Moderator: Andrew
brywool wrote:This is great news. To those that keep beating the drum for those that came before Arnel... this isn't that kind of a film. Not a 'History of Journey'. You'll never get more of that than the version of the story portrayed in Behind the Music (which was pretty sanitized).
As the article says:
“This film is ultimately a snapshot of Journey at this moment in 2008 in its 30-plus year history, as it emerges with a new lead singer.”
It's like the "Let it Be" film was for The Beatles only instead of finding the subject band of the film in the middle of a breakup, this film will deal with a band that has new life and you have to give credit to Arnel here.
Not sure why every positive for Journey (and especially Arnel) has to be held up to their past history. The film doesn't really seem to have a lot to do with that as the story kind of IS Arnel and what he's brought to the band and how the band have moved on with him. The other stuff has nothing to do with it.
Couldn't be happier for the band. Others who were involved in the past will get their royalties... unless they really didn't contribute that much to the history to begin with.
Deb wrote:brywool wrote:This is great news. To those that keep beating the drum for those that came before Arnel... this isn't that kind of a film. Not a 'History of Journey'. You'll never get more of that than the version of the story portrayed in Behind the Music (which was pretty sanitized).
As the article says:
“This film is ultimately a snapshot of Journey at this moment in 2008 in its 30-plus year history, as it emerges with a new lead singer.”
It's like the "Let it Be" film was for The Beatles only instead of finding the subject band of the film in the middle of a breakup, this film will deal with a band that has new life and you have to give credit to Arnel here.
Not sure why every positive for Journey (and especially Arnel) has to be held up to their past history. The film doesn't really seem to have a lot to do with that as the story kind of IS Arnel and what he's brought to the band and how the band have moved on with him. The other stuff has nothing to do with it.
Couldn't be happier for the band. Others who were involved in the past will get their royalties... unless they really didn't contribute that much to the history to begin with.
I saw the title "Journey Documentary" and assumed it was about Journey from beginning to present......that's usually what documentary means to me. I missed where they said it was a "snapshot of this moment in 2008". My bad. Not so sure I'd call it a documentary then...JMO. But hey, either way it's great for Journey and especially Arnel.
Deb wrote:brywool wrote:This is great news. To those that keep beating the drum for those that came before Arnel... this isn't that kind of a film. Not a 'History of Journey'. You'll never get more of that than the version of the story portrayed in Behind the Music (which was pretty sanitized).
As the article says:
“This film is ultimately a snapshot of Journey at this moment in 2008 in its 30-plus year history, as it emerges with a new lead singer.”
It's like the "Let it Be" film was for The Beatles only instead of finding the subject band of the film in the middle of a breakup, this film will deal with a band that has new life and you have to give credit to Arnel here.
Not sure why every positive for Journey (and especially Arnel) has to be held up to their past history. The film doesn't really seem to have a lot to do with that as the story kind of IS Arnel and what he's brought to the band and how the band have moved on with him. The other stuff has nothing to do with it.
Couldn't be happier for the band. Others who were involved in the past will get their royalties... unless they really didn't contribute that much to the history to begin with.
I saw the title "Journey Documentary" and assumed it was about Journey from beginning to present......that's usually what documentary means to me. I missed where they said it was a "snapshot of this moment in 2008". My bad. Not so sure I'd call it a documentary then...JMO. But hey, either way it's great for Journey and especially Arnel.
Saint John wrote:Another intangible that will make record sales explode. These guys have their shit togther like never before. Or at least since about 1983. I couldn't be happier for these guys...especially Arnel.
Deb wrote:brywool wrote:This is great news. To those that keep beating the drum for those that came before Arnel... this isn't that kind of a film. Not a 'History of Journey'. You'll never get more of that than the version of the story portrayed in Behind the Music (which was pretty sanitized).
As the article says:
“This film is ultimately a snapshot of Journey at this moment in 2008 in its 30-plus year history, as it emerges with a new lead singer.”
It's like the "Let it Be" film was for The Beatles only instead of finding the subject band of the film in the middle of a breakup, this film will deal with a band that has new life and you have to give credit to Arnel here.
Not sure why every positive for Journey (and especially Arnel) has to be held up to their past history. The film doesn't really seem to have a lot to do with that as the story kind of IS Arnel and what he's brought to the band and how the band have moved on with him. The other stuff has nothing to do with it.
Couldn't be happier for the band. Others who were involved in the past will get their royalties... unless they really didn't contribute that much to the history to begin with.
I saw the title "Journey Documentary" and assumed it was about Journey from beginning to present......that's usually what documentary means to me. I missed where they said it was a "snapshot of this moment in 2008". My bad. Not so sure I'd call it a documentary then...JMO. But hey, either way it's great for Journey and especially Arnel.
jrnyman28 wrote:Saint John wrote:Another intangible that will make record sales explode. These guys have their shit togther like never before. Or at least since about 1983. I couldn't be happier for these guys...especially Arnel.
It ain't comin' out til the end of '09...I doubt it will affect record sales much. UNLESS it is a part of a NEW CD/DVD package??
brywool wrote:Neal knows what the interest in Journey's about these days. I'm sure he's got no problem with it. And actually, I agree with him- BTM was very slanted to Steve and his emotional problems. It gave Journey some great publicity and it served it's purpose.
annie89509 wrote:.. but Journey would not have much of a 30-yr history without Steve Perry -- this is a fact.
