7 Wishes wrote:WRONG, YET AGAIN.
The Republicans tried to pass through higher and higher spending bills and Clinton had to keep trimming the fat.
It was the DEMS who intentionally reduced the ranks of the government. The Republicans fought them tooth and nail.
What, your party suddenly had a reversal of hypocrisy under Clinton? Every single Republican President since Ike has increased the size of the Federal Government, and every single Democratic President has reduced it.
Again, have fun ignoring the facts. Continue to deceive yourselves.
Right. Let's see, who are the Democrat Presidents since Ike?
Kennedy - his views actually are much closer to today's Republicans than Democrats.
Johnson - Vietnam, War on Poverty, no increase in government there.
Carter - 22% iunterest rates, misery index, Iran hostages, the list goes on and on (to his credit, his work with Habitat for Humanity is to be commended and I wish other former Presidents and VPs would use their influence and time this way).
Clinton - even if you give him credit, it's only one of 4.
Who else might have been added to the list had the American people not been wise enough to elect a Republican?
Hubert Humphrey - one of the great liberal big spenders of all time.
George McGovern - another government shrinker who had to fire his first VP running mate before the election was even held:roll:
Walter Mondale - oops, another big time liberal spender.
Michael Dukakis - oh yea, big time government shrinker
Al Gore - It hurts too much to try to list his "accomplishments"
John Kerry - the list of big spenders goes on and on and on
And now we have Barry Obama. Fortunately, the American people will see him for what he is: an opportunist who's only accomplishments have been to live off of the taxpayers and donor's money, pushing extremely liberal policies.
It must be fun living in your fantasy world where history is what you want it to be, rather than what it was. They used to call it "delusion".
