The Journey Board

[Tito]

If you had started an appreciate thread for me, I would have had to kill you.

hey tito, i think you should start an appreciation thread for lora.

I can't. Plus I don't think I'm Andrew's favorite right now.

[Behshad]

I just got back on the computer. I've been sleeping,etc. Plus, I was hoping by the time I got to work this morning, you would've reread what I originally typed and my first response to your comment and I would've seen an apology from you in PM or publicly. Sadly, I did not receive one.

What kind of crack are you on, Tito?
You want Andrew to apologize to YOU?
Where is YOUR apology to him!???
And dont play the innocent card. You mentioned Jeff's name just to start shit all over again. What you suggested was just a little match you had to get the fire going and you did. We've been here long enough to know what purpose people have with his posts.
I did respond to your 1st suggestion comment that no matter what, we will post here in the Journey section to support Jeff.... but you couldnt deal with it,,, and thats what brought us to page 10 now.....
I think you need to apologize not only to Andrew but also Jeff for all the negativity you have cause (with no reason) since you started here.
Your buddy Saint John used to be one of the best posters around here, but since you came around here, he has changed a lot,,, mostly to impress you with his board powers and dean-wanna-be goals.... but all that shit is gettin old now,,, I wish the old SJ would be back and post his entertaining and fun posts like the old days.....

[Tito]

I just got back on the computer. I've been sleeping,etc. Plus, I was hoping by the time I got to work this morning, you would've reread what I originally typed and my first response to your comment and I would've seen an apology from you in PM or publicly. Sadly, I did not receive one.

What kind of crack are you on, Tito?
You want Andrew to apologize to YOU?
Where is YOUR apology to him!???
And dont play the innocent card. You mentioned Jeff's name just to start shit all over again. What you suggested was just a little match you had to get the fire going and you did. We've been here long enough to know what purpose people have with his posts.
I did respond to your 1st suggestion comment that no matter what, we will post here in the Journey section to support Jeff.... but you couldnt deal with it,,, and thats what brought us to page 10 now.....
I think you need to apologize not only to Andrew but also Jeff for all the negativity you have cause (with no reason) since you started here.
Your buddy Saint John used to be one of the best posters around here, but since you came around here, he has changed a lot,,, mostly to impress you with his board powers and dean-wanna-be goals.... but all that shit is gettin old now,,, I wish the old SJ would be back and post his entertaining and fun posts like the old days.....

Not to throw an innoncent person into the fire but from SusieP's post on page 4:

Tito,
do you HAVE to turn this topic to another anti JSS topic?

a lot = more than you think... Move on...

To be fair, Tito didn't post only about JSS, it was me who picked out that point.
He may not be on my Christmas card list yet, but fair's fair.

Back to Behshad, YOU read what you wanted to read. I also said this would apply to any former or even current member who had their own thread. If Soto did not have his own thread, then the Soto postings in the Journey forum would be fair game to be allowed. That was my SUGGESTION. This was only one point out of four that I made.

Again, it was my SUGGESTION, that is why I take offense to Andrew telling me to STFU and let him run the board. I wasn't telling him to do anything, I was making SUGGESTIONS as he requested.

[Behshad]

Tito
in all fairness, I was the 1st person to post to you in this thread when you mentioned Jeff's name.
You had your intentions with your posts. And YOU dont decide what is fair or not fair here. Its not your board. If Andrew thought that it was unfair for Jeff to have his own section AND being discussed in the Journey forum, trust me , he wouldve done something about it. You and Saint John seem to be the only two who have a problem with Jeff being discussed here in the Journey section. Even suggesting it makes it more obvious that youre totally anti Jeff... If you truly suggest to improve this place then start of by following your own suggestions. Did you know that there is a specifiy section for gig reviews way down on the board? You and Saint John couldve used that to tell us about REO show you guys went to last week,,,,, but you didnt cause you knew that this section has the main traffic......
Both of you are great guys in person, so it's surprising how you guys play these foolish old games here just to upset people who support Jeff. What do you try to accomplish? You think with your anti-Jeff posts you can change people's minds about Jeff's music?
Just apologize to Drew and lets move on,,,

[Tito]

Tito
in all fairness, I was the 1st person to post to you in this thread when you mentioned Jeff's name.
You had your intentions with your posts. And YOU dont decide what is fair or not fair here. Its not your board. If Andrew thought that it was unfair for Jeff to have his own section AND being discussed in the Journey forum, trust me , he wouldve done something about it. You and Saint John seem to be the only two who have a problem with Jeff being discussed here in the Journey section. Even suggesting it makes it more obvious that youre totally anti Jeff... If you truly suggest to improve this place then start of by following your own suggestions. Did you know that there is a specifiy section for gig reviews way down on the board? You and Saint John couldve used that to tell us about REO show you guys went to last week,,,,, but you didnt cause you knew that this section has the main traffic......
Both of you are great guys in person, so it's surprising how you guys play these foolish old games here just to upset people who support Jeff. What do you try to accomplish? You think with your anti-Jeff posts you can change people's minds about Jeff's music?
Just apologize to Drew and lets move on,,,

This was address in point 1. I would have more than gladly posted the REO stuff in its respective thread if everything flowed the way I SUGGESTED it should. Since the Journey forum is the main traffic forum (which we all agreed on) that is why it was posted here. You're right, this Andrew's board and he can do what he wants, but he asked for suggestions and I gave mine. Judging by his response, he apparently didn't like them. I didn't just thow out my suggestion unwarranted, it was asked for. I did NOT start any Soto sh-t with my post. Technically, I never did. It was always a response to something.

Also, what do I owe Andrew an apology for? I've been nothing but a good solider. I've always obeyed his requests i.e. appreciation threads, deleted stories, etc.

[Behshad]

Tito
in all fairness, I was the 1st person to post to you in this thread when you mentioned Jeff's name.
You had your intentions with your posts. And YOU dont decide what is fair or not fair here. Its not your board. If Andrew thought that it was unfair for Jeff to have his own section AND being discussed in the Journey forum, trust me , he wouldve done something about it. You and Saint John seem to be the only two who have a problem with Jeff being discussed here in the Journey section. Even suggesting it makes it more obvious that youre totally anti Jeff... If you truly suggest to improve this place then start of by following your own suggestions. Did you know that there is a specifiy section for gig reviews way down on the board? You and Saint John couldve used that to tell us about REO show you guys went to last week,,,,, but you didnt cause you knew that this section has the main traffic......
Both of you are great guys in person, so it's surprising how you guys play these foolish old games here just to upset people who support Jeff. What do you try to accomplish? You think with your anti-Jeff posts you can change people's minds about Jeff's music?
Just apologize to Drew and lets move on,,,

This was address in point 1. I would have more than gladly posted the REO stuff in its respective thread if everything flowed the way I SUGGESTED it should. Since the Journey forum is the main traffic forum (which we all agreed on) that is why it was posted here. You're right, this Andrew's board and he can do what he wants, but he asked for suggestions and I gave mine. Judging by his response, he apparently didn't like them. I didn't just thow out my suggestion unwarranted, it was asked for. I did NOT start any Soto sh-t with my post. Technically, I never did. It was always a response to something.

Also, what do I owe Andrew an apology for? I've been nothing but a good solider. I've always obeyed his requests i.e. appreciation threads, deleted stories, etc.

good soldier? You started an appreciation topic within another topic just a day or two ago.......

[Tito]

Tito
in all fairness, I was the 1st person to post to you in this thread when you mentioned Jeff's name.
You had your intentions with your posts. And YOU dont decide what is fair or not fair here. Its not your board. If Andrew thought that it was unfair for Jeff to have his own section AND being discussed in the Journey forum, trust me , he wouldve done something about it. You and Saint John seem to be the only two who have a problem with Jeff being discussed here in the Journey section. Even suggesting it makes it more obvious that youre totally anti Jeff... If you truly suggest to improve this place then start of by following your own suggestions. Did you know that there is a specifiy section for gig reviews way down on the board? You and Saint John couldve used that to tell us about REO show you guys went to last week,,,,, but you didnt cause you knew that this section has the main traffic......
Both of you are great guys in person, so it's surprising how you guys play these foolish old games here just to upset people who support Jeff. What do you try to accomplish? You think with your anti-Jeff posts you can change people's minds about Jeff's music?
Just apologize to Drew and lets move on,,,

This was address in point 1. I would have more than gladly posted the REO stuff in its respective thread if everything flowed the way I SUGGESTED it should. Since the Journey forum is the main traffic forum (which we all agreed on) that is why it was posted here. You're right, this Andrew's board and he can do what he wants, but he asked for suggestions and I gave mine. Judging by his response, he apparently didn't like them. I didn't just thow out my suggestion unwarranted, it was asked for. I did NOT start any Soto sh-t with my post. Technically, I never did. It was always a response to something.

Also, what do I owe Andrew an apology for? I've been nothing but a good solider. I've always obeyed his requests i.e. appreciation threads, deleted stories, etc.

good soldier? You started an appreciation topic within another topic just a day or two ago.......

that was clearly tongue in cheek and comedic. Although the man that save Diamond Dave did have to be mentioned and honored.

[Deb]

We just need to diffuse all the angst with more Dokken threads... Dokken brings peace and happiness to MR.

Please...make it stop. Please....

Please note that we have diverted all attention to Kip Winger. That should neutralize Dokkenitis!

Not so fast!!! I got yours and Deb's subliminal affirmation of my post... haha! Notice that you each post twice after I mention Dokken, keeping my Don smiley in the reply as a signal that the post is directed to me. Each of you has an avatar with Jeff Scott Soto (who sings on the new album LSA) wearing a sports jersey, one with the number 10, and one with the number 4 -- the subliminal message if you scroll thru reads, "10-4, Rip! 10-4, Rip!"

LMAO! You got all that from our posts? Damn you're good!

[Behshad]

that was clearly tongue in cheek and comedic. Although the man that save Diamond Dave did have to be mentioned and honored.

Oh I see, so its ok to bend Drew's rules as long as your comedic about it. Now it all makes sense!

Well Good Soldier, I think we all owe you an appology for assuming you were serious, while all along you were just a comedian with your tongue in your cheek.( Saint John liked it too ) . Sincere apologies to both of you.

[Rhiannon]

[bluejeangirl76]

You are the funniest motherfucker I've ever met.

[Michigan Girl]

I'm pretty sure the point is being missed all together!!!
Andrew gave reasons for not wanting the appreciation threads and other threads of this nature....
"My opposition to these appreciation threads and other similar styled things is purely and simply
because the origins of this board come from a place where folks could say how they really felt about
this band and other topics, without fear of being closed down because you weren't a cheerleader for the band. "

He also stated.....
"I appreciate ALL views and ALL input. Thanks folks."

and
" My view - well, the board should be what the community of posters want it to be.
Those posting will in the end, dictate the feel, vibe and mood of the board.
This board allowed many to have a say without having to be positive 100% of the time and
without being closed down or banned for having those views. "


Tito shared his thoughts, opinions and/or suggestions.
I could be way off base, but I read it as.... if his appreciation threads don't fit with the vibe of this board,
why do these things? ~list of items that could possibly use a change (his opinion, not mine)!!!!

SOMEONE came in and picked out the JSS section, took it as a personal attack on JSS and started
a MAJOR war!!!

Do I agree with Tito's suggestions? That answer would be NO~but I saw the point he was trying to make!!
Do I like seeing negative things written about JSS? Again the answer would be~NO!!!
But that is NOT what his post was about. I. actually thought some of the suggestions bordered on the
ridiculous and hysterical(I got a HUGE laugh out of them) just to make his point about the appreciation threads
....(this is my opinion, again).

Andrew CLEARLY invited ALL imput, imput was given and people were attacked as a result!!
It is ANDREW's decision as to what's to be done with Tito's suggestions and idea's, not ours.

I do, however, firmly believe Andrew's decision should be respected.

Sorry, RHI.....I was working on this long before the midnight train came through!!!!

[Rhiannon]

You are the funniest motherfucker I've ever met.

Hells yes.

[Rhiannon]

Sorry, RHI.....I was working on this long before the midnight train came through!!!!

Preach on, baby girl!!

[Michigan Girl]

RHI~ please correct my spelling....should be MIDNIGHT, I just can't stand it!!! Thanks!!

[Onestepper]

I'm pretty sure the point is being missed all together!!!
Andrew gave reasons for not wanting the appreciation threads and other threads of this nature....
"My opposition to these appreciation threads and other similar styled things is purely and simply
because the origins of this board come from a place where folks could say how they really felt about
this band and other topics, without fear of being closed down because you weren't a cheerleader for the band. "

He also stated.....
"I appreciate ALL views and ALL input. Thanks folks."

and
" My view - well, the board should be what the community of posters want it to be.
Those posting will in the end, dictate the feel, vibe and mood of the board.
This board allowed many to have a say without having to be positive 100% of the time and
without being closed down or banned for having those views. "


Tito shared his thoughts, opinions and/or suggestions.
I could be way off base, but I read it as.... if his appreciation threads don't fit with the vibe of this board,
why do these things? ~list of items that could possibly use a change (his opinion, not mine)!!!!

SOMEONE came in and picked out the JSS section, took it as a personal attack on JSS and started
a MAJOR war!!!

Do I agree with Tito's suggestions? That answer would be NO~but I saw the point he was trying to make!!
Do I like seeing negative things written about JSS? Again the answer would be~NO!!!
But that is NOT what his post was about. I. actually thought some of the suggestions bordered on the
ridiculous and hysterical(I got a HUGE laugh out of them) just to make his point about the appreciation threads
....(this is my opinion, again).

Andrew CLEARLY invited ALL imput, imput was given and people were attacked as a result!!
It is ANDREW's decision as to what's to be done with Tito's suggestions and idea's, not ours.

I do, however, firmly believe Andrew's decision should be respected.

Sorry, RHI.....I was working on this long before the midnight train came through!!!!

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

[Michigan Girl]

I'm pretty sure the point is being missed all together!!!
Andrew gave reasons for not wanting the appreciation threads and other threads of this nature....
"My opposition to these appreciation threads and other similar styled things is purely and simply
because the origins of this board come from a place where folks could say how they really felt about
this band and other topics, without fear of being closed down because you weren't a cheerleader for the band. "

He also stated.....
"I appreciate ALL views and ALL input. Thanks folks."

and
" My view - well, the board should be what the community of posters want it to be.
Those posting will in the end, dictate the feel, vibe and mood of the board.
This board allowed many to have a say without having to be positive 100% of the time and
without being closed down or banned for having those views. "


Tito shared his thoughts, opinions and/or suggestions.
I could be way off base, but I read it as.... if his appreciation threads don't fit with the vibe of this board,
why do these things? ~list of items that could possibly use a change (his opinion, not mine)!!!!

SOMEONE came in and picked out the JSS section, took it as a personal attack on JSS and started
a MAJOR war!!!

Do I agree with Tito's suggestions? That answer would be NO~but I saw the point he was trying to make!!
Do I like seeing negative things written about JSS? Again the answer would be~NO!!!
But that is NOT what his post was about. I. actually thought some of the suggestions bordered on the
ridiculous and hysterical(I got a HUGE laugh out of them) just to make his point about the appreciation threads
....(this is my opinion, again).

Andrew CLEARLY invited ALL imput, imput was given and people were attacked as a result!!
It is ANDREW's decision as to what's to be done with Tito's suggestions and idea's, not ours.

I do, however, firmly believe Andrew's decision should be respected.

Sorry, RHI.....I was working on this long before the midnight train came through!!!!

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner, right, wrong or indifferent.

ABSOLUTELY!!!!

Maybe I should have said FINAL DECISION!!!

[Rhiannon]

RHI~ please correct my spelling....should be MIDNIGHT, I just can't stand it!!! Thanks!!

I'm the same way.

[Behshad]

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Its not feedback when its build on sarcasm and hatred towards an ex member of the band. Explain to me what part of the POINT 2 he made was to improve this place......
Andrew is open to suggestions to IMPROVE this place. Not what TITO's Personal Prefrences are. There's the difference, no double standard.

Also, MG,,, I didnt think what Tito said in his original post here was an attack towards Jeff. I simply responded to him that if he thinks that JSS topics wont be discussed here, he's in for a surprise.