I agree, It does seen more and more like this is becoming the Arnel show instead of the Journey show. Soon he will be able to walk away from Journey as a superstar in his own country and around the world with a huge fillipino and american fan base. By using Journey as his stepping stone to fame he will probably; not to long in the future go solo. From a business point of view it would be a logical move;Apparently he is more business smart than this simple cinderella story leads one to believe, He has seperate management from the other band members, apparently Arnel's not the one we should be worrying about. JMObluejeangirl76 wrote:It sounds like an Arnel documentary, not a Journey one. They're just the backdrop. And does seem a little premature. They should really title it something else though, since he had nothing to do with the success of DSB or that era of the band. Should have tied it into the Revelation title, or use something about Journey in the title with Revelation in the subtile somehow.
(go right ahead.. flame away for that... its still true)
But of course, the DSB name will sell. Cha-ching.
Saint John wrote:annie89509 wrote:.. but Journey would not have much of a 30-yr history without Steve Perry -- this is a fact.
No, it's actually not.
annie89509 wrote:Saint John wrote:annie89509 wrote:.. but Journey would not have much of a 30-yr history without Steve Perry -- this is a fact.
No, it's actually not.
Notice I said "much" of a history, SJ. All their hit songs were centered around SP's voice. That's an exact quote from Neal. All the other Journeymen have said as much over the years. So, yes, I would say it's a fact.
jrnyman28 wrote:Guess I should have finished reading the thread before that last response to Deb...Brywool took care of it!
annpea wrote:I agree, It does seen more and more like this is becoming the Arnel show instead of the Journey show. Soon he will be able to walk away from Journey as a superstar in his own country and around the world with a huge fillipino and american fan base. By using Journey as his stepping stone to fame he will probably; not to long in the future go solo. From a business point of view it would be a logical move;Apparently he is more business smart than this simple cinderella story leads one to believe, He has seperate management from the other band members, apparently Arnel's not the one we should be worrying about. JMObluejeangirl76 wrote:It sounds like an Arnel documentary, not a Journey one. They're just the backdrop. And does seem a little premature. They should really title it something else though, since he had nothing to do with the success of DSB or that era of the band. Should have tied it into the Revelation title, or use something about Journey in the title with Revelation in the subtile somehow.
(go right ahead.. flame away for that... its still true)
But of course, the DSB name will sell. Cha-ching.
Saint John wrote:annie89509 wrote:Saint John wrote:annie89509 wrote:.. but Journey would not have much of a 30-yr history without Steve Perry -- this is a fact.
No, it's actually not.
Notice I said "much" of a history, SJ. All their hit songs were centered around SP's voice. That's an exact quote from Neal. All the other Journeymen have said as much over the years. So, yes, I would say it's a fact.
Almost all hit songs by any band are centered around the lead singer's voice. You're supposition is probably correct, but in no way, shape or form can it be construed as a "fact." I agree with everything you said minus the "this is a fact" part.![]()
That's a good point I didn't think about it that way. I hoping when the hype dies down that the band doesn't go down with it. I'm hoping they stay large and in charge for years to come.Gunbot wrote:annpea wrote:I agree, It does seen more and more like this is becoming the Arnel show instead of the Journey show. Soon he will be able to walk away from Journey as a superstar in his own country and around the world with a huge fillipino and american fan base. By using Journey as his stepping stone to fame he will probably; not to long in the future go solo. From a business point of view it would be a logical move;Apparently he is more business smart than this simple cinderella story leads one to believe, He has seperate management from the other band members, apparently Arnel's not the one we should be worrying about. JMObluejeangirl76 wrote:It sounds like an Arnel documentary, not a Journey one. They're just the backdrop. And does seem a little premature. They should really title it something else though, since he had nothing to do with the success of DSB or that era of the band. Should have tied it into the Revelation title, or use something about Journey in the title with Revelation in the subtile somehow.
(go right ahead.. flame away for that... its still true)
But of course, the DSB name will sell. Cha-ching.
I see him having a hard time succeeding here in the States without Journey. He is a superstar singing songs that were on the charts years ago. He has one song that's charting now and it's the groups song not his, as he doesn't have a writing credit on it. From the Rolling stone article it sounds like he really wants to go home. Hopefully with out the glamour of Journey he can be a star in the Philippines. For an example let's look at Lea Salonga, Tony Award winner, most Americans know her name but when she released an album here, despite all the Filipinos living here in the states, it still tanked. Like I said a lot more people know her from her Disney specials and film appearances, but It hasn't propelled her Stateside career as much as one would think. I would love to see Arnel go home and hit it big, but even there, unless he turns into another ballad singer or starts rapping in Tagalog I think it's going to be tough. I just hope he's making enough out the tour to help him live a comfortable life style at home. Who knows how much his manager is taking off the top?
annie89509 wrote:brywool wrote:Neal knows what the interest in Journey's about these days. I'm sure he's got no problem with it. And actually, I agree with him- BTM was very slanted to Steve and his emotional problems. It gave Journey some great publicity and it served it's purpose.
"Journey documentary and its 30-yr history" - that's the first thing that caught my attention. Then it goes to talk about Arnel's life. Hence, my Neal comment.
I know this is starting an old argument ... but Journey would not have much of a 30-yr history without Steve Perry -- this is a fact. Sure, there are 2 or 3 songwriters on those songs, but can anyone say with a straight face that these songs would resonant after all these years had someone else other than SP sang those songs? Would there be all these tribute bands with singers sounding just like SP singing these songs? Would Arnel have been hired had he not been able to sing these songs "just like Perry?"
BTM was rightfully slanted toward SP, because that IS the history of Journey -- as everyone knows it.
annie89509 wrote: In other words, Journey owes it's 30-yr relevancy to Steve Perry's voice.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests