OPRAH BALKS AT HOSTING SARAH PALIN; STAFF DIVIDED

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Don » Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:45 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
strangegrey wrote:Blah bla blah blah blah. Dude, go back to CNN, then want their tampon back....


And the clan meeting wouldn’t officially be at fire marshal capacity without a word from the forum's heavyweight shadowboxer of invisible agents of the Left…

Whatsamatter?
No takers on your enticing Craigslist scat-munching personal?

It’s already been leaked that McCain’s newly adopted strategy to win is “blame the media.”
True to form, you’ve lept to attention and unblinkingly carried out the campaign's subliminal marching orders.

Good boy.
Now roll over and lick the chunky peanut butter off McCain’s wizened graybushed cumspigot.


If only the VietCong had snapped your arms and saved countless innocent bystanders the graven image of you compulsively masturbating on the village lawn.
If only the john had pulled out and came on your mother’s tits, the world might have been spared your virulent strain of conservative ass-duncery.

Drop dead and be sure to tell Ronny Raygun I said ‘hi’ upon your arrival to Hell.


That was probably the most eloquent ad hominem attack I have ever read! Bravo and extra style points! Even if everything you wrote is meaningless liberal tripe!

But definately loved the language! I mean that. It was a very funny read!


I had this picture in my head of Professor Dumbledore speaking to Voldemort :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Wolfticket supreme :lol: :lol:
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby treetopovskaya » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:10 pm

damn oprah sheep. bah. }:C)
User avatar
treetopovskaya
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3071
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 4:58 pm

Postby 7 Wishes » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:24 pm

Holy shit. I haven't laughed that hard in a long, long time...that was one of the most hysterical responses I've ever read. Wow. Heh heh...the opening line is a killer. TNC, you need to write a book.
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:54 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
strangegrey wrote:Blah bla blah blah blah. Dude, go back to CNN, then want their tampon back....


And the clan meeting wouldn’t officially be at fire marshal capacity without a word from the forum's heavyweight shadowboxer of invisible agents of the Left…

Whatsamatter?
No takers on your enticing Craigslist scat-munching personal?

It’s already been leaked that McCain’s newly adopted strategy to win is “blame the media.”
True to form, you’ve lept to attention and unblinkingly carried out the campaign's subliminal marching orders.

Good boy.
Now roll over and lick the chunky peanut butter off McCain’s wizened graybushed cumspigot.


If only the VietCong had snapped your arms and saved countless innocent bystanders the graven image of you compulsively masturbating on the village lawn.
If only the john had pulled out and came on your mother’s tits, the world might have been spared your virulent strain of conservative ass-duncery.

Drop dead and be sure to tell Ronny Raygun I said ‘hi’ upon your arrival to Hell.


That was probably the most eloquent ad hominem attack I have ever read! Bravo and extra style points! Even if everything you wrote is meaningless liberal tripe!

But definately loved the language! I mean that. It was a very funny read!


I agree, funny shit, :lol: but I'm sort of at a loss for what any of it exactly means.

Mentioned is VietCong. I know that in California, we've got a very huge Vietnamese population here, I was engaged once to one in San Jose. Anyways, during that time I was engaged, I was pretty involved with the Vietnamese community. And all of them were completely against Kerry. They view him as one of the villains of the Vietnam war. So Kerry wouldn't be scoring any votes down at places like Little Saigon.
I've never eaten a piece of sushi I didn't thoroughly enjoy.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby Babyblue » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:04 pm

At one tine i enjoyed her show & her magazine.But i can't stans either anymore.To HELL with her.
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby whirlwind » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:42 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
strangegrey wrote:Blah bla blah blah blah. Dude, go back to CNN, then want their tampon back....


And the clan meeting wouldn’t officially be at fire marshal capacity without a word from the forum's heavyweight shadowboxer of invisible agents of the Left…

Whatsamatter?
No takers on your enticing Craigslist scat-munching personal?

It’s already been leaked that McCain’s newly adopted strategy to win is “blame the media.”
True to form, you’ve lept to attention and unblinkingly carried out the campaign's subliminal marching orders.

Good boy.
Now roll over and lick the chunky peanut butter off McCain’s wizened graybushed cumspigot.


If only the VietCong had snapped your arms and saved countless innocent bystanders the graven image of you compulsively masturbating on the village lawn.
If only the john had pulled out and came on your mother’s tits, the world might have been spared your virulent strain of conservative ass-duncery.

Drop dead and be sure to tell Ronny Raygun I said ‘hi’ upon your arrival to Hell.






LMAO! Frank really struck a nerve. His one liner is a classic.
Last edited by whirlwind on Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
PEACE!

Quote of the Day
A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep.
Saul Bellow
User avatar
whirlwind
8 Track
 
Posts: 983
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:13 am
Location: ELMO

Postby strangegrey » Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:32 am

I love the claim that 'blaming the media' is now considered a 'new' tatic 'uncovered' by liberals and the media.

Laughable.

For every one Glen Beck, there are literally hundreds of Al Frankens, Wolf Blitzers, Dan (On-the) Ragthers, Katie Cuntrags and Keith OB-mans out there, Literally frothing at the mouth at an opportunity to attack a running or elected republican.

The only reason why some of you lib douchebags can't see it is because you have short memories. Up until the democrat greek God worship temple...oh excuse me, Democrat National Convention....the liberal media has had their guns turned towards Hillary Clinton. Because nothing could get in the way of electing their empty, 2-bit crack house worker from illinois.....Now that Clinton has been dispensed with, it's time to turn their guns back on republicans. Considering that most libs don't have a memory stretching beyond 5 days, this 'attacking republicans' thing seems like a new thing.

News flash fuckos....it's been going on since Reagan and before!


The fact that republicans are finally making you eat your own shit and accept responsibilities for your actions is what's new....and you can't deal with that. That's the problem here.

Oh Gawd, the humanity. A democrat being made to own up to his or her actions....Oh the humanity! :roll:

It's about fucking time. If only more republicans had the balls t o make you people eat your feces for the crap you try to make people believe, we wouldn't have to deal with useless, untalanted crack-heads like B. Hussein Obama.
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby whirlwind » Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:44 am

I suspect that the Media are mostly masochists and most got a woody when Palin snapped the whip on some of their sorry ass's. Too bad that Hillary didn't have the guts for it.
PEACE!

Quote of the Day
A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep.
Saul Bellow
User avatar
whirlwind
8 Track
 
Posts: 983
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:13 am
Location: ELMO

Postby 7 Wishes » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:22 am

strangegrey wrote:I love the claim that 'blaming the media' is now considered a 'new' tatic 'uncovered' by liberals and the media.
Laughable.

For every one Glen Beck, there are literally hundreds of Al Frankens, Wolf Blitzers, Dan (On-the) Ragthers, Katie Cuntrags and Keith OB-mans out there, Literally frothing at the mouth at an opportunity to attack a running or elected republican.


That is quite simply the most ignorant statement you've made in a long, long time. Once again, you're just plain wrong. And Frank has you PEGGED. Down for the count. Goodnight!
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Postby donnaplease » Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:20 am

whirlwind wrote:I suspect that the Media are mostly masochists and most got a woody when Palin snapped the whip on some of their sorry ass's. Too bad that Hillary didn't have the guts for it.


I'd love to see a debate between Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton. My opinion=Sarah Palin would chew Hillary up and spit her out! But... I do want to see her speak off-the-cuff, to see how she handles herself when her words aren't scripted for her.
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby csiako » Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:36 am

donnaplease wrote:
whirlwind wrote:I suspect that the Media are mostly masochists and most got a woody when Palin snapped the whip on some of their sorry ass's. Too bad that Hillary didn't have the guts for it.


I'd love to see a debate between Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton. My opinion=Sarah Palin would chew Hillary up and spit her out! But... I do want to see her speak off-the-cuff, to see how she handles herself when her words aren't scripted for her.


heres the 2006 alaska's governor debate

http://gregransom.com/prestopundit/2008 ... knowl.html
User avatar
csiako
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 2:58 pm

Postby strangegrey » Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:48 am

7 Wishes wrote:
strangegrey wrote:I love the claim that 'blaming the media' is now considered a 'new' tatic 'uncovered' by liberals and the media.
Laughable.

For every one Glen Beck, there are literally hundreds of Al Frankens, Wolf Blitzers, Dan (On-the) Ragthers, Katie Cuntrags and Keith OB-mans out there, Literally frothing at the mouth at an opportunity to attack a running or elected republican.


That is quite simply the most ignorant statement you've made in a long, long time. Once again, you're just plain wrong. And Frank has you PEGGED. Down for the count. Goodnight!


Who has me pegged? Who are you talking about?
Talk about Ignorance!
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:54 am

strangegrey wrote:I love the claim that 'blaming the media' is now considered a 'new' tatic 'uncovered' by liberals and the media.

Laughable.


Actually, Nixon started it in the 70s.
I don’t know anyone who thinks it’s new.
Republican Joe Scarborough has stated that he’s learned the McCain campaign is gonna try to ride the tactic out all the way to the inaugural ball.

strangegrey wrote:For every one Glen Beck, there are literally hundreds of Al Frankens


Never worked in a news capacity ever.

strangegrey wrote:Wolf Blitzers


Used to work for Pat Robertson.
Tries to be fair to the detriment of the facts themselves.
Impugned Paul Begala's Christian faith on-air due to his Democratic credentials.

Will most likely be posthumously eulogized by the right as a fair shooter ala Tim Russert.

strangegrey wrote:Dan (On-the) Ragthers,


Career ended in disgrace and ignominy.

strangegrey wrote:Katie Cuntrags


Started off her evening news broadcast with Rush Limbaugh as a guest.
Has since been caught editing Jon McCain interviews to omit the candidate’s gaffes.

strangegrey wrote:and Keith OB-mans out there


The only left-leaning cable news show in existence.

Conspicuous by its absence, why no mention of O’Reilly, Hannity, Cavuto, Hume, Stossel, Will, Crowley, Buchanan, Kristol?
Or TV’s dearly departed, like Coulter, Carlson, Savage, Novak, and most recently Ingraham?

strangegrey wrote:Literally frothing at the mouth at an opportunity to attack a running or elected republican.


There’s nothing “literal” about anything you said.
For the most part, Couric and Blitzer just rattle off the AP wire.

strangegrey wrote:The only reason why some of you lib douchebags can't see it is because you have short memories. Up until the democrat greek God worship temple...oh excuse me, Democrat National Convention...


The very fact that something as meaningless as the décor of a stage platform actually consumed the national headlines just proves whatever the media’s bias, it’s not in favor of the Democrats.

strangegrey wrote:the liberal media has had their guns turned towards Hillary Clinton. Because nothing could get in the way of electing their empty, 2-bit crack house worker from illinois.....


Funny, I failed to notice this lovefest when every cable channel was chock-a-block of looped Jeremiah Wright footage or having roundtable discussions as to whether or not “bittergate” firmly cemented Obama’s status as an arugula eating elitist.
The media pushed Clinton, Obama, and Edwards.
There were celebrity candidates on the other side, as well.

strangegrey wrote:The fact that republicans are finally making you eat your own shit and accept responsibilities for your actions is what's new....and you can't deal with that. That's the problem here.

Oh Gawd, the humanity. A democrat being made to own up to his or her actions....Oh the humanity!
It's about fucking time. If only more republicans had the balls t o make you people eat your feces for the crap you try to make people believe, we wouldn't have to deal with useless, untalanted crack-heads like B. Hussein Obama.


Your central thesis is the media is owned lock stock and barrel by the damn dirty libruhls.
If the media, through which the overwhelming majority of American receive their news, is little more than a fifth column disseminating liberal agitprop, how exactly do the Republicans rise above the static and make us, ahem, "eat shit"?
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby strangegrey » Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:57 am

You know, TNC....I saw the long drawn out post and said to myself, "I turn the channel when a lib flaps the vag-lips" why change now...sorry, you went through all that trouble and I just don't give a shit about the bullshit you spew!

So no, I haven't read dick of what you said...and wont. next....
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby scarygirl » Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:02 am

Saint John wrote:I can't stand that fat bitch. White women that watch her should be executed.


:lol: :lol: :lol: Holy CRAP! Took the thought that I have always thought out of mouth. I hate Oprah and her minions. That doesn't include Foolish Heart though. Love you girl. :D
User avatar
scarygirl
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: NC

Postby scarygirl » Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:04 am

Barb wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Obama Camp Turns to Clinton to Counter Palin

ST. PAUL — Senator Barack Obama will increasingly lean on prominent Democratic women to undercut Gov. Sarah Palin and Senator John McCain, dispatching Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to Florida on Monday and bolstering his plan to deploy female surrogates to battleground states, Obama advisers said Thursday.

Mrs. Clinton’s campaign event in Florida, her first for Mr. Obama since the Democratic convention, will serve as a counterpoint to the searing attacks and fresh burst of energy that Ms. Palin injected into the race with her convention speech on Wednesday, Obama aides said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/us/po ... ref=slogin


He could have avoided all of this by putting her on the ticket with him. Why he didn't, I'll never understand.


Because at the time it wasn't politically convenient and he's stupid.
User avatar
scarygirl
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: NC

Postby scarygirl » Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:11 am

StoneCold wrote:Imagine Oprah's quandary if McCain had selected Condi Rice? :)


I really like Condi. She's had so much shit slung her way, but acts ever much the lady. A real class act.
User avatar
scarygirl
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: NC

Postby artist4perry » Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:37 am

strangegrey wrote:
7 Wishes wrote:
strangegrey wrote:I love the claim that 'blaming the media' is now considered a 'new' tatic 'uncovered' by liberals and the media.
Laughable.

For every one Glen Beck, there are literally hundreds of Al Frankens, Wolf Blitzers, Dan (On-the) Ragthers, Katie Cuntrags and Keith OB-mans out there, Literally frothing at the mouth at an opportunity to attack a running or elected republican.


That is quite simply the most ignorant statement you've made in a long, long time. Once again, you're just plain wrong. And Frank has you PEGGED. Down for the count. Goodnight!


Who has me pegged? Who are you talking about?
Talk about Ignorance!

Image
This is the political intelect that he was refering to. (Al Franken, stuper genius!) :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:38 am

strangegrey wrote:You know, TNC....I saw the long drawn out post and said to myself, "I turn the channel when a lib flaps the vag-lips" why change now...sorry, you went through all that trouble and I just don't give a shit about the bullshit you spew!

So no, I haven't read dick of what you said...and wont. next....


How very fitting.
Like little Nero occupying the highest office in the land, it appears you too like to start wars you can’t finish...(though it wouldn’t be all that surprising to learn your similarities extended all the way up to having salty hard rods obstruct your windpipe)
Go ahead.
Cut n’ run and raise the white flag of defeat.
Despite your alphadog harrumphing to the contrary, everyone knows it really amounts to a tacit admission of congestive brain failure.
Like the police raids at Stonewall, this isn’t the first time you’ve been caught fleeing for the hills with your colon trailing behind you, and it won't be the last.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16056
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:27 am

I read over the weekend that Oprah isn't going to allow Palin on her show. That's great news because in doing so, she has confirmed what most of us had already knew about Oprah, what she's doing, why she's doing it and who she's doing it to.
I've never eaten a piece of sushi I didn't thoroughly enjoy.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby Rick » Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:36 am

The Sushi Hunter wrote:I read over the weekend that Oprah isn't going to allow Palin on her show. That's great news because in doing so, she has confirmed what most of us had already knew about Oprah, what she's doing, why she's doing it and who she's doing it to.


Is it her way of stickin it to da man? :lol:

She needs to be very careful here. This could backfire on her in a huge way.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Barb » Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:39 am

The Sushi Hunter wrote:I read over the weekend that Oprah isn't going to allow Palin on her show. That's great news because in doing so, she has confirmed what most of us had already knew about Oprah, what she's doing, why she's doing it and who she's doing it to.


She also knows how good Sarah Palin is -- otherwise, she'd have her on. :lol:
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby StoneCold » Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:44 am

The Sushi Hunter wrote:I read over the weekend that Oprah isn't going to allow Palin on her show. That's great news because in doing so, she has confirmed what most of us had already knew about Oprah, what she's doing, why she's doing it and who she's doing it to.


She's using the excuse that she's already backing Obie. She doesn't care about the fallout and there will be one.

Comes off racist. Shows her to be a hypocrite by not recognizing a "strong woman" in Palin.

Big deal, she's only making Palin look better.
User avatar
StoneCold
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6310
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:32 pm

Postby nolippin » Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:47 am

If she were looking to be fair, wouldn't it be McCain she should have on? He is the candidate running against Obama.

I don't believe she has had Biden on either.


StoneCold wrote:
The Sushi Hunter wrote:I read over the weekend that Oprah isn't going to allow Palin on her show. That's great news because in doing so, she has confirmed what most of us had already knew about Oprah, what she's doing, why she's doing it and who she's doing it to.


She's using the excuse that she's already backing Obie. She doesn't care about the fallout and there will be one.

Comes off racist. Shows her to be a hypocrite by not recognizing a "strong woman" in Palin.

Big deal, she's only making Palin look better.
nolippin
8 Track
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:12 am

Postby Barb » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:09 am

nolippin wrote:If she were looking to be fair, wouldn't it be McCain she should have on? He is the candidate running against Obama.

I don't believe she has had Biden on either.


StoneCold wrote:
The Sushi Hunter wrote:I read over the weekend that Oprah isn't going to allow Palin on her show. That's great news because in doing so, she has confirmed what most of us had already knew about Oprah, what she's doing, why she's doing it and who she's doing it to.


She's using the excuse that she's already backing Obie. She doesn't care about the fallout and there will be one.

Comes off racist. Shows her to be a hypocrite by not recognizing a "strong woman" in Palin.

Big deal, she's only making Palin look better.


Oprah has been the world's biggest feminist from day one. If Palin were a Democrat, there is no doubt she'd have her on. This is a bone headed business decision. Not every viewer of hers is a Democrat, and I bet less than half of her audience will vote for Obama.
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby nolippin » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:14 am

But you didn't address the point. If you are looking for her to be fair to the Reps. because she had Obama on, you should be pushing for McCain to be on..not Palin. Did she have Hillary on when she was running against Obama?


Barb wrote:
nolippin wrote:If she were looking to be fair, wouldn't it be McCain she should have on? He is the candidate running against Obama.

I don't believe she has had Biden on either.


StoneCold wrote:
The Sushi Hunter wrote:I read over the weekend that Oprah isn't going to allow Palin on her show. That's great news because in doing so, she has confirmed what most of us had already knew about Oprah, what she's doing, why she's doing it and who she's doing it to.


She's using the excuse that she's already backing Obie. She doesn't care about the fallout and there will be one.

Comes off racist. Shows her to be a hypocrite by not recognizing a "strong woman" in Palin.

Big deal, she's only making Palin look better.


Oprah has been the world's biggest feminist from day one. If Palin were a Democrat, there is no doubt she'd have her on. This is a bone headed business decision. Not every viewer of hers is a Democrat, and I bet less than half of her audience will vote for Obama.
nolippin
8 Track
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:12 am

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:30 am

I'll bet Hillary turned down Oprah's invite, if it ever had happened. Does anyone know if Hillary had ever been invited to be on the show ever? I'm not a Oprah show viewer but all indications point to the fact that Oprah only has weak and ignorant white women on her show. Is this true or am I just out in left field somewhere? And that could explain why Oprah would never invite McCain on the show.

nolippin wrote:But you didn't address the point. If you are looking for her to be fair to the Reps. because she had Obama on, you should be pushing for McCain to be on..not Palin. Did she have Hillary on when she was running against Obama?


Barb wrote:
nolippin wrote:If she were looking to be fair, wouldn't it be McCain she should have on? He is the candidate running against Obama.

I don't believe she has had Biden on either.


StoneCold wrote:
The Sushi Hunter wrote:I read over the weekend that Oprah isn't going to allow Palin on her show. That's great news because in doing so, she has confirmed what most of us had already knew about Oprah, what she's doing, why she's doing it and who she's doing it to.


She's using the excuse that she's already backing Obie. She doesn't care about the fallout and there will be one.

Comes off racist. Shows her to be a hypocrite by not recognizing a "strong woman" in Palin.

Big deal, she's only making Palin look better.


Oprah has been the world's biggest feminist from day one. If Palin were a Democrat, there is no doubt she'd have her on. This is a bone headed business decision. Not every viewer of hers is a Democrat, and I bet less than half of her audience will vote for Obama.
I've never eaten a piece of sushi I didn't thoroughly enjoy.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby Barb » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:45 am

nolippin wrote:But you didn't address the point. If you are looking for her to be fair to the Reps. because she had Obama on, you should be pushing for McCain to be on..not Palin. Did she have Hillary on when she was running against Obama?


Barb wrote:
nolippin wrote:If she were looking to be fair, wouldn't it be McCain she should have on? He is the candidate running against Obama.

I don't believe she has had Biden on either.


StoneCold wrote:
The Sushi Hunter wrote:I read over the weekend that Oprah isn't going to allow Palin on her show. That's great news because in doing so, she has confirmed what most of us had already knew about Oprah, what she's doing, why she's doing it and who she's doing it to.


She's using the excuse that she's already backing Obie. She doesn't care about the fallout and there will be one.

Comes off racist. Shows her to be a hypocrite by not recognizing a "strong woman" in Palin.

Big deal, she's only making Palin look better.


Oprah has been the world's biggest feminist from day one. If Palin were a Democrat, there is no doubt she'd have her on. This is a bone headed business decision. Not every viewer of hers is a Democrat, and I bet less than half of her audience will vote for Obama.


Is it necessary to have Hillary on? Is there anyone in America who doesn't already know Hillary Clinton and her story? Palin is the first GOP nominee for Vice President -- there is an actual story there. Normallly O would be all over something like this.
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby StoneCold » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:49 am

Yep, the reason for Palin is she's A. a woman and B. relatively new to the country's conscience and C. there's been a lot of email requests to have her on.

As with Hilary, everyone knows McCain so it wouldn't be a big deal having him on. O realizes that having Palin would be a such a boost for Palin's popularity that she'd be nailing Obie's coffin herself.
User avatar
StoneCold
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6310
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:32 pm

Postby nolippin » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:20 am

No, it isn't "necessary" to have Hillary on. It would just give some credibility to your point that Oprah should have Palin on because she is such a feminist.

I'm not sure why the reps are pushing so hard for Palin and not for McCain. I also don't understand why you cna't accept her statement that she doesn't want her show used as a political stage. I don't believe that she has had Obama on since he has become the Presidential candidate nor has she had the Dem VP candidate on.

It just seems you are looking for something to complain about. I think there will be plenty of that next week when Palin starts being asked to explain the contradictions in her speech.
nolippin
8 Track
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:12 am

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests