OT - I've seen the 'next' Barry Sanders

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Enigma869 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:26 am

Tito wrote: What does being from Chicago have anything to do with this.


I would say it has plenty to do with it, considering you're the only person in this entire thread who has advanced the premise that Payton was a better back than Sanders. As I said previously, it certainly isn't based on any numbers or the eye test. I saw both guys play and play a lot. While they were both outstanding football players, Sanders was always in a class by himself! You're a classic example of an idiotic sports fan who believes if the guy played for his team, that he must have been the best. I guess Bird must have been better than Jordan ever was. I am from Boston, afterall :roll:

Tito wrote: Again, Sanders ran in a favorable offensive scheme for a number of years. He ran against 6 DBs on the field,


This is just another example of you just making shit up. I can assure you that there was NEVER anything remotely "favorable" about any "offensive scheme" the Detroit Lions ran while Barry was in their backfield. I defy you to find one single instance anywhere of ANY NFL team having 6 DB's on the field while Sanders was in the backfield! It NEVER EVER happened! Even when the Lions had Herman Moore, they didn't have anyone who could get the ball to him! You're an assclown to now claim Sanders' success was all attributable to the constant dime defensese he faced (which NEVER happened). The guy put up great numbers because he was a great back. Even if the other team had 11 DB's on the field, it doesn't change the fact that Sanders had nobody to block for him and that all of his yards were created by his own immense talent! Also, if any NFL coach was stupid enough to put 6 DB's on the field (which again, NEVER happens to this day in the NFL), he would have two of them acting as a "Spy" on Sanders every move!

Tito wrote: Finally, the Bears have 9 NFL Championships/Superbowl champs.


Right, but 7 of them were won when the world was still flat and the Patriots didn't even exist as an organization. The Bears have only won two championships since the 1960 season, which was the Patriots first season in the AFL.
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Rockindeano » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 am

Enigma869 wrote:
Right, but 7 of them were won when the world was still flat and the Patriots didn't even exist as an organization. The Bears have only won two championships since the 1960 season, which was the Patriots first season in the AFL.


LOL, you make a good albeit funny post. There weren't even VCR's back then. Friga had to suck dick on horseback because there were no fuckin cars back then.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Tito » Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:29 am

Enigma869 wrote:
Tito wrote: What does being from Chicago have anything to do with this.


I would say it has plenty to do with it, considering you're the only person in this entire thread who has advanced the premise that Payton was a better back than Sanders. As I said previously, it certainly isn't based on any numbers or the eye test. I saw both guys play and play a lot. While they were both outstanding football players, Sanders was always in a class by himself! You're a classic example of an idiotic sports fan who believes if the guy played for his team, that he must have been the best. I guess Bird must have been better than Jordan ever was. I am from Boston, afterall :roll:


And we're all experts here so what everyone saids (including me) must be the correct answer. :roll: Based on numbers you have a case but it goes beyond numbers. One more time, Walter was the more complete/diverse back. Sanders may have been a better runner but Walter was the total package. You don't get stats for blocking. As far as the eye test goes, that is in your eyes. Just like how racist North Carolina was but yet they voted for Obama. Guess what I saw both play a lot too so we're even. Also, I'm the idiotic sports fan? Again you read what you want to read. I'm maybe conceding Barry was the better runner (but not the best back). Plus, I didn't say Walter necessarily was the best ever. If I fit the mold of the idiotic sports fan than you definitely fit the mold of the annoying Boston Irish sports fan.

Enigma869 wrote:
Tito wrote: Again, Sanders ran in a favorable offensive scheme for a number of years. He ran against 6 DBs on the field,


This is just another example of you just making shit up. I can assure you that there was NEVER anything remotely "favorable" about any "offensive scheme" the Detroit Lions ran while Barry was in their backfield. I defy you to find one single instance anywhere of ANY NFL team having 6 DB's on the field while Sanders was in the backfield! It NEVER EVER happened! Even when the Lions had Herman Moore, they didn't have anyone who could get the ball to him! You're an assclown to now claim Sanders' success was all attributable to the constant dime defensese he faced (which NEVER happened). The guy put up great numbers because he was a great back. Even if the other team had 11 DB's on the field, it doesn't change the fact that Sanders had nobody to block for him and that all of his yards were created by his own immense talent! Also, if any NFL coach was stupid enough to put 6 DB's on the field (which again, NEVER happens to this day in the NFL), he would have two of them acting as a "Spy" on Sanders every move!


Never happened? I saw Sanders run roughshod over the Bears for a few years when they started 6 DBs against them. So, it happened at least twice a year. As far as Herman Moore, somebody (at least as a product of the system) had to throw him the ball with his three straight 100+ catch seasons (123, I think was a record for awhile) highlighted with 1,686 yard season in 1995. Also, in 1995 Brett Perriman caught over 100 passes and had 1,488 yards (that's nearly 3,200 yards just between the two that season and 231 receptions). That's alot of fuckin' yards and catches. So, the QB (Mitchell's fluk year) couldn't have been that bad (in the system at least). Johnnie Morton also had a 1,000 yard season in 1997. I don't think Walter ever had one 1,000 yard receiver to compliment him his whole career. And he sure as shit never had two in a year (let alone put up the equivalent stats of 3 very good receivers in a season). So, the defenses just couldn't focus on Sanders, they had to defend the receivers as well. Payton had a shitty offensive line, no quarterback, no receivers for the bulk of career especially during his prime years. Sanders had at least a passing game to balance their offense for a number of years.

As far as the championships, you can play only who they give you.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:33 am

I am probably the person in the world that hated the 85 Bears the most. Couldn't stand them and just about cried when they won the Superbowl. Hated Ditka and that team because of him. That said, this whole Payton/Sanders argument is absurd. Payton was clearly better all things considered. Crunch your fucking numbers all you want, but what you won't see is that Sanders constantly put his team in 2nd and 13, and 3rd and infinity with his running backwards. His teams constantly sucked because you can't trade a few explosive runs for constantly being in 2nd and 3rd and 10+ yards. The guy never exhibited emotion and most of the time you needed to check the little fuck for a pulse. He was great for 3 to 5 breakout runs per game of 20 to 50 yards. The entire rest of the game he was a useless fuck that couldn't block, catch and had no intangible qualities as a leader. Barry was the games most electrifying runner, but he was a stone cold fucking loser. He never tried to get better at blocking or catching, and no one, and I mean no one, on his team looked at him as a leader. He was a naturally talented runner that was as elusive as anyone that ever played the game, but he was a mime, didn't seem bothered by losing and had zero leadership qualities. Payton was everything that Sanders wasn't with half of the athletic ability. And Dean, Payton never ran out of bounds...ever. And remember, Sanders was all but useless on grass. If football had any balls and would have never allowed these piece of shit domes, Sanders would have been just another back. Obviously his stats count, but that dude was the epitomy of a check casher. He cared as much about improving his all around game just as much as he did winning...he didn't. He retired on top because he had achieved everything he had wanted to...nothing.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:41 am

"Walter Payton was the greatest football player that ever lived," Madden said. "He could run, catch, tackle. He did all those things better than anyone else."
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Rockindeano » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:45 am

Saint John wrote:"Walter Payton was the greatest football player that ever lived," Madden said. "He could run, catch, tackle. He did all those things better than anyone else."


Yeah Madden said that, but I am willing to bet he said that before Brett Favre came along. No doubt in my mind whatsoever, that John Boy would service Brett any time any place, any way. Talk about man love? That duo makes Tito and Leonard Friga seem miniature in scale.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby hoagiepete » Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:56 am

Saint John wrote:I am probably the person in the world that hated the 85 Bears the most. Couldn't stand them and just about cried when they won the Superbowl. Hated Ditka and that team because of him. That said, this whole Payton/Sanders argument is absurd. Payton was clearly better all things considered. Crunch your fucking numbers all you want, but what you won't see is that Sanders constantly put his team in 2nd and 13, and 3rd and infinity with his running backwards. His teams constantly sucked because you can't trade a few explosive runs for constantly being in 2nd and 3rd and 10+ yards. The guy never exhibited emotion and most of the time you needed to check the little fuck for a pulse. He was great for 3 to 5 breakout runs per game of 20 to 50 yards. The entire rest of the game he was a useless fuck that couldn't block, catch and had no intangible qualities as a leader. Barry was the games most electrifying runner, but he was a stone cold fucking loser. He never tried to get better at blocking or catching, and no one, and I mean no one, on his team looked at him as a leader. He was a naturally talented runner that was as elusive as anyone that ever played the game, but he was a mime, didn't seem bothered by losing and had zero leadership qualities. Payton was everything that Sanders wasn't with half of the athletic ability. And Dean, Payton never ran out of bounds...ever. And remember, Sanders was all but useless on grass. If football had any balls and would have never allowed these piece of shit domes, Sanders would have been just another back. Obviously his stats count, but that dude was the epitomy of a check casher. He cared as much about improving his all around game just as much as he did winning...he didn't. He retired on top because he had achieved everything he had wanted to...nothing.


See below, compliments of footballdiner.com.

Myth 1 – Barry Sanders could not run inside or at the goal line.

This is a favourite of Barry Sanders critics. They point to his lack of TDs compared to other backs at the top of all-time lists, and the fact that his coaches took him out down at the goal line as evidence for a huge hole in his game. However, in the first 3 years of his career, Sanders scored 47 TDs, 21 of which came from within 4 yards, and 8 of which were from 1 yard out. The Detroit Lions coaching staff from 1992 onwards preferred having a bigger, power-back in on these situations, and took Sanders out of the game. Does that mean that Sanders became a bad goal-line back when that happened? The evidence of Sanders career, both college and pro, shows that Sanders could run as well as anybody around the goal line, but his numbers suffered because the Detroit Lions coaches preferred their own philosophy of using a heavy back in those situations.

Myth 2 – Barry Sanders couldn't catch.

The proponents of Walter Payton use this one a lot. 'Barry Sanders was only a runner, he couldn't do the other things that a RB has to be able to do, Walter Payton could do it all.' Well, Barry Sanders finished his career with 352 catches over his 10 years – he averaged 35 catches a year. Walter Payton finished with 492 catches over his 13 years – he averaged 38 catches a year. Walter Payton scored 15 receiving TDs, Barry Sanders scored 10. Payton averaged 9.2 yards per catch, and Sanders averaged 8.3. The statistics do indeed show that Payton edged Sanders in each category, but enough to rank one as an accomplished receiver, and the other as a guy who couldn't catch?

Myth 3 – Barry Sanders lost too much yardage to be the greatest.

Another myth brought up a lot is that for every one of Barry Sanders' great runs, he lost a ton of yardage, so much so that he is the NFL's all-time leader in negative yardage from scrimmage. Whilst it's true that Sanders is the all-time leader in negative yards, he averaged only 46 yards a year more than Walter Payton did. Walter Payton, the man who always fell forward, who never said die. Despite the vast differences in perception between Sanders as a runner and Payton in a runner, the statistics amount to a difference in less than 3 yards a game.

Myth 4 – Barry Sanders could only run on turf, in the dome.

This one's the best myth of all. People will try and claim that Barry Sanders could only run on turf – 'just look at his running style, it just wouldn't work on grass!' Unfortunately, these people have clearly never checked that out. During his career Barry Sanders averaged 5.0 yards per carry both indoors and outdoors, on turf and on grass, at home and away. Sanders was the definition of consistency, averaging higher than 96 yards per game on any surface whether it was home or away.

Myth 5 - Barry Sanders couldn't perform in the playoffs.

Well, whilst its true that Sanders didn't perform outstandingly in the playoffs, he only played in 6 playoff games. The sample just isn't enough. that being said, the people who use this criticism never have a bad word to say about Payton in the same regard, yet Payton had only a lone 100 yard performance in 9 playoff games. Barry Sanders had only the one as well, but from only 6 games, at a 4.2 average (as opposed to Walter Payton's 3.5 yard per carry average. If this is a great flaw in Barry Sanders' game, then we need to apply the same criticism to Walter Payton.
hoagiepete
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1610
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:16 am

Postby hoagiepete » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:11 am

First of all, it's great seeing the discussion on two of the greatest runningbacks of all time...Gale Sayers, Kansas University Jayhawk...and Barry Sanders...born and raised in Wichita, Kansas. Don't forget John Riggins...another Kansan and Jayhawk!!!

The personal slams on Barry seem a bit misguided and extreme. He played for a loser of a franchise, but to deem him a loser is rediculous.

I was never in the lockerroom with him in Detroit, so I can't argue his leadership traits. Don't see too many runningbacks judged on their leadership abilities.

I do know he is a quality individual that has done alot for his community. Isn't into the gangsta, thug shit that many of today's players are into. Hasn't killed anyone, shot himself, gotten caught with hoe's and drugs, didn't demand attention like the A Holes of today (Ocho Cinco, Moss, TO...on and on).

He was one of the best...ever...period. No way I'm going to tell you he was better than Jim Brown, Gale Sayers or Walter Payton though. That debate could go on forever. Sweetness is probably my all-time favorite, even though I too could not stand the 85 Bears. He brought class to the NFL. However, Barry had a lot of class too.
hoagiepete
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1610
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:16 am

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:22 am

hoagiepete wrote:First of all, it's great seeing the discussion on two of the greatest runningbacks of all time...Gale Sayers, Kansas University Jayhawk...and Barry Sanders...born and raised in Wichita, Kansas. Don't forget John Riggins...another Kansan and Jayhawk!!!

The personal slams on Barry seem a bit misguided and extreme. He played for a loser of a franchise, but to deem him a loser is rediculous.

I was never in the lockerroom with him in Detroit, so I can't argue his leadership traits. Don't see too many runningbacks judged on their leadership abilities.

I do know he is a quality individual that has done alot for his community. Isn't into the gangsta, thug shit that many of today's players are into. Hasn't killed anyone, shot himself, gotten caught with hoe's and drugs, didn't demand attention like the A Holes of today (Ocho Cinco, Moss, TO...on and on).

He was one of the best...ever...period. No way I'm going to tell you he was better than Jim Brown, Gale Sayers or Walter Payton though. That debate could go on forever. Sweetness is probably my all-time favorite, even though I too could not stand the 85 Bears. He brought class to the NFL. However, Barry had a lot of class too.
Fair points, Pete. Some things just can't be measured and there aren't any stats for them. Payton was a crushing blocker. How do you quantify him picking up a blitzer about to kill the quarterback? Payton did that so many times. Sanders had so many games where he'd have 20 rushes for 40 yards and then he'd pop one for 70 yards. So now you've got a guy with pretty good "stats" that has 21 rushes for 110 yards but he really didn't help his team at all. He needed more positive yards and needed to keep his team out of 2nd and 3rd and long. He needed to be a better blocker and he needed to be a better leader. Sanders was a better ball carrier, but he was not a better running back. Way too many weaknesses in his game. And playing in 70 degree weather in a dome rather than the frigid temperatures Chicago offers was probably a lot easier on the muscles. But I agree....they were both great. Payton was just greater.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby S2M » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:30 am

Saint John wrote:
hoagiepete wrote:First of all, it's great seeing the discussion on two of the greatest runningbacks of all time...Gale Sayers, Kansas University Jayhawk...and Barry Sanders...born and raised in Wichita, Kansas. Don't forget John Riggins...another Kansan and Jayhawk!!!

The personal slams on Barry seem a bit misguided and extreme. He played for a loser of a franchise, but to deem him a loser is rediculous.

I was never in the lockerroom with him in Detroit, so I can't argue his leadership traits. Don't see too many runningbacks judged on their leadership abilities.

I do know he is a quality individual that has done alot for his community. Isn't into the gangsta, thug shit that many of today's players are into. Hasn't killed anyone, shot himself, gotten caught with hoe's and drugs, didn't demand attention like the A Holes of today (Ocho Cinco, Moss, TO...on and on).

He was one of the best...ever...period. No way I'm going to tell you he was better than Jim Brown, Gale Sayers or Walter Payton though. That debate could go on forever. Sweetness is probably my all-time favorite, even though I too could not stand the 85 Bears. He brought class to the NFL. However, Barry had a lot of class too.
Fair points, Pete. Some things just can't be measured and there aren't any stats for them. Payton was a crushing blocker. How do you quantify him picking up a blitzer about to kill the quarterback? Payton did that so many times. Sanders had so many games where he'd have 20 rushes for 40 yards and then he'd pop one for 70 yards. So now you've got a guy with pretty good "stats" that has 21 rushes for 110 yards but he really didn't help his team at all. He needed more positive yards and needed to keep his team out of 2nd and 3rd and long. He needed to be a better blocker and he needed to be a better leader. Sanders was a better ball carrier, but he was not a better running back. Way too many weaknesses in his game. And playing in 70 degree weather in a dome rather than the frigid temperatures Chicago offers was probably a lot easier on the muscles. But I agree....they were both great. Payton was just greater.

You know something Sj....I'll give you that. Barry was the better runner, and ball carrier. He was quicker, more explosive, broke more ankles, was more elusive.....And Walter was tougher, stronger, and blocked better.

On the same token....MJ wasn't the best basketball player ever.....he was the best SCORER. You wanna split hairs, and catergorize things....what's fair is fair. Nash/Magic/Stockton were the best assist guys. Steve Kerr was a better 3-point shooter. Ray Allen/Nash are better free throw shooters. Garnett is a better shotblocker......Nash, again better at steals.....so just what is MJ better at? That just leaves scoring.....which is only ONE aspect of being a basketball player.....so i guess...using YOUR logic. MJ isn't the best basketball player ever..... :lol:
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:41 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:On the same token....MJ wasn't the best basketball player ever.....he was the best SCORER. You wanna split hairs, and catergorize things....what's fair is fair. Nash/Magic/Stockton were the best assist guys. Steve Kerr was a better 3-point shooter. Ray Allen/Nash are better free throw shooters. Garnett is a better shotblocker......Nash, again better at steals.....so just what is MJ better at? That just leaves scoring.....which is only ONE aspect of being a basketball player.....so i guess...using YOUR logic. MJ isn't the best basketball player ever..... :lol:
Jordan was an all around great player. He was great on offense, great on defense, great in the clutch and he was a leader. Your micro-analyzing of assists, 3-pointers and all the other stuff just made you look dumb. You're comparing 2 completely different sports.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby YoungJRNY » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:51 am

Enigma869 wrote:
Tito wrote: Thanks for proving my point. Being more complete makes you better. Barry may (or may not) have been a better runner but Walter did it all.


It proves your point in your own Chicago-colored mind. You're on here telling us that because Walter punted the ball and threw passes that he's better. That's a moronic argument. You certainly can't make the argument that Payton is better based on running the ball as a running back. Sanders averaged more yards per carry with zero offensive line and bad teams, throughout his career. Argument over!

Tito wrote: Again, they took him out on short yardage situations, Walter did not.


What's your fucking point, dude? Yes, Detroit had moronic coaches (Fontes) in the Sanders era, and they still do. If you seriously believe that because Barry's coaches didn't let him play on the goal line that Walter is the better back, you're a dope! Putting a 240lb fullback in on the goal line has never been unusual and still happens in the NFL. That doesn't mean I think Lorenzo Neal is a better back than Tomlinson (although sadly, he might be now).

Tito wrote: Some even say Walter was the best football player period. I've rarely heard anyone say Barry was the best.


That's because you never leave Chicago! In my opinion, Payton is a top 5 running back. I would never rank him number one overall, because the numbers simply don't support it, whether you're from Chicago or not!

Tito wrote: Honestly, the one most people say is the best is Jim Brown.


Right, and I didn't say Sanders was better than Brown. I've seen plenty of film of Jim Brown, and he was one bad m'f'er! Brown holds the NFL record for most yards per carry in NFL history, and that's the number one measuring stick for an NFL running back, so I wouldn't argue with anyone who ranked Brown number one. Someone can at least back up the Jim Brown argument with actual numbers that can't be refuted. The numbers for Payton simply aren't there, when compared to Sanders! Aside from the numbers actually being better, my eyes also told me Sanders was better. For the record, I think Detroit is a shithole of a city, so it's not like I'm sticking up for Sanders, because of some love I have for Detroit. The dude was simply a STUD running back who couldn't be stopped, even though his own team tried like hell!

Tito wrote: You can take all of your other RBs, I'll take Walter and our Superbowl over your Patriots.


The Patriots were irrelevant that season and weren't even good enough to be in the Super Bowl, in spite of having won three road playoff games to get there. That 1985 Bears team was the best defense I've ever seen (even to this day), and the Bears would have defeated any team who got in their way. As for the "our superbowl" comment, let me know if you'd like to compare the number of trophies in each organization's trophy case!

Tito wrote:Barry never lead his team to a Superbowl.


I'll tell you exactly what you told Dean...You lost ALL credibility with that comment! It's a moronic statement to make. Football is the ultimate team sport, and one guy will NEVER EVER EVER win a championship by himself. There have been MANY great players who didn't win championships, and Payton only won his single championship at the very end of his career, and it was because of his great defense! Last I checked, Dan Marino never won a Super Bowl either, and he's in almost everyone's top 5 QB lists of all time![/quote]

Bravo. No more left to be said. Come to think of it, didn't Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson win a goddamn Superbowl? Certain players..phenomenal ones.. are only a piece to the puzzle of what can bring on a Superbowl Birth of Victory. ULTIMATE.. TEAM.. SPORT. One guy won't get you there. 53 will.

Ps- Barry Sanders was the baddest mother fucker when it came to angel type smooth shoes. He was a sound player and broke defensive responsibilities because they ended up watching him run! He simply made art with his feet and painted a picture on the football field. Both players are HOF'ers, and were in some and a lot of ways different type backs. But Barry Sanders was the best Running Back most eyes have ever seen, even without stats!
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby stevew2 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:55 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
Right, but 7 of them were won when the world was still flat and the Patriots didn't even exist as an organization. The Bears have only won two championships since the 1960 season, which was the Patriots first season in the AFL.


LOL, you make a good albeit funny post. There weren't even VCR's back then. Friga had to suck dick on horseback because there were no fuckin cars back then.
leonard prefered donkeys
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:09 pm

No way, Trav. The guy had too many games where he was basically non-existant with the exception of 2 or 3 huge runs. While the runs do still count, they don't give your defense a rest, they don't eat up time and they don't give your offense reps and rhythm. There's a reason his teams were never consistently good. And he played behind Lomas Brown...one of the greatest NFL tackles ever and a man that went to 7 straight pro bowls (1990-1996).

I really like this article about Sanders that Sal Paolantonio wrote:


Barry Sanders, who was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2004 (his first year of eligibility), scored one touchdown for every 35 touches in his 153 regular-season games, but just one touchdown in 112 postseason touches in six playoff games.
Indeed, Sanders' only career playoff touchdown was a 47-yard run against the Dallas Cowboys in a 1991 divisional-round playoff game in the Pontiac Silverdome. The Lions won that game 38-6. Sanders' touchdown came in the final minutes of the fourth quarter with Detroit already leading 31-6. The following week, the Lions went on the road to play the Washington Redskins at RFK Stadium. Sanders was not a factor. Detroit took a 41-10 beating.

Barry Sanders wasn't the same player away from home.
Sanders' postseason performance supports the notion that he was a product of the cozy, climate-controlled Silverdome. Nice carpet for easy, stop-on-a-dime maneuvering. Seventy-two degrees. Detroit faithful keeping the defensive line off balance with high decibel support.
In four career outdoor postseason games, Sanders averaged a paltry 2.8 yards per carry. He never scored a touchdown. And he never ran for more than 65 yards in a single game. With Sanders, the Lions went 0-4 in outdoor playoff games, losing by an average of 17 points.

Nobody is suggesting that a bust of Barry should not be in Canton. He's the third-leading rusher of all time with 15,269 yards. He holds the all-time NFL record for consecutive 1,000 seasons with 10, from 1989 to 1998. Sanders was the first player to rush for 1,500 yards in a season five times. He was selected to 10 Pro Bowls. In 1997, when he rushed for 2,053 yards, he was NFL co-MVP, an honor he should have not had to share with Brett Favre that season. In 1988, Sanders won the Heisman Trophy at Oklahoma State.

But this picture of perfection has a nasty blemish. Once Sanders got to the big stage, and got out of the Silverdome, he was a bust.

Take the wild-card playoff game at Lambeau Field in 1994. That season, Sanders averaged 5.7 yards per carry -- the second-highest total of his career. In the first round of the playoffs against the Green Bay Packers, on Lambeau Field's frozen tundra, Sanders set an NFL postseason record for rushing futility. He had 13 carries for minus-one yard. He had four catches that day -- for four yards. Which means he had 16 touches for a total of three yards -- 2.7 yards less than he averaged per rush in the regular season.

Now, the spirited defense of putting him in the Hall of Fame on the first ballot always includes the theory that Sanders was the only thing the Lions had going for them in The Barry Sanders Era. That's exactly what it is -- a theory, and a bad one at that.

Did we forget about wide receivers Herman Moore and Brett Perriman? The Lions stretched the field for Sanders -- especially in the Dome. This helped him be wildly successful -- in the regular season. And in the years when the Lions went to the playoffs, their defense was not awful. It was middle of the pack -- ranked 11th in 1991, 15th in 1993, 19th in 1994, 14th in 1995 and 10th in 1997.

There is another ugly scar on Sanders' career: His Greta Garbo act on the way out the door.

After rushing for 1,491 yards in 1998, Sanders abruptly and mysteriously retired. At the time, he was 1,457 yards shy of Walter Payton's all-time rushing record. His defenders say Sanders -- who played the game with dignity and class -- did not owe anybody anything. As long as he was at peace with the decision, that was enough. That's bunk.

Here was a man who benefited greatly from the support of his teammates, his organization and his fans -- and he just turned his back on them without a word of gratitude. He left his teammates and a franchise in the lurch, to the point that the Lions demanded he return $7.3 million of his signing bonus.

Years later, when it was time for him to become eligible for Canton, Sanders had to be coaxed into providing some kind of explanation for his untimely retirement.

It was too little, too late.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Michigan Girl » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:13 pm

hoagiepete wrote:First of all, it's great seeing the discussion on two of the greatest runningbacks of all time...Gale Sayers, Kansas University Jayhawk...and Barry Sanders...born and raised in Wichita, Kansas. Don't forget John Riggins...another Kansan and Jayhawk!!!

The personal slams on Barry seem a bit misguided and extreme. He played for a loser of a franchise, but to deem him a loser is rediculous.

I was never in the lockerroom with him in Detroit, so I can't argue his leadership traits. Don't see too many runningbacks judged on their leadership abilities.

I do know he is a quality individual that has done alot for his community. Isn't into the gangsta, thug shit that many of today's players are into. Hasn't killed anyone, shot himself, gotten caught with hoe's and drugs, didn't demand attention like the A Holes of today (Ocho Cinco, Moss, TO...on and on).

He was one of the best...ever...period. No way I'm going to tell you he was better than Jim Brown, Gale Sayers or Walter Payton though. That debate could go on forever. Sweetness is probably my all-time favorite, even though I too could not stand the 85 Bears. He brought class to the NFL. However, Barry had a lot of class too.


This is great!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby S2M » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:19 pm

Not much to like about that article unless you actually HATE Barry Sanders....

I wonder what Sal would say about Peyton Manning. He plays 8+ games a year in a dome.

BTW, Barry has NEVER played with a HOFer....Payton Had future HOFers on his team......

And I have NO idea why the Lion's Defense is even an issue in that article.....

And as far as the way he left, and what he supposedly did to his team....He left them in a lerch? Oh really. That says more about the state of the team than it says about Barry. He left within reach of breaking Walter's record. And he walked away....THAT'S class......

I've always believed that a death raises people to a pedestal that is undeserved. I'm sorry that Walter died young. But his death didn't automatically raise him to the best running back ever.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:25 pm

StocktontoMalone wrote:Not much to like about that article unless you actually HATE Barry Sanders....
Or you just like the truth.

StocktontoMalone wrote:And as far as the way he left, and what he supposedly did to his team....He left them in a lerch? Oh really.
Usually when you sign a contract with a monstrous signing bonus teams actually expect you to play!

StocktontoMalone wrote: He left within reach of breaking Walter's record. And he walked away....THAT'S class......
Sounds more like a quitter to me. The pursuit of a title would have been a bit more admirable. If not with the Lions then with someone else.

StocktontoMalone wrote: I've always believed that a death raises people to a pedestal that is undeserved. I'm sorry that Walter died young. But his death didn't automatically raise him to the best running back ever.
Many, if not most, people thought that well before his death.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby YoungJRNY » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:30 pm

Saint John wrote:No way, Trav. The guy had too many games where he was basically non-existant with the exception of 2 or 3 huge runs. While the runs do still count, they don't give your defense a rest, they don't eat up time and they don't give your offense reps and rhythm. There's a reason his teams were never consistently good. And he played behind Lomas Brown...one of the greatest NFL tackles ever and a man that went to 7 straight pro bowls (1990-1996).

I really like this article about Sanders that Sal Paolantonio wrote:


Barry Sanders, who was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2004 (his first year of eligibility), scored one touchdown for every 35 touches in his 153 regular-season games, but just one touchdown in 112 postseason touches in six playoff games.
Indeed, Sanders' only career playoff touchdown was a 47-yard run against the Dallas Cowboys in a 1991 divisional-round playoff game in the Pontiac Silverdome. The Lions won that game 38-6. Sanders' touchdown came in the final minutes of the fourth quarter with Detroit already leading 31-6. The following week, the Lions went on the road to play the Washington Redskins at RFK Stadium. Sanders was not a factor. Detroit took a 41-10 beating.

Barry Sanders wasn't the same player away from home.
Sanders' postseason performance supports the notion that he was a product of the cozy, climate-controlled Silverdome. Nice carpet for easy, stop-on-a-dime maneuvering. Seventy-two degrees. Detroit faithful keeping the defensive line off balance with high decibel support.
In four career outdoor postseason games, Sanders averaged a paltry 2.8 yards per carry. He never scored a touchdown. And he never ran for more than 65 yards in a single game. With Sanders, the Lions went 0-4 in outdoor playoff games, losing by an average of 17 points.

Nobody is suggesting that a bust of Barry should not be in Canton. He's the third-leading rusher of all time with 15,269 yards. He holds the all-time NFL record for consecutive 1,000 seasons with 10, from 1989 to 1998. Sanders was the first player to rush for 1,500 yards in a season five times. He was selected to 10 Pro Bowls. In 1997, when he rushed for 2,053 yards, he was NFL co-MVP, an honor he should have not had to share with Brett Favre that season. In 1988, Sanders won the Heisman Trophy at Oklahoma State.

But this picture of perfection has a nasty blemish. Once Sanders got to the big stage, and got out of the Silverdome, he was a bust.

Take the wild-card playoff game at Lambeau Field in 1994. That season, Sanders averaged 5.7 yards per carry -- the second-highest total of his career. In the first round of the playoffs against the Green Bay Packers, on Lambeau Field's frozen tundra, Sanders set an NFL postseason record for rushing futility. He had 13 carries for minus-one yard. He had four catches that day -- for four yards. Which means he had 16 touches for a total of three yards -- 2.7 yards less than he averaged per rush in the regular season.

Now, the spirited defense of putting him in the Hall of Fame on the first ballot always includes the theory that Sanders was the only thing the Lions had going for them in The Barry Sanders Era. That's exactly what it is -- a theory, and a bad one at that.

Did we forget about wide receivers Herman Moore and Brett Perriman? The Lions stretched the field for Sanders -- especially in the Dome. This helped him be wildly successful -- in the regular season. And in the years when the Lions went to the playoffs, their defense was not awful. It was middle of the pack -- ranked 11th in 1991, 15th in 1993, 19th in 1994, 14th in 1995 and 10th in 1997.

There is another ugly scar on Sanders' career: His Greta Garbo act on the way out the door.

After rushing for 1,491 yards in 1998, Sanders abruptly and mysteriously retired. At the time, he was 1,457 yards shy of Walter Payton's all-time rushing record. His defenders say Sanders -- who played the game with dignity and class -- did not owe anybody anything. As long as he was at peace with the decision, that was enough. That's bunk.

Here was a man who benefited greatly from the support of his teammates, his organization and his fans -- and he just turned his back on them without a word of gratitude. He left his teammates and a franchise in the lurch, to the point that the Lions demanded he return $7.3 million of his signing bonus.

Years later, when it was time for him to become eligible for Canton, Sanders had to be coaxed into providing some kind of explanation for his untimely retirement.

It was too little, too late.


Anyone can argue a point over who was good and who wasn't when dealing with a single professional athlete. While that article critiques Barry Sanders numbers in games which they lost, it gets away from the fact that The Detriot Lions were the Detriot Lions because of Barry Sanders and how he played the game period.

Of course he's not going to bust off 50 yard runs every time he touches the ball, but the things he did time and time again..improvised.. was outstanding, and even more impressive he made his own holes as a runner. Also, he put Detroit in far more positions to win rather than putting them in a position to lose.

Defensive coordinators knew this, and he arguably went up against defensive fronts that put up to 10 guys in the box. The man had no line, but also didn't have 11 guys around him that could change a game the way he could. Take away Sanders, you take away the Lions threat. Most teams exploited that, but most teams gave up 15,269 yards, paving his way to a first ballot, first year sprint to Canton. What 11 guys do on a football field is one thing compared to what 1 guy does. But when talking about that one guy, which is Sanders, he simply made the 10 guys around him better, but the other 10 didn't do the same thing for him. He was the Detroit Lions in his era.

Oh yeah, where the hell you been, Dan? :o
Last edited by YoungJRNY on Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby Michigan Girl » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:39 pm

Sal Paolantonio is an idiot!!!..... :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:15 pm

YoungJRNY wrote:Take away Sanders, you take away the Lions threat.
No way. Herman Moore 1992-1998 had 966, 935, 1,173, 1,686, 1,296, 1,293, and 983 yards receiving. Herman Moore and Brett Perriman combined in 1995 to form the NFL’s most potent receiving tandem in NFL history, combining for most receptions (231) and most yards (3,174).

YoungJRNY wrote:Most teams exploited that, but most teams gave up 15,269 yards, paving his way to a first ballot, first year sprint to Canton.

Ok...but they also built big leads with the many 3 and outs caused by lost yardage because he liked to run the wrong way a lot of the time. Of course then he'd pop 2 or 3 runs to make the average look good, but that didn't help his team.

YoungJRNY wrote:What 11 guys do on a football field is one thing compared to what 1 guy does. But when talking about that one guy, which is Sanders, he simply made the 10 guys around him better, but the other 10 didn't do the same thing for him. He was the Detroit Lions in his era.
Barry Sanders played on some decent football teams, but always liked to disappear in the playoffs. Aesthetically, he never looked like he gave a shit about winning. I think that permeated to his teammates. The Lions were 7-9, 6-10, 12-4 (and a game away from the Superbowl), 5-11, 10-6, 9-7, 10-6, 5-11, 9-7, and 5-11 with Sanders. If my math is right that's 3 games under .500 and he played on 5 winning teams in 10 years. Hardly reason to say you're tired of losing and retire like a fucking baby. That dude was a quitter.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby S2M » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:23 pm

Saint John wrote:
YoungJRNY wrote:Take away Sanders, you take away the Lions threat.
No way. Herman Moore 1992-1998 had 966, 935, 1,173, 1,686, 1,296, 1,293, and 983 yards receiving. Herman Moore and Brett Perriman combined in 1995 to form the NFL’s most potent receiving tandem in NFL history, combining for most receptions (231) and most yards (3,174).

YoungJRNY wrote:Most teams exploited that, but most teams gave up 15,269 yards, paving his way to a first ballot, first year sprint to Canton.

Ok...but they also built big leads with the many 3 and outs caused by lost yardage because he liked to run the wrong way a lot of the time. Of course then he'd pop 2 or 3 runs to make the average look good, but that didn't help his team.

YoungJRNY wrote:What 11 guys do on a football field is one thing compared to what 1 guy does. But when talking about that one guy, which is Sanders, he simply made the 10 guys around him better, but the other 10 didn't do the same thing for him. He was the Detroit Lions in his era.
Barry Sanders played on some decent football teams, but always liked to disappear in the playoffs. Aesthetically, he never looked like he gave a shit about winning. I think that permeated to his teammates. The Lions were 7-9, 6-10, 12-4 (and a game away from the Superbowl), 5-11, 10-6, 9-7, 10-6, 5-11, 9-7, and 5-11 with Sanders. If my math is right that's 3 games under .500 and he played on 5 winning teams in 10 years. Hardly reason to say you're tired of losing and retire like a fucking baby. That dude was a quitter.


So Barry was a quitter because he retired early, never to win a championship.....but it is ok for(and I tried my hardest to coome up with a name, but couldn't) so-and-so to stay on a team, and suck money from the team, over stay his welcome - and never win one either? Dan Marino comes to mind, but I'm sure you will refute this theory too... :lol:

Barry Bonds comes to mind as well...... :roll:

Another loser who had the stats, and never won a title.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Enigma869 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:24 pm

Saint John wrote:I am probably the person in the world that hated the 85 Bears the most. Couldn't stand them and just about cried when they won the Superbowl. Hated Ditka and that team because of him. That said, this whole Payton/Sanders argument is absurd. Payton was clearly better all things considered. Crunch your fucking numbers all you want, but what you won't see is that Sanders constantly put his team in 2nd and 13, and 3rd and infinity with his running backwards. His teams constantly sucked because you can't trade a few explosive runs for constantly being in 2nd and 3rd and 10+ yards. The guy never exhibited emotion and most of the time you needed to check the little fuck for a pulse. He was great for 3 to 5 breakout runs per game of 20 to 50 yards. The entire rest of the game he was a useless fuck that couldn't block, catch and had no intangible qualities as a leader. Barry was the games most electrifying runner, but he was a stone cold fucking loser. He never tried to get better at blocking or catching, and no one, and I mean no one, on his team looked at him as a leader. He was a naturally talented runner that was as elusive as anyone that ever played the game, but he was a mime, didn't seem bothered by losing and had zero leadership qualities. Payton was everything that Sanders wasn't with half of the athletic ability. And Dean, Payton never ran out of bounds...ever. And remember, Sanders was all but useless on grass. If football had any balls and would have never allowed these piece of shit domes, Sanders would have been just another back. Obviously his stats count, but that dude was the epitomy of a check casher. He cared as much about improving his all around game just as much as he did winning...he didn't. He retired on top because he had achieved everything he had wanted to...nothing.


I won't even begin picking this idiotic post apart. Let's just say that I agree with you 100% that Dean's characterization of Payton running out of bounds couldn't be more wrong. Payton wasn't much more than 200lbs but NEVER shyed away from contact. He was one of the greats at putting his head down and taking on tacklers. That said, many of your assessments of Sanders are just plain ridiculous, and I'm glad hoagie pete set you straight!
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:26 pm

Oh yeah...when Sanders retired like a fag during training camp in 1999 the Lions still forged ahead and made the playoffs without him (8-8 ). They were 9-7 the second year after bitch boy retired, but didn't make the playoffs. Man, they really missed him. :lol:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:30 pm

StocktontoMalone wrote:So Barry was a quitter because he retired early, never to win a championship.....but it is ok for(and I tried my hardest to coome up with a name, but couldn't) so-and-so to stay on a team, and suck money from the team, over stay his welcome - and never win one either? Dan Marino comes to mind, but I'm sure you will refute this theory too... :lol:

Barry Bonds comes to mind as well...... :roll:

Another loser who had the stats, and never won a title.
Bonds and Marino practically died trying. Marino retired because the game had passed him by and Bonds still hasn't officially retired. Sanders retired during TRAINING CAMP...completely abandoning his teammates and the city of Detroit without any good explanation. That, is a quitter.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby S2M » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:33 pm

Saint John wrote:Oh yeah...when Sanders retired like a fag during training camp in 1999 the Lions still forged ahead and made the playoffs without him (8-8 ). They were 9-7 the second year after bitch boy retired, but didn't make the playoffs. Man, they really missed him. :lol:


BTW, a signing bonus is for SIGNING the contract. In theory, he could sign the contract, and retire the next minute and still be entitled to the signing bonus....

It is not called a 'you have to stay on the team for at least 2/3 of the contract bonus' :lol:
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:45 pm

StocktontoMalone wrote:
Saint John wrote:Oh yeah...when Sanders retired like a fag during training camp in 1999 the Lions still forged ahead and made the playoffs without him (8-8 ). They were 9-7 the second year after bitch boy retired, but didn't make the playoffs. Man, they really missed him. :lol:


BTW, a signing bonus is for SIGNING the contract. In theory, he could sign the contract, and retire the next minute and still be entitled to the signing bonus....

It is not called a 'you have to stay on the team for at least 2/3 of the contract bonus' :lol:
You're on a roll today, numbnuts.

"But at the age of 31, Sanders abruptly retired before the 1999 season. At the time, he had a few years remaining on a large contract extension he had signed two years prior. The Lions wound up suing Sanders for most of the $11 million signing bonus they had paid him, and won the court decision."
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Enigma869 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:45 pm

Saint John wrote:Barry Sanders played on some decent football teams, but always liked to disappear in the playoffs. Aesthetically, he never looked like he gave a shit about winning. I think that permeated to his teammates. The Lions were 7-9, 6-10, 12-4 (and a game away from the Superbowl), 5-11, 10-6, 9-7, 10-6, 5-11, 9-7, and 5-11 with Sanders. If my math is right that's 3 games under .500 and he played on 5 winning teams in 10 years. Hardly reason to say you're tired of losing and retire like a fucking baby. That dude was a quitter.


We get it dude...you hate Sanders and think he sucked. Your rationale is just plain fucking stupid. According to your posts, Sanders is the reason the Lions sucked. I'm fairly certain if you look at the history of the Lions, they have pretty much always sucked, even when you claimed they had "decent teams"! They have lost the most games in the NFL over the past 20 years, and that's not just a coincidence. It's a shit organization and always has been. Also, pointing out Lomas Brown as evidence that Sanders had a good line blocking for him neglects the fact that there were 4 other guys on the line who sucked! Brown was a good player, but was still only one dude, not capable of holding back an entire defense that was keying on Sanders on EVERY play!

As for your point in a previous post that Sanders wasn't "emotional" enough...so what. What the hell does that have to do with anything. I watched Joe Montana's entire career, and I'm not sure you could find a guy less emotional than Montana was. Whining about how emotional someone is or isn't is nothing more than just finding fault with a player you don't like. It has absolutely nothing to do with a player's talent. The only point I agree with you on is that Sanders wasn't a leader, and it's not anything I would ever criticize the guy for. He was a quiet, humble guy who simply didn't have the personality to be a leader. Not every great player is automatically a leader, just because of the talent he has. There is a lot more to it than that. It certainly didn't make Sanders any less of a football player.
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Saint John » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:05 pm

Enigma869 wrote:We get it dude...you hate Sanders and think he sucked.
I think Sanders was a great runner at times...but at other times he ran the wrong way, was selfishly afraid of contact, and that put his team in bad situations.

Enigma869 wrote:According to your posts, Sanders is the reason the Lions sucked.
Not what I said at all. Learn how to read. It'll help. I was saying that there's a reason he had those stats and it didn't parlay into his team having success. The stats were a fraud and his style of play wasn't conducive to winning. You can't have runs of 2, 4, 1, 3, 6, -1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 1, 3, 5, 2, 1, -3, 3, -4 and 70 and think you had a good game. That's 103 yards on 19 carries and looks good for newspaper hacks, but people that know the game realize that's a shit game and a team can't win with that formula...which is exactly why you saw no ripple effect when he left.

Enigma869 wrote:Brown was a good player, but was still only one dude, not capable of holding back an entire defense that was keying on Sanders on EVERY play!
Nobody keyed on him every play. That sort of strategy would leave guys wide open. It sounds good to bolster your argument, but it's complete bullshit. I'm sure he had a "spy" and he faced an extra guy up front, but all great backs do.

Enigma869 wrote:As for your point in a previous post that Sanders wasn't "emotional" enough...so what. What the hell does that have to do with anything. I watched Joe Montana's entire career, and I'm not sure you could find a guy less emotional than Montana was. Whining about how emotional someone is or isn't is nothing more than just finding fault with a player you don't like. It has absolutely nothing to do with a player's talent. The only point I agree with you on is that Sanders wasn't a leader, and it's not anything I would ever criticize the guy for. He was a quiet, humble guy who simply didn't have the personality to be a leader. Not every great player is automatically a leader, just because of the talent he has. There is a lot more to it than that. It certainly didn't make Sanders any less of a football player.
First, everyone knew when the chips are down that Montana was going to do whatever it took to win a game. He was a fierce competitor and everyone that played with him or against him would tell you that. I doubt you'll hear the same about Barry Sanders. I'll give you this...people are leaders in different ways and Montana was more of a stoic one, but no one ever questioned his desire to win. Much like they don't question Tom Brady's or Ray Lewis'. However, I question Barry Sanders' desire to win. He never showed me any fire, never tried to go to a different team, and tried to keep money that wasn't his. Thankfully, the judge made him give it back.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby YoungJRNY » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:29 pm

....Valuable to the argument....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvNdTSWo ... re=related

Running backwards theory

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9gZAyeR ... re=related

Best Runs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxE-NWENCmE

Walter Payton Vs Barry Sanders
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Previous

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests