Tito wrote:Go to a gay pride parade sometime or some gay neighborhoods, hell go to the Minneapolis airport men's restroom. Go to any forest preserve in the Chicago area or up to Montrose Harbor if you don't think they don't do it in public. When my mom worked at the DuPage County courthouse they average 5 (homo) public indecencies cases a week from the forest preseves. Also, I have friends who work for the forest preserve district and you won't believe what they see and find in the forest preserves.
Just as many straights going at in public too, buddy boy.
And I've been to I don't know how many pride parades and never, not once, did I ever see any sexual acts of any kind going on.
Tito wrote:Personally, I don't get it. Unless it's because they can't have children, I don't know why anyone would marry without having kids. What's the point. I would never marry someone who did not want to have children.
So if you married someone and found out a year or two into it that she couldn't have children, you'd drop her because without the ability to have a child, she and the marriage aren't worth your time?
Tito wrote:The government will force me to accept this behavior. Specifically, I cannot fire or refuse service to a gay couple. If I owned an Insurance company I am forced to pick up their "spouse" even if I don't want to. I know they arleady have domestic partners they must accept but is that right? Plus, churches will probably now have to accept homosexuals as wells. If I/we do any of the above, I would be sued and/or charged with a hate crime.
Alright then, have that your way. By this logic, an employer should also get the right to walk up to you and fire you for being a homophobic cretin. Then you and all the gay folks who are fired for no good reason can all get to know each other better on the unemployment line.
