Moderator: Andrew
Tito wrote:Let's hear some predictions. Predict the playoff teams (division winners and wildcard) and Superbowl prediction.
AFC
Patriots
Pittsburgh
Indy
Denver
Wildcard
Jacksonville
Cleveland
NFC
Dallas
Vikings
Tampa
Seattle
Wildcard
Detroit
Washington
Pittsburgh def. Vikings Superbowl.
Tito wrote:Pittsburgh def. Vikings Superbowl.
LazzMan wrote:What? No Packers on the list?
With all of the Favre-B.S. going on I would be shocked to see them qin 8 games this year.
lights1961 wrote:
HELL LAST YEAR i thought the packers would be 8-8... They are just as good this year...but LOTS OF LUCK HAS TO FALL THEIR WAY.
Rick
Tito wrote:Let's hear some predictions. Predict the playoff teams (division winners and wildcard) and Superbowl prediction.
AFC
Patriots
Pittsburgh
Indy
Denver
Wildcard
Jacksonville
Cleveland
NFC
Dallas
Vikings
Tampa
Seattle
Wildcard
Detroit
Washington
Pittsburgh def. Vikings Superbowl.
Enigma869 wrote:lights1961 wrote:
HELL LAST YEAR i thought the packers would be 8-8... They are just as good this year...but LOTS OF LUCK HAS TO FALL THEIR WAY.
Rick
The Packers are NOWHERE near as good, if Favre isn't their starting QB, and anyone who actually believes that, is delusional! I'm not a fan of Favre's antics, when it comes to the way he's handled this phantom retirement. That said, Rodgers can't carry Favre's jock, so I wouldn't go punching their ticket into the playoffs, if Favre isn't under center!
John from Boston
lights1961 wrote:
THE BEAUTY of FOOTBALL is MAYBE HE WILL???? Look at Brunell or Hassleback or even Werner for that matter... all three pretty good back up that had to flee gb to get jobs... all turned out damn good.
who is to Say AARON wont do the same...
Rick
Enigma869 wrote:Tito wrote:Pittsburgh def. Vikings Superbowl.
Do you even watch football, dude??? The Steelers are a complete fraud of a team and the Vikings have no QB! Generally speaking, teams NEVER win in the NFL, without a QB. The 1985 Bears and 2001 Ravens are exceptions to that rule, but both of those teams had defenses that simply couldn't be scored on. Minnesota has NOWHERE near that caliber of defense!
On to more pressing issues...The Patriots will vindicate themselves (with or without video tape), and defeat Dallas in the Super Bowl!
John from Boston
X factor wrote:Tito wrote:Let's hear some predictions. Predict the playoff teams (division winners and wildcard) and Superbowl prediction.
AFC
Patriots
Pittsburgh
Indy
Denver
Wildcard
Jacksonville
Cleveland
NFC
Dallas
Vikings
Tampa
Seattle
Wildcard
Detroit
Washington
Pittsburgh def. Vikings Superbowl.
Uhh...did we forget San Diego?????
Here ya go:
AFC
New England
San Diego
Jacksonville
Cleveland(going out on a limb, here)
Tennessee (yeah Yeah, It's a homer pick!)
Buffalo
NFC
Dallas
New Orleans
Arizona (my longshot- I think it's their year)
Chicago
Seattle
NY Giants
Jacksonville / New Orleans in the big one.
I'm rolling my OWN eyes at these picks!
YoungJRNY wrote: Every year there is something more to the juice that one cannot say about the year before. Gaints winning the Superbowl last year? Who saw it coming? T
Tito wrote:YoungJRNY wrote: Every year there is something more to the juice that one cannot say about the year before. Gaints winning the Superbowl last year? Who saw it coming? T
Giants will keep the tradition alive and not even make the playoffs.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:Tito wrote:YoungJRNY wrote: Every year there is something more to the juice that one cannot say about the year before. Gaints winning the Superbowl last year? Who saw it coming? T
Giants will keep the tradition alive and not even make the playoffs.
That tradition is the Super Bowl loser, not the winner.
Enigma869 wrote:lights1961 wrote:
THE BEAUTY of FOOTBALL is MAYBE HE WILL???? Look at Brunell or Hassleback or even Werner for that matter... all three pretty good back up that had to flee gb to get jobs... all turned out damn good.
who is to Say AARON wont do the same...
Rick
Brunell started because he was taken by an expansion team (the Jaguars). Hasselback wasn't backing up anyone in Seattle (he was backing up Favre in Green Bay). He was specifically brought to Seattle to be a starter, by Homgren. Kurt Warner started because Trent Green got hurt. The only one of those three guys that you mentioned who was VERY successful in their first season was Warner, and he had a great offensive team around him!
You are absolutely correct that nobody knows how good or bad Aaron Rodgers is going to be, as a QB. That said, I am VERY comfortable going out on a limb here, and saying that he will be NOWHERE near what Brett Favre has been! Brett Favre is a top 10 all-time NFL QB...Rodgers won't be!
John from Boston
Tito wrote:Second, 1985 Bears did have a quaterback - Jim McMahon. Bad ass dude.
Enigma869 wrote:Tito wrote:Second, 1985 Bears did have a quaterback - Jim McMahon. Bad ass dude.
Don't tell me about Jim McMahon, dude, because I remember the 1985 season and McMahon's career, VERY well. McMahon sucked and was a below average NFL QB. The year the Bears won the Super Bowl, McMahon threw a whopping 15 TD's and threw for a whopping 2200 yards, for the entire season! Just for perspective, McMahon's 1985 numbers were almost identical to Sage Rosenfels' 2007 numbers, and you probably don't even know what team he plays for, without googling it! Those are DREADFUL numbers, so please stop telling me that McMahon was a "bad ass dude", because he wore an Adidas headband around his neck. The guy sucked and deserves zero credit for the 1985 Bears championship run! That Bears team was ALL DEFENSE. I think it's hilarious when people bring up McMahon's name, because aside from the great Walter Payton, nobody can remember another offensive player on that team.
John from Boston
Enigma869 wrote:Don't tell me about Jim McMahon, dude, because I remember the 1985 season and McMahon's career, VERY well. McMahon sucked and was a below average NFL QB. The year the Bears won the Super Bowl, McMahon threw a whopping 15 TD's and threw for a whopping 2200 yards, for the entire season! Just for perspective, McMahon's 1985 numbers were almost identical to Sage Rosenfels' 2007 numbers, and you probably don't even know what team he plays for, without googling it! Those are DREADFUL numbers, so please stop telling me that McMahon was a "bad ass dude", because he wore an Adidas headband around his neck. The guy sucked and deserves zero credit for the 1985 Bears championship run! That Bears team was ALL DEFENSE. I think it's hilarious when people bring up McMahon's name, because aside from the great Walter Payton, nobody can remember another offensive player on that team.
Enigma869 wrote:Tito wrote:Second, 1985 Bears did have a quaterback - Jim McMahon. Bad ass dude.
Don't tell me about Jim McMahon, dude, because I remember the 1985 season and McMahon's career, VERY well. McMahon sucked and was a below average NFL QB. The year the Bears won the Super Bowl, McMahon threw a whopping 15 TD's and threw for a whopping 2200 yards, for the entire season! Just for perspective, McMahon's 1985 numbers were almost identical to Sage Rosenfels' 2007 numbers, and you probably don't even know what team he plays for, without googling it! Those are DREADFUL numbers, so please stop telling me that McMahon was a "bad ass dude", because he wore an Adidas headband around his neck. The guy sucked and deserves zero credit for the 1985 Bears championship run! That Bears team was ALL DEFENSE. I think it's hilarious when people bring up McMahon's name, because aside from the great Walter Payton, nobody can remember another offensive player on that team.
John from Boston
Tito wrote:He made the Pro Bowl that year and was the 7 highest rated QB that year. 3 Hall of Famers were ahead of him. He was a great leader. The Thursday night Minnesota game is still legendary. I believe the Bears were second in offense that year as well, which was overlooked.
mikemarrs wrote:
i am glad payton finally got a ring but then they gave the fridge the ball for a TD in that game and payton didn't get a score running.
RPM wrote:let me learn ya something my friend from boston. its not always about the stats.
he was a great leader who knew how pull the offense together.
Ray
Enigma869 wrote:RPM wrote:let me learn ya something my friend from boston. its not always about the stats.
he was a great leader who knew how pull the offense together.
Ray
I agree with your premise that it's not always about the stats. That doesn't change the fact that the Bears were all run and defense. McMahon was ALWAYS an afterthought on that team. The only reason the guy ever got any publicity was because he was always arguing with then commissioner Pete Rozelle about wearing his Adidas headband. They weren't an NFL sponsor, so Rozelle made him change it. At that point, the guy went to wearing headbands with Rozelle's name on it. McMahon was an ass-clown, and a VERY average QB. I've seen a lot of NFL QB in my life, and can tell you that I wouldn't rank McMahon in the top 100 guys that I've personally seen. He simply wasn't that good, and his career statistics back that up! The reality is that if McMahon wasn't on that 1985 team, nobody would ever even have known the guy's name!
John from Boston
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 24 guests