[RedWingFan]

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Its not feedback when its build on sarcasm and hatred towards an ex member of the band

HATRED???? Could you point out the hateful posts??? Don't bother with ones that are simply pointing out facts and/or shatter the mirage tha you and others try to paint over this forum.

[Behshad]

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Its not feedback when its build on sarcasm and hatred towards an ex member of the band

HATRED???? Could you point out the hateful posts??? Don't bother with ones that are simply pointing out facts and/or shatter the mirage tha you and others try to paint over this forum.

Weren't you dismissed before ???

[AlteredDNA]

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Its not feedback when its build on sarcasm and hatred towards an ex member of the band. Explain to me what part of the POINT 2 he made was to improve this place......
Andrew is open to suggestions to IMPROVE this place. Not what TITO's Personal Prefrences are. There's the difference, no double standard.

Also, MG,,, I didnt think what Tito said in his original post here was an attack towards Jeff. I simply responded to him that if he thinks that JSS topics wont be discussed here, he's in for a surprise.

I think that if you re-read your own posts in this thread, you'll find that you did indeed state that Tito was attacking / baiting in his original post...

[Behshad]

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Its not feedback when its build on sarcasm and hatred towards an ex member of the band. Explain to me what part of the POINT 2 he made was to improve this place......
Andrew is open to suggestions to IMPROVE this place. Not what TITO's Personal Prefrences are. There's the difference, no double standard.

Also, MG,,, I didnt think what Tito said in his original post here was an attack towards Jeff. I simply responded to him that if he thinks that JSS topics wont be discussed here, he's in for a surprise.

I think that if you re-read your own posts in this thread, you'll find that you did indeed state that Tito was attacking / baiting in his original post...

Baiting yes. Attacking Jeff nope. I never said that he attacked Jeff.

[AlteredDNA]

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Its not feedback when its build on sarcasm and hatred towards an ex member of the band. Explain to me what part of the POINT 2 he made was to improve this place......
Andrew is open to suggestions to IMPROVE this place. Not what TITO's Personal Prefrences are. There's the difference, no double standard.

Also, MG,,, I didnt think what Tito said in his original post here was an attack towards Jeff. I simply responded to him that if he thinks that JSS topics wont be discussed here, he's in for a surprise.

I think that if you re-read your own posts in this thread, you'll find that you did indeed state that Tito was attacking / baiting in his original post...

Baiting yes. Attacking Jeff nope. I never said that he attacked Jeff.

Semantics - either way your claim is that Tito was doing more than offering his suggestions on a thread that was specifically created to accept suggestions, right?

[Behshad]

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Its not feedback when its build on sarcasm and hatred towards an ex member of the band. Explain to me what part of the POINT 2 he made was to improve this place......
Andrew is open to suggestions to IMPROVE this place. Not what TITO's Personal Prefrences are. There's the difference, no double standard.

Also, MG,,, I didnt think what Tito said in his original post here was an attack towards Jeff. I simply responded to him that if he thinks that JSS topics wont be discussed here, he's in for a surprise.

I think that if you re-read your own posts in this thread, you'll find that you did indeed state that Tito was attacking / baiting in his original post...

Baiting yes. Attacking Jeff nope. I never said that he attacked Jeff.

Semantics - either way your claim is that Tito was doing more than offering his suggestions on a thread that was specifically created to accept suggestions, right?

This isnt about what I claim. Tito made few suggestions. Andrew didnt like them . Andrew's board, Andrew's rules. Tito can implement all those rules to Tito's forum.
Now if Tito along the way of his suggestions tried to include Jeff in there , he must have had his own reasons to do so,,,, so wouldnt you be better of asking him his main reason for mentioning Jeff's name, since youre one of his cheerleaders here?

[Onestepper]

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Its not feedback when its build on sarcasm and hatred towards an ex member of the band. Explain to me what part of the POINT 2 he made was to improve this place......
Andrew is open to suggestions to IMPROVE this place. Not what TITO's Personal Prefrences are. There's the difference, no double standard.

Also, MG,,, I didnt think what Tito said in his original post here was an attack towards Jeff. I simply responded to him that if he thinks that JSS topics wont be discussed here, he's in for a surprise.

I think that if you re-read your own posts in this thread, you'll find that you did indeed state that Tito was attacking / baiting in his original post...

Baiting yes. Attacking Jeff nope. I never said that he attacked Jeff.

Semantics - either way your claim is that Tito was doing more than offering his suggestions on a thread that was specifically created to accept suggestions, right?

This isnt about what I claim. Tito made few suggestions. Andrew didnt like them . Andrew's board, Andrew's rules. Tito can implement all those rules to Tito's forum.
Now if Tito along the way of his suggestions tried to include Jeff in there , he must have had his own reasons to do so,,,, so wouldnt you be better of asking him his main reason for mentioning Jeff's name, since youre one of his cheerleaders here?

For someone that claims that this is Andrew's board and he can do what he wants, you sure speak for him a lot.

[Behshad]

For someone that claims that this is Andrew's board and he can do what he wants, you sure speak for him a lot.

I dont speak for Andrew. I am just stating some facts in regards of HIS wishes. If youve been here for longer than a month, you should know what his wishes are. Simple.Butl given the fact that I get questioned by Tito's cheerleaders left and right, I see no choice to answer them one by one.

Next?

[AlteredDNA]

I agree that Andrew's decision should be respected. But the double standard is laughable. If you want feedback, then be prepared to hear stuff that you may not like or agree with. And don't attack someone when they offer what you requested in a respectful manner. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Its not feedback when its build on sarcasm and hatred towards an ex member of the band. Explain to me what part of the POINT 2 he made was to improve this place......
Andrew is open to suggestions to IMPROVE this place. Not what TITO's Personal Prefrences are. There's the difference, no double standard.

Also, MG,,, I didnt think what Tito said in his original post here was an attack towards Jeff. I simply responded to him that if he thinks that JSS topics wont be discussed here, he's in for a surprise.

I think that if you re-read your own posts in this thread, you'll find that you did indeed state that Tito was attacking / baiting in his original post...

Baiting yes. Attacking Jeff nope. I never said that he attacked Jeff.

Semantics - either way your claim is that Tito was doing more than offering his suggestions on a thread that was specifically created to accept suggestions, right?

This isnt about what I claim. Tito made few suggestions. Andrew didnt like them . Andrew's board, Andrew's rules. Tito can implement all those rules to Tito's forum.
Now if Tito along the way of his suggestions tried to include Jeff in there , he must have had his own reasons to do so,,,, so wouldnt you be better of asking him his main reason for mentioning Jeff's name, since youre one of his cheerleaders here?

But it is absolutely about what you claim. You came after Tito well before Andrew put the kabosh on his suggestions, and even bragged about attempting to bait Tito into posting something that would get him in trouble, if not banned. I offer that if Tito is "playing a game" with Jeff's name, then so are you.

It's gotten to a Pavlovian point that anytime Jeff's name is referenced by anyone outside of a select few in here, the assumption is that it's to tear him down and / or bait others. Not true.

As to the cheerleader comment - Really? I'm one of Tito's cheerleaders? How did you arrive at that? I've never posted on any of his threads. The only post I've made prior to this one that has anything to do with Jeff is here, made yesterday, in a Poll thread started by Prog, specifically asking about Jeff:

http://forums.melodicrock.com/phpBB/vie ... hp?t=36017

[Onestepper]

For someone that claims that this is Andrew's board and he can do what he wants, you sure speak for him a lot.

I dont speak for Andrew. I am just stating some facts in regards of HIS wishes. If youve been here for longer than a month, you should know what his wishes are. Simple.Butl given the fact that I get questioned by Tito's cheerleaders left and right, I see no choice to answer them one by one.

Next?

I was just stating fact. Have a nice day.

[AlteredDNA]

For someone that claims that this is Andrew's board and he can do what he wants, you sure speak for him a lot.

I dont speak for Andrew. I am just stating some facts in regards of HIS wishes. If youve been here for longer than a month, you should know what his wishes are. Simple.Butl given the fact that I get questioned by Tito's cheerleaders left and right, I see no choice to answer them one by one.

Next?

Again with the Cheerleader reference. Please tell us, who are said cheerleaders?