Moderator: Andrew
Angel wrote:Paula Radcliffe
She won the women's marathon!
That's the "B" race. The men's race is the only one that counts.Angel wrote:Saint John wrote:Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?
Paula Radcliffe
She won the women's marathon!
Saint John wrote:That's the "B" race. The men's race is the only one that counts.Angel wrote:Saint John wrote:Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?
Paula Radcliffe
She won the women's marathon!
Not the point. Women are inferior athletically. If not, you'd have both genders competing together...but then you'd never win anything.Angel wrote:Saint John wrote:That's the "B" race. The men's race is the only one that counts.Angel wrote:Saint John wrote:Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?
Paula Radcliffe
She won the women's marathon!
So you think you could beat Paula Radcliffe in a marathon????
SusieP wrote:British athlete famous for taking a leak at the side of the road during a marathon.
Seen by millions on tv.
Angel wrote:SusieP wrote:British athlete famous for taking a leak at the side of the road during a marathon.
Seen by millions on tv.
Not only did she stop to pee, but she won the race. Sure, she could have held it-or found a more appropriate place but either may have cost her the win. That woman has some serious dedication!
I LOVE PAULA!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6I2-YP42rs
Saint John wrote:Not the point. Women are inferior athletically. If not, you'd have both genders competing together...but then you'd never win anything.Angel wrote:Saint John wrote:That's the "B" race. The men's race is the only one that counts.Angel wrote:Saint John wrote:Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?
Paula Radcliffe
She won the women's marathon!
So you think you could beat Paula Radcliffe in a marathon????
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:] Not the point. Women are inferior athletically.
Well, i wouldnt fancy many mens chances in a doubles match against Venus and Serena - both of whom have a faster second serve than most of the top male players................
Saint John wrote:Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:] Not the point. Women are inferior athletically.
Well, i wouldnt fancy many mens chances in a doubles match against Venus and Serena - both of whom have a faster second serve than most of the top male players................
You're kidding, right? Federer and Nadal would crush them. They could play 300 sets and the Williams sisters wouldn't win one. This is of course assuming that Federer and Nadal practiced for some time as partners. Doubles is all about teamwork, which is why you seldom see the games best players competing. They tend to stick to singles.
Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.
Angel wrote: I can guarantee you that Paula Radcliffe is NOT inferior to YOU athletically.
Why not? We're physically superior across the board.Angel wrote:don't make blanket statements about men vs women.
Saint John wrote:Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.
Name a sport women are better at. And sweeping floors doesn't count.
Angel wrote: I can guarantee you that Paula Radcliffe is NOT inferior to YOU athletically.
She's got me in running, but I'd take her in boxing, baseball, football, arm wrestling, weight liftling, basketball and beer drinking.
Why not? We're physically superior across the board.Angel wrote:don't make blanket statements about men vs women.
Saint John wrote:Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.
I re-read your post. Apologies, sir.Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:Saint John wrote:Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:] Not the point. Women are inferior athletically.
Well, i wouldnt fancy many mens chances in a doubles match against Venus and Serena - both of whom have a faster second serve than most of the top male players................
You're kidding, right? Federer and Nadal would crush them. They could play 300 sets and the Williams sisters wouldn't win one. This is of course assuming that Federer and Nadal practiced for some time as partners. Doubles is all about teamwork, which is why you seldom see the games best players competing. They tend to stick to singles.
Thats the top two men in the world - most of the time they crush the other MEN never mind what they would be like against the Williams sisters. I did say against MOST top players they would do well....not all.
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:Saint John wrote:Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.
Name a sport women are better at.
Cheerleading?
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:[
She looks American and has an American sounding name. How the hell did that happen?
John - Radcliffe is a very old English name - from Nottingham i think - but, she does look like an American.
She pisses like a horse tho................
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:John - Radcliffe is a very old English name - from Nottingham i think - but, she does look like an American.
JH'sTXfan wrote:Saint John wrote:Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.
Name a sport women are better at. And sweeping floors doesn't count.
Angel wrote: I can guarantee you that Paula Radcliffe is NOT inferior to YOU athletically.
She's got me in running, but I'd take her in boxing, baseball, football, arm wrestling, weight liftling, basketball and beer drinking.
Why not? We're physically superior across the board.Angel wrote:don't make blanket statements about men vs women.
You can't pee as gracefully as Paula did.
Enigma869 wrote:Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:John - Radcliffe is a very old English name - from Nottingham i think - but, she does look like an American.
Well, whether a Brit or an American, it doesn't change my point...where the hell were the Kenyans? I've heard of fewers Brits winning marathons than Americans!
John from Boston
Saint John wrote:Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.
Name a sport women are better at. And sweeping floors doesn't count.
Angel wrote: I can guarantee you that Paula Radcliffe is NOT inferior to YOU athletically.
She's got me in running, but I'd take her in boxing, baseball, football, arm wrestling, weight liftling, basketball and beer drinking.
Why not? We're physically superior across the board.Angel wrote:don't make blanket statements about men vs women.
Enigma869 wrote:Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:John - Radcliffe is a very old English name - from Nottingham i think - but, she does look like an American.
Well, whether a Brit or an American, it doesn't change my point...where the hell were the Kenyans? I've heard of fewers Brits winning marathons than Americans!
John from Boston
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests