Let me start by saying that I completely concur with Pedroia winning the MVP award. That said, I did some research and it seems to throw a monkey wrench in the above post. It also thwarts, to some degree, John's argument that Pedroia "was an offensive machine." Let's examine the facts, shall we.StocktontoMalone wrote:Tito, you are proving our point. RBIs just prove that you got a hit with MEN ON BASE. You can't get RBIs if you don't have teammates getting on in front of you....Pedroia bats second meaning the 8,9, and 1 hitter must get on base for him to drive them in. Bottom of our lineup was putrid this year. If Quentin knocked in that many with 170 less at bats, that only proves that CWS had a better team than the Sox, and consequently would have done fairly well without him....
At bats with:
men on 2nd: Pedroia-55 Quentin-39
men on 3rd: Pedroia-19 Quentin-13
1st and 2nd: Pedroia-48 Quentin 34
1st and 3rd: Pedroia-8 Quentin-14
2nd and 3rd: Pedroia-17 Quentin-11
Bases Loaded: Pedroia-16 Quentin-8
Man in scoring position and 2 out and average: Pedroia-78 (.231) Quentin-41 (.268)
Men on and 2 out and average: Pedroia-116 (.224) Quentin-67 (.284)
It seems to me (actually, it's a fact) like Dustin Pedroia had far more chances to drive in runs, but seemed to get the majority of his hits with no one on base. His averages with a man, or men, in scoring position and 2 outs were putrid (.231 and .224). Again, given his glove, his speed, his attitude, the fact that he was a great teammate and the fact that he played all year, he more than deserves the MVP award. And let me say that I despise the White Sox and was glad when Quentin broke his wrist.
