Awwww Tony and Jessica take in a Journey show!

by **Rhiannon** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:32 am

DrFU wrote:

Exactly right, Linda. You see, the proof is in the cleavage. Normal breast tissue doesn't have such sharp definition. Test it right now. Squeeze your girls together... what do they do? They look fuller, but retain natural lines. A bag of silicone or saline will be visible behind the original breast tissue. Now, she was a tig ol bittied girl to begin with, but she's clearly had augmentation.

Like stevew2 said, not that it matters. But she was gorge as/was back in the day. Now her hair is fake, her nails are fake, her tan is fake, her chin, nose, teeth... why not the boobs, too?

by **stevew2** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:33 am

Tito wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:[
OR POSSIBLY.................

See he isn't the monster people say he is.

Also, I remember there was a (Simpson/Metal Skool) clip that was worse than that one.

If you beleive he really cried, i got some oceanfront property in Idaho for your ass

by **wildone** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:39 am

stevew2 wrote:
Tito wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:[
OR POSSIBLY.................

See he isn't the monster people say he is.

Also, I remember there was a (Simpson/Metal Skool) clip that was worse than that one.
If you beleive he really cried, i got some oceanfront property in Idaho for your ass

I could see her now butchering that song.....just tell her to sit down shut up and undue another button...lol

by **Tito** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:39 am

Saint John wrote:
Tito wrote:
Saint John wrote:They have taste in music...no doubt about it. And Jessica Simpson is not as bad of a singer as some people make her out to be. Actually, I thought her version of Take My Breath Away was pretty fucking good. And I must also admit that I watched her show with Nick Lachey regularly. She's certainly a dumbfuck, but she is also talented and pretty easy on the eyes.

I don't know about that dude

http://youtube.com/watch?v=cbkbsmD30L0

She didn't even fucking sing and besides, she was so drunk she could hardly stand up.

That's the point. There used to be a different clip on youtube. It's been taken off a few times. It was worse.

by **stevew2** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:50 am

wildone wrote:
stevew2 wrote:
Tito wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:[
OR POSSIBLY.................

See he isn't the monster people say he is.

Also, I remember there was a (Simpson/Metal Skool) clip that was worse than that one.
If you beleive he really cried, i got some oceanfront property in Idaho for your ass
I could see her now butchering that song.....just tell her to sit down shut up and undue another button...lol

Or three

by **journeypower** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:46 am

Jessica is one hot lucky gal. if not for Nick, she won't be in this side of the entertainment biz, but on the other side of it. don't get me wrong, she does look someone who is good for ****. she might also get famous in that department.

by **stevew2** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:52 am

journeypower wrote:Jessica is one hot lucky gal. if not for Nick, she won't be in this side of the entertainment biz, but on the other side of it. don't get me wrong, she does look someone who is good for ****. she might also get famous in that department.

what it **** ? say it man

by **journeypower** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:54 am

stevew2 wrote:
journeypower wrote:Jessica is one hot lucky gal. if not for Nick, she won't be in this side of the entertainment biz, but on the other side of it. don't get me wrong, she does look someone who is good for ****. she might also get famous in that department.
what it **** ? say it man

PORN ! happy now?

by **spellbinder** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:55 am

Rhiannon wrote:
stevew2 wrote:are they fake titties? {not that it matters}

You decide

I need ttango1 to evaluate.
He seems have the qualifications to opine on this ....

by **journeypower** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:04 am

Rhiannon wrote:
DrFU wrote:

Exactly right, Linda. You see, the proof is in the cleavage. Normal breast tissue doesn't have such sharp definition. Test it right now. Squeeze your girls together... what do they do? They look fuller, but retain natural lines. A bag of silicone or saline will be visible behind the original breast tissue. Now, she was a tig ol bittied girl to begin with, but she's clearly had augmentation.

Like stevew2 said, not that it matters. But she was gorge as/was back in the day. Now her hair is fake, her nails are fake, her tan is fake, her chin, nose, teeth... why not the boobs, too?

normal breast tissue does have sharp definition. certain women have them and have perfect rounded breasts. but you are right, the only way to know if they were real, is to touch em. you can never be certain by merely looking nowadays. however, I could still tell most of the time if they are real or not just by looking.

by **stevew2** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:09 am

journeypower wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
DrFU wrote:

Exactly right, Linda. You see, the proof is in the cleavage. Normal breast tissue doesn't have such sharp definition. Test it right now. Squeeze your girls together... what do they do? They look fuller, but retain natural lines. A bag of silicone or saline will be visible behind the original breast tissue. Now, she was a tig ol bittied girl to begin with, but she's clearly had augmentation.

Like stevew2 said, not that it matters. But she was gorge as/was back in the day. Now her hair is fake, her nails are fake, her tan is fake, her chin, nose, teeth... why not the boobs, too?

normal breast tissue does have sharp definition. certain women have them and have perfect rounded breasts. but you are right, the only way to know if they were real, is to touch em. you can never be certain by merely looking nowadays. however, I could still tell most of the time if they are real or not just by looking.

Touchin squeezin and lifting is the only way to know for sure

by **Saint John** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:32 am

Simpson's rack is real, folks.

by **stevew2** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:36 am

Saint John wrote:Simpson's rack is real, folks.

thanks for clarifying that. They hang like real tits. Im so glad now, life is worth living now

by **Saint John** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:41 am

stevew2 wrote:
Saint John wrote:Simpson's rack is real, folks.
thanks for clarifying that. They hang like real tits. Im so glad now, life is worth living now

You're welcome. My ex had a HUGE rack and her tits were real, but she could make them look like Simpson did in that picture...not quite that good, but close. Tito used to stare at her tits. He can vouch. :lol:

by **tammy** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:47 am

journeypower wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
DrFU wrote:

Exactly right, Linda. You see, the proof is in the cleavage. Normal breast tissue doesn't have such sharp definition. Test it right now. Squeeze your girls together... what do they do? They look fuller, but retain natural lines. A bag of silicone or saline will be visible behind the original breast tissue. Now, she was a tig ol bittied girl to begin with, but she's clearly had augmentation.

Like stevew2 said, not that it matters. But she was gorge as/was back in the day. Now her hair is fake, her nails are fake, her tan is fake, her chin, nose, teeth... why not the boobs, too?

normal breast tissue does have sharp definition. certain women have them and have perfect rounded breasts. but you are right, the only way to know if they were real, is to touch em. you can never be certain by merely looking nowadays. however, I could still tell most of the time if they are real or not just by looking.

If she lies down & they don't, then ya know...somebody trip her.

by **DrFU** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:49 am

Saint John wrote:
stevew2 wrote:
Saint John wrote:Simpson's rack is real, folks.
thanks for clarifying that. They hang like real tits. Im so glad now, life is worth living now

You're welcome. My ex had a HUGE rack and her tits were real, but she could make them look like Simpson did in that picture...not quite that good, but close. Tito used to stare at her tits. He can vouch.

Sure, Dan-o; whatever fable you need to tell yourself to get through the day... :lol:

by **Rhiannon** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:49 am

tammy wrote:If she lies down & they don't, then ya know...somebody trip her.

Actually... that is true... and my roomy was watching some show on Spike a few nights ago that did the float test. Wanna know for sure? Throw her in a pool. See if they float. Real ones will, fake ones won't. Foolproof. :wink:

by **stevew2** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:51 am

Saint John wrote:
stevew2 wrote:
Saint John wrote:Simpson's rack is real, folks.
thanks for clarifying that. They hang like real tits. Im so glad now, life is worth living now

You're welcome. My ex had a HUGE rack and her tits were real, but she could make them look like Simpson did in that picture...not quite that good, but close. Tito used to stare at her tits. He can vouch.

Did you let him squeeze them? Just think SJ someone problablly squeezing them right now, just not you

by **Saint John** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:00 am

stevew2 wrote: Did you let him squeeze them? Just think SJ someone problablly squeezing them right now, just not you

Lol...you're absolutely right, dude. Someone's squeezing her rack and she's squeezing his wallet. He can have her. And no, Tito never squeezed them...I hope. :lol:

by **Saint John** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:02 am

DrFU wrote:Sure, Dan-o; whatever fable you need to tell yourself to get through the day

If I find any of the old pictures from out meet and greet with Journey I'll post one just you, Fu Fu.

by **stevew2** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:03 am

Saint John wrote:
stevew2 wrote: Did you let him squeeze them? Just think SJ someone problablly squeezing them right now, just not you

Lol...you're absolutely right, dude. Someone's squeezing her rack and she's squeezing his wallet. He can have her. And no, Tito never squeezed them...I hope.

That you know of, na, he d rather squeeze your gonads, or Jonnie boys

by **stevew2** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:04 am

Saint John wrote:
DrFU wrote:Sure, Dan-o; whatever fable you need to tell yourself to get through the day

If I find any of the old pictures from out meet and greet with Journey I'll post one just you, Fu Fu.

please do

by **texafana** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:15 am

Simpsons rak seems real. I've seen photos of her where the girls are hanging low and to and fro.

by **stevew2** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:33 am

texafana wrote:Simpsons rak seems real. I've seen photos of her where the girls are hanging low and to and fro.

post a few for us if you dare

by **Deb** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:57 am

texafana wrote:Simpsons rak seems real. I've seen photos of her where the girls are hanging low and to and fro.

Probably true, it's surprising what a good push up bra can do. :lol:

by **RossValoryRocks** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:33 am

by **RedWingFan** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:33 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:

Wow, that's pretty cool Stu. :lol:

by **RossValoryRocks** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:34 am

RedWingFan wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:

Wow, that's pretty cool Stu.

Sorry I fixed it...check again...they look real to me! LOL

by **Rhiannon** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:35 am

Those are real ones that Stu posted. Rumor has it she got the implants while she was dating John Mayer.

by **DrFU** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:35 am

RedWingFan wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:

Wow, that's pretty cool Stu.

life sized, no less...

MR

Awwww Tony and Jessica take in a Journey show!

Who is online