Heard this on ~ where else ~ RXP 101.9

Excellent new song, from Queen's new CD.
Read the words....very clever & "sign of the times"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuQSFi4flxI
Moderator: Andrew
Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
Rick wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
You know, I was very skeptical as to how PR would sound on a Queen album, but that sounds damn good.
TRAGChick wrote:Hey all...
Heard this on ~ where else ~ RXP 101.9
Excellent new song, from Queen's new CD.
Read the words....very clever & "sign of the times"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuQSFi4flxI
epresley wrote:Rick wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
You know, I was very skeptical as to how PR would sound on a Queen album, but that sounds damn good.
Man, I was too, but it is GREAT!!!!!!!!!! Doesn't really sound like Queen per se', but it DOES sound like guys who are rock legends. Paul is STILL one of the great singers of all time and May is a monster on guitar.
finalfight wrote:Straight ahead rock and roll as expected. Nothing special.
Allied Forces wrote:It's not Queen. This is Queen + Paul Rodgers.
Rick wrote:It's special in that it's the continuance of Queen. That's an iconic band that would otherwise be a shame to lose.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:Allied Forces wrote:It's not Queen. This is Queen + Paul Rodgers.
It's NOT "Queen + Paul Rodgers". "Under Pressure" was recorded by "Queen + David Bowie". This is nothing more than "Brian, Roger and some unknown guy on bass + Paul Rodgers".
Rick wrote:It's special in that it's the continuance of Queen. That's an iconic band that would otherwise be a shame to lose.
Queen was iconic because the 4 original members stayed in the band. Freddie said so himself before he passed. Queen died with him. I admire Deacon for bailing on this.
RedWingFan wrote:Allied Forces wrote:It's not Queen. This is Queen + Paul Rodgers.
It's NOT "Queen + Paul Rodgers". "Under Pressure" was recorded by "Queen + David Bowie". This is nothing more than "Brian, Roger and some unknown guy on bass + Paul Rodgers".
Rick wrote:It's special in that it's the continuance of Queen. That's an iconic band that would otherwise be a shame to lose.
Queen was iconic because the 4 original members stayed in the band. Freddie said so himself before he passed. Queen died with him. I admire Deacon for bailing on this.
Rick wrote:epresley wrote:Rick wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
You know, I was very skeptical as to how PR would sound on a Queen album, but that sounds damn good.
Man, I was too, but it is GREAT!!!!!!!!!! Doesn't really sound like Queen per se', but it DOES sound like guys who are rock legends. Paul is STILL one of the great singers of all time and May is a monster on guitar.
Yes, on all accounts. Paul Rodgers' voice is irreplaceable in Rock 'n Roll and it wouldn't be the same without him. As good as that track sounds, I still think JSS would have sounded better fronting Queen. I also think JSS would sound great fronting VH. He can sing DLR's music better than DLR can, now days.
Allied Forces wrote:RedWingFan wrote:Allied Forces wrote:It's not Queen. This is Queen + Paul Rodgers.
It's NOT "Queen + Paul Rodgers". "Under Pressure" was recorded by "Queen + David Bowie". This is nothing more than "Brian, Roger and some unknown guy on bass + Paul Rodgers".
Rick wrote:It's special in that it's the continuance of Queen. That's an iconic band that would otherwise be a shame to lose.
Queen was iconic because the 4 original members stayed in the band. Freddie said so himself before he passed. Queen died with him. I admire Deacon for bailing on this.
Let me ask you, and I'm not criticizing. Shouldn't Journey have moved on too then? Based on your opinion of Queen I am curious about your opinion on that.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:epresley wrote:Rick wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
You know, I was very skeptical as to how PR would sound on a Queen album, but that sounds damn good.
Man, I was too, but it is GREAT!!!!!!!!!! Doesn't really sound like Queen per se', but it DOES sound like guys who are rock legends. Paul is STILL one of the great singers of all time and May is a monster on guitar.
Yes, on all accounts. Paul Rodgers' voice is irreplaceable in Rock 'n Roll and it wouldn't be the same without him. As good as that track sounds, I still think JSS would have sounded better fronting Queen. I also think JSS would sound great fronting VH. He can sing DLR's music better than DLR can, now days.
Dude!! Don't be tryin to mess with VH!!![]()
Gunbot wrote:Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:epresley wrote:Rick wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
You know, I was very skeptical as to how PR would sound on a Queen album, but that sounds damn good.
Man, I was too, but it is GREAT!!!!!!!!!! Doesn't really sound like Queen per se', but it DOES sound like guys who are rock legends. Paul is STILL one of the great singers of all time and May is a monster on guitar.
Yes, on all accounts. Paul Rodgers' voice is irreplaceable in Rock 'n Roll and it wouldn't be the same without him. As good as that track sounds, I still think JSS would have sounded better fronting Queen. I also think JSS would sound great fronting VH. He can sing DLR's music better than DLR can, now days.
Dude!! Don't be tryin to mess with VH!!![]()
Just for you 78![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcuT4J6m ... re=related
Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:epresley wrote:Rick wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
You know, I was very skeptical as to how PR would sound on a Queen album, but that sounds damn good.
Man, I was too, but it is GREAT!!!!!!!!!! Doesn't really sound like Queen per se', but it DOES sound like guys who are rock legends. Paul is STILL one of the great singers of all time and May is a monster on guitar.
Yes, on all accounts. Paul Rodgers' voice is irreplaceable in Rock 'n Roll and it wouldn't be the same without him. As good as that track sounds, I still think JSS would have sounded better fronting Queen. I also think JSS would sound great fronting VH. He can sing DLR's music better than DLR can, now days.
Dude!! Don't be tryin to mess with VH!!![]()
Allied Forces wrote:RedWingFan wrote:Allied Forces wrote:It's not Queen. This is Queen + Paul Rodgers.
It's NOT "Queen + Paul Rodgers". "Under Pressure" was recorded by "Queen + David Bowie". This is nothing more than "Brian, Roger and some unknown guy on bass + Paul Rodgers".
Rick wrote:It's special in that it's the continuance of Queen. That's an iconic band that would otherwise be a shame to lose.
Queen was iconic because the 4 original members stayed in the band. Freddie said so himself before he passed. Queen died with him. I admire Deacon for bailing on this.
Let me ask you, and I'm not criticizing. Shouldn't Journey have moved on too then? Based on your opinion of Queen I am curious about your opinion on that.
journel wrote:paul rodgers + queen is bad company. i love both bands but hearing pr do "hammer to fall" just ain't for me. george michael is closer to that legacy sound just don't know if he would fit better with the band and vice versa. a one time tour won't hurt i guess unless they play some wham songs!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c7x2JD_j-0
finalfight wrote:journel wrote:paul rodgers + queen is bad company. i love both bands but hearing pr do "hammer to fall" just ain't for me. george michael is closer to that legacy sound just don't know if he would fit better with the band and vice versa. a one time tour won't hurt i guess unless they play some wham songs!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c7x2JD_j-0
Paul Rodgers and Queen is just plain bad in my opinion. I just can't get into this new album at all and have really mixed feelings when I hear Rodgers sing classic Queen songs live, as I did when JSS was fronting Journey. It doesn't necessarily sound wrong just very, very different. Jeff would have been absolutely stellar in Queen though. Ah, to think what could have been!
Rick wrote:Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:epresley wrote:Rick wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
You know, I was very skeptical as to how PR would sound on a Queen album, but that sounds damn good.
Man, I was too, but it is GREAT!!!!!!!!!! Doesn't really sound like Queen per se', but it DOES sound like guys who are rock legends. Paul is STILL one of the great singers of all time and May is a monster on guitar.
Yes, on all accounts. Paul Rodgers' voice is irreplaceable in Rock 'n Roll and it wouldn't be the same without him. As good as that track sounds, I still think JSS would have sounded better fronting Queen. I also think JSS would sound great fronting VH. He can sing DLR's music better than DLR can, now days.
Dude!! Don't be tryin to mess with VH!!![]()
I know what you mean, but let me as you this Mark. If DLR and Sammy decided they weren't interested, wouldn't you think JSS would be the next best option?
Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:epresley wrote:Rick wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
You know, I was very skeptical as to how PR would sound on a Queen album, but that sounds damn good.
Man, I was too, but it is GREAT!!!!!!!!!! Doesn't really sound like Queen per se', but it DOES sound like guys who are rock legends. Paul is STILL one of the great singers of all time and May is a monster on guitar.
Yes, on all accounts. Paul Rodgers' voice is irreplaceable in Rock 'n Roll and it wouldn't be the same without him. As good as that track sounds, I still think JSS would have sounded better fronting Queen. I also think JSS would sound great fronting VH. He can sing DLR's music better than DLR can, now days.
Dude!! Don't be tryin to mess with VH!!![]()
I know what you mean, but let me as you this Mark. If DLR and Sammy decided they weren't interested, wouldn't you think JSS would be the next best option?
Can I have Gary Cherone?Nah!! Seriously, I think Jeff would do well. He could do the whole catalog, which even if they wanted to DLR couldn't. He just gets by singing his old stuff as it is. Still puts on a good show though!!
Rick wrote:Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:epresley wrote:Rick wrote:Moon Beam wrote:Thanks for posting of this Nora, I like it.
Love Paul Rodgers voice!
You know, I was very skeptical as to how PR would sound on a Queen album, but that sounds damn good.
Man, I was too, but it is GREAT!!!!!!!!!! Doesn't really sound like Queen per se', but it DOES sound like guys who are rock legends. Paul is STILL one of the great singers of all time and May is a monster on guitar.
Yes, on all accounts. Paul Rodgers' voice is irreplaceable in Rock 'n Roll and it wouldn't be the same without him. As good as that track sounds, I still think JSS would have sounded better fronting Queen. I also think JSS would sound great fronting VH. He can sing DLR's music better than DLR can, now days.
Dude!! Don't be tryin to mess with VH!!![]()
I know what you mean, but let me as you this Mark. If DLR and Sammy decided they weren't interested, wouldn't you think JSS would be the next best option?
Can I have Gary Cherone?Nah!! Seriously, I think Jeff would do well. He could do the whole catalog, which even if they wanted to DLR couldn't. He just gets by singing his old stuff as it is. Still puts on a good show though!!
And that right there is the beauty of that which is DLR. He is more than vocals. A true artistic frontman.
Gary Cherone? Man that VH 3 album did NOTHING for me. That was in a whole different and dark direction. I do like a couple of tracks though. But you have to quit thinking it's Van Halen to begin to like it.
conversationpc wrote:Decent song but I don't hear too much of the classic Queen sound. I'd feel better about it Queen MINUS Paul Rodgers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests