much a hack as TNC is on politics. His formula has run its course, and I won't be seeing it.
Those that bought into the hype about this guy in the first place are the real hacks.
"Sixth Sense" was an overblown Twilight Zone episode with an ending that gave itself away within the first ten frames.
Maybe someday the media will lead you by the nose and get you excited for the next "reincarnation of Hitchcock" or whatever is the most convenient buzz slogan to rile the hopes of non-thinking dupes like you.
"Unbreakable" was damn good tho.
Jeremey wrote:I thought Lady in the Water was the worst big budget studio film ever.
Now The Happening has taken that crown.
mistiejourney wrote:Seriously, you got Sixth Sense right off the bat? Hell, I watched it once, and I've watched it 100 times since and I STILL find clues I didn't "get"!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests