Moderator: Andrew
squirt1 wrote:See Drudgereport.com Stars have to put up blogs . I hope he gets the last laugh under the circumstances.
Since 78 wrote:squirt1 wrote:See Drudgereport.com Stars have to put up blogs . I hope he gets the last laugh under the circumstances.
Post a link!
Rick wrote:Since 78 wrote:squirt1 wrote:See Drudgereport.com Stars have to put up blogs . I hope he gets the last laugh under the circumstances.
Post a link!
http://www.reuters.com/article/internet ... 22&sp=true
Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:Since 78 wrote:squirt1 wrote:See Drudgereport.com Stars have to put up blogs . I hope he gets the last laugh under the circumstances.
Post a link!
http://www.reuters.com/article/internet ... 22&sp=true
Thanks Rick!
I don't know how hes going to sue when he doesn't know who did it. I guess its time to call in Net Force!
Rick wrote:Since 78 wrote:Rick wrote:Since 78 wrote:squirt1 wrote:See Drudgereport.com Stars have to put up blogs . I hope he gets the last laugh under the circumstances.
Post a link!
http://www.reuters.com/article/internet ... 22&sp=true
Thanks Rick!
I don't know how hes going to sue when he doesn't know who did it. I guess its time to call in Net Force!
I agree, who do you sue? Well they can actually track down the individual responsible for the internet access that was used to post the blog, and investigate from there, but then you'll probably wind up suing some poor bastard that has 19 cents in the bank. It would probably be better just to have it removed when it pops up.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests