Thats why they open

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Thats why they open

Postby Eric » Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:32 am

Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3934
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby G.I.Jim » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:38 am

This doesn't surprise me in the least! I love their music, but you don't get much farther left than those two. These musicians and actors need to just shut their pieholes and do whatever the hell they do for a living! It goes both ways...If someone's a diehard republican and a musician...I could care less, and think they should keep their opinions to themselves.

All of these people who come out and say "if he gets elected, I'm moving to Europe"...Good! Get the fuck outta here and don't let the door hit your ass on the way out! Alec Baldwin can take all his friends from Hollywood with him, and the world would be a much better place! :roll:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Postby brandonx76 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:40 am

How do you think the band members of Journey will be voting?
User avatar
brandonx76
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 11:16 am
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: Thats why they open

Postby Rocker Chic » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:46 am

Eric wrote:http://www.popeater.com/music/article/back-off-of-our-barracuda-maverick/161983?icid=100214839x1208946976x1200488006


Regardless of whatever party an artist supports/belongs to, any use of that artist's music should be cleared with the artist first and foremost. It is done routinely in movies and TV, so politics should not be exempt.

Debbie
User avatar
Rocker Chic
8 Track
 
Posts: 650
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 1:00 am
Location: New York City, Baby!

Re: Thats why they open

Postby Michigan Girl » Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:05 am

Rocker Chic wrote:
Eric wrote:http://www.popeater.com/music/article/back-off-of-our-barracuda-maverick/161983?icid=100214839x1208946976x1200488006


Regardless of whatever party an artist supports/belongs to, any use of that artist's music should be cleared with the artist first and foremost. It is done routinely in movies and TV, so politics should not be exempt.

Debbie


I AGREE!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Thats why they open

Postby G.I.Jim » Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:15 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
Rocker Chic wrote:
Eric wrote:http://www.popeater.com/music/article/back-off-of-our-barracuda-maverick/161983?icid=100214839x1208946976x1200488006


Regardless of whatever party an artist supports/belongs to, any use of that artist's music should be cleared with the artist first and foremost. It is done routinely in movies and TV, so politics should not be exempt.

Debbie


I AGREE!!! :wink:


I do agree with that too! I think no matter what it's for, they should always have the artists permission before using their tunes. I was just referring to their outspoken political beliefs. Reminds me of REO... Why can't he just shut up and sing??? I saw them with Journey a few years ago, and while I loved their set list...He just had to throw in his rants about the war and spew out his beliefs....People at the concert were like "STFU and sing dumbass"!!! :roll:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Re: Thats why they open

Postby Eric » Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:18 am

Rocker Chic wrote:
Eric wrote:http://www.popeater.com/music/article/back-off-of-our-barracuda-maverick/161983?icid=100214839x1208946976x1200488006


Regardless of whatever party an artist supports/belongs to, any use of that artist's music should be cleared with the artist first and foremost. It is done routinely in movies and TV, so politics should not be exempt.

Debbie


I guess it playing once in the background in an arena doesn't seem to me to be "using". And again...Journey didn't bitch about DSB being used.
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3934
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Re: Thats why they open

Postby S2M » Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:21 am

Eric wrote:
Rocker Chic wrote:
Eric wrote:http://www.popeater.com/music/article/back-off-of-our-barracuda-maverick/161983?icid=100214839x1208946976x1200488006


Regardless of whatever party an artist supports/belongs to, any use of that artist's music should be cleared with the artist first and foremost. It is done routinely in movies and TV, so politics should not be exempt.

Debbie


I guess it playing once in the background in an arena doesn't seem to me to be "using". And again...Journey didn't bitch about DSB being used.


Journey didn't bitch because all Neal was seeing was $$$$$, and they wanted to be relevant again........
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby S2M » Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am

brandonpfn wrote:How do you think the band members of Journey will be voting?


I think we should nominate your sheriff for prez......Joe Arpaio.


Image
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby johnroxx » Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:41 am

The title of this thread gets my nomination for most retarded one ever on MR.com.

We're talkin' knuckle-draggin', mouth-breathin' level retarded here, folks.

;^)
User avatar
johnroxx
8 Track
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:38 am
Location: Oceanside, CA

Postby brywool » Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:45 am

johnroxx wrote:The title of this thread gets my nomination for most retarded one ever on MR.com.

We're talkin' knuckle-draggin', mouth-breathin' level retarded here, folks.

;^)


agreed.
User avatar
brywool
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7688
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:54 am

Postby brandonx76 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:24 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:
brandonpfn wrote:How do you think the band members of Journey will be voting?


I think we should nominate your sheriff for prez......Joe Arpaio.


Image


That guy doesn't mess around, I'm sure he's as diplomatic as a rabid Steve Perry fan...but back to my question...
User avatar
brandonx76
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 11:16 am
Location: Beyond the Sun

Postby Eric » Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:29 am

johnroxx wrote:The title of this thread gets my nomination for most retarded one ever on MR.com.

We're talkin' knuckle-draggin', mouth-breathin' level retarded here, folks.

;^)


Why did you read it then? :lol:
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3934
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Re: Thats why they open

Postby artist4perry » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:09 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Rocker Chic wrote:
Eric wrote:http://www.popeater.com/music/article/back-off-of-our-barracuda-maverick/161983?icid=100214839x1208946976x1200488006


Regardless of whatever party an artist supports/belongs to, any use of that artist's music should be cleared with the artist first and foremost. It is done routinely in movies and TV, so politics should not be exempt.

Debbie


I AGREE!!! :wink:


I do agree with that too! I think no matter what it's for, they should always have the artists permission before using their tunes. I was just referring to their outspoken political beliefs. Reminds me of REO... Why can't he just shut up and sing??? I saw them with Journey a few years ago, and while I loved their set list...He just had to throw in his rants about the war and spew out his beliefs....People at the concert were like "STFU and sing dumbass"!!! :roll:
Where I agree they have the right, do they consider the costs? No one hears the tunes and think they vote for them. And being hard nosed can get you bad press, which no artist needs.
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Re: Thats why they open

Postby Michigan Girl » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:11 am

artist4perry wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Rocker Chic wrote:
Eric wrote:http://www.popeater.com/music/article/back-off-of-our-barracuda-maverick/161983?icid=100214839x1208946976x1200488006


Regardless of whatever party an artist supports/belongs to, any use of that artist's music should be cleared with the artist first and foremost. It is done routinely in movies and TV, so politics should not be exempt.

Debbie


I AGREE!!! :wink:


I do agree with that too! I think no matter what it's for, they should always have the artists permission before using their tunes. I was just referring to their outspoken political beliefs. Reminds me of REO... Why can't he just shut up and sing??? I saw them with Journey a few years ago, and while I loved their set list...He just had to throw in his rants about the war and spew out his beliefs....People at the concert were like "STFU and sing dumbass"!!! :roll:
Where I agree they have the right, do they consider the costs? No one hears the tunes and think they vote for them. And being hard nosed can get you bad press, which no artist needs.


It's still their right!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Thats why they open

Postby jrnyman28 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:17 am

artist4perry wrote: No one hears the tunes and think they vote for them.


I disagree. I think there are plenty of people who hear the music and think the band must support that candidate. And if that is the case, it can be just as divisive to the fan base. Politics has that affect of making people take sides. You can lose fans for being politically vocal. And nowhere did the band state WHO they support or don't so the negative backlash from "fans" should be next to nothing.
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Re: Thats why they open

Postby Eric » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:57 am

jrnyman28 wrote:
artist4perry wrote: No one hears the tunes and think they vote for them.


I disagree. I think there are plenty of people who hear the music and think the band must support that candidate. And if that is the case, it can be just as divisive to the fan base. Politics has that affect of making people take sides. You can lose fans for being politically vocal. And nowhere did the band state WHO they support or don't so the negative backlash from "fans" should be next to nothing.


Nobody even was talking about this until HEART brought it up...
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3934
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby Aaron » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:02 am

That is the most press Heart has had in 20 years and they are bitching about it. :roll:

I'll make sure to miss their set Wednesday. :)
Taking life a quarter mile at a time .... [img]
User avatar
Aaron
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 9:55 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Postby UncleKG » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:13 am

Aaron wrote:That is the most press Heart has had in 20 years and they are bitching about it. :roll:

I'll make sure to miss their set Wednesday. :)


Then you'll be missing the biggest surprise of the show. Heart put on a phenomenal show, especially Ann singing the Who "Love Reign O'er Me." Your loss.
User avatar
UncleKG
LP
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:57 am

Postby Aaron » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:23 am

I'm sure I'll make it without seeing them.

UncleKG wrote:
Aaron wrote:That is the most press Heart has had in 20 years and they are bitching about it. :roll:

I'll make sure to miss their set Wednesday. :)


Then you'll be missing the biggest surprise of the show. Heart put on a phenomenal show, especially Ann singing the Who "Love Reign O'er Me." Your loss.
Taking life a quarter mile at a time .... [img]
User avatar
Aaron
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 9:55 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Postby brandonx76 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:25 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:
brandonpfn wrote:How do you think the band members of Journey will be voting?


I think we should nominate your sheriff for prez......Joe Arpaio.


Image


Stockton - nice av, and the goils, but can we get rid of Gramps?
User avatar
brandonx76
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 11:16 am
Location: Beyond the Sun

Postby cudaclan » Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:41 am

The irony of playing Barracuda. Research should be done before supporting your campaign without consent. Heart’s Barracuda was written in response to the music industry moguls towards them. If Plymouth (Chrysler resurrects) reintroduced the Cuda’… I choose Won’t Get Fooled Again. And we hold the Wilson sisters with the highest esteem.
cudaclan
45 RPM
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: lost in a trash can

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:02 am

McCain hasn’t even taken the oath of office and we’re already granted a sneak peep at what the next four years will bring.
When and if McCain should breaks the law (in this case, intellectual property theft), his followers will dutifully spin and point the finger at wild-eyed liberals.
Good to know.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Tito » Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:09 am

Obama didn't get permission from Brooks & Dunn for using "Only in America." What do you think about that. On a side note to that, that song didn't fit, it was actually uncomfortable and very pandering.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby stevew2 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:14 am

Tito wrote:Obama didn't get permission from Brooks & Dunn for using "Only in America." What do you think about that. On a side note to that, that song didn't fit, it was actually uncomfortable and very pandering.
What dosent pandering mean numb nuts?
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:24 am

Tito wrote:Obama didn't get permission from Brooks & Dunn for using "Only in America." What do you think about that.


Same rule applies.
I would think campaign officials would have more legal sense than your avg. music pirating teen.

Tito wrote:On a side note to that, that song didn't fit, it was actually uncomfortable and very pandering.


Not my kind of music, but I had no problem with it.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby johnroxx » Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:10 am

Eric wrote:
johnroxx wrote:The title of this thread gets my nomination for most retarded one ever on MR.com.

We're talkin' knuckle-draggin', mouth-breathin' level retarded here, folks.

;^)


Why did you read it then? :lol:


Uh, maybe because it was staring right at me as I browsed the INDEX of this forum?

:roll:

;^)
User avatar
johnroxx
8 Track
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:38 am
Location: Oceanside, CA

Re: Thats why they open

Postby artist4perry » Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:40 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
artist4perry wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Rocker Chic wrote:
Eric wrote:http://www.popeater.com/music/article/back-off-of-our-barracuda-maverick/161983?icid=100214839x1208946976x1200488006


Regardless of whatever party an artist supports/belongs to, any use of that artist's music should be cleared with the artist first and foremost. It is done routinely in movies and TV, so politics should not be exempt.

Debbie


I AGREE!!! :wink:


I do agree with that too! I think no matter what it's for, they should always have the artists permission before using their tunes. I was just referring to their outspoken political beliefs. Reminds me of REO... Why can't he just shut up and sing??? I saw them with Journey a few years ago, and while I loved their set list...He just had to throw in his rants about the war and spew out his beliefs....People at the concert were like "STFU and sing dumbass"!!! :roll:
Where I agree they have the right, do they consider the costs? No one hears the tunes and think they vote for them. And being hard nosed can get you bad press, which no artist needs.


It's still their right!!! :wink:

I agree fully. I just think Steve handled it in such a way as to not throw negative attention his way.
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Re: Thats why they open

Postby Michigan Girl » Sun Sep 07, 2008 6:56 am

artist4perry wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
artist4perry wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Rocker Chic wrote:
Eric wrote:http://www.popeater.com/music/article/back-off-of-our-barracuda-maverick/161983?icid=100214839x1208946976x1200488006


Regardless of whatever party an artist supports/belongs to, any use of that artist's music should be cleared with the artist first and foremost. It is done routinely in movies and TV, so politics should not be exempt.

Debbie


I AGREE!!! :wink:


I do agree with that too! I think no matter what it's for, they should always have the artists permission before using their tunes. I was just referring to their outspoken political beliefs. Reminds me of REO... Why can't he just shut up and sing??? I saw them with Journey a few years ago, and while I loved their set list...He just had to throw in his rants about the war and spew out his beliefs....People at the concert were like "STFU and sing dumbass"!!! :roll:
Where I agree they have the right, do they consider the costs? No one hears the tunes and think they vote for them. And being hard nosed can get you bad press, which no artist needs.


It's still their right!!! :wink:

I agree fully. I just think Steve handled it in such a way as to not throw negative attention his way.

I agree again!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am


Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests

cron