strangegrey wrote:Arkansas wrote:DrFU wrote:Arkansas wrote:Ever hear of anyone trademarking or copyrighting their internet names?
Probably the only way to stop this crap. But even then, it'd just get ignored.
I wonder what the online slander laws are like these days...? And are the site hosts liable too?
later~
slander is spoken; libel is written
to prove either, 3 things are required:
statements must be false
person making statements must know they are false
person about whom statements are made must have suffered material harm
The bottom-feeding behavior under discussion wouldn't meet the test.
http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2008/ ... libel.html
Point is, if defamation intent can be proven, then the poster should be criminally liable and it's possible the website owner/host is also liable for allowing such comments to remain published. And even though the latter hasn't really happened yet, at some point a court may hold the owner accountable.
This looks pertinent.
http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/co-li ... -9891.html
This sounds like something that's happened around here.
http://en.allexperts.com/q/Civil-Commer ... mation.htm
This is an interesting read.
http://www.rcfp.org/news/mag/32-2/when_ ... ne_37.html
later~
Arkansas, you're clearly not a lawyer. For anyone to prove a tort, intent is not the only thing that needs to be proven. Damages must also be proven (extremely hard to do)...in addition to damages, cause-in-fact needs to be proven (far more difficult than even damages to prove).
I never said anything about damages. I was speculating on criminality. And my thinking was that if somehow malicious intent could be proven (by whatever mechanism) then that poster might stop being so careless with the comments. And, if the website owner/host also feared legal action, then he/she might find a way to keep it from happening, or at least show due diligence by moderation & prompt deletion.
Btw, I never claimed to be a lawyer...but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express!
later~