nolippin wrote:No, it isn't "necessary" to have Hillary on. It would just give some credibility to your point that Oprah should have Palin on because she is such a feminist.
I'm not sure why the reps are pushing so hard for Palin and not for McCain. I also don't understand why you cna't accept her statement that she doesn't want her show used as a political stage. I don't believe that she has had Obama on since he has become the Presidential candidate nor has she had the Dem VP candidate on.
It just seems you are looking for something to complain about. I think there will be plenty of that next week when Palin starts being asked to explain the contradictions in her speech.
I guess because we wouldn't even expect her to invite McCain on. As far as looking for things to complain about ... I couldn't care less if Palin appears on Oprah. She doesn't need Oprah and Oprah has only proven that she views Palin as a big threat to her stupid wonder boy. The people who are really ticked off are Oprah's fans -- check out her message boards.
I couldn't care less if she's on or not either. O's fans will get over it.